GuthBall's Venusians moved to Mars ...

[Hägar]

http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

That's a really interesting but small item compared to those multiple
items a hundred times larger on Venus.

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
“Guth Venus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5630418595926178146
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5629579402364691314
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

[Hägar]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:040550ef-76e5-4960...@to5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

That's a really interesting but small item compared to those multiple
items a hundred times larger on Venus.

**************************************
Just more of your warmed-over, re-hashed, grainy Venusian images with
nothing on them to see ... unless you're mentally unstable, like you, then
there are remnants of an entire civilization to see, albeit invisible to
normal folks.

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

Planets, moons, asteroids and meteors have their metals, because
that’s what makes for their crust and those kinds of rocks and their
otherwise solidified composition of complex elements, instead of being
fluids or gaseous.

The extremely tall Mars monolith should be another good example of a
protruding rock of somewhat unusual formation or conceivable
placement.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47024373/ns/technology_and_science-science/

The Phobos monolith offers a similar item that’s quite unusual
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_monolith

The vast majority if terrestrial monoliths of any significantly
rectangular or geometric odd form have been intentionally created and
placed, whereas few if any natural monoliths are uniform enough to
qualify as being well shaped as rectangulars and protruding quite as
perpendicular as those identified on Mars and Phobos. Most of our
terrestrial monoliths are not isolated, whereas instead there’s a
nearby collection of natural formations with similar monolithic
configurations to pick from. Of course, visual imaging isn’t nearly
as reliable or image pixel truthworthy as radar imaging, and the low
solar angle of below 45 degrees can become a distraction or illusion
that can fool the best human interpretation.

Remember that Hagar and his fellow redneck ZNRs as having picked out
all sorts of Muslim WMD from our best spy camera imaging, that offered
at least ten fold better resolution than anything obtained of Mars or
Phobos. So, perhaps this is clearly another subjective science of
deductive observationology that our Hagar still isn’t qualified in.

http://www.enchantedrockstatenaturalarea.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/rocks.jpg
http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000uVz6oS8x0Y4/s/750/750/UTCR-067.jpg
http://davidinglima2.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/turret_arch.jpg
http://www.pictures1.temehu.com/p1/Acacus-natural-arch-Forzhaga.jpg
http://www.metrolic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Arches-National-Park.jpg

Square or rectangular need not be the only monoliths:
http://costaricaspecialdealsonline.blogspot.com/2011/05/costa-rica-stone-spheres-addition-to.html

What’s entirely missing from those monoliths of Mars and Phobos is any
surrounding or community like infrastructure, or rational logistics
pertaining to mining or extracting whatever.

In spite of the mainstream gauntlet that’ll automatically by default
and obfuscation will oppose anything that’s new or improved, perhaps
yourself and others of any deductive image interpreting expertise can
try to add a little something from their very own observationology
talent to this growing list, of contributing to what an actively
thriving community of an intelligent mining operation should look
like, as if imaged from the perspective of an advanced spy satellite,
keeping in mind that the scale of such items on any given dimension
has to be worth at least 75 meters/pixel or preferably larger 225 m/
pixel in order to count, so for the most part we’re not trying to
interpret anything that’s smaller than 225 meters per geometric
dimension.

[Hägar]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:285ab00c-017f-4514...@a8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

Planets, moons, asteroids and meteors have their metals, because
that’s what makes for their crust and those kinds of rocks and their
otherwise solidified composition of complex elements, instead of being
fluids or gaseous.

The extremely tall Mars monolith should be another good example of a
protruding rock of somewhat unusual formation or conceivable
placement.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47024373/ns/technology_and_science-science/

The Phobos monolith offers a similar item that’s quite unusual
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_monolith

<< snip GuthBall drivel >>

But those extremely fuzzy and imagination dependent outlines on Venus that
only you can discern, are proof positive, in your feeble mental
constitution, that advanced intelligence created them, whereas that monolith
on Mars broke free from the cliff above, tumbled end-for-end for a good
distance and then landed perfectly upright in a 100% sand environment. So,
that monolith, presumably made of basalt or granite became "accidentally"
buried in the Martian desert sands for billions of years and erosion of the
cliff just now exposed it to us ... sounds so "2001 - A Space Odyssey" to
me.

Perhaps you're the ape with the bone ... you're mentally equipped for the
part ...

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 13, 6:52 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> But those extremely fuzzy and imagination dependent outlines on Venus that
> only you can discern, are proof positive, in your feeble mental
> constitution, that advanced intelligence created them, whereas that monolith
> on Mars broke free from the cliff above, tumbled end-for-end for a good
> distance and then landed perfectly upright in a 100% sand environment.  So,
> that monolith, presumably made of basalt or granite became "accidentally"
> buried in the Martian desert sands for billions of years and erosion of the
> cliff just now exposed it to us ... sounds so "2001 - A Space Odyssey" to
> me.
>
> Perhaps you're the ape with the bone ... you're mentally equipped for the
> part ...

I've never stipulated "proof positive" about intelligent other life
existing/coexisting on Venus, although at least thus far nothing of
any known forms of natural geology seems to fit the whole picture of
what "Guth Venus" seems to represent, as offering by far the most
interesting and complex collection of geometrical shapes that seem
arranged in the most community and intelligent infrastructure like
plan.

Planets, moons, asteroids and meteors have their metals, because

that’s what makes for their crust, those nifty kinds of rocks and

their otherwise solidified composition of complex elements, instead of

their being icy, fluids or gaseous.

The extremely tall Mars monolith should be another good example of a

protruding rock of somewhat unusual formation or conceivable as an
artificial placement.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47024373/ns/technology_and_science-science/

The Phobos monolith offers a similar item that’s quite unusual:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_monolith

The vast majority of terrestrial monoliths, especially those of any
significantly rectangular or geometric odd form, have been

intentionally created and placed, whereas few if any natural monoliths

are uniform enough to qualify as being so well shaped as rectangulars

and protruding quite as perpendicular as those identified on Mars and
Phobos. Most of our terrestrial monoliths are not isolated, whereas
instead there’s a nearby collection of natural formations with similar
monolithic configurations to pick from. Of course, visual imaging

isn’t nearly as reliable or image pixel truth-worthy as radar imaging,

and the low solar angle of below 45 degrees can become a distraction

or illusion that can fool the best human interpretation (although
shadows are also very telling).

Mainstream conditional physics:
Remember that our resident FUD-master (Hagar) and his fellow redneck
ZNRs as having picked out all sorts of those Muslim WMD from our best

spy camera imaging, that offered at least ten fold better resolution
than anything obtained of Mars or Phobos. So, perhaps this is clearly
another subjective science of deductive observationology that our

Hagar still isn’t qualified in. Never the less, Hagar accepts such
images of Mars as being of perfectly good mainstream science, and at
the very same time rejects all forms of interpreting those radar
obtained images of Venus.

[Hägar]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:2c7f9ccf-ac8a-43ff...@iu9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

*** I have only these comments:
Just like you're innocent until proven guilty,
Anything that looks like an intelligent artifact on any heavenly
body other than Earth is indeed freak of nature, until there is vetted
scientific proof to the contrary.

[Notroll2012]

"Hägar" wrote in message
news:EqGdnWQKt7Yx9hXS...@giganews.com...

*****************
How ironic that Hagar should speak of freaks of nature.

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 13, 11:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Exactly, as I've always stipulated that items depicted within "Guth
Venus" are truly quite freakish and otherwise entirely unheard of as
per geological formations, especially when combined within that area
which seems to offer a good dozen "freak of nature" items of truly
impressive size and complexity to pick from.

Speaking about "freak of nature"; how exactly did you and your fellow
ZNRs come to be?

Is becoming a LLPOF brown-nosed clown and/or minion working on behalf
of the Semites in charge, required before redneck bully manhood is
achieved?

[Hägar]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4dbf3a6a-51f8-4b54...@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

********************************************
The minimum requirement is a good dose of common sense and intelligence,
which, unfortunately, would leave you standing at the dock, thumb firmly
implanted in rectum, while the ship has long sailed with us ZNR Rednecks
aboard. You could try swimming ... rumor has it that bullshit floats ...

[Brad Guth]

Deductively interpreting any image is always subjective, and the more
you know about how that image was obtained is also how we can better
interpret whatever that image has to offer (Muslim WMD, Venusian stuff
or natural geology).

[Hägar]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:a3e707fa-8679-42e1...@kn16g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

*** It's your story, oh Retarded One ... I'll let you tell it any way
you want to ... I just remember the source ...

[Brad Guth]

You seem perfectly qualified as to identifying those Mars monoliths as
purely natural rock. Would you care to further quantify or validate
upon that interpretation, with other examples of such that's
objectively proven as being perfectly natural geology?

Is it possible that such geometric rectangular rocks just fell out of
the sky, and stuck into the ground without their having created any
crater?

[HVAC]

On 4/13/2012 4:48 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
> Speaking about "freak of nature"; how exactly did you and your fellow
> ZNRs come to be?
>
> Is becoming a LLPOF brown-nosed clown and/or minion working on behalf
> of the Semites in charge, required before redneck bully manhood is
> achieved?

LOL! Only you, Guth, could come up with this insane drivel.
I can see in your file how old you are, but most of the time
your writing is like a ten year old bed wetting crackhead.

I mean, 'LLPOF'? Liar Liar Pants On Fire?

Make that a nine year old bed wetting crackhead.










--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo

[Hägar]

"HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jmbli1$cgo$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...

> On 4/13/2012 4:48 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>>
>>
>> Speaking about "freak of nature"; how exactly did you and your fellow
>> ZNRs come to be?
>>
>> Is becoming a LLPOF brown-nosed clown and/or minion working on behalf
>> of the Semites in charge, required before redneck bully manhood is
>> achieved?
>
>
> LOL! Only you, Guth, could come up with this insane drivel.
> I can see in your file how old you are, but most of the time
> your writing is like a ten year old bed wetting crackhead.
>
> I mean, 'LLPOF'? Liar Liar Pants On Fire?
>
> Make that a nine year old bed wetting crackhead.

I think the GuthBall needs a woman ... he's been spanking Frank
for so long that he's become cross-eyed and is hallucinating.

[HVAC]

On 4/14/2012 11:59 AM, Hägar wrote:
>
>>
>> LOL! Only you, Guth, could come up with this insane drivel.
>> I can see in your file how old you are, but most of the time
>> your writing is like a ten year old bed wetting crackhead.
>>
>> I mean, 'LLPOF'? Liar Liar Pants On Fire?
>>
>> Make that a nine year old bed wetting crackhead.
>
>
> I think the GuthBall needs a woman ... he's been spanking Frank
> for so long that he's become cross-eyed and is hallucinating.

Here's an easy question for everyone here...How many of *your*
friends would be comfortable using the phrase, Liar, Liar...Pants
On Fire"?

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

I've never stipulated "proof positive" about intelligent other life

existing/coexisting on Venus, although at least thus far we have
nothing of any known forms of natural geology that seems to fit the
whole picture or community of what "Guth Venus" seems to represent, as

offering by far the most interesting and complex collection of

geometrical shapes that seem as though arranged in the most community
and intelligent infrastructure like rational plan, as situated in a
very mountainous terrain none the less.

Planets, moons, asteroids and meteors have their metals, because

that’s what makes for their crust, and all of those nifty kinds of

rocks and their otherwise solidified composition of complex elements,
instead of their being icy, fluids or gaseous.

The extremely tall Mars monolith should be another good example of a

protruding rock of somewhat unusual formation or perhaps conceivable

as an artificial placement.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47024373/ns/technology_and_science-science/

The Phobos monolith offers a similar item that’s quite unusual:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_monolith

The vast majority of terrestrial monoliths, especially those of any
significantly rectangular or geometric odd form, have been
intentionally created and placed, whereas few if any natural monoliths
are uniform enough to qualify as being so well shaped as rectangulars
and protruding quite as perpendicular as those identified on Mars and
Phobos. Most of our terrestrial monoliths are not isolated, whereas
instead there’s a nearby collection of natural formations with similar
monolithic configurations to pick from. Of course, visual imaging
isn’t nearly as reliable or image pixel truth-worthy as radar imaging,
and the low solar angle of below 45 degrees can become a distraction
or illusion that can fool the best human interpretation (although
shadows are also very telling).

Mainstream conditional physics:
Remember that our resident FUD-master (Hagar) and his fellow redneck

ZNRs are supposedly qualified image interpreters, as having picked out
all sorts of those Muslim WMD from our best spy camera imaging that

offered at least ten fold better resolution than anything obtained of
Mars or Phobos. So, perhaps this is clearly another subjective

science of deductive observationology that our Hagar still isn’t any
better qualified. Never the less, Hagar accepts such images of Mars

as being of perfectly good mainstream science, and at the very same
time rejects all forms of interpreting those radar obtained images of

Venus being anything except natural hot rocks that just so happen to
look as a community of complex structures and infrastructure should.

http://www.enchantedrockstatenaturalarea.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/rocks.jpg
http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000uVz6oS8x0Y4/s/750/750/UTCR-067.jpg
http://davidinglima2.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/turret_arch.jpg
http://www.pictures1.temehu.com/p1/Acacus-natural-arch-Forzhaga.jpg
http://www.metrolic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Arches-National-Park.jpg

Square or rectangular need not be the only monoliths:
http://costaricaspecialdealsonline.blogspot.com/2011/05/costa-rica-stone-spheres-addition-to.html

http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_crb_doug.htm
“In the modern stone-art known as lapidary, it is very difficult to
make a perfect sphere that is 2 feet wide. To manufacture spheres out
of a hard substance that is 6, 7 or 8 feet in diameter...is building
on a scale above what we can accomplish today. For the ancients, it
was child's play.”

These round monoliths are indeed quite unusual because nature simply
can not create them, and otherwise their quarry site was only 50+
miles away, though any human tooling or work sits have not yet been
identified. None the less, from any satellite perspective of imaging,
these near perfectly round monoliths would clearly stand out, as being
unnatural and thus a clear sign of intelligent life (at least smarter
than Hager because he simply couldn’t create any stone monolith sphere
if his pathetic redneck life depended on it)

What’s entirely missing from those very rectangular monoliths of Mars
and Phobos is any surrounding or community like infrastructure, much
less any quarry site or rational logistics pertaining as to any base-
camp of mining or extracting whatever. In other words, those are
clearly unique stand-alone items that should be natural, even though
highly unusual and even unprecedented when none others can be found
for any deductive comparison or subjective analogy.

In spite of the mainstream gauntlet that’ll automatically by default

and obfuscation will always oppose anything that’s new or improved,

perhaps yourself and others of any deductive image interpreting
expertise can try to add a little something from their very own
observationology talent to this growing list, of contributing to what
an actively thriving community of an intelligent mining operation
should look like, as if imaged from the perspective of an advanced spy
satellite, keeping in mind that the scale of such items on any given
dimension has to be worth at least 75 meters/pixel or preferably

larger 225 m/pixel in order to count, so for the most part we’re not

trying to interpret anything that’s smaller than 225 meters per
geometric dimension.

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
“Guth Venus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5630418595926178146
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5629579402364691314
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj

[Hägar]

"HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:jmcbcl$638$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...

> On 4/14/2012 11:59 AM, Hägar wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> LOL! Only you, Guth, could come up with this insane drivel.
>>> I can see in your file how old you are, but most of the time
>>> your writing is like a ten year old bed wetting crackhead.
>>>
>>> I mean, 'LLPOF'? Liar Liar Pants On Fire?
>>>
>>> Make that a nine year old bed wetting crackhead.
>>
>>
>> I think the GuthBall needs a woman ... he's been spanking Frank
>> for so long that he's become cross-eyed and is hallucinating.
>
>
> Here's an easy question for everyone here...How many of *your*
> friends would be comfortable using the phrase, Liar, Liar...Pants
> On Fire"?
>

Well, Robert deNero uttered the phrase in a movie, except like a drill
sergeant, not like that effeminate third grade whiner GuthBall ...

[Hägar]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:e956c4f6-c9e2-4173...@js1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

Don't you ever get tired of regurgitating the same old cud ???

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Nor any worse than yourself?

I bet your friend Hitler regurgitated all the time, as did GW Bush,
Dick Cheney and Kissinger, whom you unconditionally love. What is it
about your redneck ZNR/GOP that isn't regurgitation?

[Sir Gilligan Horry]

On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
<brad...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:e956c4f6-c9e2-4173...@js1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
>>
>> Don't you ever get tired of regurgitating the same old cud ???
>
>Nor any worse than yourself?

The Universe is indeed old.

Or maybe it's been there forever.


___


Alt Alien Research Intelligence Agency Official Admiral Wizzard.
(i156.photobucket.com/albums/t2/SirGilliganHorry/Alien_UFO_Research_Intelligence_Agency.jpg)
... here... http://bit.ly/gsYSvc

"Project Mothership" UFOs Aliens Proof Evidence...
http://www.geocities.ws/project_mothership/

Documentary "WATER" ... by Saida Medvedeva.
Beautiful Documentary ...
http://www.voiceentertainment.net/movies/watermovie.html

For Those Who Want To Know...
http://www.WantToKnow.info

Best Aliens UFOs Videos Proof Evidence...
http://BestAliensUFOsVideos.blogspot.com

Aliens UFOs Extraterrestrials Videos Documentaries...
http://YouTube.com/JimsSpaceAgency


___

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 14, 2:49 pm, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
>

> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:e956c4f6-c9e2-4173...@js1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
>
> >> Don't you ever get tired of regurgitating the same old cud ???
>
> >Nor any worse than yourself?
>
> The Universe is indeed old.
>
> Or maybe it's been there forever.
>
> ___
>
> Alt Alien Research Intelligence Agency Official Admiral Wizzard.
> (i156.photobucket.com/albums/t2/SirGilliganHorry/Alien_UFO_Research_Intelligence_Agency.jpg)

>  ... here...http://bit.ly/gsYSvc
>
> "Project Mothership" UFOs Aliens Proof Evidence...http://www.geocities.ws/project_mothership/

>
> Documentary "WATER" ... by Saida Medvedeva.

> Beautiful Documentary ...http://www.voiceentertainment.net/movies/watermovie.html
>
> For Those Who Want To Know...http://www.WantToKnow.info
>
> Best Aliens UFOs Videos Proof Evidence...http://BestAliensUFOsVideos.blogspot.com

>
> Aliens UFOs Extraterrestrials Videos Documentaries...http://YouTube.com/JimsSpaceAgency
>
> ___

Yes indeed it's old, and thus far we have nothing objective proving
that it's not a whole lot older than 13.75 GY.

Whatever planets. moons and asteroids associated with Sirius(B) should
date as being only 256 +/- some odd million years old, and those set
free from much older white dwarfs that have cooled below 3800 K should
be 1000+ GY old.

"Barrow and Tipler estimate that it would take 1e15 years for a white
dwarf to cool to 5 K", however, if weakly interacting massive
particles exist, it is possible that interactions with these particles
will keep some white dwarfs much warmer than this for approximately
1e25 years."

The recent WDs of 3800 K and only 100 ly from us as being interpreted
as only 12 GY old is simply not possible, because anything of a WD
star that's cooled off by that much is simply much older. The only
other option is that these are a new breed of RDs or BDs of only .6s
Ms and considerable metallicity.

[The Patriot]

"HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:jmcbcl$638$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...

Patriot Answer: one, my next door neighbor who is a
six year old kid.

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Nor is this hardly any worse off than yourself?

I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the time, as did GW
Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you unconditionally love to
brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole sphincters without remorse.
What exactly is it about your precious redneck ZNR/GOP version of
everything that isn't regurgitation?

If something is getting mainstream published, televised and otherwise
promoted in our public media and K12 textbooks, by those having
essentially produced ten plus millions of copies plus having been
continually entertainment hyped at us from every other possible angle,
as supposedly representing the one and only whole truth and nothing
but the truth, seems about as mainstream regurgitation worthy as it
ever gets.

Last time I’d checked, that method was called indoctrination or just
plain old brain washing, which obviously you and other redneck ZNRs
approve of.

[HVAC]

On 4/15/2012 12:08 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
> I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the time, as did GW
> Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you unconditionally love to
> brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole sphincters without remorse.

Can someone explain Guth's bizarre fascination with
all things anal? Is it fecalphilia?

[saul...@cox.net]

IT'S OBVIOUS, HVAC, GOOFY LOVES HIS OWN SHIT!

Saul Levy

[Hägar]

"HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:jmesv9$f37$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...

> On 4/15/2012 12:08 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>>
>>
>> I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the time, as did GW
>> Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you unconditionally love to
>> brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole sphincters without remorse.
>
> Can someone explain Guth's bizarre fascination with
> all things anal? Is it fecalphilia?

GuthBall would have an affinity for anal sphincters ... he IS an
asshole ... after all ...

[Notroll2012]

"Hägar" wrote in message
news:Q6idnYo3DIknvhHS...@giganews.com...

**********************
Pot, kettle, you mindless cracker.

[Sir Gilligan Horry]

On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:23:04 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
<brad...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 14, 2:49 pm, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
>>
>> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:e956c4f6-c9e2-4173...@js1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>> >> On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
>>
>> >> Don't you ever get tired of regurgitating the same old cud ???
>>
>> >Nor any worse than yourself?
>>
>> The Universe is indeed old.
>>
>> Or maybe it's been there forever.
>>

>

> only

I Love You, I'm Sorry, Please Forgive Me, Thank You

___


Alt Alien Research Intelligence Agency Official Admiral Wizzard.
(i156.photobucket.com/albums/t2/SirGilliganHorry/Alien_UFO_Research_Intelligence_Agency.jpg)

... here... http://bit.ly/gsYSvc

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 16, 11:56 am, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:23:04 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
>
>
>

> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 14, 2:49 pm, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
>
> >> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:e956c4f6-c9e2-4173...@js1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >> On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
>
> >> >> Don't you ever get tired of regurgitating the same old cud ???
>
> >> >Nor any worse than yourself?
>
> >> The Universe is indeed old.
>
> >> Or maybe it's been there forever.
>
> >  only
>
> I Love You, I'm Sorry, Please Forgive Me, Thank You
>
> ___
>
> Alt Alien Research Intelligence Agency Official Admiral Wizzard.
> (i156.photobucket.com/albums/t2/SirGilliganHorry/Alien_UFO_Research_Intelligence_Agency.jpg)

>  ... here...http://bit.ly/gsYSvc
>
> "Project Mothership" UFOs Aliens Proof Evidence...http://www.geocities.ws/project_mothership/

>
> Documentary "WATER" ... by Saida Medvedeva.

> Beautiful Documentary ...http://www.voiceentertainment.net/movies/watermovie.html
>
> For Those Who Want To Know...http://www.WantToKnow.info
>
> Best Aliens UFOs Videos Proof Evidence...http://BestAliensUFOsVideos.blogspot.com

>
> Aliens UFOs Extraterrestrials Videos Documentaries...http://YouTube.com/JimsSpaceAgency
>
> ___

A forever universe seems perfectly logical, and it certainly doesn't
hurt a flea.

Btw; fleas have been around since the first dinosaurs, and before the
flea were those nifty diatoms.

Perhaps us humans are just an unfortunate glitch in evolution, because
at this rate we're not long for this world.

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 14, 11:50 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:e956c4f6-c9e2-4173...@js1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
>

> Don't you ever gettired of regurgitatingthe same old cud ???

Nor hardly any worse off than yourself?

I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the time, as did GW
Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you unconditionally love to
brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole sphincters without remorse.

What exactly is it about your precious redneck ZNR/GOP version of
everything that isn't regurgitation?

I seem to recall being forced to regurgitate the “pledge of
allegiance” thousands of times. In any dictatorial Zionist Nazi
society era of rednecks, that would be called indoctrination, or what
we’d call brainwashing by those that wanted each K12 generation to
become good little droid robots or borg like minions exactly like
yourself.

If something is getting mainstream published, televised and otherwise
promoted in our public media and K12 textbooks, by those having
essentially produced ten plus millions of copies plus having been
continually entertainment hyped at us from every other possible angle,
as supposedly representing the one and only whole truth and nothing
but the truth, seems about as mainstream regurgitation worthy as it
ever gets.

Last time I’d checked, that method was called indoctrination or just

plain old brainwashing, which obviously you and other redneck ZNRs
fully approve of.

[HVAC]

On 4/22/2012 8:14 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
> I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the time, as did GW
> Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you unconditionally love to
> brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole sphincters without remorse.

More bizarre anal/fecal references from Guth.

[The Patriot]

"HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:jn0vk3$dg6$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...

> On 4/22/2012 8:14 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
>>
>>
>> I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the
>> time, as did GW
>> Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you
>> unconditionally love to
>> brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole sphincters
>> without remorse.
>
>
> More bizarre anal/fecal references from Guth.
>

Because Guth is an un-American asshole.

[saul...@cox.net]

LOOKS LIKE THE SAME OLD SHIT AGAIN!

LIKE THAT K12 FIXATION...

Saul Levy

> Brad Guth, I AM FUCKED IN THE HEAD!

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 22, 8:20 am, "The Patriot" <xxx...@charter.net> wrote:
> "HVAC" <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Interesting that you, Hitler, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger
consider the whole truth and nothing but the truth as "un-American".

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "Hägar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html

The wild west of Usenet/newsgroups and the more K12+ user-friendly
Google Groups version is entirely unlike the fancy mainstream
publications of “Astronomy” and “Discovery” which I do not always
agree with their editorials and contrived or agenda manipulated topics
by insiders and entertainment ghost writers, however, at least they’ve
been known to publish a wide range of other independent research
that’s new and improved as idea-worthy plus somewhat provoking against
the old mainstream status quo that’s often K12 textbook cemented in
place for as many generations as I can recall. Of course, they
wouldn’t dare publish any critical or disparaging words against our
DARPA, JPL, ASU or NASA, which they must continually worship without
question or remorse, nor much less independently fact-check, in order
to keep that profitable floodgate of public-funded science and
technology flow by publishing their infomercials plus loads of other
hype and eyecandy without reservations, thereby kept as an always open
door and essential source of their income.

So, even when more recent interpretations about our physically dark
and paramagnetic moon of terrific metallicity plus any reviews of what
the extremely nearby planet Venus has to offer are worked into various
topics and replies that manage to get Usenet/newsgroup and/or Google
Groups published for all the world to see and interact with, whereas
instead of readers constructively sharing in ideas or in their own
version of interpreting the best available science, they instead get
themselves all weird into astro-raging and going postal extreme crazy
about anything that’s suggesting there’s anything the least bit
different than whatever their K12 years plus whatever faith had taught
or rather as having previously indoctrinated into them.

These folks or rather bullies of Usenet/newsgroup domination react as
a borg like Semitic collective of Rusemasters and FUD-masters that
topic/author stalk, but otherwise seldom bother with thinking for
themselves, and they’ll be damned if anyone else gets any fair shot at
contemplating or considering anything new or improved unless it’s over
their dead body. This is basically intellectual terrorism, as well as
intellectual treason if it were to be defined by most any civil court
of law, but then “freedom of speech” and their upper caste faith-based
diversity is always on their side.

Uplink.space.com was and is still operating as “bautforum.com” (aka
Discovery), is nothing but an open cesspool of insider mainstream
hype, spewing infomercials plus offering as much obfuscation via their
naysay and denial gauntlet against outsiders as they can muster, as
well as are most other mainstream forums and newsgroups that are each
at great risk of losing their K12 status, unless they too uphold the
mainstream status quo policy regardless of any consequences, as though
operating as a kind of mafia closed mindset of doing everything their
way, or else.

An old story of past research (though hardly all that original),
objectively proving that complex other life can indeed exist or at
least temporarily coexist at extreme pressures and temperatures:
Life As We Didn't Know It (NASA)
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast13apr_1/
Since this science report, there have been deeper explorations and
investigative research pertaining to higher temperatures and much
greater pressures that complex life has either evolved into or as
having adapted in order to make the best of it. Those geothermal
vapors of Venus can’t be any too goldilocks human friendly, unless
we’re properly outfit in order to protect ourselves. In other words,
any naked Goldilocks isn’t going survive, especially if she’s already
mainstream snookered and dumbfounded herself past the point of no
return.

Unlike my devoted LLPOF peers of mainstream obfuscation FUD-masters
and their usual denial of their being in denial, that always insist
upon putting us independent investigative outsiders in the crazy-box
or loony-bin along with an added NO FLY qualification, it seems that

I've never stipulated "proof positive" about intelligent other life
existing/coexisting on Venus, although at least thus far we have

nothing of any known forms of natural geology or planetology that
seems to fit the whole complex picture or plan-view of what "Guth

Venus" seems to represent, as offering by far the most interesting and

complex collection of large scale geometrical shapes or fantastically
weird natural formations that seem as though arranged in the most

community and intelligent infrastructure like rational plan, as

situated in a very mountainous terrain setting none the less.

Planets, moons, asteroids and meteors have their metals (aka
metallicity), because that’s what makes for their crust, and all of

those nifty kinds of rocks and their otherwise solidified composition

of complex elements, instead of their being dominated as icy, of
fluids or gaseous. The only thing substantially fluid about planets
like Earth and Venus are the innards, that are stoked with a
substantial amount of extremely hot thorium and uranium.

The extremely tall Mars monolith should be another good example of a

protruding rock of a somewhat unusual formation or perhaps conceivable

as an artificial placement.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47024373/ns/technology_and_science-science/

The Phobos monolith offers another similar item that’s quite
unusual:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_monolith

The vast majority of known terrestrial monoliths, especially those of
any significantly rectangular or geometric oddly unnatural form, have
been those intentionally created and placed, whereas few if any

natural monoliths are uniform enough to qualify as being so well
shaped as rectangulars and protruding quite as perpendicular as those
identified on Mars and Phobos. Most of our terrestrial monoliths are

also not isolated, whereas instead there’s a nearby collection of

natural formations with similar monolithic configurations to pick
from. Of course, visual imaging isn’t nearly as reliable or image
pixel truth-worthy as radar imaging, and the low solar angle of below

45 degrees can become another visual distraction or impose illusions

that can fool the best human interpretation (although shadows are also

very telling if you know exactly where that illumination is coming
from).

Mainstream conditional physics:
Remember that our resident FUD-master (Hagar) and his fellow redneck
ZNRs are supposedly qualified image interpreters, as having picked out
all sorts of those Muslim WMD from our best spy camera imaging that
offered at least ten fold better resolution than anything obtained of
Mars or Phobos. So, perhaps this is clearly another subjective
science of deductive observationology that our Hagar still isn’t any
better qualified. Never the less, Hagar accepts such images of Mars
as being of perfectly good mainstream science, and at the very same
time rejects all forms of interpreting those radar obtained images of
Venus being anything except natural hot rocks that just so happen to
look as a community of complex structures and infrastructure should.

http://www.enchantedrockstatenaturalarea.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/rocks.jpg
http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000uVz6oS8x0Y4/s/750/750/UTCR-067.jpg
http://davidinglima2.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/turret_arch.jpg
http://www.pictures1.temehu.com/p1/Acacus-natural-arch-Forzhaga.jpg
http://www.metrolic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Arches-National-Park.jpg

Square or rectangular need not be the only unexplained monoliths:

http://costaricaspecialdealsonline.blogspot.com/2011/05/costa-rica-stone-spheres-addition-to.html
http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_crb_doug.htm
“In the modern stone-art known as lapidary, it is very difficult to
make a perfect sphere that is 2 feet wide. To manufacture spheres out
of a hard substance that is 6, 7 or 8 feet in diameter...is building
on a scale above what we can accomplish today. For the ancients, it
was child's play.”

These perfectly round monoliths are indeed quite unusual because as
far as anyone knows nature simply can not create them, and otherwise

their quarry site was only 50+ miles away, though any human tooling or

work sites have not yet been identified. None the less, from any

satellite perspective of imaging, these near perfectly round monoliths
would clearly stand out, as being unnatural and thus a clear sign of
intelligent life (at least smarter than Hager because he simply
couldn’t create any stone monolith sphere if his pathetic redneck life
depended on it)

What’s entirely missing from those very rectangular monoliths of Mars
and Phobos is any surrounding or community like infrastructure, much

less any logical quarry site or rational logistics pertaining as to
any base-camp of mining or extracting whatever. In other words, those

are clearly unique stand-alone items that should be natural, even
though highly unusual and even unprecedented when none others can be
found for any deductive comparison or subjective analogy.

In spite of the usual mainstream gauntlet that’ll automatically by
default and applied obfuscation, always oppose anything that’s new or
improved, can be further nullified or if need be circumvented, as
perhaps from yourself and others of any deductive image interpreting
expertise can at least try to add a little something from their very

own observationology talent to this growing list, of contributing

their own interpretation to what an actively thriving community of an

intelligent mining operation should look like, as if imaged from the
perspective of an advanced spy satellite, keeping in mind that the
scale of such items on any given dimension has to be worth at least 75
meters/pixel or preferably larger 225 m/pixel in order to count, so
for the most part we’re not trying to interpret anything that’s

smaller than 225 meters per geometric dimension, although some
deductive interpretations could be reveling as to whatever else is
there.

For those of us that are observationology dysfunctionals, here’s a not
so little size perspective: At 275 m, the Cowboys Stadium /
Louisiana Superdome (plus part of its surrounding real estate
footprint) would fit within each cup of that enormous clover shaped
reservoir.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowboys_Stadium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FEMA_-_37671_-_Aerial_of_repaired_Super_Dome_in_New_Orleans,_Louisiana.jpg
We humans have also created our very own enormously artificial
reservoirs by having constructed large dams, although a somewhat
roundish natural formed reservoir like Crater Lake of 8500 meters
diameter is actually a substantial volcano pit which isn’t the least
bit artificial nor has it ever been interpreted as such from satellite
imaging as artificial, whereas some of those other terrestrial
reservoirs as viewed from orbit would tend to be interpreted as
somewhat if not entirely artificial because, nature and the usual
geology of land and erosion doesn’t usually place something hugely
geometric and/or so unusually symmetrical in mountainous terrain and
within the path of a river or as typically blocking a canyon/gorge, as
well as for anything bridging or spanning over an enormous canyon or
gorge is likely going to get deductively interpreted as having been
artificially created. But you really need to look for yourself and
deductively interpret before taking sides on this one.

Just for a friendly game of amusing yourself and others being a good
investigative sport, this ongoing investigative effort is simply
intended to share and see if anyone else can manage to deductively
interpret anything the least bit unusual within the following image
that doesn’t quite look as though the natural laws of physics and
geology was entirely responsible. (try to remember that the original
image is that of a radar obtained composite of 36 confirming looks or
scans per pixel, obtained at a FOV down angle of 43 degrees, so its
interpretation can be nearly 3D worthy). If you’re stumped or
dumbfounded, then turn this observationology request over to a bunch
of 5th graders, as a class science project.

Besides whatever perfectly natural fluid reservoiring, what the hell
(literally scorching hot as hell) is that extremely large clover
shaped reservoir doing there? (I mean, it’s really big and kind of
obvious, and then what about that other somewhat smaller one that’s
seemingly connected and clearly containing something fluid, not to
mention more than a few other oddly geometric considerations that look
as though quite artificial, as though some level of intelligence had
created them).

It’s unlikely such a complex and active planet such as Venus wouldn’t
have its fair share of surface fluids, or at least geothermal boosted/
extruded muds or dense mineral and/or those acidic brines to contend
with, as well as hydrocarbons shouldn’t be impossible once we
reconsider what the Saturn moon Titan has to work with.

Even as offering a highly conservative reservoir interpretation, it
still seems rather enormous but otherwise kind of perfectly natural,
including that other somewhat conventional reservoir above that’s
containing something fluid and seems connected. However, as far as
anyone knows, there’s not one other terrestrial example or that
obtained from any other planet or moon as offering anything nearly as
complex while situated in such a geologically mountainous terrain and
erosion plus looking as so downright impressive, so what the hell
gives?

At this point of my ongoing observationology (11+ years of deductive
image interpreting), I’m still favoring that such a large clover
shaped reservoir represents a mostly natural though extremely large
geological formation, and just because something like this highly
complex reservoir is truly big doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist, and
just because the exact same image resampling process was applied
equally to each and every other available pixel which didn’t manage to
convert any of those other surrounding raw pixels into artificial
looking items, doesn’t mean that the few items it did manage to
interpret as geometrical and as otherwise potentially created as
though intelligently symmetrical, are not actually there to behold,
because nature isn’t very good at creating highly symmetrical and/or
complex looking geometries, and especially whenever there’s a logical
community like infrastructure pattern involved.

In spite of the usual mainstream gauntlet that’ll automatically by
default and applied obfuscation, always oppose anything that’s new or
improved, can be further nullified or if need be circumvented, as
perhaps from yourself and others of any deductive image interpreting
expertise can at least try to add a little something from their very

own observationology talent to this growing list, of contributing

their own interpretation to what an actively thriving community of an

intelligent mining operation should look like, as if imaged from the
perspective of an advanced spy satellite, keeping in mind that the
scale of such items on any given dimension has to be worth at least 75
meters/pixel or preferably larger 225 m/pixel in order to count, so
for the most part we’re not trying to interpret anything that’s

smaller than 225 meters per geometric dimension, although some
deductive interpretations could be reveling as to whatever else is
there.

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
“Guth Venus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5630418595926178146
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5629579402364691314
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj

[The Patriot]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:cfa4c2ba-bfcb-453f...@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 22, 8:20 am, "The Patriot" <xxx...@charter.net>
wrote:
> "HVAC" <mr.h...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:jn0vk3$dg6$1...@hvac.motzarella.org...> On
> 4/22/2012 8:14 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
> >> I bet your best friend Hitler regurgitated all the
> >> time, as did GW
> >> Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger, of which you
> >> unconditionally love to
> >> brown-nose all the way to their butt-hole
> >> sphincters
> >> without remorse.
>
> > More bizarre anal/fecal references from Guth.
>
> Because Guth is an un-American asshole.

Interesting that you, Hitler, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and
Kissinger
consider the whole truth and nothing but the truth as
"un-American".

***********************************************************************

I sure considered the truth that you are an un-American
asshole, no doubt.

[Brad Guth]

On Apr 24, 11:50 am, "The Patriot" <xxx...@charter.net> wrote:
> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

So, anyone that's deductively interpreting the best available science
that's based upon those regular laws of physics, or reading from
anything published by anyone other than the mainstream victors, is "un-
American"?

At least yourself, GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Kissinger and Hitler would
all have that exact same interpretation. Obviously you have no native
American Indian blood in your vanes. What mafia bloodline do you
belong to?

[saul...@cox.net]

ARE THOSE WIND VANES OR ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT WIND CHIMES, GOOFY?

YOUR SPELLING IS GETTING VERY BAD!

Saul Levy

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:48:02 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
<brad...@gmail.com> wrote:

So, anyone that's deductively interpreting the best available science
that's based upon those regular laws of physics, or reading from
anything published by anyone other than the mainstream victors, is

"un-American"?

At least yourself, GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Kissinger and Hitler would
all have that exact same interpretation. Obviously you have no native
American Indian blood in your vanes. What mafia bloodline do you
belong to?
>

Brad Guth, I TILT AT WIND CHIMES!

[The Patriot]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:dcdf43ce-effa-4e93...@k7g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...

**********************************************************************
Deductively interpreting lets you out of the equation
then, right?

At least yourself, GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Kissinger and
Hitler would
all have that exact same interpretation. Obviously you
have no native
American Indian blood in your vanes. What mafia
bloodline do you
belong to?

You telling me you are Native American? More like
inbred, local, Liberal, hypocrite.

[Brad Guth]

And your superior contribution(s) to humanity or the environment has
been???????

Are you suggesting that those laws of physics pertaining to gas or
vapor buoyancy, the thermodynamics of refrigeration and molecular
sieves doesn't apply to Venus?

How can the innards of Venus be all that different from the innards of
Earth?

What part(s) of interpreting an image makes you so mad or full of
rage?

Thumbnail images, including mgn_c115s095_1.gif (225 m/pixel)
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
“Guth Venus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5630418595926178146
https://picasaweb.google.com/bradguth/BradGuth#5629579402364691314
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj

[HVAC]

On 4/24/2012 3:48 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
>
>
> At least yourself, GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Kissinger and Hitler would
> all have that exact same interpretation. Obviously you have no native
> American Indian blood in your vanes.

It's 'veins', dummy.

[The Patriot]

"Brad Guth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:673fe9e1-fc7b-4799...@a8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...

***********************************************************

What the fuck are you yammering about?

[Brad Guth]

[saul...@cox.net]

THAT'S WHAT WE THOUGHT: THE SAME OLD INSANE FIXATIONS!

NO SURPRISE THERE!

Saul Levy

> Brad Guth, I AM A MAD COW!