Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion What Day Did Humes Burn Paperwork?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ben Holmes  
View profile  
 More options Aug 4 2012, 10:37 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
Date: 4 Aug 2012 22:37:33 -0400
Local: Sat, Aug 4 2012 10:37 pm
Subject: Re: What Day Did Humes Burn Paperwork?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
In article <501caf7...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...

>On 8/3/2012 8:38 PM, pjspe...@AOL.COM wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 2, 2012 11:56:58 AM UTC-7, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>> Tony Marsh has repeatedly asserted Saturday morning.

>>> The *only* evidence puts it 24+ hours later.

>>> I wonder if anyone will EVER see a citation supporting a Saturday morning

>>> Humes fireplace party...

>> Baden has claimed it was Saturday morning as well. This allows him to
>> pretend Humes' claim the rear entrance wound was by the EOP was just a
>> simple mistake, and a case of Humes simply forgetting what was in the
>> notes he'd burned.

>> Baden's pretend scenerio also fails to explain why so many others claimed
>> the wound was where Humes said it was, and why none of the witnesses
>> recalled a wound where Baden would like us to believe it was.

>You seem a little confused. There were TWO burn parties. First when Humes
>burned his notes and the other doctors notes on Saturday morning because
>they were bloodstained (after he copied them). Then he called Dr. Perry
>and found out about the throat wound and had to rewrite the whole report.
>Then on Sunday morning when he was satisfied that he had figured it out
>and made all the necessary changes he burned his original report.

>His first report said the bullet hit the back and fell out and JFK was hit
>in the head from the front.

My! What a *change* in your claims!!!

You *ORIGINALLY* jumped in to claim that Humes burned paperwork on
Saturday, IN ORDER TO REFUTE THE POSSIBILITY THAT HUMES REWROTE EVERYTHING
*AFTER* OSWALD WAS SHOT ON SUNDAY.

Now, of course, your new claim wouldn't refute or have anything to do with
the possibility.

And interestingly, you're now claiming again what you refuted in your
previous statement quoted below:

"Humes supposedly burned the notes ... in his fireplace on Saturday
morning." - Anthony Marsh 1/15/2003

"I never said that Humes burned the doctors' notes on Saturday." - Anthony
Marsh 2/5/2003 (21 days later...)

The only question that remains... and has NEVER been answered... can you
cite *ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER* that would lead anyone to believe that
Humes was busy at his fireplace on Saturday morning?

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google