cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c
Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white
shift:
sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g
Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole
not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:
(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0->d_S=vt_1->d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=>(d_G=vt_2|d_S=vt_1<-d_G=vt_2)
for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius
For which information exists in the partial differential:
dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=0
dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=c
Therefore:
lim z->0 lim m->0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,
sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)
The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this
information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist
be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity
with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its
planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any
planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity.
Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info
"BURT" <macro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cae9b8b2-bde8-4e43...@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> The energy shift to light revealed in Pound Rebka means infinite
> energy shift to light for black hole horizons. Incoming light goes
> infinitely blue shifted or infinitely energetic. While outgoing light
> gets infinitely red shifted to zero energy.
>
> Both these predictions for light's energy at any event horizon are
> nonsense and disproves their existence.
>
> Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour
Wow!
Here is SR debunking 101
The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber.
One line, I win.
:)
Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that
do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance
in science.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no
gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole
it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past
the speed of light inside.
Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions.
Mitch Raemsch
LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326
I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us tuned by
such disinformation.
Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info
<mitch.nico...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e93d5348-2e1b-4b86...@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 23, 5:02 am, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh>
wrote:
> Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
> > Well here's SR 101:
>
> > cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
> > 1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c
>
> > Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and
> > white shift:
>
> > sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
> > 1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g
>
> > Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any
> > black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:
>
> (t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0->d_S=vt_1->d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=>(d_G=vt_2|d_S=
> vt_1<-d_G=vt_2)> for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild
> radius
>
> > For which information exists in the partial differential:
>
> dz/dcos(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(w)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v
> )csc(z)=0
>
> dm/dcos(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(w)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v
Relativists can not think linearly without sucking on
thier "transform" lollipops.
Where's our public owned supercomputer simulations? (or don't the
regular laws of physics apply?)
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
A zero gravity black hole interior seems doable. At least a reverse-
gravity BH core seems entirely logical.
Perhaps the black looking shell or sphere of a given BH is merely a
weird crust or layer of antimatter.
Brain washing. We'd see a return to Mars by the bounded ranging of this
very message the same as a map to get to Deimos, but whoso the relationship
between my progress and the means to effect is destruction continues to be
so evident. BTW, a hardon is a particle to the rise of Atlantis, by the
time we reognize it as the eight wonder of the world, there'd be that much
less ocean to walk on it. These targets for magnetic polar anti-tangets are
the culprits as is the magnetic reflection of hyper-conductivity. It
complements coolons that have curled the same neural information into
genetic helixes and strands that such lands suite as for the accounting of
all murderons and burnons in the development of para-forcal systems to these
techlogies that have been built to unsigned and unauthorized practices or
respects, could what the difference be to replace them...
Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info
"Spaceman" <spac...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote in message
news:l-adnUz7BoILnfzV...@comcast.com...