I Am So Popular

[HVAC]

I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
at least once a week.

So I guess I'm doing something right!
















--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

[saul...@cox.net]

LET'S ATTACK THE BUDDIboi, HVAC!

HE'S BEEN TOO QUIET LATELY!

HIS KARMIC BULLSHIT ABOUT SOME PSYCHOPATH KILLING ME WENT NOWHERE!

I CALL HIM INSANE JOHN THE RABID-NAZI FOR A REASON!

Saul Levy

[Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:28 -0400

HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:

> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
> at least once a week.
>
> So I guess I'm doing something right!

Yeah, you're getting yourself quoted from time-to-time. Here's an
example of one of your quotes from my random quotations file:

"What goes around, comes around. That's not karma ... it's justice."
-- Mr. Harlow Hvac (April 18, 2012)

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"There's not enough weed on the planet to make me believe a con man
like him."
-- Mr. Harlow Hvac (February 12, 2012)

[HVAC]

On 4/23/2012 1:27 PM, Don Martin wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:28 -0400, HVAC<mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
>> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
>> at least once a week.
>>
>> So I guess I'm doing something right!
>

> My policy is to always post hostile emails here, so all can enjoy the venom of
> religionists. Who knows? Perhaps other religionists might learn from it?


My kung fu is strong.

[Painius]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:28 -0400, HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>

>I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
>computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
>at least once a week.
>
>So I guess I'm doing something right!

Yes, of course.

I, on the other hand, receive email from people who are interested in
astronomy and my various takes on cosmic issues.

I guess I'm old enough now to realize that I've made enough enemies in
my lifetime. Life is too short to continue to build that list.

Of course, this does not include sheep who faithfully believe (or
disbelieve) anything with absolutely no evidence to support them. That
type of enema (oops, I mean enemy) comes natural to a true lover of
science, where only facts rule and imagination takes us forward.

REALITY ROCKS !!!

Happy days *and*...
Starry starry nights !

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
Only you can make the most of yourself.

[G=EMC^2]

On Monday, April 23, 2012 11:32:28 AM UTC-4, HVAC wrote:
> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
> at least once a week.
>
> So I guess I'm doing something right!
>

> For a complete born losses I think you are doing great TreBert

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 23, 1:21 pm, Painius <starswir...@aol.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:28 -0400, HVAC <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
> >computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
> >at least once a week.
>
> >So I guess I'm doing something right!
>
> Yes, of course.
>
> I, on the other hand, receive email from people who are interested in
> astronomy and my various takes on cosmic issues.
>
> I guess I'm old enough now to realize that I've made enough enemies in
> my lifetime.  Life is too short to continue to build that list.
>
> Of course, this does not include sheep who faithfully believe (or
> disbelieve) anything with absolutely no evidence to support them. That
> type of enema (oops, I mean enemy) comes natural to a true lover of
> science, where only facts rule and imagination takes us forward.
>
> REALITY ROCKS !!!
>
> Happy days *and*...
>      Starry starry nights !
>
> --
> Indelibly yours,

> Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/

> Only you can make the most of yourself.

The only time HVAC is going forward is when he's able to run-over
innocent children, then Hagar comes along to scoop up the roadkill for
another redneck home cooked meal.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

[HVAC]

On 4/23/2012 4:21 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>>
>> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
>> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
>> at least once a week.
>>
>> So I guess I'm doing something right!
>
> Yes, of course.
>
> I, on the other hand, receive email from people who are interested in
> astronomy and my various takes on cosmic issues.

That's because, unlike me, you are not controversial.
You're sort of boring. (No offense)

> I guess I'm old enough now to realize that I've made enough enemies in
> my lifetime. Life is too short to continue to build that list.

I, on the other hand, harbor no ill will towards any man who
does not wish harm on those weaker than him. However, I am not
naive enough to believe that they feel the same.

[4HEAD]

On 4/23/2012 10:32 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
>
> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
> at least once a week.
>
> So I guess I'm doing something right!
>

Care to describe one of these attacks?
(( :->/

[Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:34:19 -0400
HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/2012 1:27 PM, Don Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:28 -0400, HVAC<mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
> >> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
> >> at least once a week.
> >>
> >> So I guess I'm doing something right!
> >
> > My policy is to always post hostile emails here, so all can enjoy
> > the venom of religionists. Who knows? Perhaps other religionists
> > might learn from it?
>
> My kung fu is strong.

You might be doing it wrong -- Kung Fu is supposed to make you strong.

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

"Obey the principles without being bound by them."
-- Bruce Lee

[BDK]

In article <ffdc41f9-facb-42a6-a839-fcf29e852b48
@jx17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, brad...@gmail.com says...

> Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / ?Guth Usenet?

No wonder you're one of the all time usenet kOOks...

--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster.

[HVAC]

On 4/24/2012 6:00 AM, BDK wrote:
>
>>
>> The only time HVAC is going forward is when he's able to run-over
>> innocent children, then Hagar comes along to scoop up the roadkill for
>> another redneck home cooked meal.
>

> No wonder you're one of the all time usenet kOOks...

Warhole has been MIA lately. I wonder if all the people stating
that they were going to complain to the authorities in his country
were successful?

Will Guth be next?

[HVAC]

Not at this time.

[saul...@cox.net]

I HOPE SO, HVAC!

GOOFY IS HOPELESS THOUGH! HE NEEDS A BRAIN TRANSPLANT!

Saul Levy

[Painius]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:09:12 -0400, HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 4/23/2012 4:21 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
>>> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
>>> at least once a week.
>>>
>>> So I guess I'm doing something right!
>>
>> Yes, of course.
>>
>> I, on the other hand, receive email from people who are interested in
>> astronomy and my various takes on cosmic issues.
>
>
>That's because, unlike me, you are not controversial.
>You're sort of boring. (No offense)

LOL...

The Moon is really a full-fledged planet in its own right...

http://selene.painellsworth.net/

Red shifts are probably illusions much like mirages here on Earth. It
follows from this that the Universe may not be expanding, so there is
no need to invoke a mysterious "dark energy" that fuels an
accelerating expansion of the Universe. Challenge the existing
paradigm!

The evidence for the Big Bang can also point to a catastrophic event
that happened 13.75 billion years ago, and not necessarily the
beginning of our Universe.

"Dark matter" may actually be spacetime itself.

Space appears to be comprised of a great energy that I refer to as
"gravitational energy". This energy flows into and through matter to
achieve both the constant renewal of nuclear forces and the "effect"
that astronomers refer to as gravity.

Science-related, but not astronomy-related subjects:

Both theists and athiests have no scientific evidence to support
either their positions or their claims. Therefore they are both like
sheep, blind sheep. Neither one can squash the claims of the other,
because both the theist position and the atheist position is built
upon a foundation of sand. Both positions require the acceptance of
either a belief or a non-belief based upon nothing more than "faith",
faith and faith alone. No one can truthfully say whether or not a
deity exists. So both theists and atheists are guilty of lying to
themselves and to everyone with whom they come into contact.

Agnostics are little better than theists or atheists, for they, too,
take up a position of either belief or non-belief. Agnostics are the
smarter of the sheep and are a little less blind. But they're still
sheep who base their positions on faith and faith alone.

I have often been involved in discussions, many times in "heated"
talks, on this newsgroup about the above subjects. It's all in the
archives. And I expound on some of the astronomy subjects on my
website, which is linked below in my sig.

And please don't bother to respond with one of your stale, dry as dust
pieces of crap like, "Have you busted another aneurism?" You do
sometimes grow very tiresome yourself, Dr. Campbell.

[saul...@cox.net]

YOU REMAIN A FUCKING KOOK, PEENUSINTHEASSKOOK!

SAME AS ALWAYS!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:38:19 -0400, Painius <stars...@aol.com>
wrote:

>LOL...
>
>The Moon is really a full-fledged planet in its own right...
>
>http://selene.painellsworth.net/

[HOW ABOUT TASTIER MUSIC?]

[HVAC]

On 4/24/2012 5:38 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>>
>> That's because, unlike me, you are not controversial.
>> You're sort of boring. (No offense)
>
> LOL...
>
> The Moon is really a full-fledged planet in its own right...
>
> http://selene.painellsworth.net/
>
> Red shifts are probably illusions much like mirages here on Earth. It
> follows from this that the Universe may not be expanding, so there is
> no need to invoke a mysterious "dark energy" that fuels an
> accelerating expansion of the Universe. Challenge the existing
> paradigm!
>
> The evidence for the Big Bang can also point to a catastrophic event
> that happened 13.75 billion years ago, and not necessarily the
> beginning of our Universe.
>
> "Dark matter" may actually be spacetime itself.
>
> Space appears to be comprised of a great energy that I refer to as
> "gravitational energy". This energy flows into and through matter to
> achieve both the constant renewal of nuclear forces and the "effect"
> that astronomers refer to as gravity.

That's not controversial, it's just kooky.

> Science-related, but not astronomy-related subjects:
>
> Both theists and athiests have no scientific evidence to support
> either their positions or their claims. Therefore they are both like
> sheep, blind sheep. Neither one can squash the claims of the other,
> because both the theist position and the atheist position is built
> upon a foundation of sand. Both positions require the acceptance of
> either a belief or a non-belief based upon nothing more than "faith",
> faith and faith alone. No one can truthfully say whether or not a
> deity exists.

Using your logic, one can say that esp and ghosts exist as well.

> Agnostics are little better than theists or atheists, for they, too,
> take up a position of either belief or non-belief. Agnostics are the
> smarter of the sheep and are a little less blind. But they're still
> sheep who base their positions on faith and faith alone.
>
> I have often been involved in discussions, many times in "heated"
> talks, on this newsgroup about the above subjects. It's all in the
> archives. And I expound on some of the astronomy subjects on my
> website, which is linked below in my sig.
>
> And please don't bother to respond with one of your stale, dry as dust
> pieces of crap like, "Have you busted another aneurism?" You do
> sometimes grow very tiresome yourself, Dr. Campbell.

Lol

[Painius]

TA DAAAAAAAAaaaaaaa!

Saul, you're such a prude!

Happy days *and*...
Starry starry nights !

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
Only you can make the most of yourself.

[Painius]

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:09:12 -0400, HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:

>>On 4/23/2012 4:21 PM, Painius wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I Am So Popular on these groups that I get attacks against my
>>>> computer at least once a day. I even get private e-mail threats
>>>> at least once a week.
>>>>
>>>> So I guess I'm doing something right!
>>>
>>> Yes, of course.
>>>
>>> I, on the other hand, receive email from people who are interested in
>>> astronomy and my various takes on cosmic issues.
>>
>>
>>That's because, unlike me, you are not controversial.
>>You're sort of boring. (No offense)
>

I just remembered another one. Astrophysicists continue to wonder
about the mismatch of matter and antimatter in the Universe. From all
appearances, the entire extent of the physical mass of the Universe is
comprised of matter, as opposed to antimatter. This is considered an
unsolved problem in cosmology and is called "Baryon asymmetry"...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_asymmetry

There is no scientific reason to believe that this is really a
problem. It is based upon the belief that matter particles, since
they are the opposite charge of their antimatter counterparts, would
be electrically attracted to their antimatter particles, and KABLOOEY!
There is also no reason to believe that antimatter would remain in
simple particle form, while matter forms atoms and molecules. And the
most common atom in the Universe is simple hydrogen, which is made of
one proton and one electron. Note the neutral charge of the hydrogen
atom. There is no reason to believe that the proton's antimatter
particle, the antiproton would not get together with the electron's
antimatter particle, the positron, and form "antihydrogen". Every
atom of simple antihydrogen would also be electrically neutral, just
like the simple hydrogen atom. The hydrogen atom and the antihydrogen
atom, both electrically neutral, would not be attracted to each other,
so the actual chance of KABLOOEY is dramatically reduced.

This gives me every reason to believe that there is still just as much
antimatter in the Universe as there is matter. Some of the galaxies
and galaxy clusters we view through our telescopes may be made
entirely of antimatter. There is really no way to tell.

[Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess]

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:40:33 -0400
HVAC <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/24/2012 6:00 AM, BDK wrote:
> >
> >> The only time HVAC is going forward is when he's able to run-over
> >> innocent children, then Hagar comes along to scoop up the roadkill
> >> for another redneck home cooked meal.
> >
> > No wonder you're one of the all time usenet kOOks...
>
> Warhole has been MIA lately. I wonder if all the people stating
> that they were going to complain to the authorities in his country
> were successful?

I hope you're right because he could benefit a lot from a visit from
the local authorities -- can you imagine the look on his face when they
explain why they've come to see him?

> Will Guth be next?

It depends: Has he violated any of his country's laws that could
potentially land him in prison?

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist
in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
-- Carl Sagan

[HVAC]

On 4/26/2012 4:29 AM, Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess wrote:
>
>>
>> Warhole has been MIA lately. I wonder if all the people stating
>> that they were going to complain to the authorities in his country
>> were successful?
>
> I hope you're right because he could benefit a lot from a visit from
> the local authorities -- can you imagine the look on his face when they
> explain why they've come to see him?
>
>> Will Guth be next?
>
> It depends: Has he violated any of his country's laws that could
> potentially land him in prison?

Yes. He has admitted to income tax fraud.

[HVAC]

In the early universe, there were no atoms at all. No protons, no
electrons. Therefore, no anti-protons nor positrons.

Experiments have found that if you start with equal amounts of matter
and anti-matter, the interactions between them will cause a slight
excess of matter to develop.

[Warhol]

Op 24-4-2012 13:40, HVAC schreef:

> On 4/24/2012 6:00 AM, BDK wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The only time HVAC is going forward is when he's able to run-over
>>> innocent children, then Hagar comes along to scoop up the roadkill for
>>> another redneck home cooked meal.
>>
>> No wonder you're one of the all time usenet kOOks...
>
>
> Warhole has been MIA lately. I wonder if all the people stating
> that they were going to complain to the authorities in his country
> were successful?
>
> Will Guth be next?
>
>
>

Have you ever seen any inglorious bastards successful with this Mizwar
Warrior of the sacred word??? Hah... they live in illusions and deceive...

they fail miserably the miserables...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xrauEnhGNg

[saul...@cox.net]

IS TAX FRAUD STILL AGAINST THE LAW?

IT SURE IS!

TURN HIM IN TO THE IRS!

Saul Levy

[HVAC]

On 4/26/2012 7:26 AM, Warhol wrote:
>
>
>
> Have you ever seen any inglorious bastards successful with this Mizwar
> Warrior of the sacred word??? Hah... they live in illusions and deceive...
>
> they fail miserably the miserables...

Huh?

[Painius]

I love to watch you backpedal, which you will do when you cannot come
up with a single "experiment" that shows this.

And why would there be? What would it be about matter that gives it
such an "edge"?

Remember Ben Franklin? and how he initially gave reversed polarities
for electricity? It's possible that the same thing has happened here.
What we call "matter" may actually be "antimatter" and vice versa!

Happy days *and*...
Starry starry nights !

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/

When you better yourself, you better the world.

[saul...@cox.net]

TOO BAD, PIGO, WE KNOW WHAT A FUCK UP YOU ARE!

NO ICE IS MELTING IN GREENLAND FOR EXAMPLE!

http://www.webcampedia.com/webcam/503/

NOTHING IS MELTING, IDIOT!

Saul Levy

[THIS FUCKING, DEAD FOOL AGAIN, PIGO?]

[saul...@cox.net]

YOU REMAIN A FUCKING KOOK, PEENUSINTHEASSKOOK!

SAME AS ALWAYS!

FUCK OFF, FOOL!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:24:04 -0400, Painius <stars...@aol.com>
wrote: