Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
3 Low Wit Rats That Post
12 views
Skip to first unread message
G=EMC^2
Oct 26, 2012, 8:11:16 AM10/26/12
to
I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
HVAC
Oct 26, 2012, 6:44:45 PM10/26/12
to
Quit being a crybaby and act like a man.
PS- You can tell that bitch, Robin, to shut her fucking mouth too.
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/images/tia_logo_large.jpg
Double-A
Oct 26, 2012, 6:58:02 PM10/26/12
to
Double-A
Brad Guth
Oct 26, 2012, 7:10:51 PM10/26/12
to
On Oct 26, 5:11 am, "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
approved type have a very serious job to do, of keeping as many K12s
and others as turned off or simply excluded or banished from even
reading Usenet/newsgroups, and they seem to easily accomplish this
goal with their horrific language and X-rated context.
This is another government and even faith-based approved and sustained
policy of their never policing those acting as intellectual and public
media terrorists, that's a policy intended to keep as much of the
general public and especially K12s from ever discovering what's really
going on and who the most responsible for perpetrating this type of
skulduggery are, of exposing those topic/author stalking and trashing
this and most other internet accessible context that's getting a
little too truth-worthy for their own good.
But then I've only been saying this for the past 12 years, so what the
hell do I really know about proxy wars. Perhaps a good analogy as to
further investigating this, is to "follow the money".
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”
HVAC
Oct 26, 2012, 7:32:14 PM10/26/12
to
On 10/26/2012 7:10 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
> Mainstream mafia rusemasters and FUD-masters of the Oligarch and ZNR
> approved type have a very serious job to do, of keeping as many K12s
> and others as turned off or simply excluded or banished from even
> reading Usenet/newsgroups, and they seem to easily accomplish this
> goal with their horrific language and X-rated context.
'Horrific' language? You're a fucking pussy.
>
> Mainstream mafia rusemasters and FUD-masters of the Oligarch and ZNR
> approved type have a very serious job to do, of keeping as many K12s
> and others as turned off or simply excluded or banished from even
> reading Usenet/newsgroups, and they seem to easily accomplish this
> goal with their horrific language and X-rated context.
> This is another government and even faith-based approved and sustained
> policy of their never policing those acting as intellectual and public
> media terrorists
Brad Guth
Oct 26, 2012, 8:07:07 PM10/26/12
to
from being put-off or intentionally excluded by what these rusemasters
and FUD-masters have as their job of mainstream status-quo damage
control, doing as much public media skulduggery as possible to the
rest of us.
This Usenet/newsgroup freedom of publishing our interpretations of
past and current events is continually disrupted and tarnished by
those either paid and/or obligated to apply as much mainstream damage-
control as they can muster, and there's still no bounty on their
heads.
What sort of classrooms on Earth can operate this way?
What if each and every time you'd resolved a software programming
issue, others in your group as secretly paid better than yourself
managed to damage or otherwise corrupt your work so that it was always
dysfunctional?
What part of this mainstream approved skulduggery is not treasonous?
saul...@cox.net
Oct 26, 2012, 8:23:50 PM10/26/12
to
WHAT MONEY, YOU FUCKING VILLAGE IDIOT?
Saul Levy
> Brad Guth, I AM A FUCKING VILLAGE IDIOT!
Saul Levy
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 27, 2012, 12:22:13 AM10/27/12
to
On 10/26/2012 6:44 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>> I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
>> that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
>> understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
>> people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
>> nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
>> scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
>
>
> Here's a tissue. Boo-Fucking-Hoo.
> Quit being a crybaby and act like a man.
>
> PS- You can tell that bitch, Robin, to shut her fucking mouth too.
My oh my! Is that you or the drugs speaking, HVAC? Perhaps some
> On 10/26/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>> I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
>> that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
>> understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
>> people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
>> nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
>> scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
>
>
> Here's a tissue. Boo-Fucking-Hoo.
> Quit being a crybaby and act like a man.
>
> PS- You can tell that bitch, Robin, to shut her fucking mouth too.
chemicals to calm you down at least to the level where you just shoot up
a post office or movie theater.
TreeBert, just doesn't understand that the reason Robbin is being kind
is because she feels it's her duty to humor the aging senile geezers
before they die to gain brownie points in heaven.
HVAC propmotes "natural selection" so for evolutionists like him, it's
simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
And HVAC, what the FUCK is this long fucking tail of "returns" on all
your posts? Is that so the NSA can easily find them (and the "persons
of interest" you have identified) in the INTERNET mix?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
HVAC
Oct 27, 2012, 9:14:54 AM10/27/12
to
On 10/27/2012 12:22 AM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 6:44 PM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 10/26/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>> I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
>>> that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
>>> understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
>>> people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
>>> nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
>>> scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
>>
>>
>> Here's a tissue. Boo-Fucking-Hoo.
>> Quit being a crybaby and act like a man.
>>
>> PS- You can tell that bitch, Robin, to shut her fucking mouth too.
>
> My oh my! Is that you or the drugs speaking, HVAC? Perhaps some
> chemicals to calm you down at least to the level where you just shoot up
> a post office or movie theater.
Ya. That's it. It was the drugs.
> On 10/26/2012 6:44 PM, HVAC wrote:
>> On 10/26/2012 8:11 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>> I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
>>> that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
>>> understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
>>> people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
>>> nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
>>> scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
>>
>>
>> Here's a tissue. Boo-Fucking-Hoo.
>> Quit being a crybaby and act like a man.
>>
>> PS- You can tell that bitch, Robin, to shut her fucking mouth too.
>
> My oh my! Is that you or the drugs speaking, HVAC? Perhaps some
> chemicals to calm you down at least to the level where you just shoot up
> a post office or movie theater.
Normally I'm very nice, as everyone knows.
> HVAC propmotes "natural selection"
I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
> so for evolutionists like him, it's
> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
this is the way that biological evolution works. Don't YOU, BJ?
> And HVAC, what the FUCK is this long fucking tail of "returns" on all
> your posts? Is that so the NSA can easily find them (and the "persons of
> interest" you have identified) in the INTERNET mix?
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 27, 2012, 1:24:32 PM10/27/12
to
On 10/27/2012 9:14 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 12:22 AM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>> HVAC propmotes "natural selection"
>
>
> I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
> every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
> On 10/27/2012 12:22 AM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>> HVAC propmotes "natural selection"
>
>
> I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
> every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
communism and all leftards want to make it the (illegal) state religion
of America as a "good first step".
As for "acknowledged reality" that is something of a stretch, especially
as "evolution" is promoted by the left. The problem is that there is no
science or logical thinking left in it. Now it's all politics and force
like "climate science". In fact "evolution" was the first "climate science"!
The catch, dear boy, that you expect nobody to notice is that evolution
isn't about being true or not true, about being "fact" or "fiction".
It's about scientific observation. And the scientific observations are
that evolution does seem to be a true fact in certain relatively
restricted cases of simple organism development. But from THERE "true
believers" make the usual human "great leap of faith" that this theory
applies any direction they look including humanoid species. Evidence for
such an extension is not only sparse but contrary as well. Thus,
evolution is both true and untrue at the same time which doesn't make
for a very good position to argue from in a political "debate" with the
likes of HVAC.
>> so for evolutionists like him, it's
>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>
>
> I never said it was the 'best thing'. Again, I acknowledge the fact that
> this is the way that biological evolution works. Don't YOU, BJ?
universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
HVAC
Oct 27, 2012, 2:25:54 PM10/27/12
to
On 10/27/2012 1:24 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>> I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
>> every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
> Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
> communism and all leftards want to make it the (illegal) state religion
> of America as a "good first step".
You've gone around the bend again, BJ. Evolution is certainly 'godless'.
>
>> I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
>> every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
> Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
> communism and all leftards want to make it the (illegal) state religion
> of America as a "good first step".
Only a fool would believe otherwise. Let me ask you, BJ,
what makes you believe in god? What evidence is there for a god?
You fancy yourself as a scientist (you're not) so lay out your case for
a god. I will wait right here.
> As for "acknowledged reality" that is something of a stretch, especially
> as "evolution" is promoted by the left.
thinks, I don't give a fuck what the right thinks. Evolution through
natural selection is a very well documented fact. Anyone who resists
acknowledging it's truth does so for some fucked up personal agenda.
That makes them an idiot in my book.
> The problem is that there is no
> science or logical thinking left in it. Now it's all politics and force
> like "climate science". In fact "evolution" was the first "climate
> science"!
> The catch, dear boy, that you expect nobody to notice is that evolution
> isn't about being true or not true, about being "fact" or "fiction".
> It's about scientific observation. And the scientific observations are
> that evolution does seem to be a true fact in certain relatively
> restricted cases of simple organism development. But from THERE "true
> believers" make the usual human "great leap of faith" that this theory
> applies any direction they look including humanoid species. Evidence for
> such an extension is not only sparse but contrary as well. Thus,
> evolution is both true and untrue at the same time which doesn't make
> for a very good position to argue from in a political "debate" with the
> likes of HVAC.
time. Evolution is fact. The 'missing links' are mostly all 'found
links' now. Not only is evolution a fact, it is one of the most
beautiful, complex yet simple, ideas ever to have come down the pike.
>>> so for evolutionists like him, it's
>>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>>
>>
>> I never said it was the 'best thing'. Again, I acknowledge the fact that
>> this is the way that biological evolution works. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
>
> Works for animals. But what you ignore are the HIGHER laws of the
> universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
> the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
you ask for some special treatment due to your god?
It ain't gonna happen.
Seriously, why the fuck would you believe in 'Higher Laws' when there is
zero....ZERO evidence to support your prideful point of view?
It is due to the reality that you, just like everyone else, are nothing
but a bit of flotsam in our ocean universe? That's all you are you
know...Nothing. Just another turd in the sewer. (no offense)
Christopher A. Lee
Oct 27, 2012, 2:42:29 PM10/27/12
to
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:25:54 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/27/2012 1:24 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>>
>>> I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
>>> every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
>>
>> Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
Lie.
>On 10/27/2012 1:24 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>>
>>> I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
>>> every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
>>
>> Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
>> communism
Lie.
>> and all leftards
Lie.
>> want to make it the (illegal) state religion
>> of America
>> as a "good first step".
>You've gone around the bend again, BJ. Evolution is certainly 'godless'.
>Only a fool would believe otherwise. Let me ask you, BJ,
>what makes you believe in god? What evidence is there for a god?
>You fancy yourself as a scientist (you're not) so lay out your case for
>a god. I will wait right here.
>
>
>> As for "acknowledged reality" that is something of a stretch,
>> especially
>> as "evolution" is promoted by the left.
>Politicizing the facts is irrelevant. I don't give a fuck what the left
>thinks, I don't give a fuck what the right thinks. Evolution through
>natural selection is a very well documented fact. Anyone who resists
>acknowledging it's truth does so for some fucked up personal agenda.
>That makes them an idiot in my book.
>> The problem is that there is no
>> science or logical thinking left in it.
>> Now it's all politics and force
>> like "climate science".
Lie.
>> In fact "evolution" was the first "climate
>> science"!
>Are you drunk?
He's seriously mentally ill.
>> The catch, dear boy, that you expect nobody to notice is that evolution
>> isn't about being true or not true, about being "fact" or "fiction".
>> It's about scientific observation. And the scientific observations are
>> that evolution does seem to be a true fact in certain relatively
>> restricted cases of simple organism development. But from THERE "true
>> believers" make the usual human "great leap of faith" that this theory
>> applies any direction they look including humanoid species. Evidence for
>> such an extension is not only sparse but contrary as well. Thus,
>> evolution is both true and untrue at the same time which doesn't make
>> for a very good position to argue from in a political "debate" with the
>> likes of HVAC.
>What a load of malarkey. You seem to try to argue both sides at the same
>time. Evolution is fact. The 'missing links' are mostly all 'found
>links' now. Not only is evolution a fact, it is one of the most
>beautiful, complex yet simple, ideas ever to have come down the pike.
>>>> so for evolutionists like him, it's
This is a dishonest pretence that the acceptance of well-understood
scientific fact is some kind of ideology.
>>>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>>>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>>>
>>> I never said it was the 'best thing'. Again, I acknowledge the fact that
>>> this is the way that biological evolution works. Don't YOU, BJ?
>>
>> Works for animals. But what you ignore are the HIGHER laws of the
>> universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
>> the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
>
>Why is it that every time I out-logic you and back you into a corner,
>you ask for some special treatment due to your god?
>It ain't gonna happen.
>
>Seriously, why the fuck would you believe in 'Higher Laws' when there is
>zero....ZERO evidence to support your prideful point of view?
religion.
>It is due to the reality that you, just like everyone else, are nothing
>but a bit of flotsam in our ocean universe? That's all you are you
>know...Nothing. Just another turd in the sewer. (no offense)
Jeff-Relf.Me
Oct 27, 2012, 3:50:10 PM10/27/12
to
[Jeff-R...@Oct.27.Seattle{0.50.PM.2012}]
Virtually, "God" is nature. Praise nature, not Jesus.
Virtually, "God" is nature. Praise nature, not Jesus.
alie...@gmail.com
Oct 27, 2012, 4:35:48 PM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 10:23 am, "bjac...@teranews.com" <bjac...@iwaynet.net>
wrote:
(snip to the crash)
> Works for animals. But what you ignore are the HIGHER laws of the
> universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
> the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
What "higher laws"? Who wrote/passed them? What court do they get
tested in?
Why do these "higher laws" not apply to any other form of life?
Mark L. Fergerson
wrote:
(snip to the crash)
> Works for animals. But what you ignore are the HIGHER laws of the
> universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
> the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
tested in?
Why do these "higher laws" not apply to any other form of life?
Mark L. Fergerson
Brad Guth
Oct 27, 2012, 5:01:07 PM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 12:50 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.27.Seattle{0.50.PM.2012}]
and/or survive off the backs and demise of others.
Take away the free stuff and those nifty local tax and utility credits
that low income housing gets to directly benefit from (without tenants
having to contribute anything in return), and you'd be paying at least
half again or possibly twice as much. Unwed girls get to have as many
public funded kids as they like, plus some of the best medical care
for those kids and themselves to boot. Figure at least a half million
per average kid, because they don't all manage to stay healthy or out
of trouble. Your discarded kids on the other hand are perhaps way
better off without having you around, because they might actually
contribute a bit more than they take.
AA also doesn't have any valid excuse for his pathetic life of living
off others, unless he's working undercover.
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.27.Seattle{0.50.PM.2012}]
> Virtually, "God" is nature. Praise nature, not Jesus.
Except there's nothing all that natural about the way some always take
and/or survive off the backs and demise of others.
Take away the free stuff and those nifty local tax and utility credits
that low income housing gets to directly benefit from (without tenants
having to contribute anything in return), and you'd be paying at least
half again or possibly twice as much. Unwed girls get to have as many
public funded kids as they like, plus some of the best medical care
for those kids and themselves to boot. Figure at least a half million
per average kid, because they don't all manage to stay healthy or out
of trouble. Your discarded kids on the other hand are perhaps way
better off without having you around, because they might actually
contribute a bit more than they take.
AA also doesn't have any valid excuse for his pathetic life of living
off others, unless he's working undercover.
Jeff-Relf.Me
Oct 27, 2012, 5:11:37 PM10/27/12
to
[Jeff-R...@Oct.27.Seattle{2.11.PM.2012}]
It's not a crime to have less income.
I've never had "low income housing" nor "utility credits".
I qualify, but I don't ask for it.
My landlord can't apply for them, of course.
It's not a crime to have less income.
I've never had "low income housing" nor "utility credits".
I qualify, but I don't ask for it.
My landlord can't apply for them, of course.
Brad Guth
Oct 27, 2012, 6:52:22 PM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 2:11 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.27.Seattle{2.11.PM.2012}]
You don't seem to get the picture here. Low income housing
automatically qualifies for and typically gets property tax credits
and special utility rates that the rest of us don't get. The
structure that you live in is not paying full tilt for much of
anything unless it includes fancy condos or even conventional
apartments that you haven't made us aware of.
The property as a vacant lot alone is likely worth over a million, and
the closer to the UW the more valuable that property gets (could
easily be worth ten million).
You do the math as based upon the size of that lot, its infrastructure
of having been accommodating how many, and its proximity to the UW.
I'd bet you're not having to pay half as much as ordinary private
property holders get to pay.
However, if that's keeping honest folks with minimal income out of
trouble and giving them a basic roof over their heads, is likely a
good enough tradeoff for the others as having to pay more for just
about everything, including their not taking from a local food-bank
simply because they could if they wanted to.
You seem more than financially capable of donating to that local food-
bank, and yet that's not the case.
Do you ever take in wandering souls that can't afford the simplest of
basic housing?
It doesn't sound as though you'd even give AA a spot of floor to sleep
on, even though I'd bet you could teach AA another thing or two about
getting by dirt cheap.
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.27.Seattle{2.11.PM.2012}]
automatically qualifies for and typically gets property tax credits
and special utility rates that the rest of us don't get. The
structure that you live in is not paying full tilt for much of
anything unless it includes fancy condos or even conventional
apartments that you haven't made us aware of.
The property as a vacant lot alone is likely worth over a million, and
the closer to the UW the more valuable that property gets (could
easily be worth ten million).
You do the math as based upon the size of that lot, its infrastructure
of having been accommodating how many, and its proximity to the UW.
I'd bet you're not having to pay half as much as ordinary private
property holders get to pay.
However, if that's keeping honest folks with minimal income out of
trouble and giving them a basic roof over their heads, is likely a
good enough tradeoff for the others as having to pay more for just
about everything, including their not taking from a local food-bank
simply because they could if they wanted to.
You seem more than financially capable of donating to that local food-
bank, and yet that's not the case.
Do you ever take in wandering souls that can't afford the simplest of
basic housing?
It doesn't sound as though you'd even give AA a spot of floor to sleep
on, even though I'd bet you could teach AA another thing or two about
getting by dirt cheap.
SkyEyes
Oct 27, 2012, 6:59:13 PM10/27/12
to
> On 10/27/2012 9:14 AM, HVAC wrote:
>
>
> > On 10/27/2012 12:22 AM, bjac...@teranews.com wrote:
> >> HVAC propmotes "natural selection"
>
> > I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
> > every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
> Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
> communism and all leftards want to make it the (illegal) state religion
> of America as a "good first step".
Evolution is a biological reality. not a "religion." As much as you
> >> HVAC propmotes "natural selection"
>
> > I don't promote natural selection. I acknowledge it's reality as does
> > every person capable of logical thinking. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
> Sure you promote it. Godless evolution is the state religion of
> communism and all leftards want to make it the (illegal) state religion
> of America as a "good first step".
want to conflate biological reality - which has mountains and
mountains of evidence to support it - to a "religion," which is
nothing more than superstition, you're wrong, and everyone with two
working brain cells knows that.
>
> As for "acknowledged reality" that is something of a stretch, especially
> as "evolution" is promoted by the left. The problem is that there is no
> science or logical thinking left in it. Now it's all politics and force
> like "climate science". In fact "evolution" was the first "climate science"!
Evolution is a biological reality that has been observed in the lab
> As for "acknowledged reality" that is something of a stretch, especially
> as "evolution" is promoted by the left. The problem is that there is no
> science or logical thinking left in it. Now it's all politics and force
> like "climate science". In fact "evolution" was the first "climate science"!
*and* in the wild. Wishing won't change that fact.
>
> The catch, dear boy, that you expect nobody to notice is that evolution
> isn't about being true or not true, about being "fact" or "fiction".
Indeed. "Truth" is one of those slippery constructs of which everyone
> The catch, dear boy, that you expect nobody to notice is that evolution
> isn't about being true or not true, about being "fact" or "fiction".
has their own version. Facts, on the other hand, are facts.
Evolution is a fact.
> It's about scientific observation. And the scientific observations are
> that evolution does seem to be a true fact in certain relatively
> restricted cases of simple organism development. But from THERE "true
> believers" make the usual human "great leap of faith" that this theory
> applies any direction they look including humanoid species.
Humans, like all other life forms, reproduce imperfectly. The
offspring better suited to their environment reproduce more
successfully. Hence, evolution.
What's the matter, BJ, is your ego so puny that unless you can believe
you're specially created by some gawd, you feel like shit? The rest
of us are not so emotionally bankrupt.
> Evidence for
> such an extension is not only sparse but contrary as well.
apes. One of my favorite data points is the fact that an extinct ape
retrovirus left its imprint in not only *our* DNA, but at *exactly the
same location* in the DNA of chimps. This is unexplainable by any
means other than by evolution - that both chimps and humans had a
common ancestor that contracted the retrovirus, which left its imprint
on the ancestor's DNA, and all of the ancestor's decendants possess
it.
There are other data points that support primate-to-human evolution,
but that one's my fav.
>Thus,
> evolution is both true and untrue at the same time which doesn't make
> for a very good position to argue from in a political "debate" with the
> likes of HVAC.
fact.
>
> >> so for evolutionists like him, it's
> >> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
> >> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>
> > I never said it was the 'best thing'. Again, I acknowledge the fact that
> > this is the way that biological evolution works. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
> Works for animals. But what you ignore are the HIGHER laws of the
> universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
> the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
And what are these "higher" laws, and how does one discern them, pray
> >> so for evolutionists like him, it's
> >> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
> >> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>
> > I never said it was the 'best thing'. Again, I acknowledge the fact that
> > this is the way that biological evolution works. Don't YOU, BJ?
>
> Works for animals. But what you ignore are the HIGHER laws of the
> universe that apply to man but are ignored by him (you). In that context
> the animal way is FAR from a "best thing".
tell? Methinks you're talking through your hat, as the old saying
goes.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Brad Guth
Oct 27, 2012, 8:36:34 PM10/27/12
to
franken genetic creators that are about to reproduce the new and
improved human species that's nearly immortal compared to the rest of
us.
G=EMC^2
Oct 27, 2012, 10:24:07 PM10/27/12
to
On Oct 27, 12:21 am, "bjac...@teranews.com" <bjac...@iwaynet.net>
wrote:
Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
you all know who fits. TreBert
wrote:
you all know who fits. TreBert
Brad Guth
Oct 27, 2012, 11:53:23 PM10/27/12
to
those that seem to support anything you've ever had to say.
If you can read between their lines, you'll discover how the
mainstream cabal of insiders like to make fun of you, while knowing
they can erase any trace of whatever you think is important. In the
meantime, they make certain that K12s are kept away from reading your
stuff, as well as most of my stuff. These are not nice people, unless
you happen to like the ZNR redneck Oligarch types.
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 28, 2012, 3:39:37 AM10/28/12
to
On 10/27/2012 2:25 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 1:24 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
> You've gone around the bend again, BJ. Evolution is certainly 'godless'.
> Only a fool would believe otherwise. Let me ask you, BJ,
> what makes you believe in god? What evidence is there for a god?
So your argument isn't based on any facts but only that you will think a
> On 10/27/2012 1:24 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
> You've gone around the bend again, BJ. Evolution is certainly 'godless'.
> Only a fool would believe otherwise. Let me ask you, BJ,
> what makes you believe in god? What evidence is there for a god?
person a "fool" if they examine evidence rather than listen to you.
That's real "science" for sure.
> You fancy yourself as a scientist (you're not) so lay out your case for
> a god. I will wait right here.
others to "prove" that you are right. You know, HVAC those slaves are
certainly subhuman, why they can't even learn to read and write.
(because we made it illegal) You are an arrogant moron.
You pretend to be a scientist, but it's been shown here over and over
that you are a fake and fraud. So why don't you lay out your evidence
that I'm not a scientist while I sit here with the absolute proof you
are a liar right in my hand? I'll wait.
Perhaps you need to exercise that gummint workstation of yours. I'm
certainly in there all over the place like dog shit. Given your usual
level of evolutionist honesty (none) I presume you already have done so
and are spinning known lies just as part of the old job to try to jerk
my chain. I'm not the jerk here, though.
>> As for "acknowledged reality" that is something of a stretch, especially
>> as "evolution" is promoted by the left.
> Politicizing the facts is irrelevant. I don't give a fuck what the left
> thinks, I don't give a fuck what the right thinks. Evolution through
> natural selection is a very well documented fact. Anyone who resists
> acknowledging it's truth does so for some fucked up personal agenda.
Just as Wormley (and you) promote the global warming tax scam for your
own selfish greed. You can pretend to be innocent but Jesus said by
their fruits ye shall know them. You're plenty fruity.
> That makes them an idiot in my book.
Treebert's theory of heavy air. The only difference between you and him
is that he calls them all "his" theories. You allow others to take
credit for the fucked up mess.
>> The problem is that there is no
>> science or logical thinking left in it. Now it's all politics and force
>> like "climate science". In fact "evolution" was the first "climate
>> science"!
> Are you drunk?
>> The catch, dear boy, that you expect nobody to notice is that evolution
>> isn't about being true or not true, about being "fact" or "fiction".
>> It's about scientific observation. And the scientific observations are
>> that evolution does seem to be a true fact in certain relatively
>> restricted cases of simple organism development. But from THERE "true
>> believers" make the usual human "great leap of faith" that this theory
>> applies any direction they look including humanoid species. Evidence for
>> such an extension is not only sparse but contrary as well. Thus,
>> evolution is both true and untrue at the same time which doesn't make
>> for a very good position to argue from in a political "debate" with the
>> likes of HVAC.
>
>
> What a load of malarkey. You seem to try to argue both sides at the same
> time. Evolution is fact. The 'missing links' are mostly all 'found
> links' now. Not only is evolution a fact, it is one of the most
> beautiful, complex yet simple, ideas ever to have come down the pike.
have no interest in truth. In fact your work is to smash all truth. Well
a person has to eat. Personally I don't have to promote lies to eat.
> Why is it that every time I out-logic you and back you into a corner,
> you ask for some special treatment due to your god?
own mind. In my case I'm a genius on my own website. I win.
> It ain't gonna happen.
> Seriously, why the fuck would you believe in 'Higher Laws' when there is
> zero....ZERO evidence to support your prideful point of view?
your superpowers to examine all the laws of nature? Sure.
> It is due to the reality that you, just like everyone else, are nothing
> but a bit of flotsam in our ocean universe? That's all you are you
> know...Nothing. Just another turd in the sewer. (no offense)
is so short-sighted and narrow minded as to think that all the
indications of extra-dimensional existence are just things to ignore.
You ignore truth at your own peril, HVAC.
SkyEyes
Oct 28, 2012, 3:42:26 AM10/28/12
to
Brad Guth
Oct 28, 2012, 7:54:49 AM10/28/12
to
HVAC
Oct 28, 2012, 9:09:16 AM10/28/12
to
On 10/28/2012 3:39 AM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>> You've gone around the bend again, BJ. Evolution is certainly 'godless'.
>> Only a fool would believe otherwise. Let me ask you, BJ,
>> what makes you believe in god? What evidence is there for a god?
>
> So your argument isn't based on any facts but only that you will think a
> person a "fool" if they examine evidence rather than listen to you.
> That's real "science" for sure.
I'm glad you provided all the evidence you have for god ie: none.
>
>> You've gone around the bend again, BJ. Evolution is certainly 'godless'.
>> Only a fool would believe otherwise. Let me ask you, BJ,
>> what makes you believe in god? What evidence is there for a god?
>
> So your argument isn't based on any facts but only that you will think a
> person a "fool" if they examine evidence rather than listen to you.
> That's real "science" for sure.
>> You fancy yourself as a scientist (you're not) so lay out your case for
>> a god. I will wait right here.
>
> So now you have to haul out your usual marginalization and ridicule of
> others to "prove" that you are right. You know, HVAC those slaves are
> certainly subhuman, why they can't even learn to read and write.
> (because we made it illegal) You are an arrogant moron.
> Perhaps you need to exercise that gummint workstation of yours. I'm
> certainly in there all over the place like dog shit. Given your usual
> level of evolutionist honesty (none) I presume you already have done so
> and are spinning known lies just as part of the old job to try to jerk
> my chain. I'm not the jerk here, though.
Why is that?
>> Politicizing the facts is irrelevant. I don't give a fuck what the left
>> thinks, I don't give a fuck what the right thinks. Evolution through
>> natural selection is a very well documented fact. Anyone who resists
>> acknowledging it's truth does so for some fucked up personal agenda.
>
> Sure you do. That's why you promote this total unscientific nonsense.
> Just as Wormley (and you) promote the global warming tax scam for your
> own selfish greed. You can pretend to be innocent but Jesus said by
> their fruits ye shall know them. You're plenty fruity.
>> That makes them an idiot in my book.
>
> Your "book" means shit in the large world picture. It's on a par with
> Treebert's theory of heavy air. The only difference between you and him
> is that he calls them all "his" theories. You allow others to take
> credit for the fucked up mess.
about people who go about their 'science' with an agenda. They are
idiots. If you have any evidence to the contrary, present it.
>>> The problem is that there is no
>>> science or logical thinking left in it. Now it's all politics and force
>>> like "climate science". In fact "evolution" was the first "climate
>>> science"!
>
>> Are you drunk?
>
> Are you stoned again?
>> What a load of malarkey. You seem to try to argue both sides at the same
>> time. Evolution is fact. The 'missing links' are mostly all 'found
>> links' now. Not only is evolution a fact, it is one of the most
>> beautiful, complex yet simple, ideas ever to have come down the pike.
>
> I TOLD you that the truth puts me at a disadvantage. But obviously you
> have no interest in truth. In fact your work is to smash all truth. Well
> a person has to eat. Personally I don't have to promote lies to eat.
>> Why is it that every time I out-logic you and back you into a corner,
>> you ask for some special treatment due to your god?
>
> You can't out-logic treebert, let alone me. You are genius only in your
> own mind. In my case I'm a genius on my own website. I win.
>> Seriously, why the fuck would you believe in 'Higher Laws' when there is
>> zero....ZERO evidence to support your prideful point of view?
>
> And the way you know there is ZERO evidence would again be your use of
> your superpowers to examine all the laws of nature? Sure.
>> It is due to the reality that you, just like everyone else, are nothing
>> but a bit of flotsam in our ocean universe? That's all you are you
>> know...Nothing. Just another turd in the sewer. (no offense)
>
> Pretty negative viewpoint there HVAC. And one which only applies if one
> is so short-sighted and narrow minded as to think that all the
> indications of extra-dimensional existence are just things to ignore.
you're a kook?
HVAC
Oct 28, 2012, 9:18:06 AM10/28/12
to
On 10/27/2012 10:24 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
>> HVAC propmotes "natural selection" so for evolutionists like him, it's
>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>>
>> And HVAC, what the FUCK is this long fucking tail of "returns" on all
>> your posts? Is that so the NSA can easily find them (and the "persons
>> of interest" you have identified) in the INTERNET mix?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
> you all know who fits. TreBert
Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>
>> HVAC propmotes "natural selection" so for evolutionists like him, it's
>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>>
>> And HVAC, what the FUCK is this long fucking tail of "returns" on all
>> your posts? Is that so the NSA can easily find them (and the "persons
>> of interest" you have identified) in the INTERNET mix?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
> you all know who fits. TreBert
We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
bukaki film.
Brad Guth
Oct 28, 2012, 9:28:01 AM10/28/12
to
On Oct 28, 12:38 am, "bjac...@teranews.com" <bjac...@iwaynet.net>
wrote:
By simply replying to Harlow that must hide himself behind a industry
standard title that's used for Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning, is simply making his Semitic approved FUD-master job so
much easier and more productive.
wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 2:25 PM, HVAC wrote:
>
>
standard title that's used for Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning, is simply making his Semitic approved FUD-master job so
much easier and more productive.
G=EMC^2
Oct 28, 2012, 9:52:45 AM10/28/12
to
On Oct 27, 5:11 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.27.Seattle{2.11.PM.2012}]
Jeff My one room + tiny kitchen goes for $875 of that I pay 300.
Landlord pays for heat,and water. I worked all my life,and saved lots
of money. What made me broke was b being ripped off by Rick Scott(Now
Governor of Fl. GOP Mafia owns FL.nursing homes,and my wife for 2.6
years lived in his Tandem nursing home. I paid them $914 each week,and
Scott at the same time got 70,000 a year from medicare. It was in the
press for "one day" that Scott stole 1.7 billion bucks,and took the
5th 75 times at a hearing. Spent $200,000,000 to become governor of
Fl. I tried going to the Orlando Sentinal but they became deaf and
dumb. Its a GOP rag. Rick Scott,and Romney are birds of a feather. I
can have no more than $22OO to my name. In Fascist America rich
pay no taxes,and those that paid taxes for 7O years are screwed in the
end. Vote in Romney and medicare will be replaced with Tang. TeBet
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.27.Seattle{2.11.PM.2012}]
Landlord pays for heat,and water. I worked all my life,and saved lots
of money. What made me broke was b being ripped off by Rick Scott(Now
Governor of Fl. GOP Mafia owns FL.nursing homes,and my wife for 2.6
years lived in his Tandem nursing home. I paid them $914 each week,and
Scott at the same time got 70,000 a year from medicare. It was in the
press for "one day" that Scott stole 1.7 billion bucks,and took the
5th 75 times at a hearing. Spent $200,000,000 to become governor of
Fl. I tried going to the Orlando Sentinal but they became deaf and
dumb. Its a GOP rag. Rick Scott,and Romney are birds of a feather. I
can have no more than $22OO to my name. In Fascist America rich
pay no taxes,and those that paid taxes for 7O years are screwed in the
end. Vote in Romney and medicare will be replaced with Tang. TeBet
HVAC
Oct 28, 2012, 10:02:48 AM10/28/12
to
On 10/28/2012 9:52 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>
> Jeff My one room + tiny kitchen goes for $875 of that I pay 300.
> Landlord pays for heat,and water.
Ya. Everyone knows you're on the dole, Bert.
>
> Jeff My one room + tiny kitchen goes for $875 of that I pay 300.
> Landlord pays for heat,and water.
That should leave you with over a thousand dollars a month for beer.
> I worked all my life
Did you go to work yesterday? Last week? Last month?
So you haven't worked 'all your life'.
> and saved lots
> of money. What made me broke was b being ripped off by Rick Scott(Now
> Governor of Fl. GOP Mafia owns FL.nursing homes,and my wife for 2.6
> years lived in his Tandem nursing home. I paid them $914 each week,and
> Scott at the same time got 70,000 a year from medicare.
somewhere on the order of 50-75,000 dollars. That's for 4 fucking DAYS!
Of course I have great insurance. My out of pocket will be zero.
> press for "one day" that Scott stole 1.7 billion bucks,and took the
> 5th 75 times at a hearing. Spent $200,000,000 to become governor of
> Fl. I tried going to the Orlando Sentinal but they became deaf and
> dumb. Its a GOP rag.
you present as a doddering old man with a foolish story? I'm surprised
that you didn't include him in your list of low wits. LOL
> can have no more than $22OO to my name. In Fascist America rich
> pay no taxes,and those that paid taxes for 7O years are screwed in the
> end.
saul...@cox.net
Oct 28, 2012, 10:41:49 AM10/28/12
to
ALL YOU HAVE HERE IS A LOAD OF SHIT, BLOWJOB!
WE ALL KNOW IT TOO! YOU IMPRESS GOOFY, BUT THAT'S ALL!
FUCK OFF, FOOL!
Saul Levy
WE ALL KNOW IT TOO! YOU IMPRESS GOOFY, BUT THAT'S ALL!
FUCK OFF, FOOL!
Saul Levy
Brad Guth
Oct 28, 2012, 10:22:54 PM10/28/12
to
rates or any other public-funded benefits. I doubt they're paying a
quarter of what the same location as privately developed and as to
what the unsubsidized (such as yourself) would have to pay for that
location and its infrastructure.
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 28, 2012, 11:46:41 PM10/28/12
to
and the internet decrees that I am one and all gullible idiot Americans
reading about it automatically believe it because you told us all how
smart you are and how you are "never" wrong.
It's no insult to me because I have no respect for you, but it's a
pretty big insult to the gullible.
Jeff-Relf.Me
Oct 29, 2012, 12:59:09 AM10/29/12
to
[Jeff-R...@Oct.28.Seattle{9.59.PM.2012}]
My rooming house was built in 1926 and it's in ill⋅repair.
It doesn't meet the TOUGH standards required of "low income housing".
I know people who get vouchers for low income housing;
they may NOT move in here, to my house −− NO WAY, NO HOW.
You ( Brad⋅Guth ) are just angry; you're telling lies left and right.
You don't know the facts, yet that doesn't stop you from spewing.
"reduced utility rates" ? God ! you're such an idiot.
Unlike you, Brad, I get NO "welfare" of any kind.
My rooming house was built in 1926 and it's in ill⋅repair.
It doesn't meet the TOUGH standards required of "low income housing".
I know people who get vouchers for low income housing;
they may NOT move in here, to my house −− NO WAY, NO HOW.
You ( Brad⋅Guth ) are just angry; you're telling lies left and right.
You don't know the facts, yet that doesn't stop you from spewing.
"reduced utility rates" ? God ! you're such an idiot.
Unlike you, Brad, I get NO "welfare" of any kind.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 7:36:32 AM10/29/12
to
On 10/28/2012 11:46 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>> "Indications of extra-dimensional existence"....And you don't think
>> you're a kook?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> No, I presume I'm a kook because some self-appointed "god" of America
> and the internet decrees that I am one and all gullible idiot Americans
> reading about it automatically believe it because you told us all how
> smart you are and how you are "never" wrong.
You're a kook.
>
>> "Indications of extra-dimensional existence"....And you don't think
>> you're a kook?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> No, I presume I'm a kook because some self-appointed "god" of America
> and the internet decrees that I am one and all gullible idiot Americans
> reading about it automatically believe it because you told us all how
> smart you are and how you are "never" wrong.
Brad Guth
Oct 29, 2012, 8:25:40 AM10/29/12
to
On Oct 28, 9:59 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.28.Seattle{9.59.PM.2012}]
Once again, you have to constantly lie about others in order to get
your pathetic self by.
It takes electrical and natural gas energy, as well as clean water
plus sewer and garbage management in order to reasonably accommodate
those our your cheap housing kind. Are you suggesting that your
building has it's own well and septic system, plus runs its own
generators or having its own solar and wind energy farm?
You're not remotely smart enough to know any better, and you obviously
can't do the math of what the honest all-inclusive cost plus whatever
the property owners must take, unless that building were owned by the
local mafia or by some other assistance group, like the Salvation Army
would make a whole lot of sense because of how efficiently they manage
such things.
You continually hijack and revise topics in order to suit your own
perverted ego, and you don't really give a tinkers damn about anyone
else following the original topic or any of its related subtopics as
long as you get to revise everything and can manage to get by with
paying the absolute least amount, because you're so fu-cking extra
special that you can't manage to get a real job that pays in more than
it takes out (of course you and others of your kind couldn't possibly
understand any of that).
Your kind of cheap housing gets special property tax and utility rate
compensation because of its low income or subsidized housing status.
Most that live within that structure are getting outside assistance
(many students will be declaring bankruptcy or just bailing out on
their debts and responsibilities because those necessary real jobs
that pay enough outside of being city, state and federal employed no
longer exist), and otherwise the city, state and feds receives the
least amount per unit in return, plus the public gets to pick up other
tabs that you don't want anyone talking about the real all-inclusive
cost of running a city, state or nation that gets to accommodate those
which never contribute enough to compensate for what they take.
You’ve previously admitted to having taken food from a local food bank
simply because it’s offered without any proof or justification that
you actually deserve any of it.
You've previously claimed and taken unemployment and qualify yourself
for public transportation discounts, even though you really shouldn’t
be qualified.
You consistently mooch off of a UW local area DSL server at no charge
(aka NOCHARGE.COM or .NET), and no doubt you make all of your long
distance calls via that channel while downloading HDTV and full-length
movies plus most of anything else as taken for free, and you obviously
don't give an tinkers damn how that activity hogs or drags down the
internet throughput that everyone else gets to pay something for.
Whenever you get sick or injured enough to need any outside help, you
pay little if anything for those services and supplies. You never
take advise nor having given anyone else any credit for knowing
anything, so at the very least you deserve to die alone because, who's
going to miss having Jeff around?
Some of the perks you get in exchange for those services provided to
the landlord are likely kept off the books and/or fully taken off his
income as another cost or expense of doing business (so as per
bartering rules there’s no local business nor income taxes collected),
not that such is entirely a bad thing if that give and take barter
system is kept privately within reason, although the big boys that you
seem to like get to do this with millions, billions and even trillions
of our hard earned loot.
Just because I don’t happen to like most of them bad guys that got
this nation into such a mess over the past few decades, and you seem
to like them all as long as you get a cheap roof over your head, a
source of free food and discounted or free public services), is not
hardly a qualifier of slander on my part for suggesting that you’re
not nearly as deserving as you think. Even if only half of everyone
in Seattle operated as you have, there wouldn’t be hardly any city
infrastructure or services available for anyone (no paved streets,
water, sewer, street lighting, parks or schools), and apparently
you’re perfectly good with knowing that.
How exactly does removing the context of any given topic or reply, and
revising the title of any given topic, make you a happy Mormon?
Are you suggesting that all books in any public library should get
their titles revised and portions of whatever context removed?
Of course you don't really care, because you are Jeff the
dysfunctional Mormon that always gets to do as he pleases, and unlike
yourself, at least I don't have to modify a topic in order to suit my
inflated ego of superiority over everyone else.
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.28.Seattle{9.59.PM.2012}]
your pathetic self by.
It takes electrical and natural gas energy, as well as clean water
plus sewer and garbage management in order to reasonably accommodate
those our your cheap housing kind. Are you suggesting that your
building has it's own well and septic system, plus runs its own
generators or having its own solar and wind energy farm?
You're not remotely smart enough to know any better, and you obviously
can't do the math of what the honest all-inclusive cost plus whatever
the property owners must take, unless that building were owned by the
local mafia or by some other assistance group, like the Salvation Army
would make a whole lot of sense because of how efficiently they manage
such things.
You continually hijack and revise topics in order to suit your own
perverted ego, and you don't really give a tinkers damn about anyone
else following the original topic or any of its related subtopics as
long as you get to revise everything and can manage to get by with
paying the absolute least amount, because you're so fu-cking extra
special that you can't manage to get a real job that pays in more than
it takes out (of course you and others of your kind couldn't possibly
understand any of that).
Your kind of cheap housing gets special property tax and utility rate
compensation because of its low income or subsidized housing status.
Most that live within that structure are getting outside assistance
(many students will be declaring bankruptcy or just bailing out on
their debts and responsibilities because those necessary real jobs
that pay enough outside of being city, state and federal employed no
longer exist), and otherwise the city, state and feds receives the
least amount per unit in return, plus the public gets to pick up other
tabs that you don't want anyone talking about the real all-inclusive
cost of running a city, state or nation that gets to accommodate those
which never contribute enough to compensate for what they take.
You’ve previously admitted to having taken food from a local food bank
simply because it’s offered without any proof or justification that
you actually deserve any of it.
You've previously claimed and taken unemployment and qualify yourself
for public transportation discounts, even though you really shouldn’t
be qualified.
You consistently mooch off of a UW local area DSL server at no charge
(aka NOCHARGE.COM or .NET), and no doubt you make all of your long
distance calls via that channel while downloading HDTV and full-length
movies plus most of anything else as taken for free, and you obviously
don't give an tinkers damn how that activity hogs or drags down the
internet throughput that everyone else gets to pay something for.
Whenever you get sick or injured enough to need any outside help, you
pay little if anything for those services and supplies. You never
take advise nor having given anyone else any credit for knowing
anything, so at the very least you deserve to die alone because, who's
going to miss having Jeff around?
Some of the perks you get in exchange for those services provided to
the landlord are likely kept off the books and/or fully taken off his
income as another cost or expense of doing business (so as per
bartering rules there’s no local business nor income taxes collected),
not that such is entirely a bad thing if that give and take barter
system is kept privately within reason, although the big boys that you
seem to like get to do this with millions, billions and even trillions
of our hard earned loot.
Just because I don’t happen to like most of them bad guys that got
this nation into such a mess over the past few decades, and you seem
to like them all as long as you get a cheap roof over your head, a
source of free food and discounted or free public services), is not
hardly a qualifier of slander on my part for suggesting that you’re
not nearly as deserving as you think. Even if only half of everyone
in Seattle operated as you have, there wouldn’t be hardly any city
infrastructure or services available for anyone (no paved streets,
water, sewer, street lighting, parks or schools), and apparently
you’re perfectly good with knowing that.
How exactly does removing the context of any given topic or reply, and
revising the title of any given topic, make you a happy Mormon?
Are you suggesting that all books in any public library should get
their titles revised and portions of whatever context removed?
Of course you don't really care, because you are Jeff the
dysfunctional Mormon that always gets to do as he pleases, and unlike
yourself, at least I don't have to modify a topic in order to suit my
inflated ego of superiority over everyone else.
Brad Guth
Oct 29, 2012, 8:29:42 AM10/29/12
to
On Oct 28, 8:45 pm, "bjac...@teranews.com" <bjac...@iwaynet.net>
wrote:
Harlow is always smarter than everyone else combined, and by simply
replying to anything that spews from between his butt-cheeks is
further proof positive that he's the really smart one.
Are you required by law to read and reply to his stuff?
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”
wrote:
replying to anything that spews from between his butt-cheeks is
further proof positive that he's the really smart one.
Are you required by law to read and reply to his stuff?
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 8:45:35 AM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 8:29 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
> Harlow is always smarter than everyone else combined
True.
>
> Harlow is always smarter than everyone else combined
> and by simply
> replying to anything that spews from between his butt-cheeks
> further proof positive that he's the really smart one.
> Are you required by law to read and reply to his stuff?
hanson
Oct 29, 2012, 11:11:50 AM10/29/12
to
Harlow "HVAC" <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
Harlow is always smarter than everyone else combined
>
True.
>
Brad Guth wrote:
further proof positive that he's the really smart one.
>
Brad Guth wrote:
further proof positive that he's the really smart one.
>
Harlow wrote:
Geniuses like me have no need for titles.
>
hanson wrote:
Geniuses like me have no need for titles.
>
Brad, bald/chrome-dome Harlow has reached the age
(60) when male vanity becomes a fethish-like fixation.
>
So, Brad, don't get so sarcastic & aggravated over
Harlow, who just had some "total-awake", full scale
hair transplant surgery from his ass to his scalp.
Here is what Harlow said Friday, 2 days ago:
>
Harlow wrote:
I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days than
most people who post here...
it's time to let the good times roll!
>
hanson wrote:
Hairy, hairy, but there you go, Brad. Harlow is grateful
for your comments since his "good times roll" on now
as he is able to curl his hair now.
Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahahanson
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 11:25:37 AM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 11:11 AM, hanson wrote:
>
> Harlow wrote: Geniuses like me have no need for titles.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> Brad, bald/chrome-dome Harlow has reached the age (60) when male vanity
> becomes a fethish-like fixation.
I'm still 59 and have all my hair. It IS getting thinner and finer tho.
>
> Harlow wrote: Geniuses like me have no need for titles.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> Brad, bald/chrome-dome Harlow has reached the age (60) when male vanity
> becomes a fethish-like fixation.
And grey. I consider myself very, very lucky to even be alive at this
age. So many chances in my life to die. Very lucky indeed.
> Harlow wrote:
> I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most people who
> post here...
> it's time to let the good times roll!
Painius
Oct 29, 2012, 12:11:22 PM10/29/12
to
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:18:06 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/27/2012 10:24 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>
>>> HVAC propmotes "natural selection" so for evolutionists like him, it's
>>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>>>
>>> And HVAC, what the FUCK is this long fucking tail of "returns" on all
>>> your posts? Is that so the NSA can easily find them (and the "persons
>>> of interest" you have identified) in the INTERNET mix?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
>> you all know who fits. TreBert
>
>
>Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>
>We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
>ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
>bukaki film.
Each of us should be ourselves and not "like" anybody else.
>On 10/27/2012 10:24 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
>>
>>> HVAC propmotes "natural selection" so for evolutionists like him, it's
>>> simply a matter of animal competition. And among animals the best thing
>>> for the older ones to do is die and be eaten.
>>>
>>> And HVAC, what the FUCK is this long fucking tail of "returns" on all
>>> your posts? Is that so the NSA can easily find them (and the "persons
>>> of interest" you have identified) in the INTERNET mix?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
>> you all know who fits. TreBert
>
>
>Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>
>We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
>ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
>bukaki film.
Bert and I go way back. We don't always agree, but we do usually "get
along" with each other.
I guess that's the diff, Harlow. You're too immature to be able to
get along with people, except those who are as bottish and childlike
as you are (and those whom you spoof into thinking you have your head
on straight).
O! and those who whine a lot like you do! LMFAO !
PS. Would you like a little cheese with that wine?
--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"Never be afraid to kick a friend, especially when he's down."
hanson
Oct 29, 2012, 12:18:54 PM10/29/12
to
"Harlow "HVAC" <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>
>
Brad Guth wrote:
Harlow is always smarter than everyone else combined
>
Harlow wrote:
True.
>
Brad Guth wrote:
further proof positive that he's the really smart one.
>
Harlow wrote:
Geniuses like me have no need for titles.
>
hanson wrote:
Brad, bald/chrome-dome Harlow has reached the age
(60) when male vanity becomes a fethish-like fixation.
>
Geniuses like me have no need for titles.
>
hanson wrote:
Brad, bald/chrome-dome Harlow has reached the age
(60) when male vanity becomes a fethish-like fixation.
>
So, Brad, don't get so sarcastic & aggravated over
Harlow, who just had some "total-awake", full scale
hair transplant surgery from his ass to his scalp.
>
Harlow, who just had some "total-awake", full scale
hair transplant surgery from his ass to his scalp.
>
Harlow wrote:
I'm still 59 and have all my hair. It IS getting thinner
and finer tho. And grey.
>
hanson wrote:
I'm still 59 and have all my hair. It IS getting thinner
and finer tho. And grey.
>
.... ahahahaha.. see, Harlow, what you just said, THAT is
part of the above mentioned "Male vanity"... ahahahaha..
Harlow wrote:
I consider myself very, very lucky to even be alive
at this age. So many chances in my life to die.
Very lucky indeed.
>
I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days than
most people who post here...
it's time to let the good times roll!
>
Ya baby!
>
hanson wrote:
most people who post here...
it's time to let the good times roll!
>
Ya baby!
>
.... ahahahaha... celebrate while it lasts, dude.
When your narcotics have done their job on
you and are "thru" with you, you'll curse them
and wish you'd never seen nor taken them.
Then you should & will say to "be very lucky to
even be alive"... These things are POISONS,
dude. .... High, higher, over and OUT!......
Painius
Oct 29, 2012, 12:30:39 PM10/29/12
to
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
<doub...@hush.com> wrote:
>On Oct 26, 5:11 am, "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
>> that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
>> understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
>> people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
>> nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
>> scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
>
>
>Of course there's always killfiling!
That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
<doub...@hush.com> wrote:
>On Oct 26, 5:11 am, "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have been posting for 20 years,and never before did we have people
>> that are abusive as these three. Robbin being a very kind lady can't
>> understand why we would be in the same group with such nasty low life
>> people. It could be the reason so many do not post anymore. I know
>> nightbat's family did not want him to post anymore. These three are
>> scum,and they get their kicks being nasty go figure TreBert
>
>
That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
Painius
Oct 29, 2012, 12:34:12 PM10/29/12
to
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:32:14 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/26/2012 7:10 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>>
>> Mainstream mafia rusemasters and FUD-masters of the Oligarch and ZNR
>> approved type have a very serious job to do, of keeping as many K12s
>> and others as turned off or simply excluded or banished from even
>> reading Usenet/newsgroups, and they seem to easily accomplish this
>> goal with their horrific language and X-rated context.
>
>
>'Horrific' language? You're a fucking pussy.
>
>
>
>> This is another government and even faith-based approved and sustained
>> policy of their never policing those acting as intellectual and public
>> media terrorists
>
>
>YOU may think me a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
"teachers" like you.
What a hoot! LMBO !
>On 10/26/2012 7:10 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>>
>> Mainstream mafia rusemasters and FUD-masters of the Oligarch and ZNR
>> approved type have a very serious job to do, of keeping as many K12s
>> and others as turned off or simply excluded or banished from even
>> reading Usenet/newsgroups, and they seem to easily accomplish this
>> goal with their horrific language and X-rated context.
>
>
>'Horrific' language? You're a fucking pussy.
>
>
>
>> This is another government and even faith-based approved and sustained
>> policy of their never policing those acting as intellectual and public
>> media terrorists
>
>
>YOU may think me a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
"teachers" like you.
What a hoot! LMBO !
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 12:41:48 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 12:18 PM, hanson wrote:
>
> I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most people who
> post here...
> it's time to let the good times roll!
>>
> Ya baby!
>>
> hanson wrote:
> .... ahahahaha... celebrate while it lasts, dude.
> When your narcotics have done their job on
> you and are "thru" with you, you'll curse them
> and wish you'd never seen nor taken them.
> Then you should & will say to "be very lucky to even be alive"... These
> things are POISONS,
> dude. .... High, higher, over and OUT!......
Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>
> I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most people who
> post here...
> it's time to let the good times roll!
>>
> Ya baby!
>>
> hanson wrote:
> .... ahahahaha... celebrate while it lasts, dude.
> When your narcotics have done their job on
> you and are "thru" with you, you'll curse them
> and wish you'd never seen nor taken them.
> Then you should & will say to "be very lucky to even be alive"... These
> things are POISONS,
> dude. .... High, higher, over and OUT!......
However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on powerful
pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 12:51:39 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 12:11 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>>> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
>>> you all know who fits. TreBert
>>
>>
>> Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>>
>> We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
>> ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
>> bukaki film.
>
> Each of us should be ourselves and not "like" anybody else.
You should be less gullible. You're smart enough to realize that all
>
>>> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
>>> you all know who fits. TreBert
>>
>>
>> Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>>
>> We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
>> ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
>> bukaki film.
>
> Each of us should be ourselves and not "like" anybody else.
this paranormal crap that you believe in...Excuse me, don't DISBELIEVE
in, is bullshit. Right?
> Bert and I go way back. We don't always agree, but we do usually "get
> along" with each other.
NOT point out how stupid he appears. You think it's being nice to Bert
to coddle him and offer zero criticism. I disagree. If Bert had known
someone like me who would be blunt with him when he was younger, perhaps
he would have actually accomplished something in his life besides
getting a form letter from the Vatican for his completely nonsensical
G=EMC^2.
People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 12:53:29 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 12:11 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>
> I guess that's the diff, Harlow. You're too immature to be able to
> get along with people, except those who are as bottish and childlike
> as you are (and those whom you spoof into thinking you have your head
> on straight).
I see. So anyone who disagrees with YOU, is a childish bot who are
> get along with people, except those who are as bottish and childlike
> as you are (and those whom you spoof into thinking you have your head
> on straight).
misled by being 'spoofed' by me. Brilliant!
Some think of me as a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 12:55:14 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 12:30 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>
> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>
> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
Shockingly, I *agree* with you. Vive la Liberté!
>
>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>
> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>
> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
Brad Guth
Oct 29, 2012, 12:55:20 PM10/29/12
to
On Oct 29, 8:12 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
Harlow is medicated, and is getting our best treatments that spendy
drugs can provide (naturally of course they're all public funded)
drugs can provide (naturally of course they're all public funded)
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 2:00:19 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 12:55 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
> Harlow is medicated, and is getting our best treatments that spendy
> drugs can provide (naturally of course they're all public funded)
Goth, you should feel proud that I receive nothing but the best in
>
>
> Harlow is medicated, and is getting our best treatments that spendy
> drugs can provide (naturally of course they're all public funded)
health care.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 2:05:49 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 12:34 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>> YOU may think me a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
>
> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
> "teachers" like you.
Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>
>> YOU may think me a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
>
> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
> "teachers" like you.
Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
hanson
Oct 29, 2012, 2:38:45 PM10/29/12
to
"HVAC" <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
-- hanson wrote:
>>
Harlow wrote:
>> I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days
>> than most people who post here...
>> it's time to let the good times roll!
>> Ya baby!
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> .... ahahahaha... celebrate while it lasts, dude.
>> When your narcotics have done their job on
>> you and are "thru" with you, you'll curse them
>> and wish you'd never seen nor taken them.
>> Then you should & will say to "be very lucky to
>> even be alive"... These things are POISONS,
>> dude. .... High, higher, over and OUT!......
>
Harlow wrote:
>> I bet I've used more narcotics in the last 5 days
>> than most people who post here...
>> it's time to let the good times roll!
>> Ya baby!
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> .... ahahahaha... celebrate while it lasts, dude.
>> When your narcotics have done their job on
>> you and are "thru" with you, you'll curse them
>> and wish you'd never seen nor taken them.
>> Then you should & will say to "be very lucky to
>> even be alive"... These things are POISONS,
>> dude. .... High, higher, over and OUT!......
>
Harlow wrote:
> Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>
> However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on powerful
> pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
> name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
> I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
> Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
>
> These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
>
hanson wrote:
> Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>
> However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on powerful
> pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
> name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
> I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
> Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
>
> These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
>
10-4. I wish you fast & total recovery. Good luck!
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 3:39:09 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 2:38 PM, hanson wrote:
>
> Harlow wrote:
>> Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>>
>> However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on
>> powerful pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
>> name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
>> I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
>> Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
>>
>> These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> 10-4. I wish you fast & total recovery. Good luck!
I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>
> Harlow wrote:
>> Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>>
>> However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on
>> powerful pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
>> name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
>> I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
>> Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
>>
>> These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
>>
> hanson wrote:
> 10-4. I wish you fast & total recovery. Good luck!
hanson
Oct 29, 2012, 4:25:19 PM10/29/12
to
Harlow "HVAC" <hv...@physisist.net> wrote in message
news:k6mm0t$l8b$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...
> On 10/29/2012 2:38 PM, hanson wrote:
>>
>
>> Harlow wrote:
>>> Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>>>
>>> However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on
>>> powerful pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
>>> name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
>>> I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
>>> Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
>>>
>>> These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> 10-4. I wish you fast & total recovery. Good luck!
>
>>
>
>> Harlow wrote:
>>> Thank you for your concern, Mr. Hanson. I appreciate it.
>>>
>>> However, this isn't my first rodeo nor surgery. I have been on
>>> powerful pain relieving medications before. Morphine and Dilaudid to
>>> name a couple. Currently I have both Vicodin and Percocet at home.
>>> I stopped taking the Percocet yesterday. I will continue with the
>>> Vicodin until I phase it out over the next week or so.
>>>
>>> These drugs are there for a reason. Use them, don't abuse them.
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> 10-4. I wish you fast & total recovery. Good luck!
>
Harlow wrote:
> I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>
hanson wrote:
> I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>
Do you mind posting then what they operated on
you for, that needed fully awake consciousness
during surgery and then caused you pain to the
point of "puking", which was so bad that you have
"used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most
people who post here"...... but now 1 week later
made you "pretty much almost recovered"
>
Of course, if it's embarrassing you need not to
reply. But I do ask since you aren't exactly a
person that is shy and easily embarrassed.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 4:57:02 PM10/29/12
to
No big deal.
Jeff-Relf.Me
Oct 29, 2012, 5:14:16 PM10/29/12
to
[Jeff-R...@Oct.29.Seattle{2.14.PM.2012}]
An illustration of HVAC's carotid artery:
http://www.riversideonline.com/source/images/image_popup/ans7_carotid_artery-dissection.jpg
An illustration of HVAC's carotid artery:
http://www.riversideonline.com/source/images/image_popup/ans7_carotid_artery-dissection.jpg
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 29, 2012, 5:28:49 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 3:57 PM, HVAC wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 4:25 PM, hanson wrote:
>>
>> Harlow wrote:
>>> I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> Do you mind posting then what they operated on
>> you for, that needed fully awake consciousness
>> during surgery and then caused you pain to the
>> point of "puking", which was so bad that you have
>> "used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most
>> people who post here"...... but now 1 week later
>> made you "pretty much almost recovered"
>>>
>> Of course, if it's embarrassing you need not to
>> reply. But I do ask since you aren't exactly a
>> person that is shy and easily embarrassed.
>
>
> They cut open my carotid artery and roto-rooted it.
>
> No big deal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
No big deal my ass! Are you kidding? Reduced circulation to the
> On 10/29/2012 4:25 PM, hanson wrote:
>>
>> Harlow wrote:
>>> I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> Do you mind posting then what they operated on
>> you for, that needed fully awake consciousness
>> during surgery and then caused you pain to the
>> point of "puking", which was so bad that you have
>> "used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most
>> people who post here"...... but now 1 week later
>> made you "pretty much almost recovered"
>>>
>> Of course, if it's embarrassing you need not to
>> reply. But I do ask since you aren't exactly a
>> person that is shy and easily embarrassed.
>
>
> They cut open my carotid artery and roto-rooted it.
>
> No big deal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
brain? This explains EVERYTHING you've posted here!
Now all we need to determine is how much of that magnificent brain is
now necrotic tissue. I'm sure a diagnosis can be made from the content
of your current posts.
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 29, 2012, 5:30:09 PM10/29/12
to
Hubris. Followed inevitably and inexorably by nemesis.
hanson
Oct 29, 2012, 5:48:54 PM10/29/12
to
"HVAC" <hv...@physisist.net> wrote in message
news:k6mqis$m2e$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...
> On 10/29/2012 4:25 PM, hanson wrote:
>>
Harlow wrote:
I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>>>
hanson wrote:
Do you mind posting then what they operated on
you for, that needed fully awake consciousness
during surgery and then caused you pain to the
point of "puking", which was so bad that you have
"used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most
people who post here"...... but now 1 week later
made you "pretty much almost recovered"
>>>
Of course, if it's embarrassing you need not to
reply. But I do ask since you aren't exactly a
person that is shy and easily embarrassed.
>
>>
Harlow wrote:
I'm pretty much almost recovered. I went fishing Friday.
>>>
hanson wrote:
Do you mind posting then what they operated on
you for, that needed fully awake consciousness
during surgery and then caused you pain to the
point of "puking", which was so bad that you have
"used more narcotics in the last 5 days than most
people who post here"...... but now 1 week later
made you "pretty much almost recovered"
>>>
Of course, if it's embarrassing you need not to
reply. But I do ask since you aren't exactly a
person that is shy and easily embarrassed.
>
Harlow wrote:
They cut open my carotid artery and roto-rooted it.
No big deal.
>
They cut open my carotid artery and roto-rooted it.
No big deal.
>
[Jeff-R...@Oct.29.Seattle{2.14.PM.2012}] wrote:
An illustration of HVAC's carotid artery:
<http://www.riversideonline.com/source/images/image_popup/ans7_carotid_artery-dissection.jpg>
>
hanson wrote:
An illustration of HVAC's carotid artery:
<http://www.riversideonline.com/source/images/image_popup/ans7_carotid_artery-dissection.jpg>
>
Harlow, "No big deal"?... ahahaha...
Your drugs still cloud your judgment!
They needed you to be awake for good
reason. One slight fuck-up on their part
or one little piece of cholesterol plaque
braking lose & entering your brain...&
... you would have taken your last warm
shit... and if lucky, your self-announced
IQ of 400 would have dropped down to
the level of plant life.
Thanks for the info though.
HVAC
Oct 29, 2012, 7:13:49 PM10/29/12
to
On 10/29/2012 5:28 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>>
>> No big deal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> No big deal my ass! Are you kidding? Reduced circulation to the brain?
> This explains EVERYTHING you've posted here!
There is plenty of built in redundancy in the human body. I thanked my
>
>>
>> No big deal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> No big deal my ass! Are you kidding? Reduced circulation to the brain?
> This explains EVERYTHING you've posted here!
doctor today for watching out for me and ordering the tests that
discovered this condition. Again, it's good to have the very best in
health care.
> Now all we need to determine is how much of that magnificent brain is
> now necrotic tissue. I'm sure a diagnosis can be made from the content
> of your current posts.
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 1:24:30 AM10/30/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:51:39 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/29/2012 12:11 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
>>>> you all know who fits. TreBert
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>>>
>>> We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
>>> ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
>>> bukaki film.
>>
>> Each of us should be ourselves and not "like" anybody else.
>
>
>You should be less gullible. You're smart enough to realize that all
>this paranormal crap that you believe in...Excuse me, don't DISBELIEVE
>in, is bullshit. Right?
>
>
>> Bert and I go way back. We don't always agree, but we do usually "get
>> along" with each other.
>
>
>Exactly, you have this foolish notion that it's being nice to Bert to
>NOT point out how stupid he appears. You think it's being nice to Bert
>to coddle him and offer zero criticism. I disagree. If Bert had known
>someone like me who would be blunt with him when he was younger, perhaps
>he would have actually accomplished something in his life besides
>getting a form letter from the Vatican for his completely nonsensical
>G=EMC^2.
>
>People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
>On 10/29/2012 12:11 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>> Your a shit head and should make that 4 low wit rats.But in reality
>>>> you all know who fits. TreBert
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyone who points out Bert's foolishness is a 'low wit rat'.
>>>
>>> We should all be like Painus and allow/encourage all the kooky and wrong
>>> ideas that Bert spooges over these groups like the target girl in a jap
>>> bukaki film.
>>
>> Each of us should be ourselves and not "like" anybody else.
>
>
>You should be less gullible. You're smart enough to realize that all
>this paranormal crap that you believe in...Excuse me, don't DISBELIEVE
>in, is bullshit. Right?
>
>
>> Bert and I go way back. We don't always agree, but we do usually "get
>> along" with each other.
>
>
>Exactly, you have this foolish notion that it's being nice to Bert to
>NOT point out how stupid he appears. You think it's being nice to Bert
>to coddle him and offer zero criticism. I disagree. If Bert had known
>someone like me who would be blunt with him when he was younger, perhaps
>he would have actually accomplished something in his life besides
>getting a form letter from the Vatican for his completely nonsensical
>G=EMC^2.
>
>People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 1:25:27 AM10/30/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:53:29 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/29/2012 12:11 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>> I guess that's the diff, Harlow. You're too immature to be able to
>> get along with people, except those who are as bottish and childlike
>> as you are (and those whom you spoof into thinking you have your head
>> on straight).
>
>I see. So anyone who disagrees with YOU, is a childish bot who are
>misled by being 'spoofed' by me. Brilliant!
>
>Some think of me as a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
I consider you neither.
>On 10/29/2012 12:11 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>> I guess that's the diff, Harlow. You're too immature to be able to
>> get along with people, except those who are as bottish and childlike
>> as you are (and those whom you spoof into thinking you have your head
>> on straight).
>
>I see. So anyone who disagrees with YOU, is a childish bot who are
>misled by being 'spoofed' by me. Brilliant!
>
>Some think of me as a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 1:27:46 AM10/30/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:55:14 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/29/2012 12:30 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>>
>> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
>> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>>
>> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
>> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
>
>Shockingly, I *agree* with you. Vive la Liberté!
I'm not shocked at all.
>On 10/29/2012 12:30 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>>
>> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
>> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>>
>> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
>> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
>
>Shockingly, I *agree* with you. Vive la Liberté!
The shocking part is when you *don't* agree with me! <G>
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 1:30:36 AM10/30/12
to
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:05:49 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/29/2012 12:34 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> YOU may think me a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
>>
>> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
>> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
>> "teachers" like you.
>
>Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>
>Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
>agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
>up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
Why is it that Kookstone Kopps like yourself always prove that they
>On 10/29/2012 12:34 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> YOU may think me a terrorist, I consider myself a teacher.
>>
>> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
>> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
>> "teachers" like you.
>
>Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>
>Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
>agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
>up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
are far worse in character than any "kook" they ever "busted"?
Relayer447
Oct 30, 2012, 5:23:28 AM10/30/12
to
On 10/29/12 11:30 AM, Painius wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>
> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>
> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
>
Kill filing is also for ppl who value their time, and don't want to waste
>
> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>
> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
>
even 1 second wading through trolls and idiots crapola to find posts
that may be worth reading. Same as using a spam filter.
R447
HVAC
Oct 30, 2012, 6:29:11 AM10/30/12
to
On 10/30/2012 1:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>
>> People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
>
> So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
Good. I'm glad we have some common ground. The fact that YOU believe
>
>> People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
>
> So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
that Bert is barely literate is a good place to start our reconciliation
As for me, I never make excuses.
HVAC
Oct 30, 2012, 6:31:59 AM10/30/12
to
On 10/30/2012 1:30 AM, Painius wrote:
>
>>> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
>>> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
>>> "teachers" like you.
>>
>> Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>>
>> Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
>> agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
>> up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
>
> Why is it that Kookstone Kopps like yourself always prove that they
> are far worse in character than any "kook" they ever "busted"?
So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>
>>> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
>>> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
>>> "teachers" like you.
>>
>> Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>>
>> Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
>> agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
>> up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
>
> Why is it that Kookstone Kopps like yourself always prove that they
> are far worse in character than any "kook" they ever "busted"?
protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 2:42:09 PM10/30/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:29:11 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/30/2012 1:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
>>
>> So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
>
>Good. I'm glad we have some common ground. The fact that YOU believe
>that Bert is barely literate is a good place to start our reconciliation
>
>As for me, I never make excuses.
Yeah, I noticed that about you. And I suppose you think that makes
>On 10/30/2012 1:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
>>
>> So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
>
>Good. I'm glad we have some common ground. The fact that YOU believe
>that Bert is barely literate is a good place to start our reconciliation
>
>As for me, I never make excuses.
you a "tough" guy, right?
You try to screw with people's heads, but you don't have enough of a
psychological background to be successful.
You regularly plagiarize scientific publications, and you don't have
the sense to realize that there are plenty of people out there who
make it their life's goal to nab the likes of you (your "ilk"? lol).
You commit copyright infringement, and you justify it by trying to
turn the tables on anyone who warns you and confronts you with it.
You're a crook, a thief, and a very bad impersonator of a human being.
In short, you're a bot - a trollerbot...
Fun to play with, however *not* to *ever* be taken seriously.
LMBO !
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 2:53:24 PM10/30/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:23:28 -0500, Relayer447 <R4...@your.service>
wrote:
Sorry, but that's just an excuse. If you like, then call it "fear of
spam". It's still fear, nonetheless.
wrote:
spam". It's still fear, nonetheless.
Painius
Oct 30, 2012, 3:01:10 PM10/30/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:31:59 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/30/2012 1:30 AM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
>>>> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
>>>> "teachers" like you.
>>>
>>> Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>>>
>>> Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
>>> agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
>>> up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
>>
>> Why is it that Kookstone Kopps like yourself always prove that they
>> are far worse in character than any "kook" they ever "busted"?
>
>So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
I really wish I *was* lying, Harlow. Fact is, there was a time way
>On 10/30/2012 1:30 AM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>> That's irrelevant, you pompous ass. Children used to read this
>>>> newsgroup until their parents put a stop to it precisely because of
>>>> "teachers" like you.
>>>
>>> Of course you'll have no problems providing names, right?
>>>
>>> Why is that kooks and religious freaks like you love to say that your
>>> agenda is 'the children'? I already know that you just made that story
>>> up...Who exactly did you think you were fooling?
>>
>> Why is it that Kookstone Kopps like yourself always prove that they
>> are far worse in character than any "kook" they ever "busted"?
>
>So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
before you started posting here when young people would read and post
to alt.astronomy with a view to learning about the sky, and to hear
things about cutting edge astronomy. They didn't care much for the
sci.* groups because the likes of Uncle Al would always tell them to
"do their own homework". We in alt.astronomy welcomed their questions
and either answered them or steered the kids to where they could
discover the answers.
Your denial only shows your distinct lack of character. You *wish* I
wasn't lying, but wishing it don't make it so, trollerbot.
Brad Guth
Oct 30, 2012, 3:04:56 PM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30, 11:42 am, Painius <starswir...@aol.com> wrote:
because that's exactly what liars and FUD-master do best. Faith-based
cults and cabals often make it their policy to never police their own
kind.
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:29:11 -0400, HVAC <h...@physisist.net> wrote:
> >On 10/30/2012 1:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>
> >>> People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
>
> >> So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
>
> >Good. I'm glad we have some common ground. The fact that YOU believe
> >that Bert is barely literate is a good place to start our reconciliation
>
> >As for me, I never make excuses.
>
> Yeah, I noticed that about you. And I suppose you think that makes
> you a "tough" guy, right?
>
> You try to screw with people's heads, but you don't have enough of a
> psychological background to be successful.
>
> You regularly plagiarize scientific publications, and you don't have
> the sense to realize that there are plenty of people out there who
> make it their life's goal to nab the likes of you (your "ilk"? lol).
>
> You commit copyright infringement, and you justify it by trying to
> turn the tables on anyone who warns you and confronts you with it.
>
> You're a crook, a thief, and a very bad impersonator of a human being.
> In short, you're a bot - a trollerbot...
>
> Fun to play with, however *not* to *ever* be taken seriously.
>
> LMBO !
>
> --
> Indelibly yours,
> Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
> >On 10/30/2012 1:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>
> >>> People like YOU are the reason that Bert is semi-literate.
>
> >> So, what's *your* excuse, again? LMAO !
>
> >Good. I'm glad we have some common ground. The fact that YOU believe
> >that Bert is barely literate is a good place to start our reconciliation
>
> >As for me, I never make excuses.
>
> Yeah, I noticed that about you. And I suppose you think that makes
> you a "tough" guy, right?
>
> You try to screw with people's heads, but you don't have enough of a
> psychological background to be successful.
>
> You regularly plagiarize scientific publications, and you don't have
> the sense to realize that there are plenty of people out there who
> make it their life's goal to nab the likes of you (your "ilk"? lol).
>
> You commit copyright infringement, and you justify it by trying to
> turn the tables on anyone who warns you and confronts you with it.
>
> You're a crook, a thief, and a very bad impersonator of a human being.
> In short, you're a bot - a trollerbot...
>
> Fun to play with, however *not* to *ever* be taken seriously.
>
> LMBO !
>
> --
> Indelibly yours,
> "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
In other words, he's quite Jewish but gets to pretend being an Atheist
because that's exactly what liars and FUD-master do best. Faith-based
cults and cabals often make it their policy to never police their own
kind.
HVAC
Oct 30, 2012, 3:44:17 PM10/30/12
to
On 10/30/2012 2:42 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>> As for me, I never make excuses.
>
> Yeah, I noticed that about you. And I suppose you think that makes
> you a "tough" guy, right?
Well, I am a 'tough guy'. Mentally as well as physically.
>
>> As for me, I never make excuses.
>
> Yeah, I noticed that about you. And I suppose you think that makes
> you a "tough" guy, right?
I don't make excuses because they get you nowhere.
> You try to screw with people's heads, but you don't have enough of a
> psychological background to be successful.
insofar as I wish to bring balance to alt.astronomy. You and your kook
friends like to float a lot of trial balloons.
I am the pin.
> You regularly plagiarize scientific publications, and you don't have
> the sense to realize that there are plenty of people out there who
> make it their life's goal to nab the likes of you (your "ilk"? lol).
someone's head. May I point out to YOU that the only training in the law
that YOU ever got was when a cop read you your Miranda Rights.
Therefore as far as the law goes, you can shut the fuck up.
> You commit copyright infringement, and you justify it by trying to
> turn the tables on anyone who warns you and confronts you with it.
> You're a crook, a thief
HVAC
Oct 30, 2012, 3:50:56 PM10/30/12
to
On 10/30/2012 3:01 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>> So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>> protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
>
> I really wish I *was* lying, Harlow. Fact is, there was a time way
> before you started posting here when young people would read and post
> to alt.astronomy with a view to learning about the sky
Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>
>> So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>> protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
>
> I really wish I *was* lying, Harlow. Fact is, there was a time way
> before you started posting here when young people would read and post
> to alt.astronomy with a view to learning about the sky
> and to hear
> things about cutting edge astronomy.
bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
I illuminate. You're welcome.
Jeff-Relf.Me
Oct 30, 2012, 4:21:29 PM10/30/12
to
[Jeff-R...@Oct.30{1.21.PM.Seattle.2012}]
Painius, my Darla, Usenet is mostly male.
Usenet is a free⋅for⋅all, a fist fight, more so than anywhere else.
It's nothing like WikiPedia, so it's not indexed like WikiPedia.
Everyday, Usenetters upload tera⋅bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
Painius, my Darla, Usenet is mostly male.
Usenet is a free⋅for⋅all, a fist fight, more so than anywhere else.
It's nothing like WikiPedia, so it's not indexed like WikiPedia.
Everyday, Usenetters upload tera⋅bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
Brad Guth
Oct 30, 2012, 5:26:25 PM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30, 1:21 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.30{1.21.PM.Seattle.2012}]
Except you treat Usenet/newsgroups like a tourette sponsored food
fight, when most everyone else is acting responsibly and essentially
behaving themselves.
> [Jeff-Relf...@Oct.30{1.21.PM.Seattle.2012}]
fight, when most everyone else is acting responsibly and essentially
behaving themselves.
Painius
Oct 31, 2012, 3:24:18 AM10/31/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:50:56 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/30/2012 3:01 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>>> protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
>>
>> I really wish I *was* lying, Harlow. Fact is, there was a time way
>> before you started posting here when young people would read and post
>> to alt.astronomy with a view to learning about the sky
>
>
>Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>
>
>> and to hear
>> things about cutting edge astronomy.
>
>
>Yes. This is exactly why I am here. To prevent the dissemination of
>bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
>I illuminate. You're welcome.
That's a lie, as you confessed earlier when you specifically stated
>On 10/30/2012 3:01 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> So you don't have the names of all the 'children' that you are
>>> protecting? That's why I asked, I knew you were lying.
>>
>> I really wish I *was* lying, Harlow. Fact is, there was a time way
>> before you started posting here when young people would read and post
>> to alt.astronomy with a view to learning about the sky
>
>
>Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>
>
>> and to hear
>> things about cutting edge astronomy.
>
>
>Yes. This is exactly why I am here. To prevent the dissemination of
>bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
>I illuminate. You're welcome.
that you don't give a fuck.
You're not here to illuminate, or if you really are here to
illuminate, you're not the least bit good at it. You just shovel your
shit from here to there. Those who are on to you are those with good
noses for the shit you shovel.
If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
newsgroups.
Maybe it would help if you could provide more information about what
you do as a scientist? What branch(es) of TA do you work in? What
cosmic mystery(ies) do you presently study and "theorize" in? You
might even provide us with the website of a school, institute and/or
lab you presently work in, or one that you have worked in before. The
TA websites that I've read have long lists of names of their faculty,
their researchers and the visitors to their facilities.
The fact that I've never encountered your name in any of those
websites could merely indicate that "Harlow Campbell" is not your
real-life name, or it might just mean that I have yet to encounter the
websites where your name is listed.
So enlighten me, Harlow, or, in your words, "illuminate".
"Habits are chains, too weak to be felt, too strong to be broken."
Relayer447
Oct 31, 2012, 5:28:35 AM10/31/12
to
On 10/30/12 1:53 PM, Painius wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:23:28 -0500, Relayer447 <R4...@your.service>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/29/12 11:30 AM, Painius wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
>>
>>>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>>>
>>> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
>>> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>>>
>>> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
>>> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
>>
>> Kill filing is also for ppl who value their time, and don't want to waste
>> even 1 second wading through trolls and idiots crapola to find posts
>> that may be worth reading. Same as using a spam filter.
>> R447
>
> Sorry, but that's just an excuse. If you like, then call it "fear of
> spam". It's still fear, nonetheless.
>
Excuse? Damn. Unbelievable. Whatever. By the way, I don't have anybody
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 04:23:28 -0500, Relayer447 <R4...@your.service>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/29/12 11:30 AM, Painius wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT), Double-A
>>
>>>> Of course there's always killfiling!
>>>
>>> That was invented for the fearful, AA, for people who are deathly
>>> afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
>>>
>>> If one wants to live in a fantasy world, then by all means, they
>>> should start killfiling those of whom they're deathly afraid.
>>
>> Kill filing is also for ppl who value their time, and don't want to waste
>> even 1 second wading through trolls and idiots crapola to find posts
>> that may be worth reading. Same as using a spam filter.
>> R447
>
> Sorry, but that's just an excuse. If you like, then call it "fear of
> spam". It's still fear, nonetheless.
>
from this newsgroup on killfile, but do have a few from other newsgroups
on this ng server.
R447
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 9:27:21 AM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 3:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>
>> Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>>
>>
>>> and to hear
>>> things about cutting edge astronomy.
>>
>>
>> Yes. This is exactly why I am here. To prevent the dissemination of
>> bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
>> I illuminate. You're welcome.
>
> That's a lie, as you confessed earlier when you specifically stated
> that you don't give a fuck.
See above. That was said in the context of your 'trip down memory lane'.
>
>> Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>>
>>
>>> and to hear
>>> things about cutting edge astronomy.
>>
>>
>> Yes. This is exactly why I am here. To prevent the dissemination of
>> bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
>> I illuminate. You're welcome.
>
> That's a lie, as you confessed earlier when you specifically stated
> that you don't give a fuck.
Apology accepted in advance.
> If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
> here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
> all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
> newsgroups.
> Maybe it would help if you could provide more information about what
> you do as a scientist? What branch(es) of TA do you work in? What
> cosmic mystery(ies) do you presently study and "theorize" in? You
> might even provide us with the website of a school, institute and/or
> lab you presently work in, or one that you have worked in before. The
> TA websites that I've read have long lists of names of their faculty,
> their researchers and the visitors to their facilities.
> The fact that I've never encountered your name in any of those
> websites could merely indicate that "Harlow Campbell" is not your
> real-life name, or it might just mean that I have yet to encounter the
> websites where your name is listed.
>
> So enlighten me, Harlow, or, in your words, "illuminate".
Painius
Oct 31, 2012, 12:16:42 PM10/31/12
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 04:28:35 -0500, Relayer447 <R4...@your.service>
lol
Then you probably haven't been reading a.a for very long.
Kooks and Kookstone Kopps have turned it into an astronomical farce.
(pun intended)
It's just that some of us have been posting here for so long that we
can't seem to break ourselves away from it.
How about you? Do you have any particular attraction to astronomy?
Then you probably haven't been reading a.a for very long.
Kooks and Kookstone Kopps have turned it into an astronomical farce.
(pun intended)
It's just that some of us have been posting here for so long that we
can't seem to break ourselves away from it.
How about you? Do you have any particular attraction to astronomy?
Painius
Oct 31, 2012, 12:24:44 PM10/31/12
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:27:21 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/31/2012 3:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>>>
>>>
>>>> and to hear
>>>> things about cutting edge astronomy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. This is exactly why I am here. To prevent the dissemination of
>>> bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
>>> I illuminate. You're welcome.
>>
>> That's a lie, as you confessed earlier when you specifically stated
>> that you don't give a fuck.
>
>See above. That was said in the context of your 'trip down memory lane'.
>
>Apology accepted in advance.
And you can't even remotely understand that it is you who should
>On 10/31/2012 3:24 AM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>> Spare me your trip down memory lane. I don't give a fuck.
>>>
>>>
>>>> and to hear
>>>> things about cutting edge astronomy.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. This is exactly why I am here. To prevent the dissemination of
>>> bullshit by the likes of you and you kooks pals. Where you obfuscate,
>>> I illuminate. You're welcome.
>>
>> That's a lie, as you confessed earlier when you specifically stated
>> that you don't give a fuck.
>
>See above. That was said in the context of your 'trip down memory lane'.
>
>Apology accepted in advance.
apologize. LMBO !
>> If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
>> here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
>> all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
>> newsgroups.
>
>Says who? You? I don't give a fuck what YOU say.
then you would ignore my posts.
>> Maybe it would help if you could provide more information about what
>> you do as a scientist? What branch(es) of TA do you work in? What
>> cosmic mystery(ies) do you presently study and "theorize" in? You
>> might even provide us with the website of a school, institute and/or
>> lab you presently work in, or one that you have worked in before. The
>> TA websites that I've read have long lists of names of their faculty,
>> their researchers and the visitors to their facilities.
>
>I am currently quite happily retired.
be listed in some capacity somewhere on some TA website.
>> The fact that I've never encountered your name in any of those
>> websites could merely indicate that "Harlow Campbell" is not your
>> real-life name, or it might just mean that I have yet to encounter the
>> websites where your name is listed.
>>
>> So enlighten me, Harlow, or, in your words, "illuminate".
>
>Request denied.
Or, it most likely means that you're a complete fraud who has never
trained as any kind of scientist. You're such a friggin' frump!
LMAO !
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 12:38:52 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 12:16 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>> Excuse? Damn. Unbelievable. Whatever. By the way, I don't have anybody
>>from this newsgroup on killfile, but do have a few from other newsgroups
>> on this ng server.
>> R447
>
> lol
>
> Then you probably haven't been reading a.a for very long.
>
> Kooks and Kookstone Kopps have turned it into an astronomical farce.
> (pun intended)
What has turned this into a farce is Painus and his band of kook
>
>> Excuse? Damn. Unbelievable. Whatever. By the way, I don't have anybody
>>from this newsgroup on killfile, but do have a few from other newsgroups
>> on this ng server.
>> R447
>
> lol
>
> Then you probably haven't been reading a.a for very long.
>
> Kooks and Kookstone Kopps have turned it into an astronomical farce.
> (pun intended)
brothers. Painus like to be 'edgy' and if that means making up facts to
support his kooky ideas, so be it.
His belief in god, his belief in FTL travel, his belief that the big
bang never happened, his belief that the universe is NOT expanding, all
of these and more should be given equal treatment with mainstream
physics and astronomy, is Painus' rallying cry.
If you've got a kooky idea, Painus is ready to accept it.
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 12:44:59 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 12:24 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>>> If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
>>> here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
>>> all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
>>> newsgroups.
>>
>> Says who? You? I don't give a fuck what YOU say.
>
> All evidence to the contrary. If you *really* didn't care what I say,
> then you would ignore my posts.
On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>
>>> If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
>>> here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
>>> all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
>>> newsgroups.
>>
>> Says who? You? I don't give a fuck what YOU say.
>
> All evidence to the contrary. If you *really* didn't care what I say,
> then you would ignore my posts.
honesty, logic and evidence.
>>> Maybe it would help if you could provide more information about what
>>> you do as a scientist? What branch(es) of TA do you work in? What
>>> cosmic mystery(ies) do you presently study and "theorize" in? You
>>> might even provide us with the website of a school, institute and/or
>>> lab you presently work in, or one that you have worked in before. The
>>> TA websites that I've read have long lists of names of their faculty,
>>> their researchers and the visitors to their facilities.
>>
>> I am currently quite happily retired.
>
> Did you retire before the Internet?
> Even if you're retired, you would
> be listed in some capacity somewhere on some TA website.
contractors and labeled with a secret classification.
>>> So enlighten me, Harlow, or, in your words, "illuminate".
>>
>> Request denied.
>
> That *could* be because you want to continue to enjoy your privacy.
Christopher A. Lee
Oct 31, 2012, 12:49:43 PM10/31/12
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:44:59 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/31/2012 12:24 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>> If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
>>>> here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
>>>> all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
>>>> newsgroups.
>>>
>>> Says who? You? I don't give a fuck what YOU say.
>>
>> All evidence to the contrary. If you *really* didn't care what I say,
>> then you would ignore my posts.
>
>On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>honesty, logic and evidence.
It is sheer arrogance and sociopathy for somebody to (metaphorically)
>On 10/31/2012 12:24 PM, Painius wrote:
>>
>>>> If you truly understood "theoretical astrophysics", then you would be
>>>> here to join in and speculate about all things astronomy. Instead,
>>>> all you do is spread your fecal matter all over this and other
>>>> newsgroups.
>>>
>>> Says who? You? I don't give a fuck what YOU say.
>>
>> All evidence to the contrary. If you *really* didn't care what I say,
>> then you would ignore my posts.
>
>On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>honesty, logic and evidence.
crash our apartment, shit on the carpet and tell people who don't like
it to ignore it.
His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
to.
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 12:54:59 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 12:49 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>
>> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>> honesty, logic and evidence.
>
> It is sheer arrogance and sociopathy for somebody to (metaphorically)
> crash our apartment, shit on the carpet and tell people who don't like
> it to ignore it.
>
> His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
> to.
I agree. Painus is an asshole.
>
>> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>> honesty, logic and evidence.
>
> It is sheer arrogance and sociopathy for somebody to (metaphorically)
> crash our apartment, shit on the carpet and tell people who don't like
> it to ignore it.
>
> His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
> to.
Christopher A. Lee
Oct 31, 2012, 12:59:58 PM10/31/12
to
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:54:59 -0400, HVAC <hv...@physisist.net> wrote:
>On 10/31/2012 12:49 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>
>>> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>>> honesty, logic and evidence.
>>
>> It is sheer arrogance and sociopathy for somebody to (metaphorically)
>> crash our apartment, shit on the carpet and tell people who don't like
>> it to ignore it.
>>
>> His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
>> to.
>
>I agree. Painus is an asshole.
The question is, why?
>On 10/31/2012 12:49 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>
>>> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>>> honesty, logic and evidence.
>>
>> It is sheer arrogance and sociopathy for somebody to (metaphorically)
>> crash our apartment, shit on the carpet and tell people who don't like
>> it to ignore it.
>>
>> His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
>> to.
>
>I agree. Painus is an asshole.
Unfortunately the Internet has given village idiots a world-wide
audience, not just their neighbours or the folk in the bar.
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 1:07:07 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 12:59 PM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>
>>> His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
>>> to.
>>
>> I agree. Painus is an asshole.
>
> The question is, why?
Cause he's a kook. That's what kooks do.
>
>>> His stupidity is off-topic in all three of the newsgroups he posts it
>>> to.
>>
>> I agree. Painus is an asshole.
>
> The question is, why?
> Unfortunately the Internet has given village idiots a world-wide
> audience, not just their neighbours or the folk in the bar.
They're not as patient and compassionate as I am......
Painius
Oct 31, 2012, 1:12:19 PM10/31/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:21:29 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>?[Jeff-R...@Oct.30{1.21.PM.Seattle.2012}]
plagiarism and copyright infringement under *any* circumstances.
It doesn't matter if they're retired scientists, either.
Ergo, those who commit those crimes are not scientists with good
character, and probably not scientists at all. I'm just sayin'.
And don't call me "Darla"!
LOL !
"UseNet does not change; we change."
>?[Jeff-R...@Oct.30{1.21.PM.Seattle.2012}]
>Painius, my Darla, Usenet is mostly male.
>
>Usenet is a free?for?all, a fist fight, more so than anywhere else.
>
>It's nothing like WikiPedia, so it's not indexed like WikiPedia.
>
>Everyday, Usenetters upload tera?bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
>
>No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
I know no scientists who are of good character who commit scientific
plagiarism and copyright infringement under *any* circumstances.
It doesn't matter if they're retired scientists, either.
Ergo, those who commit those crimes are not scientists with good
character, and probably not scientists at all. I'm just sayin'.
And don't call me "Darla"!
LOL !
"UseNet does not change; we change."
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 2:10:38 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 1:12 PM, Painius wrote:
>
>> Everyday, Usenetters upload tera?bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
>> No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
>
> I know no scientists who are of good character who commit scientific
> plagiarism and copyright infringement under *any* circumstances.
>
> It doesn't matter if they're retired scientists, either.
>
> Ergo, those who commit those crimes are not scientists with good
> character, and probably not scientists at all. I'm just sayin'.
>
> And don't call me "Darla"!
Hey! I just noticed the thread title. Good one, Jeff.
>
>> Everyday, Usenetters upload tera?bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
>> No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
>
> I know no scientists who are of good character who commit scientific
> plagiarism and copyright infringement under *any* circumstances.
>
> It doesn't matter if they're retired scientists, either.
>
> Ergo, those who commit those crimes are not scientists with good
> character, and probably not scientists at all. I'm just sayin'.
>
> And don't call me "Darla"!
Brad Guth
Oct 31, 2012, 2:16:39 PM10/31/12
to
On Oct 31, 10:12 am, Painius <starswir...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:21:29 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> >?[Jeff-Relf...@Oct.30{1.21.PM.Seattle.2012}]
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:21:29 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
> >Painius, my Darla, Usenet is mostly male.
>
> >Usenet is a free?for?all, a fist fight, more so than anywhere else.
> >It's nothing like WikiPedia, so it's not indexed like WikiPedia.
>
> >Everyday, Usenetters upload tera?bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
> >No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
>
> I know no scientists who are of good character who commit scientific
> plagiarism and copyright infringement under *any* circumstances.
>
> It doesn't matter if they're retired scientists, either.
>
> Ergo, those who commit those crimes are not scientists with good
> character, and probably not scientists at all. I'm just sayin'.
>
> And don't call me "Darla"!
>
> LOL !
>
> --
> Indelibly yours,
> Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
>
> >Usenet is a free?for?all, a fist fight, more so than anywhere else.
> >It's nothing like WikiPedia, so it's not indexed like WikiPedia.
>
> >Everyday, Usenetters upload tera?bytes of copyrighted material, without permission.
> >No one gets caught, no one is punished. Usenet is censor proof.
>
> I know no scientists who are of good character who commit scientific
> plagiarism and copyright infringement under *any* circumstances.
>
> It doesn't matter if they're retired scientists, either.
>
> Ergo, those who commit those crimes are not scientists with good
> character, and probably not scientists at all. I'm just sayin'.
>
> And don't call me "Darla"!
>
> LOL !
>
> --
> Indelibly yours,
> "UseNet does not change; we change."
Jeff that sees nothing wrong with plagiarism or pirating is only here
to hijack topics and to make all others feel unwelcome or inferior.
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 2:28:33 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 2:16 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
> Jeff that sees nothing wrong with plagiarism or pirating is only here
> to hijack topics and to make all others feel unwelcome or inferior.
Gee, Goth... I'd have figured that you'd be used to feeling unwelcome
>
>
> Jeff that sees nothing wrong with plagiarism or pirating is only here
> to hijack topics and to make all others feel unwelcome or inferior.
and inferior by now.
saul...@cox.net
Oct 31, 2012, 2:59:57 PM10/31/12
to
YOU ARE VERY INFERIOR, GOOFBALL!
READ YOUR OWN SHIT AND YOU'LL SEE WHY YOU ARE UNWELCOME!
Saul Levy
READ YOUR OWN SHIT AND YOU'LL SEE WHY YOU ARE UNWELCOME!
Saul Levy
bja...@iwaynet.net
Oct 31, 2012, 3:33:58 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 11:44 AM, HVAC wrote:
> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
> honesty, logic and evidence.
Come ACDC, evolutionist atheists don't operate like that! In the
> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
> honesty, logic and evidence.
"theory" of evolution, animals evolve through the use of camouflage,
imitating other animals, (lying) brute force, and predatory instincts.
And you, as a relative of some monkey can do no better than likewise.
Honesty, morality, ethics, logic, and evidence are fairy tales of those
ignorant degenerate Theists.
HVAC
Oct 31, 2012, 3:38:37 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 3:33 PM, bja...@teranews.com wrote:
>
>> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>> honesty, logic and evidence.
>
> Come ACDC, evolutionist atheists don't operate like that! In the
> "theory" of evolution, animals evolve through the use of camouflage,
> imitating other animals, (lying) brute force, and predatory instincts.
I am a superior animal.
>
>> On the contrary...Rather than ignore your posts, I refute them with
>> honesty, logic and evidence.
>
> Come ACDC, evolutionist atheists don't operate like that! In the
> "theory" of evolution, animals evolve through the use of camouflage,
> imitating other animals, (lying) brute force, and predatory instincts.
> And you, as a relative of some monkey can do no better than likewise.
> Honesty, morality, ethics, logic, and evidence are fairy tales of those
> ignorant degenerate Theists.
would they?
grampz008
Oct 31, 2012, 4:23:13 PM10/31/12
to
BELLIED,
HAIR GEL WEARING, MUCUS DRIPPIN, KNUCKLE DRAGGIN FOO!
grampz
Painius
Oct 31, 2012, 6:22:17 PM10/31/12
to
theists, Coby. And maybe you can explain to me how theist priests can
bring themselves to fuck little boys?
What a hoot! LOL !
"UseNet does not change; we change. [tinw]"
saul...@cox.net
Oct 31, 2012, 7:19:53 PM10/31/12
to
WHO THE FUCK ASKED YOU, YOU SENILE OLD GOAT?
SHUT THE FUCK UP!
LOSER IDIOT!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:23:13 -0500, grampz008 <"g008"@invalid.org>
wrote:
SHUT THE FUCK UP!
LOSER IDIOT!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:23:13 -0500, grampz008 <"g008"@invalid.org>
wrote:
grampz008
Nov 1, 2012, 1:45:13 PM11/1/12
to
OUTTA YER HIND END! YOU BETTER TREAT OLD GRAMPZ
WITH RESPECT, YOU SOD BUSTIN HOG HUMPER! I'LL SIC
MA DAWGS ON YER TURKEY FACED SELF!
grampz
saul...@cox.net
Nov 1, 2012, 4:22:40 PM11/1/12
to
ANOTHER DELUSIONAL ASSWIPE?
YEP!
YOU AIN'T MY GRAMPS, MORON!
I SURE AM GLAD I'M NOT RELATED TO THE LIKES OF YOU!
NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP!
IDIOT!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:45:13 -0500, grampz008 <"g008"@invalid.org>
YEP!
YOU AIN'T MY GRAMPS, MORON!
I SURE AM GLAD I'M NOT RELATED TO THE LIKES OF YOU!
NOW SHUT THE FUCK UP!
IDIOT!
Saul Levy
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:45:13 -0500, grampz008 <"g008"@invalid.org>
grampz008
Nov 2, 2012, 3:11:13 AM11/2/12
to
gonna just leave you be and let you go back to wollarin in
the hogpen. Yer just too easy a dang target.
grampz
saul...@cox.net
Nov 2, 2012, 4:27:24 PM11/2/12
to
YOU'RE FUCKING SENILE!
YOU HAVE BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT'S DISEASE!
FUCK OFF AND FUCKIN' SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:11:13 -0500, grampz008 <"g008"@invalid.org>
YOU HAVE BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT'S DISEASE!
FUCK OFF AND FUCKIN' SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:11:13 -0500, grampz008 <"g008"@invalid.org>
grampz008
Nov 2, 2012, 4:42:54 PM11/2/12
to
FUK FUK FUK FUK FUK FUK FUK FUK OFF, YOU FUKIN FUKER!
fukin grampz
you really are one dumb son of a bitch
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages