Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Zeus and Susan

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 8:47:12 PM8/22/09
to
Subject: Re: Yes!!
Date:10 Sep 9614:04:55 EDT
From: "Susan" <103674.201 @CompuServe.COM>
To: Edmond Wollmann <woll...@mail.sdsu.edu>

Edmond Wollmann wrote;

> I usually put the chart to the side and just go in "blind". I have
> seen astrological aspects in predictive charts come out profoundly
> and with precision-I have also seen them fail. It is my gut that
> knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is freedom of choice-and
> it is exercised only by awareness and realization. Beyond
> this-philosophers will make me look like an idiot. I do not
> understand much of what they say, because it seems so far off. My
> mind really does function Neptunian (3rd house remember?) and this
> just flows into the Mars in Gemini. I have only taken a few
> philosophy classes myself. I really don't know all the arguments for
> free will and determinism. I just know what I know.

Oh, stop it, Zeusie. You don't fool me for a minute honey. This is
not what you believe, your intellect is superior and we both know it.
By the way, Jmie told me last night that modern philosphy has come down
to argueing things like empiricism, et al because science rules the
day. It's pretty hard for most people to relate to; I think of Jude the
Obscure by Hardy..I think you are the most brilliant man in the world
and have known a number of brilliant men remember? Oh, how I love you!
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
� 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 9:00:09 PM8/22/09
to

In article <4A9091...@earthlink.net>

Edmond Wollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: Yes!!
> Date:10 Sep 9614:04:55 EDT
> From: "Susan" <103674.201 @CompuServe.COM>
> To: Edmond Wollmann <woll...@mail.sdsu.edu>
>

Lack of integrity noted, again.

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Aug 22, 2009, 9:16:27 PM8/22/09
to
On Aug 22, 6:00 pm, "Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
<mixmas...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
> In article <4A909190.2...@earthlink.net>

>
> Edmond Wollmann <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: Yes!!
> > Date:10 Sep 9614:04:55 EDT
> > From: "Susan" <103674.201 @CompuServe.COM>
> > To: Edmond Wollmann <wollm...@mail.sdsu.edu>

>
> Lack of integrity noted, again.

Says the stalking spammer oof 12 years.

Keep it up assholes, I can go forever.

Message has been deleted

Fujikawa Yamamoto

unread,
Aug 24, 2009, 6:53:00 PM8/24/09
to
On 22 Aug 2009, Edmond Wollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> posted some
news:4A9091...@earthlink.net:

That's not what she said when your noodle limped out, was it Edmo?

Did you ever pay back Susan Boyle?

"I have your address and will mail you the money." Edmo says the check
is in the mail.

Chris Krolczyk

unread,
Aug 25, 2009, 7:50:31 PM8/25/09
to
On Aug 22, 8:16 pm, Edmond Wollmann <AArctophi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > Date:10 Sep 9614:04:55 EDT

Pathetic.

Still can't let it go after all these years, can you?

> Keep it up assholes, I can go forever.

So can most other public masturbators.

It doesn't make *their* spooge artful or
insightful, either.

-Chris Krolczyk

Edmond Wollmann

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 7:01:08 PM8/27/09
to
> That's not what she said when your noodle limped out, was it Edmo?

My noodle never limps out. Either one of them, unlike you abusers. You
can't use either one.



> Did you ever pay back Susan Boyle?

> "I have your address and will mail you the money." Edmo says the check
> is in the mail.

Never said that idiot.

From - Tue Dec 17 19:27:05 1996
Received: from emout20.mail.aol.com (emout20.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.46])
by mail.sdsu.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
id TAA04472 for <woll...@mail.sdsu.edu>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996
19:09:15 -0800 (PST)
X-UIDL: 850879562.000
From: Suzyq...@aol.com
Received: by emout20.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA15537 for
woll...@mail.sdsu.edu; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 22:09:22 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 22:09:22 -0500
Message-ID: <96121722065...@emout20.mail.aol.com>
To: woll...@mail.sdsu.edu
Subject: Re: Salud!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="PART.BOUNDARY.0.24450.emout20.mail.aol.com.850878419"
Status: U
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 6079


--PART.BOUNDARY.0.24450.emout20.mail.aol.com.850878419
Content-ID: <0_24450_...@emout20.mail.aol.com.36482>
Content-type: text/plain

Dear Eddy,

.... Also, honey, please do not be offended but I don't lend money, I
GIVE it. If you try to send it back it will REALLY hurt my feelings and
I don't think it's wise to have hurt feelings over silly $ when you're
in love, do you? Pls don't argue with me because I will be quite
stubborn and adamant about this, you won't change my mind and I'll just
get upset! So I will send it Saturday and not another word between us
about this. What's mine is yours, do you see?

You were so sweet and sounded so concerned on the phone, that was really
nice and I love you for it.
Susan

She refused to even hear about it. It was a gift, I don't give back
gifts, its not nice.

0 new messages