Received: by 10.68.135.2 with SMTP id po2mr5182229pbb.0.1352505006704;
        Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:50:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: 9/11 Required Reading: "500 Days"
Date: 9 Nov 2012 18:50:06 -0500
Lines: 52
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <509d4387$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <5071a65e@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <fba60ba2-0fcf-4d5f-9add-bdbabfdf370c@c2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <5097d2b3$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <b2594b4d-c601-4f8b-8189-28f35b9ec9e0@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <k7hik3$obd$5@dont-email.me>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <k7hik3$obd$5@dont-email.me>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 9 Nov 2012 11:55:19 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1352505006 166.84.1.3 (9 Nov 2012 17:50:06 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 9 Nov 2012 17:50:06 -0500, 166.84.1.3
Path: 6ni71924pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!newspump.sol.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
X-Received-Bytes: 3158
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/9/2012 12:28 AM, Jason Burke wrote:
> On 11/8/2012 2:20 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>> On Nov 6, 1:00 am, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/4/2012 6:56 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Nov 3, 10:10 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/3/2012 3:48 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Longer does not equal hotter.
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure what you mean by this steel compromising example from Nat
>> Geo, and your theory of trusses, so I'll let Mainframe weigh in on
>> that or
>> see if you can clarify.
>>
>>
>>>> It is said that oxygen fires are hotter, and when something is
>>>> burning at
>>>> length as opposed to some of these WTC short term fires, it must be
>>>> looked
>>>> at as improbable that these fires were having that type of theorized
>>>> impact.  Some of these other fires where 'no fire has ever brought
>>>> down a
>>>> steel-beamed structure before' were not affected by all this inferno
>>>> type
>>>> fire that was engulfing the whole buildings.
>>>
>>> I have no idea what you THINK you mean by that.
>>
>> The gist is that buildings of steel do not get hot enough to burn down in
>> fires, and before 9/11, none had.  The steel stays intact.  I would think
>
> I wonder how steel is formed. Is it by magic?
>

Yes, it is by magic. And the workers are not called United Steelworkers 
of America. They are called magicians by their bosses.

>> these steel-structured buildings had enough steel to be such that a Nat
>> Geo experiment would not get them to compromise.  Are you saying the Nat
>> Geo experiment was in comparison to the trusses?  And what if the trusses
>> were compromised?  Wouldn't the greater and main steel beams just remain
>> intact, while 'THEY" just fell?
>>
>> CJ
>>
>
>