Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Mark Lane #83
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anthony Marsh  
View profile  
 More options Sep 21 2012, 8:46 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Date: 21 Sep 2012 20:46:54 -0400
Local: Fri, Sep 21 2012 8:46 pm
Subject: Re: Mark Lane #83
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 9/21/2012 1:22 PM, John Reagor King wrote:

> In article <505a581...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
>   Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> On 9/19/2012 4:17 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>>> On 19 Sep 2012 13:41:25 -0400, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
>>> wrote:

>>>> In article <2qci58dpb7fn6vtcl687rp2uvtrdjtc...@4ax.com>, John McAdams
>>>> says...

>>>>> On 6 Sep 2012 06:37:26 -0700, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that the Warren Commission
>>>>>> took
>>>>>> testimony from a Veterinarian for ballistics issues, yet still was
>>>>>> forced to
>>>>>> ignore the testimony since in contradicted the SBT.

>>>>>> "Although the Commission asserted that its experts had proved that one
>>>>>> bullet
>>>>>> could pass through the President's neck and then through the Governor's
>>>>>> chest
>>>>>> and wrist and enter his thigh, the experts had never attempted that
>>>>>> comprehensive test. Instead, they had fired different bullets, each
>>>>>> through a
>>>>>> different substance, each bullet suffering distortion in the process.
>>>>>> Nevertheless the Commission concluded that one bullet - Commission
>>>>>> Exhibit 399 -
>>>>>> did all the damage, while remaining unshattered, unflattened,
>>>>>> undeformed.

>>>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ce399.gif

>>>>> Lane just can't stop lying.

>>>> You just can't stop making claims that you cannot defend.

>>> Ben turns tail and runs.

>>> The photo of CE 399 viewed end on clearly shows that Lane was lying
>>> about unshattered, unflattened, undeformed.

>>> .John

>> Oh really? Show me where CE 399 was SHATTERED as you claim.
>> And maybe you've never seen the first photo of the bullet before it
>> became CE 399.

> Now, finally, you have a point, Anthony.  CE 399 was not shattered.  Of
> course it wasn't Tim who claimed that, so it is amusing that you replied
> to him with that.

> And there is a photo of the same bullet before it became CE 399?  Does
> that photo show it as not only unshattered, but additionally undeformed
> and unflattened as well?

Yes. As usual you reveal that you are afraid to visit my Web site since
I have posted that photo hundreds of times.

> Oh do please, I beg you on hands and knees, abjectly, share that photo
> with us poor unwashed masses, either by posting it in-article (which you
> knew years before you falsely claimed that you have to "beg" Dr. McAdams
> to allow it, that in reality he'll allow without you asking) or else
> post a link to it.  Be sure it's a link that Research can get to.

McAdams never lets me post graphics inline. I always post a link.

http://the-puzzle-palace.com/FBI43646.jpg

> But remember carefully: you have to accompany the photo with irrefutable
> proof that the photo is of the same bullet that later "became CE 399."
> Just "saying" it's the same bullet isn't good enough.  You have to prove
> it.

Frazier even marks it for you with "Q1."
All your hedging can not hide the fact that you are profoundly ignorant
of the evidence in this case. Maybe a trip to the Nation Archives would
help.

> Watch everybody, undoubtably this photo will answer all our questions
> about the assassination.  We will never again wonder what the real truth
> is.  CTs and LNs will be living together within days.

One photo does not tell the entire story of the JFK assassination.
> Oh, sorry, C&C warning.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google