Paintings for my friends
JoDream
For those of you willing to email your address or PO box,, I will send the
gifts to you..
I have just finished 5 of them.
From my heart I thank,
Keera ^
Pammy ^
Widdy
Jennia ^
Rick ^
Jfreddy ^
Bob
Eve
Nym
Julie
Roachie
Tom K
thomas
Danielle
Temp Dog
and more
I have some addresses checked off. I would love to paint pictures for the
rest of you..
Please email your address. So that I can let you know what you have given
me..
The FBI found me clean..
Love,
Jo
Keera? A seascape in Rhode Island or a horse?
LOL
Let me know :-)
--
http://www.geocities.com/dreammin7/Moments.html?967859918300
Edmond Wollmann
How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
http://astroconsulting.com/FAQs/neptune.htm
"Those who walk during the day, do not stumble, because they see the
light of this world. But those who walk at night stumble, because the
light is not in them." John:11,9
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Uruk Descendant
>From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
>Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
>
>In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> >
> > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>
>see is a Russian submarine.
>
>It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>
Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
with money gets attention?
I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
Did you have any astrology to discuss? How about psychology? If I were truly a
loser you and your abusing friends would have ignored me long ago.
I am steadily expanding, and you will see that my prediction is correct
astrologically;
Move over busker, your day is done,
move over busker my time has come.
I'm telling you to...
Move over busker, I'll bang my drum
Move over busker, my time has come.
You've got it coming, coming to you.
Move over busker, your day, your day is done.
Move over busker, my time has come.
You've got it coming, coming to you!!"
Paul McCartney/Eric Stewart, "Move Over Busker"
Cujo
Edmond Wollmann wrote in message <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
point of being an absolute fuckweasel?
---
Did you have a question about how the ALL THAT IS is reflected through
astrology? I was an astrologer 1000 times in Babylon.
Ed Wollmann, delusional kook explains his past.
Cujo
Uruk Descendant wrote in message
<20000913021236...@ng-fi1.aol.com>...
>>Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
>>From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
>>Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>>Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
>>
>>In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> >
>> > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>>
>>Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
>>see is a Russian submarine.
>>
>>It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>>
>
>Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
>with money gets attention?
>
>I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
Sure you do, kook!
>Did you have any astrology to discuss? How about psychology? If I were
truly a
>loser you and your abusing friends would have ignored me long ago.
>I am steadily expanding, and you will see that my prediction is correct
>astrologically;
Don't confuse laughing at you with attention. Your astrology is a fucking
joke. Even the astrologers you steal from consider you a laughingstock.
JoDream
<el...@no.spam> wrote in message news:srvao8...@news.supernews.com...
> In article <39bf3c70...@news.syd.connect.com.au>,
> Ken Anglesea <pla...@fishinternet.com.au> wrote:
>
> >>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
It serves me to know I am loved. It serves me to know it is OK to trust
humanity. It serves me to know that darkness is not exclusive; That all
humans suffer and we are united like a circle that never ends. It serves me
to believe that I have a right to live in harmony with 'all that is' and it
serves me to be able to discern the difference between good and evil.
Have a nice day you idiot.
Jo
>
> >How does it serve you to be such a lousy human being?.
> >
> >Jo just offered something nice and you try to destroy it by posting
> >something so vile.
>
> Vile is all he has to give.
>
jfred
> <el...@no.spam> wrote in message news:srvao8...@news.supernews.com...
> > In article <39bf3c70...@news.syd.connect.com.au>,
> > Ken Anglesea <pla...@fishinternet.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > >>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>
> It serves me to know I am loved. It serves me to know it is OK to trust
> humanity. It serves me to know that darkness is not exclusive; That all
> humans suffer and we are united like a circle that never ends. It serves
> me to believe that I have a right to live in harmony with 'all that is'
> and it serves me to be able to discern the difference between good and
> evil. Have a nice day you idiot.
Jo, the abrupt swerves you use to punctuate your conclusions crack me
up! You are a poet.
--
jfred
Habent Abdenda Omnes Praeter Me ac Simiam Meam
eve nshali
Jo, you are such a sweet soul, thank you. And thanks for today's
reply to edie, I wonder if it'll sink in...
I'll send you my email addy, not because I expect a painting, not that
I wouldn't love one but I am in oz! Just the bit you mentioned above:
"So that I can let you know what you have given me.."
You have given me and anyone with a heart a lot by being brave enough
to bare your soul in this group, maybe it's that aries midheaven!
>--
>http://www.geocities.com/dreammin7/Moments.html?967859918300
>
>
A [Temporary] Dog
<woll...@my-deja.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
ascended the alter of Fluffy and shouted:
Edmond, I'm *damn* proud that Jo chooses to put me with the other
folks in that list. If they're the army of darkness, count me in as
K9 scout.
>
>http://astroco[Bite][Chew][Spit out]une.htm
>
>"Those who walk during the day, do not stumble, because they see the
>light of this world. But those who walk at night stumble, because the
>light is not in them." John:11,9
Into Edmoland, go those aged fruitcakes and those old spammers, and
the flamed, who all long and all night whine before the alter of
Fluffy. With them I have nought to do.
But in Spinicland will I go. For to Spinicland go the fair and
courteous Wow Wows and Skeptics. And there pass the gold and silver,
the ermine and all rich furs, harpers and minstrels, and the happy of
the world.
--
- A (Temporary) Dog | Certified PSF / Virtual Kookhound
The Domain is *erols dot com* | Guild Dog for the "We're *Not* Lost
The Name is tempdog | Damit" Tribe of Skeptics
http://users.erols.com/tempdog/ | Official Companion Animal of
Put together as name@domain | the Black Ships
"One Small Step For A Paranormal, One Giant Leap For KookKind" -Cipher
Pedantus
"Uruk Descendant" <urukdes...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000913021236...@ng-fi1.aol.com...
> >Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
> >From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
> >Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
> >
> >In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> I am steadily expanding, ....
<snip>
Ego *inflation*, Ed...:| ?
Rog
Pedantus
"Beep" <spa...@west.net> wrote in message
news:oknurs4dmiasdh0kj...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 05:06:05 GMT, Edmond Wollmann
>
> Pam
Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
Rog..:)
>
>
> --
> email address: beep at west dot net
> Rheumatic Disease info: http://www.silcom.com/~sblc
> I check alt.fan.beep every day. Happy year 2000!
> -- Яллю
thomas rondy
<el...@no.spam> wrote in message
news:wollmann.still.hating....@no.spam...
> In article <20000913021236...@ng-fi1.aol.com>, Wollmann
> posing as Uruk (a type of Orc?) Descendant <urukdes...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes
them
> >with money gets attention?
>
> getting the attention but it is you that is the convicted criminal and
> it is you that has been posting threats. Now we find you injecting your
> vile into the newsgroup because you can't stand Jo being nice to some
> people you don't like. Are you really so stupid that you can't see how
> childish you are being?
>
> Get help, Wollmann. Get help before it is too late.
>
My guess would be that it is already far too late.
thomas rondy
JoDream <jod...@home.com> wrote in message
news:SFOv5.40621$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com...
>
> <el...@no.spam> wrote in message news:srvao8...@news.supernews.com...
> > In article <39bf3c70...@news.syd.connect.com.au>,
> > Ken Anglesea <pla...@fishinternet.com.au> wrote:
> >
>
> humanity. It serves me to know that darkness is not exclusive; That all
> humans suffer and we are united like a circle that never ends. It serves
me
> to believe that I have a right to live in harmony with 'all that is' and
it
> serves me to be able to discern the difference between good and evil.
> Have a nice day you idiot.
> Jo
WORD!
<SNIPPAGE>
Da nymmster! Whoa!
misdemeanor (PC 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on probation,
sued for Unlawful Detainer and evicted in 3/96, past violator of Federal
and State game laws for abusing wildlife, and remorseless confessed
killer of someone's child, dumbshit NetKook who has lost 15 ISP accounts
due to his spammin, net abuse, harassment, and violent physical threats,
and remarkably cowardly yellow bellied pussy who didn't show up for
lunch at PF Chang's even though it was only five minutes from his place
You tell us, you evil piece of shit.
el...@no.spam
Edmond Wollmann <woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
How does it serve you to be a vile, negative, lying asshole with no
friends and a criminal record?
--
"I DO NOT HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD."
-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998,
the Ted Kennedy of astrologers
http://lart.com/ed/
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=541493235&fmt=text
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#wollman
http://users.erols.com/tempdog/
Da nymmster! Whoa!
misdemeanor (PC 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on probation,
sued for Unlawful Detainer and evicted in 3/96, past violator of Federal
and State game laws for abusing wildlife, and remorseless confessed
killer of someone's child, dumbshit NetKook who has lost 15 ISP accounts
due to his spammin, net abuse, harassment, and violent physical threats,
and remarkably cowardly yellow bellied pussy who didn't show up for
lunch at PF Chang's even though it was only five minutes from his place
and after he claimed he would meet people there with a police escort wrote:
>
> >From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
> >Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
> >
> >In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > >
> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> >
> >Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
> >see is a Russian submarine.
> >
> >It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
> >
>
> Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
> with money gets attention?
It doesn't. That's because you *are* a criminal.
el...@no.spam
Steve Burnett <sb...@sun.smbtech.com> wrote:
>In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> >
> > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
>see is a Russian submarine.
>
>It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
It also bakes his potato when he isn't getting the attention.
el...@no.spam
posing as Uruk (a type of Orc?) Descendant <urukdes...@aol.com> wrote:
>Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
>with money gets attention?
What does that have to do with this thread, moron? It is Jo that is
Ken Anglesea
<woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
How does it serve you to be such a lousy human being?.
Jo just offered something nice and you try to destroy it by posting
something so vile.
SNIPPED
>
>--
>Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
>© 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
>Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
>Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
<><><><
D.R.Ken Anglesea™.Astrocricketologistš
Astrokenologist. (Owner, Operator)
Lord of A.D.A.
2995603 .SAN. 92-01766-048.
http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
http://lart.com/ed/
ryannosaurus
<woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
How does it serve you that you only have support FROM clueless?
Beep
<woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
You are a sour lemon in the fruit garden of life.
Pam
Spamster
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
The same way it serves YOU to be a fuckhead?
Spamster
Uruk Descendant wrote:
> >Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
> >From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
> >Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
> >
> >In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > >
> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> >
> >Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
> >see is a Russian submarine.
> >
> >It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
> >
>
> Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
> with money gets attention?
I don't know, but it bothers you enough to keep whining.
>
> I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
>
You mean like 99% of the people here? BWAHAHAHA.
JoDream
"roachie" <roa...@petitmorte.org> wrote in message
news:8pndp8$sf2$1...@ljutefisk.databasix.com...
> Ken Anglesea <pla...@fishinternet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 05:06:05 GMT, Edmond Wollmann
> > <woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> >
> > How does it serve you to be such a lousy human being?.
>
> shit look like the empire state building.
KEYBOARD!!!!!!!!!!!
Fongool Yooooooooooooooooo
Jo loves ROachie!
>
> > Jo just offered something nice and you try to destroy it by posting
> > something so vile.
>
> It's all he knows, and someday he will be called upon it.
>
> Ocean+box of cement.
>
> --
> DataBasix.com/Lart.com/petitmorte.org Families of Fine Posters (tm)
jfred
> In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> >
> > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>
> Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
> see is a Russian submarine.
>
> It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
It also scorches his shorts that she is doing something that is beyond
him: giving away her art.
Edmo tried, but no one wanted his.
JoDream
"jfred" <sp...@petitmorte.org> wrote in message
news:1egw7ey.kf09x31yxbkuyN%sp...@petitmorte.org...
> Steve Burnett <sb...@sun.smbtech.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > >
> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> >
> > Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
> > see is a Russian submarine.
> >
> > It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>
> It also scorches his shorts that she is doing something that is beyond
> him: giving away her art.
>
Your horizon is ready Jfreddy!
Sending it off,, Did you get your sullpies yet?
Jo :-)
jfred
> "jfred" <sp...@petitmorte.org> wrote in message
> news:1egw7ey.kf09x31yxbkuyN%sp...@petitmorte.org...
> > Steve Burnett <sb...@sun.smbtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> > >
> > > Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and see is a
> > > Russian submarine.
> > >
> > > It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
> >
> > It also scorches his shorts that she is doing something that is beyond
> > him: giving away her art.
> >
> What we keep, we lose. What we give, we keep forever.
> Your horizon is ready Jfreddy!
Oooh boy!
> Sending it off,, Did you get your sullpies yet?
Working on it -- some of 'em are going to have to wait for Santa Claus!
:-)
a
Uruk Descendant <urukdes...@aol.com> wrote:
>I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
Of course you do. And I'm sure you tell them all how popular you are
and how many friends you have on Usenet.
--
"Orion is a star." -- Edmond Wollmann, <36EF1B...@yahooo.com>
Widdershins
<woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>In article <CXAv5.40476$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> "JoDream" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>> For all of you who helped me through the darkness ... I have a gift
>for you.
snip
>> Please email your address. So that I can let you know what you have
>given
>> me..
>> The FBI found me clean..
>> Love,
>> Jo
>> Keera? A seascape in Rhode Island or a horse?
>> LOL
>> Let me know :-)
>
>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
How does it serve you to be so filled with hate?
Fuckhead.
Asshole.
When are you going to pay Susan back, deadbeat?
Widdershins
Skepticult Member #159-904378-909
My inner child is a mean little fucker.
el...@no.spam
>>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>How does it serve you to be such a lousy human being?.
>
>Jo just offered something nice and you try to destroy it by posting
>something so vile.
Vile is all he has to give.
JoDream
"eve nshali" <evn...@nevermind.net> wrote in message
news:39bff2e5...@news.dingoblue.net.au...
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 01:41:54 GMT, "JoDream" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>
> >For all of you who helped me through the darkness ... I have a gift for
you.
the
> >gifts to you..
> >I have just finished 5 of them.
> >From my heart I thank,
> >Keera ^
> >Pammy ^
> >Widdy
> >Jennia ^
> >Rick ^
> >Jfreddy ^
> >Bob
> >Eve
> >Nym
> >Julie
> >Roachie
> >Tom K
> >thomas
> >Danielle
> >Temp Dog
> >and more
> >I have some addresses checked off. I would love to paint pictures for
the
> >rest of you..
> >me..
> >The FBI found me clean..
> >Love,
> >Jo
> >Keera? A seascape in Rhode Island or a horse?
> >LOL
> >Let me know :-)
> >
> >
> reply to edie, I wonder if it'll sink in...
> I'll send you my email addy, not because I expect a painting, not that
> I wouldn't love one but I am in oz!
Where's oz?
Just the bit you mentioned above:
> "So that I can let you know what you have given me.."
> You have given me and anyone with a heart a lot by being brave enough
> to bare your soul in this group, maybe it's that aries midheaven!
WHew!
That was the hardest part but the alternative would have been deadly..
Thank you eve.
Love
Jo
>
>
> >--
> >http://www.geocities.com/dreammin7/Moments.html?967859918300
> >
> >
>
JoDream
"A [Temporary] Dog" <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote in message
news:iuvvrs8e3ah4n1aan...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 05:06:05 GMT, Edmond Wollmann
> ascended the alter of Fluffy and shouted:
>
> >In article <CXAv5.40476$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
>
> folks in that list. If they're the army of darkness, count me in as
> K9 scout.
>
> >
> >http://astroco[Bite][Chew][Spit out]une.htm
> >
> >"Those who walk during the day, do not stumble, because they see the
> >light of this world. But those who walk at night stumble, because the
> >light is not in them." John:11,9
>
> Into Edmoland, go those aged fruitcakes and those old spammers, and
> the flamed, who all long and all night whine before the alter of
> Fluffy. With them I have nought to do.
>
> But in Spinicland will I go. For to Spinicland go the fair and
> courteous Wow Wows and Skeptics. And there pass the gold and silver,
> the ermine and all rich furs, harpers and minstrels, and the happy of
> the world.
>
;-)
Jo
Jenni Anglesea
Well I just want to say thank you for putting me on your list of
friends. Ido consider you as one of my friends also. :o)
Take care Jo.
:o) :o) :o)
Jenni from Oz.
LectrikEd & son
>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>
>http://astrocons.com/FAQs/neptune.htm
>
How does it serve you to be a stinkweed?
NitWit?
Bunghole?
Dillweed?
PipSqueak?
PickleHead?
Plagiarizer?
LowLife?
Killer?
ConMan?
Abuser?
Spammer?
ScumBag?
ButtMunch?
SchlongSchlurper?
DoucheBag?
TamponToker?
WeasleWeenie?
Coward?
YellowBelly?
LectrikEd & son
_________________
Skepticult Member #17-21568-933
First Element and Grand Master Plenipotentiary of the Array
My name is Cornholio Montoya.
You spammed my father.
Prepare to die.
Currently I have no Girlfriend, basically because every Girl
in my town thinks that I am a Freak<-------Flagship1 tells it like it is.
Lou Minatti™
> How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
How does it serve you to be a complete and utter shit to people who are
only trying to have a little joy in their lives?
--
"You fanatical BASTARDS AND BITCHES do not own the INTERNET." -Bruce
Kettler
http://www.watchingyou.com
Lou Minatti™
>
> >Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
> >From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
> >Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
> >
> > >
> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> >
> >see is a Russian submarine.
> >
> >It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
> >
>
> with money gets attention?
>
The five friends on each hand don't count, Eddie.
Ken Anglesea
<woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
SNIP
>How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
You know.
It really burns your cookies to see people rally around a friend in
need.
So sad the clown.
UNITED WE STAND DIVIDED WE FALL.
SNIP
Ken Anglesea
wrote:
>Uruk Descendant wrote:
>>
>> >Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
>> >From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
>> >Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>> >Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
>> >
>> >In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> > >
>> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>> >
>> >Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
>> >see is a Russian submarine.
>> >
>> >It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>> >
>>
>> Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
>> with money gets attention?
>>
>> I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
>
>The five friends on each hand don't count, Eddie.
LMAO
They are not his friends just a mild acquaintance.
>--
>"You fanatical BASTARDS AND BITCHES do not own the INTERNET." -Bruce
>Kettler
>http://www.watchingyou.com
<><><><
JoDream
"Lou MinattiT" <loumi...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:39C02A...@yahoo.com...
> Uruk Descendant wrote:
> >
> > >Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
> > >From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
> > >Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> > >Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
> > >
> > >In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> > >
> > >Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
> > >see is a Russian submarine.
> > >
> > >It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
> > >
> >
> > Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes
them
> > with money gets attention?
> >
> > I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
>
> The five friends on each hand don't count, Eddie.
>
ew , sorry.
:-)
Jo, covering her face.
el...@no.spam
thomas rondy <tro...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>My guess would be that it is already far too late.
I'm afraid you are right.
el...@no.spam
Ken Anglesea <pla...@fishinternet.com.au> wrote:
>>> I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
>>The five friends on each hand don't count, Eddie.
>LMAO
>They are not his friends just a mild acquaintance.
They're trying to get away!
el...@no.spam
Pedantus <peda...@geocities.com> wrote:
> Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
No!
Widdershins
<rlsat...@exotrope.net> wrote:
>
>"Beep" <spa...@west.net> wrote in message
>>
>> You are a sour lemon in the fruit garden of life.
>>
>> Pam
>
> Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
>
>Rog..:)
>
She's being rougher on lemons.
Simon Orne
Burnett) wrote:
>In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> >
> > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>
>Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
>see is a Russian submarine.
I'd be a bit surpised if he could look up to see a starfishes' butt.
>It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
Which is why he posted that noxious message to begin with.
>
>--
>Steve Burnett
>sb...@smbtech.com
>
Simon Orne
wrote:
>>Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
>>From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
>>Date: 9/12/2000 11:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>>Message-id: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
>>
>>In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> >
>> > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>>
>>Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
>>see is a Russian submarine.
>>
>>It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>>
>
>Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
>with money gets attention?
Obviously it doesn't, or you never would have commited the excesses &
misdemeanors that you have.
>I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
Only in your dreams, asshole.
>Did you have any astrology to discuss?
Did you have some further idiocy to justify?
> How about psychology?
How about lunacy, as in your own?
>If I were truly a
>loser
Which you obviously are.
>you and your abusing friends would have ignored me long ago.
Stop morphing past killfiles, then.
>I am steadily expanding,
You are steadily declining in all possible respects.
> and you will see that my prediction is correct
>astrologically;
Your astrological palaverings have nothing to do with accuracy.
<misused material removed>
In closing, I invite you to go to Hell, with the wish you'll be
charged rent.
-- Simon Orne
Sun=Virgo
Moon=Cancer
Ascendant=Scorpio =)
eve nshali
Australia.
Pedantus
<el...@no.spam> wrote in message
news:ss0laqh...@news.supernews.com...
for?...:)
Rog...:)
Pedantus
"Widdershins" <sini...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:39c37162....@news.concentric.net...
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 20:38:23 -0400, "Pedantus"
> <rlsat...@exotrope.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Beep" <spa...@west.net> wrote in message
>
> >>
> >> You are a sour lemon in the fruit garden of life.
> >>
> >> Pam
> >
> > Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
> >
> >Rog..:)
> >
> She's being rougher on lemons.
>
>
> Widdershins
Well, I'm shipping beep a fresh supply of wet noodles...:)
Rog
jfred
No doubt the inspiration for The Addams Family's "Itt" came from an
attempt by Edmo to masturbate.
Cujo
>
> > In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > >
> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
> >
> > Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
> > see is a Russian submarine.
> >
> > It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>
> It also scorches his shorts that she is doing something that is beyond
> him: giving away her art.
>
> Edmo tried, but no one wanted his.
I want a Wollmann original!!!!!!!!
el...@no.spam
jfred <sp...@petitmorte.org> wrote:
>No doubt the inspiration for The Addams Family's "Itt" came from an
>attempt by Edmo to masturbate.
Is it true his voice is something like Itt's?
el...@no.spam
Pedantus <peda...@geocities.com> wrote:
>> > Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
>>
>> No!
> But, "sour lemon"....is this acetic vulgarity really called
>for?...:)
Well, it is too mild.
Widdershins
wrote:
>No doubt the inspiration for The Addams Family's "Itt" came from an
>attempt by Edmo to masturbate.
You are a truly evil woman.
I like it!
Widdy
Widdershins
You're in the neighborhood. Commission a portrait.
He he he.
eve nshali
<cu...@usenet-performance-art.org> wrote:
>
>"jfred" <sp...@petitmorte.org> wrote in message
>news:1egw7ey.kf09x31yxbkuyN%sp...@petitmorte.org...
>> Steve Burnett <sb...@sun.smbtech.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> > >
>> > > How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
>> >
>> > Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
>> > see is a Russian submarine.
>> >
>> > It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
>>
>> It also scorches his shorts that she is doing something that is beyond
>> him: giving away her art.
>>
>> Edmo tried, but no one wanted his.
>
>I want a Wollmann original!!!!!!!!
>
>
What would you do with it?
el...@no.spam
Bob Officer <bo...@vornet.com> wrote:
>>Why would it bother me that a criminal who threatens others and bribes them
>>with money gets attention?
>You are the person with criminal record. Fines and probation and
>everything.
Just another thing he's in denial about.
--
"I am the richest, most successful person on the planet! Yeeeeeehaaaaaw!!!"
-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998,
the Ted Kennedy of astrologers
http://lart.com/ed/
http://www.shore.net/~a/wollmann/faves.html
http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=541493235&fmt=text
Jo Mazzotta
<el...@no.spam> wrote in message news:ss21hqd...@news.supernews.com...
> In article <r13w5.402$fZc.19...@news.randori.com>,
> Pedantus <peda...@geocities.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
> >>
> >> No!
>
> >for?...:)
>
> Well, it is too mild.
If I didn't know Peddy better , I'd think he is trolling?
Jo
el...@no.spam
Jo Mazzotta <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>> >> > Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
>> >>
>> >> No!
>>
>> > But, "sour lemon"....is this acetic vulgarity really called
>> >for?...:)
>>
>> Well, it is too mild.
>If I didn't know Peddy better , I'd think he is trolling?
Knowing him makes you think he isn't?
Pedantus
"Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote in message
news:%bcw5.40777$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com...
>
> <el...@no.spam> wrote in message
news:ss21hqd...@news.supernews.com...
> > Pedantus <peda...@geocities.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> > Ain't you bein' a mite hard on 'im, beep?...:)
> > >>
> > >> No!
> >
> > >for?...:)
> >
> > Well, it is too mild.
>
> If I didn't know Peddy better , I'd think he is trolling?
>
Move 'em in
Move 'em out
Keep them dogies trolling.....
Nau...ga ...hyyyyyyyde!...:)
Rog...:)
Tom Kerr
>"eve nshali" <evn...@nevermind.net> wrote in message
>news:39bff2e5...@news.dingoblue.net.au...
<snip>
>> Jo, you are such a sweet soul, thank you. And thanks for today's
>> reply to edie, I wonder if it'll sink in...
>> I'll send you my email addy, not because I expect a painting, not that
>> I wouldn't love one but I am in oz!
>
>Where's oz?
Somewhere over the rainbow.
alan williams
bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
...
> More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends. They are not fair
> weather friends, passing acquaintances, or people that nod when I pass by
> on the street.
>
> As far as lovers, I have one. only one, I want no more than one. My one
> lover fills my heart with joy and pleasure. To try to have more than one
> lover would cut the love I would have to share with her. Would not that
> cheat her, giving only half measure for what she gives freely to me?
Well said, Virgo man.
Each of us seeks perfection in our own way, but you are blessed with
the wisdom to know that you've found it.
--
Alan Williams ... alco{at}pentile.demon.co.uk
el...@no.spam
>>Where's oz?
>Somewhere over the rainbow.
That's a rainbow?
Jo Mazzotta
"alan williams" <al...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk...
AMEN!
Go BObby!!!!!!
Jo
Edmond Wollmann
al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> ...
> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did Mr
spammer. The spinics tried to spin the issue that I have none, hence I
was jealous of the Jo abuser who has the support only of abusers like
you.
> They are not fair
> > weather friends, passing acquaintances, or people that nod when I
pass by
> > on the street.
Irrelevant, I have no such idea in my reality-- whether you are sincere
in relationships is not a matter of duration or "rules", it is a matter
of integrity and sincereity. I am sincere with new aquaintences as I am
with old friends, this is one of the reasons I am harassed here,
because I tell the truth regardless of status or bullshit.
> > As far as lovers, I have one. only one, I want no more than one.
Yes? And so? This is completely irrelevant and not "better" than having
many, it is simply YOUR PREFERENCE. Most likely from you insecurities,
not from conviction.
> My one
> > lover fills my heart with joy and pleasure.
So do my many.
> To try to have more than one
> > lover would cut the love I would have to share with her.
This is because of your profoundly conditional nature and the belief in
your limited abundance. I believe that we are ALL family, I do not
believe any one person is any BETTER than any other person, they are
simply different. I don't have to "make" committments, because I am
committed to all my actions OR I DON'T TAKE THEM. This is because I am
not a fake, like you.
>>Would not that
> > cheat her, giving only half measure for what she gives freely to me?
You, like most conditional people, believe you are "gaining or losing
something (2nd and 8th are ONE WITH 5th and 11th)" when you give love--
hence your limiting view carries with it the necessity to "make
sure", "watch out" be careful etc. etc.--all measures of the negative
view that the ALL is limited-rather than unlimited, judgmental--rather
than unconditional, that you have to do special things in order
to "deserve love and abundance" like cater to the fears of your partner
who also believes in "loss." I do not believe that way, and know that
all I come in contact with ARE the ALL, and that if they have these
conditional fears like you that they rationalize as being "better" than
equanimity and trust of the all--it is because of their own doubts
ABOUT themselves and life, and they limit themselves thus because of
beliefs in separation--not inclusion, of limitation--not eternal
perspective that are of true spirit.
> Well said, Virgo man.
> Each of us seeks perfection in our own way, but you are blessed
with
> the wisdom to know that you've found it.
Perfection is the state anyone is in at anytime, even the "perfect
misery" the spinics insist they must stay in here. But this is just his
preference, which-- if it were based on true unconditionalness and self-
empowerment, rather than his egoistic attempt to demean or say is
better than my "many" --would simply be a positive choice in
preference. Which I respect. But I have observed this negative spammer
for 4 years, and he has no clue about unconditional love.
"We know the whole idea of how we feel in that sense, we trust
ourselves as aspects of the infinite-therefore we interact
spontaneously-without necessarily having to "plan" anything, without
having to "make sure" everything will go "as planned," we do not need
the "insurance" of something to "fall back" on should what we go
for "fail." All of these ideas are doubts and mistrusts of the true
unconditionalness of our love." Bashar, "Southern Exposure"
"Now none of you are basically afraid of failure. You are not afraid
that your quest for truth will have no reward.
You are afraid of much more mundane things.
You are afraid of playing the fool.
You are afraid of letting go.
You are afraid of not being dignified.
You are afraid of not being pretty.
You are afraid of not being conventional.
You are afraid that someone will laugh.
All of this means that you do not trust the inner self-your own
identity.
That you have little faith in yourself. And until you have faith in
yourself, you can have no real faith in the Universe or in 'All That
Is.'"
Seth, early 1972
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
SDSU http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~wollmann/
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
el...@no.spam
The lying criminal Edmond Wollmann <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did Mr
>spammer.
Ok, Mr. Kook:
In <20000913021236...@ng-fi1.aol.com> you said:
"I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday."
You'll have to try some other lie, Wollmann. You've been caught at
it again.
Jo Mazzotta
"Edmond Wollmann" <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8ptru8$f8m$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
>
> was jealous of the Jo abuser who has the support only of abusers like
> you.
I am not an abuser.
YOU are an abuser.
> > They are not fair
> > > weather friends, passing acquaintances, or people that nod when I
> pass by
> > > on the street.
>
> Irrelevant, I have no such idea in my reality-- whether you are sincere
> in relationships is not a matter of duration or "rules", it is a matter
> of integrity and sincereity. I am sincere with new aquaintences as I am
> with old friends, this is one of the reasons I am harassed here,
> because I tell the truth regardless of status or bullshit.
You are harrassed because you harass.
> > > As far as lovers, I have one. only one, I want no more than one.
>
> Yes? And so? This is completely irrelevant and not "better" than having
> many, it is simply YOUR PREFERENCE. Most likely from you insecurities,
> not from conviction.
You fucking imoral prick.
> > My one
> > > lover fills my heart with joy and pleasure.
>
> So do my many.
>
One love couldn't stand you for a week.
> > To try to have more than one
> > > lover would cut the love I would have to share with her.
>
> This is because of your profoundly conditional nature and the belief in
> your limited abundance. I believe that we are ALL family, I do not
> believe any one person is any BETTER than any other person, they are
> simply different. I don't have to "make" committments, because I am
> committed to all my actions OR I DON'T TAKE THEM. This is because I am
> not a fake, like you.
Watch out for Aids , you witless wonder.
>
> >>Would not that
> > > cheat her, giving only half measure for what she gives freely to me?
>
> You, like most conditional people, believe you are "gaining or losing
> something (2nd and 8th are ONE WITH 5th and 11th)" when you give love--
> hence your limiting view carries with it the necessity to "make
> sure", "watch out" be careful etc. etc.--all measures of the negative
> view that the ALL is limited-rather than unlimited, judgmental--rather
> than unconditional, that you have to do special things in order
> to "deserve love and abundance" like cater to the fears of your partner
> who also believes in "loss." I do not believe that way, and know that
> all I come in contact with ARE the ALL, and that if they have these
> conditional fears like you that they rationalize as being "better" than
> equanimity and trust of the all--it is because of their own doubts
> ABOUT themselves and life, and they limit themselves thus because of
> beliefs in separation--not inclusion, of limitation--not eternal
> perspective that are of true spirit.
WHat the frig are you, the Anti Christ? Did you go down with Gamora in your
last life?
> > Well said, Virgo man.
>
> > Each of us seeks perfection in our own way, but you are blessed
> with
> > the wisdom to know that you've found it.
>
> Perfection is the state anyone is in at anytime, even the "perfect
> misery" the spinics insist they must stay in here. But this is just his
> preference, which-- if it were based on true unconditionalness and self-
> empowerment, rather than his egoistic attempt to demean or say is
> better than my "many" --would simply be a positive choice in
> preference. Which I respect. But I have observed this negative spammer
> for 4 years, and he has no clue about unconditional love.
You have no observational abilities because you can't get your own image out
of your eyes for 2 minutes, you creep.
Bob has more guts, more love, more compassion, more loyalty on his shoe,
than you have in one fingernial. So go to hell.
>
> "We know the whole idea of how we feel in that sense, we trust
> ourselves as aspects of the infinite-therefore we interact
> spontaneously-without necessarily having to "plan" anything, without
> having to "make sure" everything will go "as planned," we do not need
> the "insurance" of something to "fall back" on should what we go
> for "fail." All of these ideas are doubts and mistrusts of the true
> unconditionalness of our love." Bashar, "Southern Exposure"
What is it exactly that you are so afraid of boy?
>
> "Now none of you are basically afraid of failure. You are not afraid
> that your quest for truth will have no reward.
> You are afraid of much more mundane things.
> You are afraid of playing the fool.
> You are afraid of letting go.
> You are afraid of not being dignified.
> You are afraid of not being pretty.
> You are afraid of not being conventional.
> You are afraid that someone will laugh.
> All of this means that you do not trust the inner self-your own
> identity.
> That you have little faith in yourself. And until you have faith in
> yourself, you can have no real faith in the Universe or in 'All That
> Is.'"
> Seth, early 1972
>
How dare you quote Seth. You are way off the beaten path of Seth.
Now, call my ISP I don't give a fiddler's fuck. If they kill my account
because I just told you the truth about who you are, they lose 50 dollars a
month,, there are plenty more where they came from and I think you suck.
Come and get me Pig.
Jo
Pedantus
<el...@no.spam> wrote in message
news:ss21g7f...@news.supernews.com...
> >attempt by Edmo to masturbate.
>
Do you mean to imply that you *haven't* made anonymous phone calls
to Ed, just to here his voice....:)?
Rog
Spamster
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> > bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
>
> I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did Mr
> spammer.
*
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.130.188.181
24-130-188-181.san.rr.com [24.130.188.181]
*
You're the spammer around here, crybaby.
The Bane of Sidaway's Killfile
misdemeanor (PC 555- Unlawful Entry), fined, and placed on probation,
sued for Unlawful Detainer and evicted in 3/96, past violator of Federal
and State game laws for abusing wildlife, and remorseless confessed
killer of someone's child, dumbshit NetKook who has lost 15 ISP accounts
due to his spammin, net abuse, harassment, and violent physical threats,
and remarkably cowardly yellow bellied pussy who didn't show up for
lunch at PF Chang's even though it was only five minutes from his place
and after he claimed he would meet people there with a police escort wrote:
(snip lies)
>...(2nd and 8th are ONE WITH 5th and 11th)"
Christ Almighty, you are one incoherent fucking KOOK, Edmo!
Lou Minatti™
>
> In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
>
> > ...
>
> > > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
>
> spammer.
Feeling inadequate because your last girlfriend called you "Tiny Ed"?
--
"You fanatical BASTARDS AND BITCHES do not own the INTERNET." -Bruce
Kettler
http://www.watchingyou.com
The Bane of Sidaway's Killfile
So, what did he sound like to you when *you* did it?
Jo Mazzotta
"Bob Officer" <bo...@vornet.com> wrote in message
news:39cf3f0e...@news.remarq.com...
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 20:52:16 GMT, in alt.astrology "Jo Mazzotta"
> <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Edmond Wollmann" <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>
> If Edmond has a bone to pick, he is welcome to pick it with me.
> But he won't because he is a coward.
>
Breath, breath, Inhale, exhale..
You're right. I have a life long habit of going after the abusers..
It must be changed. It's all part of what's making me fall apart.
THanks Bob. But I always try to make the wrong, right.
Cannot do.
You are a lovely person.
Jo
> Edmond is the peacock
> Edmond is a the brave lion, roaring from behind a bush...
>
>
>
>
> >Jo
> >
> >> --
> >> Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
> >> © 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
> >> http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
> >> SDSU http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~wollmann/
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> >> Before you buy.
> >
>
> Bob Officer
> "No astrology? Gee and you post the same spammed fucking messages
> everyday--I don't have to know how usenet works, I know what is right
> >and *****IIIIIII****** am going to end this you understand????"
> Ed Wollmann, Expert at Net Abuse, he has done it often enough
Jo Mazzotta
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> >
> >> ...
> >
> >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
> >
>
>
> Path:
>
rQdQ!sn-east!sn-xit-uk!supernews.com!193.162.153.122.MISMATCH!news.tele.dk!1
28.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!portc.blue.aol.com.MIS
MATCH!portc01.blue.aol.com!audrey04.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
> From: urukdes...@aol.com (Uruk Descendant)
> Newsgroups: alt.astrology
> Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
> Lines: 38
> NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder07.news.aol.com
> X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
> Date: 13 Sep 2000 06:12:36 GMT
> References: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
> Message-ID: <20000913021236...@ng-fi1.aol.com>
> Xref: rQdQ alt.astrology:372434
>
> <snip>
> I have more friends (and lovers) than I can make time for everyday.
>
> end quote
>
>
> Edmond you are a liar... as proven above.
>
> >spammer. The spinics tried to spin the issue that I have none, hence I
> >was jealous of the Jo abuser who has the support only of abusers like
> >you.
>
> or Alan with a BI >20 in the 45 day window. We can,on the other hand, show
> where you have not only had messages canceled from Spam, but lost accounts
> for spamming.
>
>
> >> They are not fair
> >> > weather friends, passing acquaintances, or people that nod when I
> >pass by
> >> > on the street.
> >
> >in relationships is not a matter of duration or "rules", it is a matter
> >of integrity and sincereity. I am sincere with new aquaintences as I am
> >with old friends, this is one of the reasons I am harassed here,
> >because I tell the truth regardless of status or bullshit.
>
You
> do not have any degree of integrity nor sincerity. you show all lack of
> integrity by posting personal e-mail. when you brag and gloat.
>
> >> > As far as lovers, I have one. only one, I want no more than one.
> >
> >many, it is simply YOUR PREFERENCE. Most likely from you insecurities,
> >not from conviction.
>
>
> No, is your insecurity the reason you brag about having many lovers? Does
> that make you professional, or are you just trying to emulate Jung?
>
> >> My one
> >> > lover fills my heart with joy and pleasure.
> >
>
> But you don't "have time for them all", doesn't that show a sign of lack
of
> sincerity?
>
> >> To try to have more than one
> >> > lover would cut the love I would have to share with her.
> >
> >your limited abundance. I believe that we are ALL family, I do not
>
>
> >believe any one person is any BETTER than any other person, they are
> >simply different. I don't have to "make" committments, because I am
> >committed to all my actions OR I DON'T TAKE THEM. This is because I am
> >not a fake, like you.
>
>
> Hell, eddy, I am a better person than you on one of my bad days.
>
> >>>Would not that
> >> > cheat her, giving only half measure for what she gives freely to me?
> >
>
> Does everyone else see how Edmond doesn't exactly know who he is
> addressing? Me, Alan Or Jo?
>
> >something (2nd and 8th are ONE WITH 5th and 11th)" when you give love--
> >hence your limiting view carries with it the necessity to "make
> >sure", "watch out" be careful etc. etc.--all measures of the negative
> >view that the ALL is limited-rather than unlimited, judgmental--rather
> >than unconditional, that you have to do special things in order
> >to "deserve love and abundance" like cater to the fears of your partner
> >who also believes in "loss." I do not believe that way, and know that
> >all I come in contact with ARE the ALL, and that if they have these
> >conditional fears like you that they rationalize as being "better" than
> >equanimity and trust of the all--it is because of their own doubts
> >ABOUT themselves and life, and they limit themselves thus because of
> >beliefs in separation--not inclusion, of limitation--not eternal
> >perspective that are of true spirit.
>
>
> >> Well said, Virgo man.
> >
> >> Each of us seeks perfection in our own way, but you are blessed
> >with
> >> the wisdom to know that you've found it.
> >
> >misery" the spinics insist they must stay in here. But this is just his
> >preference, which-- if it were based on true unconditionalness and self-
> >empowerment, rather than his egoistic attempt to demean or say is
> >better than my "many" --would simply be a positive choice in
> >preference. Which I respect. But I have observed this negative spammer
> >for 4 years, and he has no clue about unconditional love.
>
>
> <snip of bashar>
>
> >"Now none of you are basically afraid of failure. You are not afraid
> >that your quest for truth will have no reward.
> >You are afraid of much more mundane things.
> >You are afraid of playing the fool.
> >You are afraid of letting go.
> >You are afraid of not being dignified.
> >You are afraid of not being pretty.
> >You are afraid of not being conventional.
> >You are afraid that someone will laugh.
> >All of this means that you do not trust the inner self-your own
> >identity.
> >That you have little faith in yourself. And until you have faith in
> >yourself, you can have no real faith in the Universe or in 'All That
> >Is.'"
> >Seth, early 1972
>
>
> I fear not.
> I have tread where only angels walk,
> I slipped the bondage of earth
> and learn to kiss the clouds
> and on laughter's slivered wings,
> In my delight, beheld the face of fate...
> and flew into the unknown
>
:-)
Jo
> --
> Bob Officer
> " I would suggest you find a real astrologer if you want
> real advice." Edmond Wollmann the faux astrologer
Jo Mazzotta
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 03:35:00 GMT, in alt.astrology al...@nospam.demon.co.uk
> (alan williams) wrote:
>
> >In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> >bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends. They are not fair
> >> weather friends, passing acquaintances, or people that nod when I pass
by
> >> on the street.
> >>
> >> As far as lovers, I have one. only one, I want no more than one. My one
> >> lover fills my heart with joy and pleasure. To try to have more than
one
> >> lover would cut the love I would have to share with her. Would not that
> >> cheat her, giving only half measure for what she gives freely to me?
> >
> > Well said, Virgo man.
>
>
> > Each of us seeks perfection in our own way, but you are blessed with
> > the wisdom to know that you've found it.
>
> enjoy the that 'little bit of wisdom'. I was trying to point out having so
> many friends (and lovers) he didn't have time enough for them in a day was
> slightly odd sounding. I would and do make time (how does measure time in
> this instance) for any friend, and give each at much time as I can give.
>
> I would give all my time to a stranger if the need would arise. Man's
> greatest gift to another man is his life.
>
:-)
Jo
>
>
> --
> thestudent:Thismanisworking,ofcourse.Probablymorethanonejob,oratleast
> afull-timejobplusademandinghobby,ortwo,orthree.withHe'llmakelove
> toyouwhenheisfinishedeating,butthatcouldbeawhile.OTOHyoudon'twanta
> hungryandcrankycrabinyourbed,sohelphimstuffhisfacefirstrising
Edmond Wollmann
"Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>
> "Bob Officer" <bo...@vornet.com> wrote in message
> news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> > >
> > >> ...
> > >
> > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
> > >
> > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
Mr
> >
> > Begin quoted message
Snip!
Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
Mr Burnette brought it up--oncce again the spnincs are caught lying,
spinning and defaming. Defeated, and defeated, and defeated.....
Do they not tire of embarassing themselves?
Subject: Re: Paintings for my friends
Path: lobby!newstf02.news.aol.com!portc01.blue.aol.com!
howland.erols.net!netnews.com!feeder.via.net!news.he.net!sn-xit-03!
supernews.com!sn-inject-01!corp.supernews.com!sburn
From: sb...@sun.smbtech.com (Steve Burnett)
Newsgroups: alt.astrology
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 06:02:37 GMT
Organization: smbtech.com - home for fallen servers
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <slrn8ru66d...@sun.smbtech.com>
References: <CXAv5.40476$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>
<8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Complaints-To: news...@supernews.com
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-no-archive: yes
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.2 (SunOS)
In article <8pn1vj$g36$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>
> How does it serve you to only have support FROM darkness?
Wollmann, you are so low the only thing you can look up and
see is a Russian submarine.
It just bakes your potato that Jo has so many friends here, doesn't it?
--
Steve Burnett
sb...@smbtech.com
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2000 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/
el...@no.spam
Convicted criminal Edmond Wollmann <woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>Mr Burnette brought it up--oncce again the spnincs are caught lying,
>spinning and defaming. Defeated, and defeated, and defeated.....
>Do they not tire of embarassing themselves?
You're projecting again, Wollmann. You're the one that's been caught
lying, spinning, and defaming. How does it serve you to be
Usenet's clown?
--
"Its [sic] not me with OCD Ricky-its you spinics."
-Edmond Wollmann, a$trologer, liar, spammer, hypocrite, censor, Jan. '98 KoTM,
convicted criminal, asshole, bully, Kook of the Year 1998,
the Ted Kennedy of astrologers
http://lart.com/ed/
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#wollman
http://users.erols.com/tempdog/
Cujo
Edmond Wollmann whined in message <8q321q$1tv$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...
>In article <pjMw5.41308$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>> news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
>> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
>> > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
>> > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
>> > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> ...
>> > >
>> > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
>> > >
>> > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
>Mr
>> >
>> > Begin quoted message
>
>Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
Looks like the 'kind, caring counsellor' is showing his good side again.
Abusing women again? You'll never get any rubes that way, kook!
>Mr Burnette brought it up--oncce again the spnincs are caught lying,
>spinning and defaming. Defeated, and defeated, and defeated.....
>Do they not tire of embarassing themselves?
You apparently never do.
***********
"Stop ano...@pacbell.net and other spammer like sher...@demon.net from
posting off topic in alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych and I'll
consider not bringing usenet to a halt."
"I'll do whatever I please-you abuseing bigots have taught me the law of the
land. Now you are going to get it full force."
"Idiot. Two can play these games and I'll flame you fuckers off the planet."
******************
Thank you for the gift of your kookiness.
---
Did you have a question about how the ALL THAT IS is reflected through
astrology? I was an astrologer 1000 times in Babylon.
Ed Wollmann, delusional kook explains his past.
Spamster
Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> In article <pjMw5.41308$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
> >
> > "Bob Officer" <bo...@vornet.com> wrote in message
> > news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
> > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> > > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> > > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> > > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> ...
> > > >
> > > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
> > > >
> > > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
> Mr
> > >
> > > Begin quoted message
>
> Snip!
> Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
>
Is that the best you can do, kook? Very pathetic, as usual.
A [Temporary] Dog
<woll...@my-deja.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
ascended the alter of Fluffy grabbed his microscopic man-meat in a
pair of tweezers and wanked and wanked and wanked and spattered the
following all over alt.astrology:
>In article <pjMw5.41308$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Bob Officer" <bo...@vornet.com> wrote in message
>> news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
>> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
>> > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
>> > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
>> > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
>> > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> ...
>> > >
>> > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
>> > >
>> > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
>Mr
>> >
>> > Begin quoted message
>
>Snip!
>Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
Ed, the only spamming bitches around here are you and bdan. BTW, have
you been taking wussy lessons from bdan? If you're going to call
someone a bitch, have the courage to spell it out.
Are you jealous of Jo's artistic ability?
--
- A (Temporary) Dog |"I am not a bitch, but,
The Domain is *erols dot com* | I play one on TV."
The Name is tempdog | - A (Temporary) Dog
http://users.erols.com/tempdog/ |
Put together as name@domain |
Lou Minatti™
SNIP!
Shut your poohole, low life.
el...@no.spam
A [Temporary] Dog <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote:
>Are you jealous of Jo's artistic ability?
He's jealous of anybody getting the attention he craves.
el...@no.spam
Lou Minatti <loumi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Shut your poohole, low life.
How would he breath?
Jo Mazzotta
"roachie" <roa...@petitmorte.org> wrote in message
news:8q34mh$c30$1...@chihuahua.databasix.com...
> Edmond Wollmann <woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > Snip!
>
> Agreed.
>
> Now. Is there any astrology you'd like me to teach you?
ROTFL
Jo
Love ya Roachie
>
> --
> DataBasix.com/Lart.com/petitmorte.org Families of Fine Posters (tm)
Jo Mazzotta
"A [Temporary] Dog" <amunged...@munged.see.sig> wrote in message
news:1j7ass8sjuo7pihss...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 18:20:56 GMT, Edmond Wollmann
> <woll...@my-deja.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
> ascended the alter of Fluffy grabbed his microscopic man-meat in a
> pair of tweezers and wanked and wanked and wanked and spattered the
> following all over alt.astrology:
>
> >In article <pjMw5.41308$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> > "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
> >> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> >> > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> >> > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >> > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> >> > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> ...
> >> > >
> >> > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
> >> > >
> >> > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
> >Mr
> >> >
> >> > Begin quoted message
> >
> >Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
>
> Ed, the only spamming bitches around here are you and bdan. BTW, have
> you been taking wussy lessons from bdan? If you're going to call
> someone a bitch, have the courage to spell it out.
>
>
Thank you TD (((((hugs)))
Jo
Jo Mazzotta
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 18:20:56 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> <woll...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <pjMw5.41308$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> > "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>
is
> a coward.
>
> While this attack isn't part of abuse of the NET, IT is, because Edmond
has
> been on a campaign of trying to remove Jo from the net since she got her
> cabal modem. Edmond almost succeeded in suspending her account.
>
> His constant Abuse of the 'Abuse Process' itself is abuse of the net in
and
> of itself.
Jo bows her head.
> >> "Bob Officer" <bo...@vornet.com> wrote in message
> >> news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
> >> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> >> > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> >> > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >> > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> >> > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> ...
> >> > >
> >> > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
> >> > >
> >> > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
> >Mr
>
> I quoted the Message where he bragged, "I have so many friends (and
lovers)
> he doesn't have time for all of them" not Jo.
>
>
> >> > Begin quoted message
>
> >Snip!
>
>
> Which Wollmann Snipped
>
> >Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
>
> and then called an innocent party a bitch!
>
> >Mr Burnette brought it up--oncce again the spnincs are caught lying,
> >spinning and defaming. Defeated, and defeated, and defeated.....
> >Do they not tire of embarassing themselves?
>
> Steven isn't defeated...
> Steven isn't lying
> Steven isn't spinning
> Steven isn't embarrassed
>
>
> <snip Of Steven's message>
>
>
> --
> Bob Officer
> "One thing to watch
> out for, readers, Ed has a histroy of setting up a big cross post then
setting
> followups to poster. That results in your followup being e-mailed to Ed.
If Ed
> does not like what you say, he tries to have your account terminated, he
will e-mail
> your admin at your ISP. One of many abuses done by Ed."
> Bill Kronert Explaining warning users about Ed's abuse of the net
Jo Mazzotta
"Lou MinattiT" <loumi...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:39C531...@yahoo.com...
> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> SNIP!
>
> Shut your poohole, low life.
Won't someone around here let me take a sip of my coffee without spitting it
all over the place..??????
ROTFL
Jo ;)
PZ Snuhmyers
Edmond Wollmann, bankrupt fool, failed publisher, high school dropout,
thundering doofus, nearly illiterate "author", and laughingstock of the
SDSU campus wrote:
>
> In article <pjMw5.41308$7W2.1...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>,
> "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
> >
> > "Bob Officer" <bo...@vornet.com> wrote in message
> > news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
> > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
> > > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
> > > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
> > > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
> > > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> ...
> > > >
> > > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
> > > >
> > > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
> Mr
> > >
> > > Begin quoted message
>
> Snip!
> Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
Bath?
Birth?
Baywatch?
Babe Ruth?
Bench?
Branch?
Cujo
A [Temporary] Dog wrote in message
<1j7ass8sjuo7pihss...@4ax.com>...
>On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 18:20:56 GMT, Edmond Wollmann
><woll...@my-deja.com> painted a red bull's eye on his forehead,
>ascended the alter of Fluffy grabbed his microscopic man-meat in a
>pair of tweezers and wanked and wanked and wanked and spattered the
>following all over alt.astrology:
>
>> "Jo Mazzotta" <jod...@home.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> news:39ce38ad...@news.remarq.com...
>>> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:05:59 GMT, in alt.astrology Edmond Wollmann
>>> > <edmond_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >In article <20000915...@pentile.demon.co.uk>,
>>> > > al...@pentile.demon.co.uk wrote:
>>> > >> In article <39c544b5...@news.remarq.com>
>>> > >> bo...@vornet.com (Bob Officer) wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> ...
>>> > >
>>> > >> > More isn't necessarily better. I have few friends.
>>> > >
>>> > >I did not bring up the quantity issue, please show me where I did
>>Mr
>>> >
>>> > Begin quoted message
>>
>>Wrong you spamming B_______H!!
>
>you been taking wussy lessons from bdan? If you're going to call
>someone a bitch, have the courage to spell it out.
Ed, you are my bitch. Still haven't taken me up on that offer for lunch at
PF Chang's, you cowardly fuck.
>Are you jealous of Jo's artistic ability?
>
Eddieee has a lot of things to be jealous of.