On Nov 17, 7:30 am, Bill Clarke <
Bill_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <
50a55b75.2006082...@news.supernews.com>, John McAdams says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 14 Nov 2012 06:59:20 -0800, Ben Holmes <
ad...@burningknife.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >>In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane explained the inconvenience of the
> >>original evidence of a German Mauser.
>
> >>"I traveled to Dallas at the beginning of 1964 and there met Hugh Aynesworth, a
> >>reporter for The Dallas Morning News, who gave me photostated copies of a number
> >>of original affidavits. These documents, prepared by the Dallas police, included
> >>one signed by Deputy Constable Weitzman. Although the Commission did not publish
> >>Weitzman's affidavit in the Report, it may be found - with diligence — in Volume
> >>XXIV, where it was reproduced without comment. So as to make the record more
> >>nearly perfect, I offer it as an appendix. It reveals that Weitzman described
> >>the rifle which he and Boone had discovered as 'a 7.65 Mauser bolt action
> >>equipped with a 4/18 scope, a thick leather brownish-black sling on it'."
>
> >>The Seymour Weitzman affidavit that Mark Lane talks about can be found here:
> >>
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh24/html/WH_Vol...
>
> >>Mark Lane is now detailing the circumstances surrounding the alleged murder
> >>weapon.
>
> >Of course, the Alyea film, which shows the weapon clearly, shows it to
> >be a Mannlicher-Carcano.
>
> >.John
>
> Of course this fact wouldn't keep Lane or Holmes from a good story.
>
> Bill Clarke
Just the way that where people THOUGHT the shots came from somehow
ECLIPSES physical evidence like three recovered shells, a recovered weapon
(PLUS eyewitness accounts of a man shooting a rifle/a rifle being
withdrawn from the window in question, a man hearing the actual bolt
action of the rifle ABOVE him etc etc) in Lane/Holmes world.
It is to laugh, as they say.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!