I NOW FORMALLY CLAIM A REVELATION OF SOME SORT IN TERMS OF A MUTUAL SCIENCE - MORALITY - HISTORY PROOF
LetItBe.TheRealFormerAtheist
ScincMraltyHist
Louis Xurdan
(I can easily prove ownership.)
a product of 2 USER ID's and associated websites and
outreach across the web.
They are (formerly atheist:)
witchdocto...@gmail.com
The core website from which this emanates, along
with a compendium, including component compendia,
of outreach applications, are:
https://sites.google.com/site/holychanges/
http://goo.gl/HTped
sites.google.com/site/holychanges
http://goo.gl/DGrwr
DGrwr
DarnGoodrower
DarnGoodRower
darn good rower
http://goo.gl/
oIWjf
oIWjf
olWorldjeunefuture
OldWorldYoungFuture
Old World Young Future
http://krunchd.com/kindarevelational
(avails a swivel-switch-like means of advancing the frames, generally
to individual webpages, outreach sites, compendia of the same)
I claim a means of conceptualizing how math and morality can become
interchangeable.
I claim a means of conceptualizing how to identify matches
and near matches of telling science/morality/history stories such that
information appears to have a quasi-life of its own.
That is related to suggestions relating to information
possibly exerting informational gravity, a means of understanding how
visitors from another solar system can
arrive despite otherwise utterly insurmountable distances as well as
how humans can do the same.
The implication is as to transformation: growth of humans in science,
compassion, and understanding of history in a living moral universe
where space and time possibly, from what seems inevitable based on a
combination of scientific and theological concepts suddenly seeming to
work together, become data point to data point.
Life, including all humans, is infinitely variable, no good member to
know fear until moment of one quick ouch.
To the person who is standing over the dead person, time passes from 5
minutes to 5 days. To the dead person time collapses. Time
measures distance. These thoughts
undoubtedly influenced Ernst Mach, Carl Mach, Albert Einstein and
Isaac Newton (though it actually occurred to me independently.)
Evolution exquisitely tuned to our environments is intensely
both scientific and religious if the universe is a living moral one.
Only freedom, equality and b/sisterhood provide a means of survival
long term. Brotherhood / sisterhood means Love, which I propose and
believe is understood and believed by ones who conveyed this science
and belief to be a living sentiment.
Those correspond to what are understood as living sentiments, that
belief conveyed by a earlier visitor to Earth, who is likely related
to ourselves.
I propose, based on Jewish / Christian theology, though I
propose for multiple substantial reasons that Western religion and the
Eastern religions, and, for that matter, the
American Indian religions, are entirely the ***SAME***
religion, now affording this SCIENCE - MORALITY - HISTORY proof, that
our relation to those visitors is preserved for proof by way of
partial mitochondrial DNA
match.
I propose the emotional discovery recently broadcast on
the U.S. Public Broadcast Service that everywhere we look we see
hexagonal nano-diamonds was foretold by this
geometric conveyance:
http://www.jewishballoons.com/israel-images/jewish-balloon-star-of-david-gold-S.jpg
The Buddha by the terms of the religion by his name transformed
precisely by way of
understanding the transformations described here. He was thus a
super-participant in
our own transformation today, he and us all part of a single religion
and science.
Those who have followed me know how I've taken an expansive view of
science and
morality such that I offer that David Wu ("false Klingons" reference
telling, along with
his "excessive happiness," as Patch Adams (Psychiatrist) would put it,
Judy Garland,
Brian Wilson, likely, and Mary Lincoln, likely, were not delusional
but overwhelmed
by an informational awareness.
I have used original parallels between the Egyptians and the Aztec /
Cortez experience.
I have used original parallels elsewhere, such as regards the Mayan
King at Isla Juan Fernandez.
I have utilized Garrett Lisi's "Theory of Everything" based simply on
a thought emanating from my having helped my mother-in-law with simple
cardboard puzzles (she's hardly simple, though--a Duke Shakespearian.)
I personally come from a cluster of mixed families and believe all are
correct as to their beliefs where they stand, so long as those beliefs
incorporate a belief in freedom, equality, and love.
I can identify at least one publicly, widely reported event
involving more than one family plus a seeming impossibility as to my
own name, particularly informationally in relation to the original
personal obsession that originated the process of which this is a
product, as personally motivating as to my presenting this.
What that means, in a nutshell, is, regardless of how
over-the-top pompous this may seem, I have a personal
(good) reason, or excuse, for feeling there's just too much
to let lie.
I call this a potential revelation of some sort, partly in the hope
Simon Pegg could utter that quickly. That would sound
funny.
I'm more glad I've offered this rather than not having done so.
I hope the ideas are useful.
This, all theory, is the result of a process that I still hope simply
affords a positive hypothetical.
The process is actually not complete.
My father was a psychiatrist backtracked to internist
(loved doctoring) who found the Pasteur / de Gaulle
Nostradamian hits intriguing.
I anticipate presenting a mutual duality of proof between
those "hits" and the rest of Nostradamus' quatrains.
This is actually not original. I'm endeavoring to give attribution
and have publicly sought assistance in identifying
the source.
However, I expect to present the key basis of the duality, which
purpose is to demonstrate a deliberateness: not 1, not 3 hits, but
deliberately a lock-and-key proof confirmed by the same
duality afforded by code in each quatrain.
Nostradamus, I believe, intended to say we are computers with
singularities (scientists /) souls (religious folk) who are
forseeable. I don't think he meant to prove anything one way or
another beyond that.
I agree with others, especially as presented here at the history
channel, that Nostradamus saw for us in this time a duality of paths:
perish or grow scientifically, morally and historically,
which is to say transform in each of those manners.
I personally believe I'm seeing 4 1/2 year olds more routinely being
like 7 year olds from my own generation (Boomer.)
Winston Churchill once said
It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's
required.
I know we can and will transform, save our oceans, and
send our children to the stars (in a nice way, of course.)