Signs and Relationships
Jodi
***Lady J***
Voodoo Ink
>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
Virgo/Aries/Taurus Moon me
Aqua/Cancer/Leo moon him
in our dreams
Carolyn
>>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
>Scorpio, sun/Gemini, rising/Aquarius, moon ME
Cancer,sun/Cancer, rising/Scorpio moon HIM
We've been together for six years, but now we're drifting apart...though we're
still close freinds. I think though it has to do with his mercury in Leo and
my mercury in Scorpio which makes for I think some troubles in communication
and his conjunct gemini planets in venus and mars which make him interested in
everything but me.
That really, really sucks.
>Virgo/Aries/Taurus Moon me
>Aqua/Cancer/Leo moon him
>in our dreams
I'm rather a novice at astrology but isn't this a bad match? Both the rising
and the moons are poorly aspected. Perhaps their chemistry lies in the rest of
their charts?
Voodoo Ink
>>Aqua/Cancer/Leo moon him
>>in our dreams
>
>I'm rather a novice at astrology but isn't this a bad match? Both the rising
>and the moons are poorly aspected. Perhaps their chemistry lies in the rest
>of
>their charts?
My aries rising conjuncts his aries mars . My aries asc trines Venus Leo
conjunct uranus, as does his mars.
My pisces mars trines his cancer jupiter conjunct uranus.
My taurus moon trines his leo moon conjunct pluto. His leo moon conjuncts my
leo pluto.
My taurus moon trines his capricorn venus.
My Pluto trines his venus.
My neptune libra conjuncts his neptune libra trines his mercury aqua retro.
My mercury libra retro trines his aqua sun.
Saturn scorpio conjunct Saturn scorpio.
anyone?
in our dreams
Tracy Devlin
How can you have a cancer sun and rising?
Tracy the proud mommy of
Cristina(4)
Nicholas(3 mon)and
Brandon(3 mon)
Kat
>Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I am
>wondering if y'all would like to help me. All I want to know is what
>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
>Whether it be present or past relationships. If you know your rising and
>moon sign and the rising and moon sign of your partner(s) that would be
>even better. Thank you
Me: Capricorn Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc, Aquarius Venus & Libra Mars
Hubby: Libra Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc & Venus & Cancer Mars
1st love: Cap Sun, Cancer Moon, Aquarius Asc, Sag Venus & Pisces Mars
the prick: Sag Sun, Leo Moon, Sag Venus & Mars Virgo
Kat
what's that saying about 3 and being a charm?
--
"some day an answer will find us - quite a long shot, but anyway..."
~Blues Traveler~
Cahooter#9 (nix the purrrrrr to email)
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
>>Cancer,sun/Cancer, rising/Scorpio moon HIM
>
>How can you have a cancer sun and rising?
Born at sunrise... the sun in cancer... so cancer is rising.
born at sunrise tomorrow = virgo sun and rising.
anytime someone is born at sunrise, they are a double "whatever their
sunsign is"
Julie
Tracy Devlin
>Born at sunrise... the sun in cancer... so cancer is rising.
>
>born at sunrise tomorrow = virgo sun and rising.
>
>anytime someone is born at sunrise, they are a double "whatever their
>sunsign is"
Mumbo Jumbo
>Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi) wrote:
>
>>Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I am
>>wondering if y'all would like to help me. All I want to know is what
>>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
>>Whether it be present or past relationships. If you know your rising and
>>moon sign and the rising and moon sign of your partner(s) that would be
>>even better. Thank you
>
>Me: Capricorn Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc, Aquarius Venus & Libra Mars
>
>Hubby: Libra Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc & Venus & Cancer Mars
>
>1st love: Cap Sun, Cancer Moon, Aquarius Asc, Sag Venus & Pisces Mars
>
>the prick: Sag Sun, Leo Moon, Sag Venus & Mars Virgo
>
>Kat
>what's that saying about 3 and being a charm?
Me: Leo Sun, Cap Moon, Leo rising, Gemini Venus, Sag Mars
Exwife ( cold distant b*tch): Aquarius Sun, Virgo Moon, Taurus Rising,
Aquarius Venus, Cancer Mars
Longterm Girlfriend and love : Leo Sun, Aquarius Moon, Scorpio Rising,
Virgo Venus, Virgo Mars
Note: Most of the people i get along best with in general seem to be ones with
strong Leo Gemini Sag or Piscean influences.
Wollmann, Edmond
>
> Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I
> I want to know is what sign you are and what sign(s) you seem to do
> well with in relationships. I am interested in hearing about present
> and past relationships. Anything from high school crushes to
> marriages. If you know your rising and moon sign and the rising and
> moon sign of your partner(s) that would be even better. Thank you very
> much for taking time to read my little post : )
Thank you for your interest in astrology and this group.
If you are willing to supply accurate and exact information I am sure
some astrologers may be willing to help if they can. Astrology is NOT
what is generally accepted and spun by newspapers and the media etc.
based only on sunsigns, anymore than "Ask Ann Landers" or some newpaper
advice column is depth psychology, counseling or professional therapy.
Would you base important life decisions on that?
To make sweeping generalizations with sun signs is simplistic and
irresponsible. The study of astrology is complex and must be learned
like any other discipline. It must be treated with the respect it
deserves as a powerful tool of understanding. Tools are always dependent
upon the astuteness of the craftsman and their application abilities.
There is one way that sun signs can be used in a positive way. That is
by having the horoscope done properly and accurately and then placing
the sun on the ascendant with its degree and sign as the ascendant. This
is the solar chart. The solar chart can then be read just like a natal
and is very revealing as far as implications and interpretations. In
this way the solar chart can be used in conjunction with the natal house
arrangement and adds powerful information as far as transits etc. as
well once an accurate horoscope has been obtained.
5.393707075 x 10 58th- Is greater than the population of a million
earths, but the smallest possible number of astrological factor
combinations. The sun sign is simply ONE of those factors. True
astrology defines the specificity of identity through delineation of a
myriad of factors, and ALL of these factors reflect the identity.
Psychodynamic functioning is reflected through astrological signature
and leads us to an understanding of the psyche and the beliefs of the
identity. These beliefs are what is responsible for the created
experiential reality and is reflected in the mirror of mind-matter.
Therefore there are as many different vibrations as people and
astrological possibilities as well. Even twins can express different
levels of the same chart, so there is no fixed pattern of anything that
makes anyone set as a such and such.
In the same way that a doctor would not make such irresponsible
diagnoses based on a persons hair color-so in the same way astrology
demands full and cogent renderings based on complete information.
At least with a solar chart we still take the natal positions in
consideration for a more complete view of the person in question. The
astrologer must be diverse and open to viewing the subject in many ways.
If astrology is to be treated as a serious subject and valuable
paradigm, we must present it in a coherent and comprehensive way.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 1999 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/tableof.htm
anonym™
(PC 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on probation, July 1999
Winner of the Victor von Frankenstein Wierd Science, Bobo, Looney
Maroon, (SIX time Looney Maroon Winner!), Tar & Feathers, and Bolo
Bullis Foam Duck Awards, P.M.A.F.A.(Prediction Mangler of Augusts'
Financial Attributes) and 1998 Usenet Kook of the Year wrote:
>
> Jodi wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I
> > am wondering if y'all (I'm from the south) would like to help me. All
> > I want to know is what sign you are and what sign(s) you seem to do
> > well with in relationships. I am interested in hearing about present
> > and past relationships. Anything from high school crushes to
> > marriages. If you know your rising and moon sign and the rising and
> > moon sign of your partner(s) that would be even better. Thank you very
> > much for taking time to read my little post : )
>
> Thank you for your interest in astrology and this group.
>
> If you are willing to supply accurate and exact information I am sure
> some astrologers may be willing to help if they can. Astrology is NOT
> what is generally accepted and spun by newspapers and the media etc.
> based only on sunsigns, anymore than "Ask Ann Landers" or some newpaper
> advice column is depth psychology, counseling or professional therapy.
> Would you base important life decisions on that?
>
> To make sweeping generalizations
Is what you're doing by responding with pre-typed screed.
She's looking for discussion, not spew, jerkoff.
snip!
Ed! Where's all that legal action you've been threatening?
What's up with the California Attorney General and the ACLU and the San
Diego Police Department and the FTC and the FBI and all your kooky komplaints?
Are we to conclude that you're threats along those lines are full of shit?
--
"Why am I an asshole?" -Edmond Wollmann
Beep
>Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi) wrote:
>
>>Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I am
>>wondering if y'all would like to help me. All I want to know is what
>>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
>>Whether it be present or past relationships. If you know your rising and
>>moon sign and the rising and moon sign of your partner(s) that would be
>>even better. Thank you
>
>Me: Capricorn Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc, Aquarius Venus & Libra Mars
>
>Hubby: Libra Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc & Venus & Cancer Mars
>
>1st love: Cap Sun, Cancer Moon, Aquarius Asc, Sag Venus & Pisces Mars
>
>the prick: Sag Sun, Leo Moon, Sag Venus & Mars Virgo
>
Me: Libra sun, Scorp rising, Gem moon, Scorp Venus, Leo Mars
The One Who Threw Me Down the Stairs:
Cancer Sun, rising ?, Aquarius Moon, Cancer Venus and Taurus Mars
Pam
ouch ;)
new email address:
beep at west dot net
Rheumatic Disease Web Site
http://www.silcom.com/~sblc
Tracy Devlin
Him....Aquarius sun....Gemini asc....I can get back to u on the moon..I forgot.
dreammin7
Beep wrote in message <3803173d...@news.west.net>...
Me: Pisces Sun, Cancer rising, Pisces moon, merc. Aquarius Veunus& jupiter,
Libra Mars
The fool who left me for a Scorpio after a 20 year argument (Marriage?)
Aquarius Sun, Virgo rising, Virgo Moon, Pisces Venus, Budweizer Mars.
Jodi
***Lady J***
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> Thank you Edmond but I'm already aware of this. From my experiences I
> have seen that although you should look at whole charts, sun signs are
> the most important, by far. Then rising and moon.
Actually the moon is most prominent.
> From what I have seen
> of marriages people usually tend to marry others with the same sun sign
> element or sun sign that is in the complimentary element of their own.
> And most all people I have met fit their sun sign very well. And if not
> it's always at least to some degree.
I am afraid you are mistaken. I stand by my intial assertion.
Please stop sending binaries attachments, it is the quickest way to lose
your account.
anonym™
probation, July 1999 Winner of the Victor von Frankenstein Wierd
Science, Bobo, Looney Maroon, (SIX time Looney Maroon Winner!), Tar &
Feathers, and Bolo Bullis Foam Duck Awards, P.M.A.F.A.(Prediction
Mangler of Augusts' Financial Attributes) and 1998 Usenet Kook of the
Year wrote:
>
> >
> > Thank you Edmond but I'm already aware of this. From my experiences I
> > have seen that although you should look at whole charts, sun signs are
> > the most important, by far. Then rising and moon.
>
> Actually the moon is most prominent.
Actually your idiocy is most prominent.
>
> > From what I have seen
> > of marriages people usually tend to marry others with the same sun sign
> > element or sun sign that is in the complimentary element of their own.
> > And most all people I have met fit their sun sign very well. And if not
> > it's always at least to some degree.
>
> I am afraid you are mistaken. I stand by my intial assertion.
> Please stop sending binaries attachments, it is the quickest way to lose
> your account.
Ed is also aware of some of the slower methods, such as spamming and
making illegal threats of violence, which is why he's lost at least 12
ISP accounts.
Jodi
***Lady J***
Mags
>
> On 19 Sep 1999 03:53:56 GMT, groov...@aol.compurrrrrr (Kat) wrote:
>
> >Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi) wrote:
> >
> >>Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I am
> >>wondering if y'all would like to help me. All I want to know is what
> >>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
> >>Whether it be present or past relationships. If you know your rising and
> >>moon sign and the rising and moon sign of your partner(s) that would be
> >>even better. Thank you
> >
> >Me: Capricorn Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc, Aquarius Venus & Libra Mars
> >
> >Hubby: Libra Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc & Venus & Cancer Mars
> >
> >1st love: Cap Sun, Cancer Moon, Aquarius Asc, Sag Venus & Pisces Mars
> >
> >the prick: Sag Sun, Leo Moon, Sag Venus & Mars Virgo
> >
>
> Me: Libra sun, Scorp rising, Gem moon, Scorp Venus, Leo Mars
>
> The One Who Threw Me Down the Stairs:
> Cancer Sun, rising ?, Aquarius Moon, Cancer Venus and Taurus Mars
>
> Pam
> ouch ;)
/me waves!
Me: Gemini Sun..Cancer Rising..Aqu Moon..Cancer Venus/Mars
Husband: Cancer Sun..Sag Rising..Scorp Moon..Leo Venus..Gem Mars
Three relationships:
1. Scorp Sun..Libra Rising..Scorp Moon..Libra Venus..Aqu Mars
2. Virgo Sun/rising..Pis Moon..Cancer Venus..Sag Mars
3. Aqu Sun..Pis Rising..Gemini Moon..Sag Venus/Mars
Mags
jfred
> /me waves!
/me waves back! How are you doing?
--
jfred... Cahooter #14, WWAS member #4, http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
[Edmo] is the first person ever to use "integrity" to mean "delusional
person without a work ethic." -- A.P. "Why am I an asshole?" -Edmo
Everybody's got something to hide except for me and my monkey
Edmond Wollmann
>
> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
consulting for 20.
A complaint will be sent for your binaries.
Your client continues to post binaries which is against the charters for
these groups. Please take action.
Thanks
Path:
newshub.sdsu.edu!newshub.csu.net!news.sdsc.edu!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!gatech!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!webtv.net!not-for-mail
From:
Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
Newsgroups:
alt.astrology
Subject:
Re: Signs and Relationships (Edmond)
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT)
Organization:
WebTV Subscriber
Lines:
33
Message-ID:
<10539-37...@newsd-281.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
References:
<37E67A...@yahoo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
localhost.webtv.net
Mime-Version:
1.0 (WebTV)
Content-Type:
Multipart/Mixed; Boundary=WebTV-Mail-25948-3233
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7Bit
X-WebTV-Signature:
1
ETAtAhUAky+De/xgEZGcezy5zDIKf5Z7yToCFHoAiL2i+5Y8SYr3pbqB650+pFJW
Content-Disposition:
Inline
X-WebTV-Stationery:
Standard;
Background="http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Valley/2114/starry.jpg";
TextColor=pink
Xref:
newshub.sdsu.edu alt.astrology:309220
anonym™
(California Penal Code 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on
probation, July 1999 Winner of the Victor von Frankenstein Wierd
Science, Bobo, Looney Maroon, (SIX time Looney Maroon Winner!), Tar &
Feathers, and Bolo Bullis Foam Duck Awards, P.M.A.F.A.(Prediction
Mangler of Augusts' Financial Attributes) and 1998 Usenet Kook of the
Year wrote:
>
> >
> > Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> > reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> > by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> > seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> > the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> > Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>
> Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
> consulting for 20.
Which adds up to a combined total of mental masturbation for 50 years!
Give him a hand, folks!
On second thought, give him a paper towel...eeeeewwwww.
> A complaint will be sent for your binaries.
GOOD!
>
> Your client continues to post binaries which is against the charters for
> these groups. Please take action.
The webtv origin explains everything.
Rhianna
<arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Jodi wrote:
>>
>> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>
>Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
>consulting for 20.
>A complaint will be sent
Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
and
instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
sent...please take action" Actually, he has a macro pre-programmed
to write those letters.
Anyway, in answer to your question, Ed Wollmann is a
Taurus, his Moon is in Capricorn, he has a Leo ascendant.
~Cheers~
Rhianna
http://www.pipeline.com/~rhianna/index.htm
Zodiac, groovy fortunetelling, mystical fun stuff
alt.astrology Cahooter #29
Edmond Wollmann
>
> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Jodi wrote:
> >>
> >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
> >
> >Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
> >consulting for 20.
> >A complaint will be sent
>
> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
> and
> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
> sent...please take action"
Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
lying piece of garbage.
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/charter.htm
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/propagan.htm
anonym™
(California Penal Code 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on
probation, July 1999 Winner of the Victor von Frankenstein Wierd
Science, Bobo, Looney Maroon, (SIX time Looney Maroon Winner!), Tar &
Feathers, and Bolo Bullis Foam Duck Awards, P.M.A.F.A.(Prediction
Mangler of Augusts' Financial Attributes) and 1998 Usenet Kook of the
Year wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> > <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Jodi wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> > >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> > >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> > >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> > >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> > >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
> > >
> > >Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
> > >consulting for 20.
> > >A complaint will be sent
> >
> > Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
> > and
> > instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
> > sent...please take action"
>
> Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
> lying piece of garbage.
You stupid son of a bitch, you've sent binaries here before yourself,
you hypocritical sack of shit.
Remember the pair of shoes you wanted Tony Sidaway to suck on?
Edmond Wollmann
be more forgiving. Until you assholes stop, I will not.
Get it?
anonym™
(California Penal Code 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on
probation, July 1999 Winner of the Victor von Frankenstein Wierd
Science, Bobo, Looney Maroon, (SIX time Looney Maroon Winner!), Tar &
Feathers, and Bolo Bullis Foam Duck Awards, P.M.A.F.A.(Prediction
Mangler of Augusts' Financial Attributes) and 1998 Usenet Kook of the
Year wrote:
>
> be more forgiving.
Fuck you.
>Until you assholes stop, I will not.
Sounds real mature, Edho.
>
> Get it?
We get that you're a KOOK!
anonym™
>
> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:59:02 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Maybe if I wasn't harassed day in and day out when I post here, I could
>
> Ed, I don't harass you, I happen to be a very nice person.
>
> I was thinking perhaps Jodi was a "newbie" who might be shocked
> by your threat to send complaints, so I told her what the deal
> was and you called me "garbage," now that's night nice at all!
>
> Btw, I have a cousin who is 6' 3" so "if you see [him] a coming,
> better step aside..." remember the song "Sixteen Tons?" It made
> the "Hit Parade" sometime in the 1950s (but I wasn't born yet)
>
Yeah!
Hey, Ed, you fuckin' pussy!
Where's the Octagon, asshole?
You invited me down there but have run away like a snot-nosed punk
everytime I ask you where and when!
Jodi
***Lady J***
anonym™
>
> Jodi wrote:
>
> >Path: mindspring!news.mindspring.net!firehose.mindspring.net!howland.erols.net!netnews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!news.new-york.net!uunet!ffx.uu.net!webtv.net!not-for-mail
> >From: Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
> >Newsgroups: alt.astrology
> >Subject: Re: Signs and Relationships
> >Organization: WebTV Subscriber
> >Lines: 29
> >Message-ID: <14674-37...@newsd-282.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
> >References: <37e6ca4b...@news.pipeline.com>> >Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary=WebTV-Mail-25983-4950
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
> >X-WebTV-Signature: 1
> > ETAsAhQ/y3nLAocGUhprO/opLkRBp2dXkgIUZHG5hBPLTf+povXMG5dTDSMLQB0=
> >Content-Disposition: Inline
> >X-WebTV-Stationery: Standard;
> > Background="http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Valley/2114/starry.jpg";
> > TextColor=pink
> >
> >
> >--WebTV-Mail-25983-4950
> >Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
> >
> >I have a question. What in the world is this binary stuff? Is that for
> >people with computers?
> >
> >
> >--WebTV-Mail-25983-4950
> >Content-Description: signature
> >Content-Disposition: Inline
> >Content-Type: Text/HTML; Charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
> >
> ><html> <body
> >background="http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Valley/2114/starry.jpg"text="pink">
> ><html> <img
> >src="http://members.tripod.com/~TheAbbey/rose/rose022b.gif"height="110">
> ><html> <embed
> >src="http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Hollow/5419/TLU.mid"
> >autostart="true"loop="true"> <html> <img
> >src="http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/Docks/6507/animetalbfly.gif"align="right">
> ><html> <center> <br> <br> <br> <br> <i> <b> </html> ***Lady J***
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--WebTV-Mail-25983-4950--
>
> The stuff right above - between "WebTV-Mail-25983-4950" - that you
> spent time formatting - is the "offending binary".
>
> There should be a setting in your software to exclude html in your
> newsgroup posts. Many news servers automatically cancel messages with
> included html formatting.
In other words, the flower, the butterfly, the background, and the song.
Lose 'em, toots!
Rhianna
<arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Rhianna wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
>> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
>> and
>> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
>> sent...please take action"
I thought I was being fair and telling things as I see them.
>
>Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
>lying piece of garbage.
Edmo, you are really mean & nasty!! Why do you have such a
bad attitude? Must be the Dark Side of your Capricorn Moon!
Rhianna
<arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Maybe if I wasn't harassed day in and day out when I post here, I could
>be more forgiving. Until you assholes stop, I will not.
Ed, I don't harass you, I happen to be a very nice person.
I was thinking perhaps Jodi was a "newbie" who might be shocked
by your threat to send complaints, so I told her what the deal
was and you called me "garbage," now that's night nice at all!
Btw, I have a cousin who is 6' 3" so "if you see [him] a coming,
better step aside..." remember the song "Sixteen Tons?" It made
the "Hit Parade" sometime in the 1950s (but I wasn't born yet)
~Cheers~
Beep
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:53:06 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
<arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Rhianna wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
>> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Jodi wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>> >
>> >Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
>> >consulting for 20.
>> >A complaint will be sent
>>
>> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
>> and
>> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
>> sent...please take action"
>
>Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
>lying piece of garbage.
>
Well, hello again, Mr. Suave!
You debonair devil, you...sweet-talking all the ladies, as usual!
Pam
ceremonial roll of eyes
new email address: beep at west dot net
Rheumatic Disease info: http://www.silcom.com/~sblc
Before you flame: I don't see every post in a
timely manner from this account! TIA for your patience.
Beep
>Beep wrote:
>>
>> On 19 Sep 1999 03:53:56 GMT, groov...@aol.compurrrrrr (Kat) wrote:
>>
>> >Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi) wrote:
>> >
>> >>Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I am
>> >>wondering if y'all would like to help me. All I want to know is what
>> >>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
>> >>Whether it be present or past relationships. If you know your rising and
>> >>moon sign and the rising and moon sign of your partner(s) that would be
>> >>even better. Thank you
>> >
>> >Me: Capricorn Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc, Aquarius Venus & Libra Mars
>> >
>> >Hubby: Libra Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc & Venus & Cancer Mars
>> >
>> >1st love: Cap Sun, Cancer Moon, Aquarius Asc, Sag Venus & Pisces Mars
>> >
>> >the prick: Sag Sun, Leo Moon, Sag Venus & Mars Virgo
>> >
>>
>> Me: Libra sun, Scorp rising, Gem moon, Scorp Venus, Leo Mars
>>
>> The One Who Threw Me Down the Stairs:
>> Cancer Sun, rising ?, Aquarius Moon, Cancer Venus and Taurus Mars
>>
>> Pam
>> ouch ;)
>
>/me waves!
>
There you are!!!
How are you?
Come back home to irc soon? :)
Hugs to sweet Gemini
Pam
Rhianna
*Laugh* I believe that there is an inverse proportional relationship.
The worse he treats a woman, the more he "likes" her or perhaps
even "lusts for her?" The Dark Side of Ed's Capricorn Moon reminds me
of the Brooding Byronic Hero at his most negative. Perhaps Ed
envisions a harem where he can treat the women miserably yet they
will all come back to him begging for more? This is just the mere
beginnings of Ed's fantasy...
Wake up, Ed! It ain't gonna happen! ;-)
>
>
>new email address: beep at west dot net
>Rheumatic Disease info: http://www.silcom.com/~sblc
>Before you flame: I don't see every post in a
>timely manner from this account! TIA for your patience.
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
<arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Maybe if I wasn't harassed day in and day out when I post here, I could
>be more forgiving. Until you assholes stop, I will not.
>
>Get it?
Naah, it'll just keep up until you go postal and leave again.
We were having some great astrology discussions until you arrived,
once again.
Just GO AWAY.
j
Rhianna
wrote:
>
>--WebTV-Mail-25983-4950
>Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
>
>I have a question. What in the world is this binary stuff? Is that for
>people with computers?
I believe it is some type of picture file or file that is not
text. If your posts come in html format, it might be
accompanied by a binary file. You didn't do anything wrong,
Edmond Wollmann is just jerky to about everyone.
Beep
wrote:
>Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
important astrologer, you know ;)
Pam
Libra, Scorpio, Gemini
Beep
>Jodi wrote:
>
>>Thank you Edmond but I'm already aware of this. From my experiences I
>>have seen that although you should look at whole charts, sun signs are
>>the most important, by far.
>
>Certain planetary aspects can be stronger than the Sun sign, though
>this may not be exactly what you're saying.
>
>For instance, a conjunction, square, or opposition from one of the
>three outer planets...
>
>>Then rising and moon.
>
>Same thing here... Powerful aspects can push their way to the top of
>the list.
>
>>From what I have seen
>>of marriages people usually tend to marry others with the same sun sign
>>element or sun sign that is in the complimentary element of their own.
>
>I'm a Scorpio; married a Leo. Not the usual recommended signs for each
>other...
>
>>And most all people I have met fit their sun sign very well. And if not
>>it's always at least to some degree.
>
>Uh, I've met a lot of people who aren't at all comfortable in their
>bodies... I don't know if that's astrology or just their lives.
I agree with you, Ken...but I am also happy to see Jodi share her
opinion. I know that you and many others as well as myself welcome
other opinions...as opposed to a certain person named Ed.
Pam
hi, Ed!
Ken Anglesea
>Beep wrote:
>>
>> On 19 Sep 1999 03:53:56 GMT, groov...@aol.compurrrrrr (Kat) wrote:
>>
>> >Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi) wrote:
>> >
>> >>Hi, I am trying to study compatibility between different signs and I am
>> >>wondering if y'all would like to help me. All I want to know is what
>> >>sign you are and what sign you seem to do well with in relationships.
>> >>Whether it be present or past relationships. If you know your rising and
>> >>moon sign and the rising and moon sign of your partner(s) that would be
>> >>even better. Thank you
>> >
>> >Me: Capricorn Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc, Aquarius Venus & Libra Mars
>> >
>> >Hubby: Libra Sun/Moon, Scorp Asc & Venus & Cancer Mars
>> >
>> >1st love: Cap Sun, Cancer Moon, Aquarius Asc, Sag Venus & Pisces Mars
>> >
>> >the prick: Sag Sun, Leo Moon, Sag Venus & Mars Virgo
>> >
>>
>> Me: Libra sun, Scorp rising, Gem moon, Scorp Venus, Leo Mars
>>
>> The One Who Threw Me Down the Stairs:
>> Cancer Sun, rising ?, Aquarius Moon, Cancer Venus and Taurus Mars
>>
>> Pam
>> ouch ;)
>
>/me waves!
>
>Me: Gemini Sun..Cancer Rising..Aqu Moon..Cancer Venus/Mars
>
>Husband: Cancer Sun..Sag Rising..Scorp Moon..Leo Venus..Gem Mars
>
>Three relationships:
>
>1. Scorp Sun..Libra Rising..Scorp Moon..Libra Venus..Aqu Mars
>2. Virgo Sun/rising..Pis Moon..Cancer Venus..Sag Mars
>3. Aqu Sun..Pis Rising..Gemini Moon..Sag Venus/Mars
>
>Mags
Maaaaaaaaggggggggggggggggggsssssssssssssssssss.
Nice seing ya .
>
>> new email address:
>> beep at west dot net
>> Rheumatic Disease Web Site
>> http://www.silcom.com/~sblc
...
D.R.Ken Anglesea™.Astrocricketologist.
Agnostic Astrologer Call 2995603 .SAN. 92-01766-048.
Neumekenologist™ S.N.I.P. W.W.A.S.#5
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://lart.com/ed/
el...@no.spam
Edmond Wollmann <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
>lying piece of garbage.
Liar, the complaints were sent for not kissing your smelly asshole, Edie.
You're so transparent.
el...@no.spam
>The stuff right above - between "WebTV-Mail-25983-4950" - that you
>spent time formatting - is the "offending binary".
But it's not binary.
el...@no.spam
Jodi <Jodi...@webtv.net> wrote:
>I have a question. What in the world is this binary stuff? Is that for
>people with computers?
Don't worry. It's just the ranting of a confused kook.
el...@no.spam
Edmond Wollmann <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Maybe if I wasn't harassed day in and day out when I post here, I could
>be more forgiving.
Maybe if you didn't post bullshit, people wouldn't disagree with you. Too
bad you're too much of a baby to handle it.
>Until you assholes stop, I will not.
But, Edie. YOU are the asshole.
Beep
wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 00:20:26 GMT, be...@dontsendhere.com (Beep) wrote:
>
>>a.d.n rescued once more
>>
>>
>>On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:53:06 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
>><arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Rhianna wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
>>>> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Jodi wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>>>> >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>>>> >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>>>> >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>>>> >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>>>> >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>>>> >
>>>> >Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
>>>> >consulting for 20.
>>>> >A complaint will be sent
>>>>
>>>> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
>>>> and
>>>> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
>>>> sent...please take action"
>>>
>>>Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
>>>lying piece of garbage.
>>>
>>
>>Well, hello again, Mr. Suave!
>>
>>You debonair devil, you...sweet-talking all the ladies, as usual!
>>
>>Pam
>>ceremonial roll of eyes
>
>*Laugh* I believe that there is an inverse proportional relationship.
>
>The worse he treats a woman, the more he "likes" her or perhaps
>even "lusts for her?"
Horrible to contemplate...:)
Pam
watch out girlz, Ed's in town!
new email address: beep at west dot net
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>In other words, the flower, the butterfly, the background, and the song.
>
>Lose 'em, toots!
Is Jodu gunning for the CNOTM award?
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~wanglese/pebble.htm
Fight spam:
http://www.caube.org.au/
Help find ET:
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
Jodi
just have this ugly dark grey screen with green writing, yuck....That
dude Edmond has a mental disurbance. He needs help. Nobody likes him but
he keeps hanging around. Oh well, I'm just gonna ignore him like I do
all the other weirdos on the web. Anyway, let's get back to my original
question. About sun, rising and moon and peoples relationships. And
please if you could tell what the relationship is like that would be
most helpful. Of course that's only if you want too. And let's drop the
subject about whether or not I am right about sun signs being dominent.
That wasn't the point to this post. Thank you.
Edmond H. Wollmann
There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
ladies, thank you.
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>
>
> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
> important astrologer, you know ;)
And you are a very important.....????? Usenet abuser?
Edmond H. Wollmann
exists-it is a "sea" of consciousness.
As an identity we create the idea that the identity we are is ALL we
are, and in a sense, by definition (Aries and Mars) cut ourselves off
from the awareness of this unbroken wholeness-note I say awareness,
because we can never truly break our interconnectedness to the "All That
Is"-only our awareness OF this connection.
Time, space and specificity are the TRUE illusion in an unbroken
wholeness that exists everywhere all at once. We have played the game of
"forgetting" that we are the reality we "apparently" exist within.
The water and the fish are ASPECTS, FACETS of the ocean-but the ocean
(Poseidon) none the less.
Negative energy remember is separating, limiting, constrictive,
segregating.
Positive is unifying, inclusive, expansive UNlimiting.
When perceived or experienced negatively (through insisting that you you
are is all you are) Neptune, through reflective effect of the energy put
in, invites effects such as confusion, illusion, escapism. These are the
EFFECTS of approaching the "sea" and viewing the sea as being dangerous
and threatening to the identity-that it will DIS-solve and end in the
dissolution and non-existence of the you you choose to be.
When we recognize that by including greater realities and greater
aspects of the self- a positive approach to Neptune-we need not fear
this "ocean" of greater aspects of the self and can then allow these
greater aspects that we are to CO-FUSE with, instead of con-fusing the
self that we are.
If we believe that we will "lose" something by incorporating and
co-fusing these larger concepts and realities, it is because of the
insecurity with the self and its rightful experience of validity just
because it exists.
If we believe that we are a part of this unbroken wholeness-this "sea"
of "All That Is" and that it must have known what it was doing when it
extended us and created us INTO the sea as one of the FACETS of it-then
there is no reason to fear dis-solution and we can know that the
abundance of the Multiverse is ours to co-fuse and have access to -to
support the facet that we are of it-this is the positive aspect of
Neptune.
And rightly so as the higher octave of Venus, the "support" of Neptune
extends to the unseen support as well as the seen.
Therefore, simply recognize that it is always a choice in creation HOW
we will experience the Ocean, the sea-
It can cleanse the toxins of belief in separateness through co-fusion-
or threaten the self as the EFFECT of the insecurities it creates of its
own existence-One=reality and one=illusion
We can drown or use this sea to transport and co-fuse the self we are
across the sea of the more expanded self we are.
Saturn=focused dream.
Neptune=expanded dream.
--
When the white eagle of the north is flying overhead,
and the browns, reds, and golds of autumn lie in
the gutter, dead.
Remember then the summer birds with wings of fire
flaying come to witness springs new hope,
born of leaves decaying.
As new life will come through death, love will come
at leisure, love of love, love of life and giving,
without measure gives in return the wondrous yearn
for promise, almost seen.
Live hand in hand, and together we'll stand
on the threshold of a dream.
The Moody Blues
anonym™
>
> Beep wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> > >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> > >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> > >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> > >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> > >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
> >
> > His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
> >
> > I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
> > important astrologer, you know ;)
>
> And you are a very important.....?????
Friend.
Alien concept to you, I am sure.
What are you proud of being, Ed?
>Usenet abuser?
Thought so.
anonym™
>
> Beep wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:53:06 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> > <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Rhianna wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> > >> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> > >> >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> > >> >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> > >> >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> > >> >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> > >> >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
> > >> >
> > >> >consulting for 20.
> > >> >A complaint will be sent
> > >>
> > >> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
> > >> and
> > >> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
> > >> sent...please take action"
> > >
> > >Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
> > >lying piece of garbage.
> > >
> >
> > Well, hello again, Mr. Suave!
> >
> > You debonair devil, you...sweet-talking all the ladies, as usual!
>
> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
> ladies, thank you.
Oh, you "have" them, eh?
You're a typical misogynist asshole...and liar.
You don't have plenty of ladies, Ed. You're a lonely masturbator with a
major attitude and an even worse debt problem.
anonym™
>
> Because the "All that Is" is the unbroken wholeness of all that
> exists-it is a "sea" of consciousness.
>
pre-typed screed:
Edmond H. Wollmann
4158 Decoro St. # 51
San Diego, CA 92122
(619) 453-2342
Mo'
snipped
Subject: Re: Ed, stop spamming your pre-typed screed, asshole was Re:
Neptune
Um, couldn't you say that having Ed and asshole in the same sentence as
being superfluous? Doesn't one kind of mean the other and vice versa?
<BAM!>
--
<chugalug lug on cum> PZ is soooo tasty, I'd thought he was sugar cane.
- MoE
jfred
> In article <37E7BC...@bigfoot.com>,
> Edmond H. Wollmann <Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me.
>
> Obviously you get fooled a lot. That's why they call you a fool.
>
> >I have plenty of ladies, thank you.
>
> That's why you do your own laundry.
>
> "I do do laundry. I have to because there will be no females in this house
> for the next 20 years." -Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer,
> hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM, convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook
> of the Year 1998
Oh dear! Another EdmoContradiction{TM}!
Do you think he was lying when he said he has plenty of ladies or when
he said that there will no females in his house for the next 20 (a nice
round number, divisible by 5) years?
I think it's the former.
He's a misogynistic, sexist bastard. No woman in her right mind would
have anything to do with the panty-pated fool.
--
jfred... Cahooter #14, WWAS member #4, http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
[Edmo] is the first person ever to use "integrity" to mean "delusional
person without a work ethic." -- A.P. "Why am I an asshole?" -Edmo
Everybody's got something to hide except for me and my monkey
Jodi
would hear on my kid's Saturday morning cartoon. Wally I thought I made
it clear to you that I didn't like you. Did you take the term WEIRD as a
compliment? I'm not surprised. For some reason the internet is loaded
with people like you. It's so annoying. Well anyway. Please don't
respond to anymore of my post. And that goes for you too Edmond if you
read this.
Jodi
Binograph
from high school crushes to marriages. >>
Hi, Lady J.
Great subject! The relationships I am mentioning have not all been intimate,
but have all proven to be significant.
ME:
Aquarius/Leo/Aries Moon
BEST:
Aquarius/Leo/Aries Moon (I kid you not) - Lovers and absolute best friends for
7 years. I think we broke up by accident. She ended up with another Aquarian
- he's pretty cool!
GOOD:
Aquarius/Aries/Leo Moon (go figure) - Great rapport, but I was already taken.
We've been playing relationship TAG for 20 years.
Libra/Gemini/Aquarius Moon - Would do absolutely anything for me, but I thought
she was too young. Now, she's too engaged (again).
Gemini/Gemini/Gemini Moon - Incredible conversations. Unfortunately, she had
too many things going on to settle down.
BAD:
Scorpio/Sagittarius/Leo Moon - I was totally infatuated with her. But
(admittedly), she was way too "deep" for me (her 6 Scorpion planets squared my
6 Aquarian planets).
Scorpio/Sagittarius/Leo Moon - Different woman, same basic problem. Better
rapport because of her Libra planets.
WORST:
Taurus/Virgo/Pisces Moon - We suffered from intuitive misunderstanding, and
disagreed on EVERYTHING. It lasted about half a kiss. But, we're still
friends.
Basically, I get along better with Air/Fire personalities. The Air part can
deal with my headiness. And, the Fire part can deal with my arrogance.
Okay, I'll shut up.
Michael
el...@no.spam
>There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me.
Obviously you get fooled a lot. That's why they call you a fool.
>I have plenty of ladies, thank you.
That's why you do your own laundry.
--
"I do do laundry. I have to because there will be no females in this house
for the next 20 years."
-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
>There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
>ladies, thank you.
>--
No way!
No lady would have *anything* to do with you!
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
<Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>Beep wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>>
>> His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
>>
>> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
>> important astrologer, you know ;)
>
>And you are a very important.....????? Usenet abuser?
>--
Pam is a very important sweet, loving person, who happens to be on
your shit list.
Can I be on it too???
:D
j
Beep
wrote:
>"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>>
>> Beep wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> > >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> > >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> > >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> > >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> > >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>> >
>> > His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
>> >
>> > I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
>> > important astrologer, you know ;)
>>
>> And you are a very important.....?????
>
>Friend.
>
>Alien concept to you, I am sure.
>
>What are you proud of being, Ed?
>
>
>>Usenet abuser?
>
>Thought so.
Nymmie...thank you !
Hugs to one of my *friends*
Pam
KAYFOLSON
are really allies. Do not jump to conclusions about who to send away. We know
you have to react defensively at first, but the only one who has been truly
rude and horrid towards you is Ed.
The lose 'em toots was harmless way of saying get rid of the fancy sig.
because it doesnt translate to the computers successfully. Lay off Wally
because he is actually a sweetheart. You are right about the other guy
though...
Edmo attacked me for daring to discuss sun sign data also. Ignore him and he
might just go away again...shhhhshhhhhhh,,,
your new friend
kay
scorpio sun/cappy moon/ taurus asc.
one brief marriage in my 20s to a double aries with leo moon,
I have been happily married to a double aries with cancer moon since 83
el...@no.spam
Edmond H. Wollmann <Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>Because the "All that Is" is the unbroken wholeness of all that
>exists-it is a "sea" of consciousness.
Because the "All that Is" is a silly phrase Edie either made up
or plagerized.
el...@no.spam
jfred <jf...@think.different> wrote:
>Do you think he was lying when he said he has plenty of ladies or when
>he said that there will no females in his house for the next 20 (a nice
>round number, divisible by 5) years?
yes
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>And one more thing. What in the world is the CNOTM award???
>
>
Clueless Newbie Of the Month.
It was in reference to your asking what is this "binary thing"
Wally Anglesea™
wrote:
>Lose 'em "toots" ?! God you're a dork. That sounds like something I
Jodi, I never said "Lose 'em toots" read who you are attributing to.
I note you have turned off all the fancy HTML. That's good. Now you
are not a CNOTM. Learn. We all had to, and if you act properly,
you'll find we can all get along.
Just don't expect to get challenged though.
Steer clear of Ed.
And if you don't want to see my responses to your posts, well you can
always ignore them, however Usenet is a free forum. Anyone can respond
to anyone.
Now have fun.
Wally Anglesea™
>Jodi, we are really not a bad group once you get to know us. Wally and anonym
>are really allies. Do not jump to conclusions about who to send away. We know
>you have to react defensively at first, but the only one who has been truly
>rude and horrid towards you is Ed.
> The lose 'em toots was harmless way of saying get rid of the fancy sig.
>because it doesnt translate to the computers successfully. Lay off Wally
>because he is actually a sweetheart.
hugs and kisses :-))
> You are right about the other guy
>though...
> Edmo attacked me for daring to discuss sun sign data also. Ignore him and he
>might just go away again...shhhhshhhhhhh,,,
Someone make sure Jodi has reference to the smbtech site please.
Ken Anglesea
wrote:
>Lose 'em "toots" ?! God you're a dork. That sounds like something I
>would hear on my kid's Saturday morning cartoon. Wally I thought I made
>it clear to you that I didn't like you. Did you take the term WEIRD as a
>compliment? I'm not surprised. For some reason the internet is loaded
>with people like you. It's so annoying. Well anyway. Please don't
>respond to anymore of my post. And that goes for you too Edmond if you
>read this.
>
Not wanting to put someone in it,but Wally never said "Lose em toots"
If you go back to the origonal thread,you can see who said what.
This is what was actually said:
In other words, the flower, the butterfly, the background, and the
song.
Lose 'em, toots!
-- As for Ed, Go here.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://lart.com/ed/
--
...
D.R.Ken Anglesea™.Astrocricketologist.
Agnostic Astrologer Call 2995603 .SAN. 92-01766-048.
Neumekenologist™ S.N.I.P. W.W.A.S.#5
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://lart.com/ed/
Stella
"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
<snip>
>
> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
> ladies, thank you.
Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions to be
owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
do not presuppose that you *have* her.
--
_.----.
* .' .-'`` *
/ / Stella Elphick |
, <x | sceptic astrologer -*-
| _\ -*- NEW EMAIL ADDRESS |
, _\ | [maia...@dtn.ntl.com]
\ \ *
'._ '.__ . >>I'm not a woo-woo, I'm just semiotically aroused<<
'----"
Nigel R Lau
>
>
>"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>
>> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
>> ladies, thank you.
>
>Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
>
>Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions to be
>owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
>do not presuppose that you *have* her.
>
hehehe ok KIDDING . Btw what the heck is a sceptic astrologer???
Beep
<Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>Beep wrote:
>>
>> a.d.n rescued once more
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:53:06 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
>> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Rhianna wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
>> >> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Jodi wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> >> >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> >> >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> >> >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> >> >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> >> >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>> >> >
>> >> >Sorry, you are incorrect. I have been studying for 30 years and
>> >> >consulting for 20.
>> >> >A complaint will be sent
>> >>
>> >> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
>> >> and
>> >> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
>> >> sent...please take action"
>> >
>> >Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
>> >lying piece of garbage.
>> >
>>
>> Well, hello again, Mr. Suave!
>>
>> You debonair devil, you...sweet-talking all the ladies, as usual!
>
>There are ladies that post here?
Yes.
You see, some of the posters here are male, and others are female. I
am not sure how far I have to go with this explanation...did you get a
birds-and-the-bees-type-of-talk at some point in your early
adolescence...I hope?
Pam
this is not my job
Beep
wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:29:22 -0500 (CDT), in alt.astrology
>Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi) wrote:
>
>>O.k .I erased my html. Are the binaries gone? Whatever those are. Now I
>>just have this ugly dark grey screen with green writing, yuck....
>
>Yes Joking the HTML is gone. (thank you)
>
>Most news servers, will not pass HTML encoded messages (they only work
>for a minority of people that use web browsers to read news, and some
>will not pass MIME encoded messages. Usenet is designed to handle only
>the basic 7 bit ASCII (nothing higher than ASCII 126) in headers and
>the 8 bit ASCII encode text in the messages...
>
>Some Time You need to take the time to read a few of the FAQs in
>news.answers I could mail you the URLs to look them up if you want. I
>think it might help.
>
>>That
>>dude Edmond has a mental disurbance. He needs help. Nobody likes him but
>>he keeps hanging around. Oh well, I'm just gonna ignore him like I do
>>all the other weirdos on the web.
>
>Ok Joking, but you need to know you are not one the Web anymore. This
>is USENET. The Web is a subset of the Internet, just like the web is a
>subset. The Internet is *huge*. WebTV and the Web (WWW) just scratches
>the surface of it. Web browsers at not the best method to explore all
>of it.
>
>If edmond becomes a problem let me or one of the other people here
>(beep are you up for this?)
Yes. If you get into problems due to Ed and I am around (I will be
out of town for about 3 weeks starting Monday but will be back after
that) feel free to email me.
Hugs
Pam
Beep
<Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>Beep wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>>
>> His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
>>
>> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
>> important astrologer, you know ;)
>
>And you are a very important.....?????
Person, Ed.
I'm a person.
Pam
I don't need an Arcturian reincarnation
Beep
>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:12:19 -0700, "Edmond H. Wollmann"
><Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>>Beep wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>>> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>>> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>>> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>>> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>>> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>>>
>>> His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
>>>
>>> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
>>> important astrologer, you know ;)
>>
>>And you are a very important.....????? Usenet abuser?
>>--
>
>Pam is a very important sweet, loving person, who happens to be on
>your shit list.
You are so nice Jules...thank you so much.
>
>Can I be on it too???
>
You are a wonderful woman...so you are on his list automatically :)
Pam
he picks his enemies like others pick friends
jfred
> On 22 Sep 1999 05:38:04 GMT, kayf...@aol.com (KAYFOLSON) wrote:
>
> >Jodi, we are really not a bad group once you get to know us. Wally and anonym
> >are really allies. Do not jump to conclusions about who to send away. We know
> >you have to react defensively at first, but the only one who has been truly
> >rude and horrid towards you is Ed.
> > The lose 'em toots was harmless way of saying get rid of the fancy sig.
> >because it doesnt translate to the computers successfully. Lay off Wally
> >because he is actually a sweetheart.
>
> hugs and kisses :-))
>
>
>
> > You are right about the other guy
> >though...
> > Edmo attacked me for daring to discuss sun sign data also. Ignore him and he
> >might just go away again...shhhhshhhhhhh,,,
>
>
> Someone make sure Jodi has reference to the smbtech site please.
You mean http://www.smbtech.com/ed/ -- THAT smbtech site?
Good reading, that.
Read it and weep, Edmo.
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
wrote:
>In article <37E8AB44...@NOSPAM.dtn.ntl.com>, Stella <maia...@NOSPAM.dtn.ntl.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>
>>> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
>>> ladies, thank you.
>>
>>Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
>>
>>Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions to be
>>owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
>>do not presuppose that you *have* her.
>>
>I'm tempted to say the obvious here ...well ok.. snobby feminist are you?
I'm gonna say the obvious... male chauvanist fucking asshole are you?
Just what part of "do not presuppose that you *have* her" do you think
is acceptable in the modern era? Just what part of "women are not
possessions to be owned" do you find offensive? Do you live in a part
of the world where women are indeed treated as property? No? Then
FUCKING KEEP YOUR CHAUVANIST ASSHOLE OPINIONS TO YOURSELF.
>hehehe ok KIDDING .
No - I don't think so. If you couldn't resist that minor temptation to
rag on someone for calling Ed on his attitudes toward women (which
have been *widely* documented in this NG), then you are indeed a
fucking chauvanist asshole.
Oh... I'm *not* kidding.
<plonk>
Paul Schlyter
Stella <maia...@NOSPAM.dtn.ntl.com> wrote:
> "Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty
>> of ladies, thank you.
>
> Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
>
> Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions
> to be owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that
> is fine, but do not presuppose that you *have* her.
instance Marsha, who defends virtually anything Eddie does or says,
to such an extent that many people believe Marsha is nothng but
one of Eddie's sock puppets.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Grev Turegatan 40, S-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pau...@saaf.se paul.s...@ausys.se pa...@inorbit.com
WWW: http://hotel04.ausys.se/pausch http://welcome.to/pausch
Jodi
my first post. And speaking of post I think this will be my last one to
this group. Most people here seem pretty nice but half the conversations
are centered around that Edmond creep. That seems to happen a lot on the
internet. One asshole ruins it for everybody else. Oh well, thanks to
all of you for helping me a little with my study. See y'all later, bye.
Avital Pilpel
> >> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty
> >> of ladies, thank you.
> >
> > Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions
> > to be owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that
> > is fine, but do not presuppose that you *have* her.
>
> Unfortunately, some women behave not much unlike possessions. For
> instance Marsha, who defends virtually anything Eddie does or says,
<snip>
Oh, come on. If I say I have a girlfriend, does that mean I claim to own
her as one would own a slave? It's a figure of speech, that's all. All Ed
meant was that he has many girlfriends, women he is sexually intimate
with.
Then again, Wollman claimed that he does his own laudnry since "there will
be no females in this house for the next 20 years". So it is safe to
assume that he doesn't really have any women, in any sense of the word
"have".
While we're on the subject of "having women" in its various senses, I
*still* can't figure out in what sense Ed meant that phrase when he said
"did you have sex or even a woman ricky?".
Avital Pilpel
el...@no.spam
Avital Pilpel <ap...@columbia.edu> wrote:
>While we're on the subject of "having women" in its various senses, I
>*still* can't figure out in what sense Ed meant that phrase when he said
>"did you have sex or even a woman ricky?".
He posted many variations on that theme. I think it was part of his cold
read fishing. He wanted me to react and tell him something of my personal
life he could use.
--
"She is the shitball."
el...@no.spam
Edmond H. Wollmann <Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>And you are a very important.....?????
She's much more important than you will ever be, Edie.
>Usenet abuser?
That she is not. You just don't like her so you call her names like
"slime" and "Usenet abuser". It shows your lack of integrity.
--
"Pam is a slime for supporting anonym"
"LYING DISINGENOUS ABUSER"
-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> In article <37E7C3...@bigfoot.com>,
> >exists-it is a "sea" of consciousness.
>
> Because the "All that Is" is a silly phrase Edie either made up
> or plagerized.
Boy, you get more mindless everyday Ricky the abuser. All that is, is
ALL THAT IS.
Big concepts, --I know having watched you abuse with one liners for 3
years-- are difficult for you. Did you have any astrology to discuss
afer three years of abusing groups created FOR THAT PURPOSE???
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 1999 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/tableof.htm
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:18:54 GMT, raf...@nelsonbay.com (Nigel R Lau)
> wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> >>"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
> >>
> >><snip>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ladies, thank you.
> >>
> >>
> >>owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
> >>do not presuppose that you *have* her.
> >>
>
> I'm gonna say the obvious... male chauvanist fucking asshole are you?
> Just what part of "do not presuppose that you *have* her" do you think
> is acceptable in the modern era? Just what part of "women are not
> possessions to be owned" do you find offensive? Do you live in a part
> of the world where women are indeed treated as property? No? Then
> FUCKING KEEP YOUR CHAUVANIST ASSHOLE OPINIONS TO YOURSELF.
>
> >hehehe ok KIDDING .
>
> No - I don't think so. If you couldn't resist that minor temptation to
> rag on someone for calling Ed on his attitudes toward women (which
> have been *widely* documented in this NG), then you are indeed a
> fucking chauvanist asshole.
>
> Oh... I'm *not* kidding.
>
> <plonk>
>
> >Btw what the heck is a sceptic astrologer???
Boy, are you exhibiting a negative and insecure masculine side or what?
Your Mars is in terrible shape I am assuming?
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> "Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
> > ladies, thank you.
>
> Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
>
> Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions to be
> owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
> do not presuppose that you *have* her.
I'll define my reality anyway I please.
Giant male ego sig snipped.
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:11:02 -0700, "Edmond H. Wollmann"
> <Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >Beep wrote:
> >>
> >> a.d.n rescued once more
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:53:06 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> >> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Rhianna wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:21:32 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
> >> >> <arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> >> >> >> reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> >> >> >> by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> >> >> >> seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> >> >> >> the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> >> >> >> Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >consulting for 20.
> >> >> >A complaint will be sent
> >> >>
> >> >> Jodi, you will soon realize that Edmond will often evade the question
> >> >> and
> >> >> instead will write something like this: "SNIP! Complaints
> >> >> sent...please take action"
> >> >
> >> >Nope, the complaints were sent for the binaries, you spin doctoring
> >> >lying piece of garbage.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Well, hello again, Mr. Suave!
> >>
> >> You debonair devil, you...sweet-talking all the ladies, as usual!
> >
>
>
> You see, some of the posters here are male, and others are female. I
> am not sure how far I have to go with this explanation...did you get a
> birds-and-the-bees-type-of-talk at some point in your early
> adolescence...I hope?
Didn't need one, but I have given many.
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 03:36:14 GMT, qtzc...@nospam.texas.net wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:12:19 -0700, "Edmond H. Wollmann"
> ><Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
> >>> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
> >>> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
> >>> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
> >>> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
> >>> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
> >>> important astrologer, you know ;)
> >>
> >>And you are a very important.....????? Usenet abuser?
> >>--
> >
> You are so nice Jules...thank you so much.
I see, "nice" is delusional perspectives colored by profound bias, and
direct lying now.
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> Lose 'em "toots" ?! God you're a dork. That sounds like something I
> would hear on my kid's Saturday morning cartoon. Wally I thought I made
> it clear to you that I didn't like you. Did you take the term WEIRD as a
> compliment? I'm not surprised. For some reason the internet is loaded
> with people like you. It's so annoying. Well anyway. Please don't
> respond to anymore of my post. And that goes for you too Edmond if you
> read this.
>
>
I will repond to whatever I please.
Edmond H. Wollmann
>
> And one more thing. What in the world is the CNOTM award???
>
>
Its a made up "anme calling" ad hominem to try to defeat and embarass
those who have defeated you with real arguments as a last ditch effort.
This fallacy is called "Argument Against the Person" (Argumentum ad
Hominem)
This fallacy always involves two arguers. One of them advances (either
directly or implicitly) a certain argument, and the other then responds
by directing his or her attention not to the first person's argument but
to the first person himself. When this occurs, the second person is said
to commit an argument against the person.
The argument against the person occurs in three forms: the ad
hominem abusive, ad hominem circumstantial, and the tu quoque.
In the ad hominem abusive, the second person responds to the first
person's argument by abusing the first person.
In the circumstantial it begins the same way, but instead of heaping
verbal abuse on his or her opponent, the respondent attempts to
discredit the opponent's argument by alluding to certain circumstances
that affect the opponent. By doing so, the respondent hopes to show that
the opponent is predisposed to argue the way he or she does and should
therefore not be taken seriously.
In the tu quoque it begins the same way-except that the second arguer
attempts to make the first appear to be hypocritical or arguing in bad
faith-i.e. "how dare you argue that I should stop doing x; why, you do
or have done x yourself!" Logic, 4th Edition Hurley, University of San
Diego, Wadsworth Publishing, 1991
el...@no.spam
Edmond H. Wollmann <arctu...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> In article <37E7C3...@bigfoot.com>,
>> Edmond H. Wollmann <Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>> >Because the "All that Is" is the unbroken wholeness of all that
>> >exists-it is a "sea" of consciousness.
>> Because the "All that Is" is a silly phrase Edie either made up
>> or plagerized.
>Boy, you get more mindless everyday Ricky the abuser.
That's your only rebuttal? LOL! You definately are a kook and you
can't support your silly premises.
>All that is, is ALL THAT IS.
Tautologies like that one aren't very usefull, kook.
>Big concepts,
Not really.
> --I know having watched you abuse with one liners for 3 years--
You still haven't learned how to count, Edie? That one was two
lines and it was quite effective at showing your concept to be
foolish.
>are difficult for you.
What's difficult? Typing while laughing at you? Typing while laughing
at your astro-babble?
>Did you have any astrology to discuss
You don't discuss astrology. Why do you continue to post that
question? Is it a form of abuse that makes you feel important?
You aren't important. You're just a net kook.
>afer three years of abusing groups created FOR THAT PURPOSE???
Pointing out your bullshit isn't "abusing groups" no matter how many
times you say it. You're a failure.
Edmond H. Wollmann
Path:
wnb2!wnmaster2!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!12.127.16.134!attmtf!ip.att.net!remarQ-easT!rQdQ!supernews.com!remarQ.com!news.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From:
el...@no.spam ()
Newsgroups:
alt.astrology, alt.astrology.metapsych, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject:
Re: Neptune
Date:
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 19:09:55 GMT
Organization:
S.P.C.A.A.
Lines:
47
Message-ID:
<ruiac3...@news.supernews.com>
References:
<37E67A...@yahoo.com> <37E7C3...@bigfoot.com>
<rugs1c...@news.supernews.com> <37E91F...@netscape.net>
X-Complaints-To:
news...@supernews.com
X-Newsreader:
trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999)
Xref:
wnb2 alt.astrology:236138 alt.astrology.metapsych:47066
alt.usenet.kooks:135694
--
el...@no.spam
>I'll define my reality anyway I please.
Did it please you to be convicted of a misdemeanor?
Did it please you to have your "book" panned by Horoscope?
Did it please you to have an illegal detainer judgement entered
against you?
el...@no.spam
Edmond H. Wollmann <arctu...@netscape.net> wrote:
>Didn't need one,
That's your opinion.
>but I have given many.
Too bad your data wasn't real.
Nigel R Lau
>On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:18:54 GMT, raf...@nelsonbay.com (Nigel R Lau)
>wrote:
>
>>In article <37E8AB44...@NOSPAM.dtn.ntl.com>, Stella
>>>
>>>
>>>"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
>>>> ladies, thank you.
>>>
>>>Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
>>>
>>>Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions to be
>>>owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
>>>do not presuppose that you *have* her.
>>>
>
>I'm gonna say the obvious... male chauvanist fucking asshole are you?
>Just what part of "do not presuppose that you *have* her" do you think
>is acceptable in the modern era? Just what part of "women are not
>possessions to be owned" do you find offensive? Do you live in a part
>of the world where women are indeed treated as property? No? Then
>FUCKING KEEP YOUR CHAUVANIST ASSHOLE OPINIONS TO YOURSELF.
>
>>hehehe ok KIDDING .
>
>No - I don't think so. If you couldn't resist that minor temptation to
>rag on someone for calling Ed on his attitudes toward women (which
>have been *widely* documented in this NG), then you are indeed a
>fucking chauvanist asshole.
And your a complete moron and need to go an get anger management ROFLMAO
LIGHTEN UP FOR GODSAKE!!
Ken Anglesea
<arctu...@netscape.net> wrote:
>Jodi wrote:
>>
>> Lose 'em "toots" ?! God you're a dork. That sounds like something I
>> would hear on my kid's Saturday morning cartoon. Wally I thought I made
>> it clear to you that I didn't like you. Did you take the term WEIRD as a
>> compliment? I'm not surprised. For some reason the internet is loaded
>> with people like you. It's so annoying. Well anyway. Please don't
>> respond to anymore of my post. And that goes for you too Edmond if you
>> read this.
>>
>>
>
>I will repond to whatever I please.
I will also respond to who ever I choose.
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:34:30 -0700, Edmond Wollmann
<arctu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>You are purposely following up ano...@pacbell.net and his purposeful
>abuse. Complaints will be sent for eternity until you cease.
>Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
>© 1999 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
>Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
>Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
>http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/tableof.htm
...
D.R.Ken Anglesea™.Astrocricketologist.
Agnostic Astrologer Call 2995603 .SAN. 92-01766-048.
Neumekenologist™ S.N.I.P. W.W.A.S.#5
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://lart.com/ed/
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 17:18:34 GMT, bo...@nospam.vornet.com (Bob Officer)
>wrote:
>
BooHoo!
We'll miss you!
Have a great time, wherever you will be!
<hug>
Julie
>Hugs
>Pam
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
>On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 03:36:14 GMT, qtzc...@nospam.texas.net wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:12:19 -0700, "Edmond H. Wollmann"
>><Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Beep wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>>>> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>>>> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>>>> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>>>> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>>>> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>>>>
>>>> His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
>>>>
>>>> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
>>>> important astrologer, you know ;)
>>>
>>>And you are a very important.....????? Usenet abuser?
>>>--
>>
>>Pam is a very important sweet, loving person, who happens to be on
>>your shit list.
>
>You are so nice Jules...thank you so much.
>>
>>Can I be on it too???
>>
>
>You are a wonderful woman...so you are on his list automatically :)
From the looks of things this week (whoo boy!), I'll be on his list
until Hell has a week of 100 degree days (Hell, Norway, that is!)
>Pam
>he picks his enemies like others pick friends
And a privilege it is, to grace that list!
j
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
<arctu...@netscape.net> wrote:
>qtzc...@nospam.texas.net wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 10:18:54 GMT, raf...@nelsonbay.com (Nigel R Lau)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <37E8AB44...@NOSPAM.dtn.ntl.com>, Stella <maia...@NOSPAM.dtn.ntl.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>"Edmond H. Wollmann" wrote:
>> >>
>> >><snip>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> There are ladies that post here? Could have fooled me. I have plenty of
>> >>> ladies, thank you.
>> >>
>> >>Where are they? Locked in your cellar?
>> >>
>> >>Integrity hint: You do not *have* ladies, women are not possessions to be
>> >>owned. If a woman chooses to acknowledge your existence, that is fine, but
>> >>do not presuppose that you *have* her.
>> >>
>> >I'm tempted to say the obvious here ...well ok.. snobby feminist are you?
>>
>> I'm gonna say the obvious... male chauvanist fucking asshole are you?
>> Just what part of "do not presuppose that you *have* her" do you think
>> is acceptable in the modern era? Just what part of "women are not
>> possessions to be owned" do you find offensive? Do you live in a part
>> of the world where women are indeed treated as property? No? Then
>> FUCKING KEEP YOUR CHAUVANIST ASSHOLE OPINIONS TO YOURSELF.
>>
>> >hehehe ok KIDDING .
>>
>> No - I don't think so. If you couldn't resist that minor temptation to
>> rag on someone for calling Ed on his attitudes toward women (which
>> have been *widely* documented in this NG), then you are indeed a
>> fucking chauvanist asshole.
>>
>> Oh... I'm *not* kidding.
>>
>> <plonk>
>>
>> >Btw what the heck is a sceptic astrologer???
>
>Boy, are you exhibiting a negative and insecure masculine side or what?
What? Me? Insecure?
>Your Mars is in terrible shape I am assuming?
Naaah, my Mars is just fine... It's t. Mars squ n. Sun right now.
Julie
"clear the decks everybody, she's gonna BLOW"!!!!!!
qtzc...@nospam.texas.net
<arctu...@netscape.net> wrote:
>Beep wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 03:36:14 GMT, qtzc...@nospam.texas.net wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:12:19 -0700, "Edmond H. Wollmann"
>> ><Edmond_...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Beep wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 14:27:11 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> >Believe what you will, but it has been my experience both in life and in
>> >>> >reading astrological literature that the sun sign is the most important,
>> >>> >by far.. Now if you had read my original post correctly you would have
>> >>> >seen that I did not ask for anyone's opinion on whether or not I have
>> >>> >the right or wrong idea about synastry. By the way, what are your signs?
>> >>> >Just the sun, rising, and moon please.
>> >>>
>> >>> His are Taurus, Leo, and Capricorn.
>> >>>
>> >>> I know how busy he is and thought I would answer for him...he's a very
>> >>> important astrologer, you know ;)
>> >>
>> >>And you are a very important.....????? Usenet abuser?
>> >>--
Well, I certainly didn't write anything below, after the word
"person".
>> >Pam is a very important sweet, loving person, who happens to have a debilitated Mars and Saturn which betrays that she is not so nice after all.
Edmo, resorting to re-writing other's words.
You must really hate Pam with an unending hatred... too bad for you.
It doesn't hurt her at all... and binds you to the one you despise as
tightly as the most passionate of loves.
Poor eddieeee... just can't take it when women won't "behave" as he
thinks they should.
just a little control freakishness there...
>> You are so nice Jules...thank you so much.
>
>I see, "nice" is delusional perspectives colored by profound bias, and
>direct lying now.
well, I've never re-written anything you've said... maybe I should try
that?
Julie
"edmo gave me a new idea"
Phil Harrison
>On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 20:50:44 -0500 (CDT), Jodi...@webtv.net (Jodi)
>wrote:
>
> I believe it is some type of picture file or file that is not
>text. If your posts come in html format, it might be
>accompanied by a binary file. You didn't do anything wrong,
>Edmond Wollmann is just jerky to about everyone.
>
Except that the images were not included in the post. The HTML code just
contained the addresses of the images.