The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
On 10/4/2012 10:55 PM, Saintly Oswald wrote:
> I'm sure many kooks have speculated about John Connally's possible role onNow, wait a damn minute here. You are not thinking paranoid enough. Maybe
> that tragic day. In so many of the photographs taken prior to the event,
> he looks sad, nervous and distressed. Perhaps he had indigestion. Perhaps
> Nellie had told him she was pregnant. I dunno. He goes way back with LBJ,
> I see. Way back. And George Bush didn't like him much, I gather, bettering
> George in politics and all. I was just watching his hospital interview,
> Bobby's video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP04_lGjkO0 , and he looks
> so happy there, as if everything worked out nicely, considering he got
> shot, that is. He said something interesting about that, too. He was shot
> by the second shot, not a shot that hit JFK, but one that hit him alone.
> One that had his name on it. He said, "...I think the man did what he
> intended to do, shoot both of us. And, uh, that's the only thing I can
> think." That reminded me of a conversation LBJ recorded with Hoover on the
> blower two days later. LBJ proposes to Hoover that if Connally hadn't been
> in the way, the President would have been hit by the 2nd shot, too. Hoover
> said that was very likely. I don't know Did the shooter intend to shoot
> them both, or did he just shoot Connally because he was in the way?
your tinfoil hat came loose. You should try the theory that the intended
target all the time was ONLY Connally and Kennedy just got in the way and
blocked a clear shot.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.