Message from discussion 9/11 Required Reading: "500 Days"
Received: by 10.68.135.2 with SMTP id po2mr5182229pbb.0.1352505006704;
Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:50:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: 9/11 Required Reading: "500 Days"
Date: 9 Nov 2012 18:50:06 -0500
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
X-Original-Trace: 9 Nov 2012 11:55:19 -0500, 188.8.131.52
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1352505006 184.108.40.206 (9 Nov 2012 17:50:06 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 9 Nov 2012 17:50:06 -0500, 220.127.116.11
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 11/9/2012 12:28 AM, Jason Burke wrote:
> On 11/8/2012 2:20 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>> On Nov 6, 1:00 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/4/2012 6:56 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>>> On Nov 3, 10:10 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/3/2012 3:48 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>>>> Longer does not equal hotter.
>> I am not sure what you mean by this steel compromising example from Nat
>> Geo, and your theory of trusses, so I'll let Mainframe weigh in on
>> that or
>> see if you can clarify.
>>>> It is said that oxygen fires are hotter, and when something is
>>>> burning at
>>>> length as opposed to some of these WTC short term fires, it must be
>>>> at as improbable that these fires were having that type of theorized
>>>> impact. Some of these other fires where 'no fire has ever brought
>>>> down a
>>>> steel-beamed structure before' were not affected by all this inferno
>>>> fire that was engulfing the whole buildings.
>>> I have no idea what you THINK you mean by that.
>> The gist is that buildings of steel do not get hot enough to burn down in
>> fires, and before 9/11, none had. The steel stays intact. I would think
> I wonder how steel is formed. Is it by magic?
Yes, it is by magic. And the workers are not called United Steelworkers
of America. They are called magicians by their bosses.
>> these steel-structured buildings had enough steel to be such that a Nat
>> Geo experiment would not get them to compromise. Are you saying the Nat
>> Geo experiment was in comparison to the trusses? And what if the trusses
>> were compromised? Wouldn't the greater and main steel beams just remain
>> intact, while 'THEY" just fell?