Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Changing One's Zodiacal sign

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Academic Zodiac

unread,
Aug 31, 2011, 9:27:54 AM8/31/11
to
Changing One's Zodiacal sign

There are no experts in sidereal or tropical astrology simply because
none of the two exists.

Gossip & Data
for the New ?on
?on of Cetus 2012 Age of Pegasus 2017
http://stores.lulu.com/astrology
First published by Klaudio Zic Publications, 2011
http://stores.lulu.com/astrology Copyright Š 2011 by Klaudio Zic. All
Rights Reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, for
commercial purposes or otherwise, without the written permission of the
Author. The names of dedicated publications are normally given in
italics.

ORIGINAL ZODIAC
It must be hard to let go: one accustomed oneself to one's faux ego and
zodiacal sign. If there were only two signs of difference, consider
yourself lucky as up to six signs of offset rule over many a winter
horoscope. Consider yourself luck anyway, since millions of people walk
around wearing false identities, some of them wearing multiple faux
horoscopes, many of them for a lifetime: they will never know their own
horoscopes. This plague especially affects professionals for whom it is
often too late to turn back and say: nothing I ever did was right!
ETERNAL ZODIAC
Did they know that they actually harmed millions by assigning faux
Sun-sign along with an improbable ascendant to you and the rest? Yeah,
sort of, they have been warned that they would never work with any true
skies at all. What they never knew was that their al too many errors were
nonlinear as well as approximately nine times greater than suspected.
SWINDLE ON BOTH SIDES
The idea was to smuggle horoscopes with approximately one sign of error
and sell them anyway. They or someone called such an open fraud "Western
astrology". No such thing.
PRINCE ECRU
Such an idea was criticized but not corrected, namely their so-called
sidereal correction has nothing to do with any real skies whatsoever: in
theory it may perchance spare you one sign of error; but you still remain
exposed to at least five signs of error, especially if you're a winter
nativity. In other words, neither the hilariously called so "sidereal"
mountebanks, nor them "tropical" swindlers ever knew the position of the
Sun. They had no ephemeris proper. All they could do is quarrel about
things that they never knew: the position if the Sun. And it gets even
better as concern the ascendant set which remains a mystery for all of
them to this date.
PLANETARY ZODIACS
After forty years of online activity along with an abundance spanning
over 11000 publications, people on this planet still don't know their own
Sun-signs. Many will never know, and much more will be completely
oblivious to their own guardian ascendants . Such is the nature of the
Devil and Maya. Rare gods knew this fact while many were fooled. In
India, per instance, they assumed that the planets follow the path of the
Sun: what a hilarious childish nonsensei!
WEASEL
Why did they call their apparently opposing but both outrageously wrong
theories sidereal and tropical? Probably in order to make it sound very
clever. The planetary positions are all both sidereal and tropical at all
times, so no difference is possible. Of course there is no difference as
there is only one position of the planet. There is no such thing as
"sidereal Mars" versus "tropical Mars" and don't be fooled into assuming
an error as "system". There was no system. The only system there was is
still called astronomy. Full stop.
REVELATION
There are no experts in sidereal or tropical astrology simply because
none of the two exists.

Read about it till October 15th 2011 when the revealing publications are
alas scheduled for timely self-destruction. You don't want the strategic
zodiacal as well as magical material to fall in the wrong hands, do you
now?

22 zodiac signs
16 ascendants
2012 AEon of Cetus
2017 Age of Pegasus
http://scr.im/rtrrt
RTRRT Instant Magick
http://stores.lulu.com/astrology

Academic Zodiac: because it is not nice to fool with Mother Nature.

2012-Nov-23 00:00 m Lib
2012-Nov-26 00:00 m Sco
2012-Nov-29 00:00 m Sco
2012-Dec-02 00:00 m Oph
2012-Dec-05 00:00 m Oph
2012-Dec-08 00:00 Oph
2012-Dec-11 00:00 Oph
2012-Dec-14 00:00 Oph
2012-Dec-17 00:00 Oph
2012-Dec-20 00:00 m Sgr

We know your horoscope. http://bit.ly/e4LvmR Your true natal horoscope.
Stay connected with the right dots across your original starry skies: 22
zodiacal stations, 16 ascendants. http://ow.ly/5T1Cz Trust your real
stars: Academic Zodiac. Ophiuchus Ascendant - Real natal ascendants &
Sun-signs. http://ht.ly/5q6ej Thank you for being supportive towards the
IAU, much as tolerant towards Harvard MPC in embracing NASA JPL as your
true natal planetary positions. http://ht.ly/5GKky Academic Zodiac #1622
#RTRRT Zodiac, ascendant set, house system, directions, dwarf planets,
comets, centaurs; objects of interest, reality rendering: case solved
http://lulu.com/astrology all astrology assets in one
place. Personal Future-Changing #RTRRT http://ow.ly/5RpTV Academic
Zodiac #1622 Your True Natal Stars http://ow.ly/5RpTx Book cheap Instant
Magick. What is behind us is not important. http://ht.ly/5YiHm #RTRRT
#1622

Dig Deeper


Academic Zodiac

http://ow.ly/6asi8
Complete Works

http://ow.ly/6as5v
Instant Magick

http://ow.ly/6aspr


0 new messages