Precepts
Edmond Wollmann
categorize perceptions is a common observational bias that enters into
the scienctific OR astrological practice and method (any investigative
process).
The fact that everyone maintains and holds certain beliefs about
reality and subjective value judgments-NECESSARILY subjectively
assigns perceptive falculties with encoded (meaning given to "things"
in the multiverse that have no built-in meaning) meaning that intrudes
into implicit causal analysis.
The "Reason"(s) that we create these experiential reality constructs
is because they reinforce our beliefs ABOUT reality to assign meaning
to locus of causation that justifies and rationalizes our own bias.
Each system of belief has its own reinforcing logic in other words. In
experiements done with cardboard circulars, subjects were asked to cut
the circulars to match the size of coins. In another test they were
asked to cut the circulars in reference to NUETRAL circulars the same
size as coins. Which do you think were more accurately cut? Thats
right, the non coin circulars. The beliefs and subjective value
judgements of the observer were found to intrude on the spatial
ability of the subject with regard to the encoding assigned to the
coin.
In another example, children (ages 6-7) were asked to draw Santa on
Dec 5, Dec 21, and Dec 31. It was found that as Christmas approached
Santa got bigger and pictures more explicit. After Christmas passed,
the drawings of Santa became miniscule by comparison to the Santas on
the 21st. The "prevailing factors" such as Christmas' approach etc.,
obviously intrude upon the veridicality (accuracy) of every and any
observer. Theories are drawn from observations.
These are examples of how perceptual categorizations intrude on the
observer and create bias and faulty attributions. Bias creates
hypervigilance in interpreting data, situations, people, and "things"
within the multiverse with this built-in meaning. Therefore as an
example of how we create our experiential reality, these tests
demonstrate that the consciousness of the observer and the observed
together form the "act" of observation. And will be found to be very
difficult to separate without discernment (please see my posts on
projection and discernment and accompanying references to Jung.).
Therefore these observations and studies being done corraborate and
support the general theories of integrity and reality creation
asserted by Bashar, Seth and myself in regard to vibrational frequency
orientation being related to experiential reality. This is pretty well
known in the psychological community but would be an enhancement to
anyone not only in the counseling and astrological fields, but can
assist the scientifically oriented in better understanding their own
bias and subjective interjection of encoded belief structures into
their own work.
Thank you for allowing me to present this idea-if it works for you,
so be it, if it does not ignore it. My ideas are always suggestions of
my own observations and offerings only. I would never insist that
anyone believe anything just because of these examples or my opinion.
The paradigmatic structures that have great influence upon belief
systems on the planet are about to undergo drastic alterations-hence
these understandings, in my opinion, are crucial to the adjustment of
perspective and transformation occurring on the planet at this time.
Here are the basic components of self-empowering and integral behavior
as I can discern it at this time. The danger I feel is that not only
do astrologers give power to "planetary configurations" but that
scientists reinforce powerlessness by blaming "chaos", "randomness",
genetic "probabilitites" etc. The truth is that we create our
realities utterly as the effect of belief and intention-which these
paradigms then measure.
Self-Empowered- Is the recognition that you lack nothing and create
your reality 100% by what you believe and define yourself to be. It is
created from all levels of psychic material, i.e., unconscious,
conscious, collective unconscious, superconscious. You have all the
tools and all the abilities that you require at any given moment to be
anything you are willing and bold enough to believe you can define
yourself to be. You are always in control 100% even when you use 90%
to create the illusion that you only have the other 10%. No one can
make you feel inferior without your consent. The recognition that the
universe has no built-in meaning. The taking of responsibility (not
guilt) for ones reality BECAUSE you know it is you and your creation.
Integrity- Functioning as an integrated whole self, without placing
power outside of the self, since nothing is outside of the self. The
recognition that you are as powerful as you need to be to create
whatever you desire to create in your reality without having to hurt
yourself or anyone else in order to create it. You are always a part
of the problem or of the solution, if you are not part of the solution
it is easy to figure out where you are on the scale (unless of course
you are involved as an analytically discerning or accurate empathic
observer-pls see the discernment vs judgment post). You are not
responsible for anyone only responsible to them by being as much as
you can be in integrity.
Negative beliefs do not have any more power than positive. So they are
not necessarily "unfortunate", for every being creates their reality
utterly as the product of what they believe or have been taught to
believe is true. There is no one truth, except that THE truth is
composed of all truths within that system. Individuals can act in
positive ways or in negative ways. Positive is simply integrative and
negative is separative. But the positive individual, by the light by
which they shine, will simply show the negative individual(s) that
they are;
A) Untouchable by anything that is not of a similar vibration. And
that;
B) They offer back to the negative individual(s) an offering of a
choice, a choice to also be positive. If they do not choose to be
positive then they can simply go their own way, for that which is
negative cannot exist within the blinding light of that which is
positive, it is simple mechanics. That is all. Even if the negativity
is intentional the positive person will still extract a positive
effect.
Action is the manifested conviction of belief-because life happens
through you not to you. Or as Walt Whitman put it.
"What you are speaks so loudly, that I can't hear what you are
saying."
No one can interpret a life or vibrational level at which they
themselves are not capable of functioning, because all is vibration.
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
Bashar and The Association
Elanore Roosevelt
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2002 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/SDSU
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Cujo
news:8da057fc.02062...@posting.google.com:
> For those so inclined,
laughing at Edmo's whines can be a lot of fun.
APJ snecked. They don't want your screed there, you asshole.
--
There wouldn't be as many satisfied ladies around, if I
hadn't ditched them long ago! - Edmo in a moment of candor.
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the August, 2000 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
http://www.petitmorte.net/cujo/cujcert.jpg
Fanatic Legion # 555-PLNTY
Rank: Colonel
Motto: "ABUNDANCE!"
Flash Bazbo
"Edmond Wollmann" <e...@astroconsulting.com> wrote in message
news:8da057fc.02062...@posting.google.com...
<snip>
>
> Thank you for allowing me to present this idea-if it works for you,
> so be it, if it does not ignore it. My ideas are always suggestions of
> my own observations and offerings only. I would never insist that
> anyone believe anything just because of these examples or my opinion.
Really? Then how do you explain this:
"Thats because Mr. Nolle, is and has been a writer for Horoscope Magazine
for
many years, and like Ronnie Grishman does not want to admit that the
ridiculous
review of my book, was just that:
A poorly written attempt to defame a person's work so far above Horoscope
and
Tyl, that they can't even critique it, because it is too intelligent,
broad and
deep for them. They have never encountered a critically thinking
astrologer,
who can critique the critics.
They are arrogant, and lack forsight"
It seems it *does* bother you when others don't buy your crap.
John Griffin
"Edmond Wollmann" <e...@astroconsulting.com> wrote
> [ whatever ]
Given the nature of the goofy ideas you post, your decision to express
them as incoherent, soporific gobble is the best idea you ever had.
Immortilist
"John Griffin" <hilb...@foxinternets.net> wrote in message
news:3d13db92$1...@news.foxinternet.com...
we could make a trial and error process where our arbitrary selective
pressure could move the ramblings towards some goal without know it does
thus
>
>
>
>
Spámster
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> For those so inclined
Do you have any plans to come up with an original thought sometime this
year?
The_Sage
>Date written: 21 Jun 2002 17:07:14 -0700
>MsgID:<8da057fc.02062...@posting.google.com>
>The fact that everyone maintains and holds certain beliefs about
>reality and subjective value judgments
You are not talking facts. What makes you blindly believe that this
assertion of yours is a "fact"?
The Sage
=============================================================
My Home Page : http://home.rmci.net/thesage
"Be careful when casting out your demons, lest you cast out
the best part of yourself" -- ??
=============================================================
Larry Huntley
news:3D13EE69...@email.com:
Making plans, even just one plan, would require some degree of original
thought on Ed's part.
I leave the obvious conclusion to the reader.
- L
--
Larry Huntley Beaverton, Oregon
Skep-Ti-Cult® Member #130-978649-969 http://www.skepticult.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no such thing as too much good whisky. - Mark Twain
el...@no.spam
Edmond Wollmann <e...@astroconsulting.com> wrote:
>For those so inclined, precepts and the inclination to ENCODE or
>to categorize perceptions is a common observational bias that
>enters into the scienctific OR astrological practice and method
>(any investigative process).
Do you really think that meaningless sentence will impress the
rubes, Edmo?
AB
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
> For those so inclined,
SNIP!
BI is off the scale!
AB
Larry Huntley wrote:
>
> Spįmster <dont....@email.com> wrote in
> news:3D13EE69...@email.com:
>
> >
> >
> > Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> >
> >> For those so inclined
> >
> > Do you have any plans to come up with an original thought sometime this
> > year?
>
>
> Making plans, even just one plan, would require some degree of original
> thought on Ed's part.
>
> I leave the obvious conclusion to the reader.
Couldn't he send some bottle caps to Popular Mechanics and get some plans?
Spámster
Larry Huntley wrote:
> Spįmster <dont....@email.com> wrote in
> news:3D13EE69...@email.com:
>
> >
> >
> > Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> >
> >> For those so inclined
> >
> > Do you have any plans to come up with an original thought sometime this
> > year?
>
>
> Making plans, even just one plan, would require some degree of original
> thought on Ed's part.
>
> I leave the obvious conclusion to the reader.
>
Good point.