Received: by 10.180.75.197 with SMTP id e5mr2103589wiw.1.1350256153596;
        Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: The Faking of Zapruder Frame 224
Date: 14 Oct 2012 19:09:13 -0400
Lines: 83
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <507b253f$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <2dd2f668-d768-493d-8c92-1e98da63decc@googlegroups.com> <652a29d7-d722-4efd-a546-e9022cdf206c@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <5070b118$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <71f46fc6-1d03-4142-ac5e-305e65669cc1@n16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <71f46fc6-1d03-4142-ac5e-305e65669cc1@n16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 14 Oct 2012 15:49:03 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1350256153 166.84.1.3 (14 Oct 2012 18:09:13 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 14 Oct 2012 18:09:13 -0500, 166.84.1.3
Path: q11ni134313707wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.139.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/13/2012 10:52 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
> On Oct 6, 9:05 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 10/6/2012 4:50 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 5, 9:06 pm, fatoldcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> I watched several of those symposium videos, and I kept waiting for the
>>>> clincher, but it never came. I wanted to believe them, and they failed.
>>>> They didn't prove a damn thing. Sorry.
>>
>>>> On Friday, October 5, 2012 4:27:54 PM UTC-4, curtjester1 wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 5, 10:37 am, Saintly Oswald <fatoldcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Let's face it. Jack White knew Mack, but he didn't know Jack.
>>
>>>>> Let's also face that you don't know very much either.  Jack White might
>>
>>>>> not have the science background as some at the Symposium but he has done
>>
>>>>> quite a bit of great work.
>>
>>>>> First of all you should get acquainted with the Z film, and why there is a
>>
>>>>> fuss about alteration and fabrication.  There are many parts to the
>>
>>>>> Symposium of 2003 besides Jack White, that the previously posted link
>>
>>>>> should provide anyone.  One will see why the sign was needed to be
>>
>>>>> enlarged, so it would hide the earlier shot to JFK, and keep the SBT
>>
>>>>> alive.  One other very noticeable thing to observe is the listlessness of
>>
>>>>> the people.  They are not watching a passing motorcade, so they got that
>>
>>>>> picture from somewhere previous to the motorcade's arrival for a backdrop.
>>
>>>>> If they were real people when the motorcade passed, they would have been
>>
>>>>> animated, waving wildly, and they would not be so 'in position.'
>>
>>>>> http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/hoax/costella1.html
>>
>>>>> CJ
>>
>>> One would first have to realize the audience mostly are already into the
>>> topic, some being very technical people, and a lot was just on camerawork
>>> talk.  You can go to many sites online if you want to get some of the more
>>> glaring anomolies that are always brought out. Sometimes one has to look
>>> at not what's there so much, as what is potentially taken out.  I do think
>>> you could have got out of Costella, the people not being animated as the
>>> motorcade came through.  That's the one I watched most all the way
>>> through.  I think the biggest topic discussed as related to alteration is
>>> the limo slowdown that's not shown like witnesses related in their
>>
>> The limo slowdown IS shown. Alvarez measured it.
>>
>>
>>
>>> testimonies.  If they eliminated that then one can go to what people and
>>> vehicles might have been doing or not doing in relation to that.  And
>>> remember like Costella said, when you fabricate something, one can leave a
>>> lot of authentic photography in, up to a high level, so one really would
>>> have to look. Here's a site that will give you enough to go on as far as
>>> looking:
>>
>>> http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/zfilmaltered.htm
>>
>>> CJ
>
> If it was shown, then why didn't the brake lights come on for
> Alvarez's slowdown?
>
> CJ
>


Because it wasn't caused by the brakes.