Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Perpetual Motion on the Moon

1 view
Skip to first unread message

G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 4:03:49 AM4/29/05
to
What better place for the "Sterling" engine to run. It works on heat
exchange (hot and cold) The moon has extreme temperature
difference from Sun to shade. Saw a small model of the Sterling engine
running on the energy of hot cup of coffee . One large sterling engine
could run a generator,and the moon theoretically could have unlimited
electricity. The ultimate free lunch. The Sterling engine was shown
on "History" channel this week Bert

spiral_72

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 10:08:08 AM4/29/05
to
Now all we have to do is get that energy here. I wonder what the losses
are on 300,000 miles of cable?

G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 5:00:29 PM4/29/05
to
Moon satellite made by man and having a diameter of 15 miles.Made of
clear plastic 99% hollow. Inside made with plasma gas(same as in a
fluorescent lighting) GE,Goodyear Gates and NASA should get together on
this project. Sterling engine supplying electricity. Orbiting the Moon
at 7300 miles. Bright enough to be seen from Earth with no trouble.
First direct glowing object other than stars in the universe. It is
mans gift to our solar system. It is my gift to Darla so she has a light
house to make it Easier to find Earth and me. Bert

nightbat

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 5:36:00 PM4/29/05
to
nightbat wrote

nightbat

Forget gazillion costing 15 mile nightlight for remember we have
your millions or billions of always leaking toy blowup sex doll oxygen
helium escaping hot gas Earth tail that can probably be spotted from
Andrometa's arms. Anyway Nasa can't even resupply the ISS how do you
plan on getting that nightlight up there, refurbished Delta?

ponder on,
the nightbat

G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 6:21:26 PM4/29/05
to
Hi nightbat NASA is going to have to go with more powerful
rockets(someday). To help pay for the cost NASA is going to have to
return 25% of the money it stole. Gates can throw in 15 billion and
Allen 8 billion.GE and Goodyear can supply the gas and plastic.
Balloons are easy to build in space. It would be lighter than the ISS.
Not as hard to build as the Great pyramid,and 9 billion people would
take pride in seeing it. It could be used to lighten up the back side of
the Moon. It could have a good effect for all humankind.. Bert

nightbat

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 7:02:02 PM4/29/05
to
nightbat wrote

\
nightbat

You and your toy blow up balloons, it's fantastic, it's
preposterous, it's ridiculous, it just might work. Ok, you pitch it to
Gates and the rest of the boys, I'll see if McDonald's golden arches
wants in and maybe some of the Los Alamos scientist's during their lunch
break. I mean this can't be as bad as that net space elevator idea, heck
and Earth air or gas to blow the thing up is free right?


ponder on,
the nightbat

Greysky

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 8:38:10 PM4/29/05
to

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:22581-427...@storefull-3177.bay.webtv.net...
You wouldn't need to put the sterling engine in a lunar satellite, Bert. You
can use the moon itself as a platform. Since the gas operates inside on a
heat gradient, just have the 'hot' end lying near the rim of a crater in the
sun, and have the 'cold' end inside the crater where sunlight never reaches.
You have a 200-300 degree difference in heat potential and the gas sealed
inside will merrily move around and let you generate electricity, which you
can turn into microwaves and beam back to earth. The efficiency will beat
using solar cells - anything else you do is fluff (like lighting up a laser
torch).

Greysky


Double-A

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 10:05:07 PM4/29/05
to

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
> Hi nightbat NASA is going to have to go with more powerful
> rockets(someday). To help pay for the cost NASA is going to have to
> return 25% of the money it stole. Gates can throw in 15 billion and
> Allen 8 billion.GE and Goodyear can supply the gas and plastic.
> Balloons are easy to build in space.


Ever tried it?


> It would be lighter than the ISS.
> Not as hard to build as the Great pyramid,and 9 billion people would
> take pride in seeing it.


You sure are free and easy with figures, Bert.

What 9 billion people?

The Earth's current population is only 6 billion (precisely
6,379,157,361 as of this morning).


> It could be used to lighten up the back side of
> the Moon.


Light pollution!

What about those lunar observatories I have planned?


> It could have a good effect for all humankind.. Bert


Double-A

Bee

unread,
Apr 29, 2005, 10:32:38 PM4/29/05
to

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:22581-427...@storefull-3177.bay.webtv.net...

Bert ..

Are you willing to lend some insight into the "Crop Circles"

L

Bee


G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
Apr 30, 2005, 10:05:33 AM4/30/05
to
Hi Double-A by the time this Moon satellite is finished there will be 9
billion people watching it. My thoughts(math) was a time 27 years into
the future,and hopefully humankind was sexy as ever. Bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
Apr 30, 2005, 10:12:35 AM4/30/05
to
Hi Bee yes I have thoughts on the crop circles. Before you came to
this group we talked about them. Do you have crop circles down under?
Bert

G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
Apr 30, 2005, 10:22:47 AM4/30/05
to
Hi Greysky Your thinking is right on the money. Our thinking is what
NASA needs. NASA has to get its mind of of money,and recreate a public
interest into deeper space. Going in low orbit for 40 years makes space
as interesting as watching grass grow. The moon was our first stepping
stone. We must find away to go back to the moon;.It still has lots of
exploring for us to do. It is only three days away. We need a man like
Christ Craft to head NASA. Bert

Message has been deleted

Bee

unread,
May 1, 2005, 7:19:32 AM5/1/05
to

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:24743-427...@storefull-3174.bay.webtv.net...

> Hi Bee yes I have thoughts on the crop circles. Before you came to
> this group we talked about them. Do you have crop circles down under?
> Bert

I will check it out Bert ..

Just got back from "Hitch hiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

Odd Film I must say ..

L

Bee
>


Yubiwan

unread,
May 4, 2005, 4:49:16 AM5/4/05
to
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:22581-427...@storefull-3177.bay.webtv.net...

(from Dr. Why?)
Darla has a special message for you, Bert, all the way from Andromeda!

**** Here's Darla--

Thank you, Bert, for your gift of the lighthouse satellite idea!
It may please you to know that there is no one like you anywhere, not in the
entire Milky Way, and not in any of the areas of Andromeda I've explored.
You are a unique and beautiful specimen of life!

Darla

PS from Yubiwan:
You may find a brief updated report from Darla in The Nightbat's thread,
"Earth Indiana Base One to Darla Galactic Mission Over".
You're welcome!

Dr. Why?


G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
May 4, 2005, 8:10:03 AM5/4/05
to
Thank you Darla for using beautiful to describe this old man. Unique
fits better(one of a kind) Yesterday oc(bill) through my thinking
was astute. Two compliments in 24 hours.(WOW) Good thing I have
Uncle Al calling me "idiot" to bring me down to reality. So you are
still at Andromeda to me its so far away. When I was a kid I thought the
Moon was very far away,and now its only 3 days away. Distance' is
getting shorter and shorter with time. Hope you will return to us very
soon Your virtual friend Bert PS thank you Dr. Why

Double-A

unread,
May 4, 2005, 9:06:06 AM5/4/05
to

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
> Thank you Darla for using beautiful to describe this old man. Unique
> fits better(one of a kind) Yesterday oc(bill) through my
thinking
> was astute. Two compliments in 24 hours.(WOW) Good thing I
have
> Uncle Al calling me "idiot" to bring me down to reality.
[snip]


Uncle Al thinks he can kick the cornerstone out from under General
Relativity through his gravity experiment. So some likely have the
same opinion of him that he seems to have of you.

Double-A

Message has been deleted

nightbat

unread,
May 4, 2005, 11:35:18 AM5/4/05
to
nightbat wrote

nightbat

Officer Uncle Al is really down deep a very kind loving soul,
just doesn't like to cold hearted science show it. He has called
nightbat only respectful names while loving others a little more
personal. Reportedly he has donated his sperm so that there will be lots
more like him to carry on the pertinent name calling tradition. And
should his Earth experiment proposal prove out positive he will be
honored on Earth and aboard the Darla Star ship before we blast off.


carry on,
the nightbat

Art Deco

unread,
May 4, 2005, 12:03:08 PM5/4/05
to
Charles D. Bohne <sp...@PasoSchweiz.de> wrote:

> On 4 May 2005 06:06:06 -0700, "Double-A" <doub...@hush.ai> wrote:
>
> >> Uncle Al calling me "idiot" to bring me down to reality.
> >[snip]
> >
> >
> >Uncle Al thinks he can kick the cornerstone out from under General
> >Relativity through his gravity experiment. So some likely have the
> >same opinion of him that he seems to have of you.
> >
> >Double-A
>

> You always are what you see in other people ;-).
> {Every description tells more about the describer
> than about the descripted}.

Like "Flonkazoid," holistic hypocrite?

> Name calling gives away your own "names" :-)
> C.

More woo-woo Chuckweasel psychology.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

<http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/alexa/socks.html>
<http://www.petitmorte.net/cujo/kazoo/kazoo.html>

G=EMC^2 Glazier

unread,
May 12, 2005, 7:14:08 AM5/12/05
to
To sum up in one word why there is no perpetual motion that word has to
be "entropy" Bert

0 new messages