Transcript of Oswald's radio debate
yeuhd
> Evidence>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
> http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
"Oswald Never would have been convicted at Trial for 2 reasons.
"#1. He was innocent.
"#2. The authorities "Tampered" with the evidence repeatedly."
(Why the quotation marks around the word tampered?)
Let's examine another of the claims on that page: "Changing transcript
of Oswald's radio debate. CASE DISMISSED"
The transcript of the radio debate was prepared by Mrs. Jeanne Rodgers,
the secretary at radio station WDSU in New Orleans, not by the Warren
Commission:
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_0066a.htm
The transcript can be compared with the actual sound recording:
Sound recording:
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/3/3c/RG065.JFK.003.2of2_-_LHO_Radio_Interview.mp3
Transcript:
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=1138&relPageId=657
The differences are trivial and insubstantial.
Here are all the variances in Oswald's words between the sound recording
and the transcript. I have put in capital letters words that appear in one
version and not the other:
Sound recording:
OSWALD: That is, ah, correct, YES.
Transcript (p. 2):
OSWALD: That is correct. CORRECT, YEA.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: That is correct, and I think those, ah, the fact that I did
live for a time in the Soviet Union...
Transcript (p. 2):
OSWALD: That is correct and I think THAT those, the fact that I did
live for a time in the Soviet Union...
Sound recording:
OSWALD: Well, that is OF COURSE A very provocative QUESTION, and I
don't think requires an answer.
Transcript (p. 3):
OSWALD: Well that is very provocative REQUEST and I don't think
requires an answer.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: This I DO NOT think is A subject to be discussed tonight.
Transcript (p. 3):
OSWALD: This I DON'T think is THE subject to be discussed tonight.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: WELL, in order to give a clear and concise and short answer to
each of those, well, let's say, questions, I would say that the facts and
figures from, oh, a country like Pakistan or Burma would even reflect more
light upon Cuba in relation to how many TELEVISION sets and how many
RADIOS and all that. This I DO NOT think is the subject to be discussed
tonight. The Fair Play for Cuba Committee, as the name implies, is
concerned primarily with Cuban-American relations.
Transcript (p. 3):
OSWALD: In order to give a clear and concise and short answer to each
of those, well let's say, questions, I would say that the facts and
figures from, oh a country like Pakistan or Burma would even reflect
more light upon Cuba in relation to how many TV sets and how many
RADIO and all that. This I DON'T think is the subject to be discussed
tonight. The Fair Play for Cuba Committee, AND as the name implies, is
concerned primarily with Cuban-American relations.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: This, however -- IT'S very convenient for rightist
organizations to drag out this or that literature purporting to show a
fact which has not been established in law. I have SAID that the Fair
Play Play for Cuba Committee has definitely been investigated.
Transcript (p. 5):
OSWALD: This, however, is very convenient for rightist organizations
to drag out this or that literature purporting to show a fact which
has not been established in law. I have SAY that the Fair Play for
Cuba Committee has definitely been investigated.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: The difference is primarily the difference between a country
like GHANA, GUINEA, Yugoslavia, China or Russia.
Transcript (p. 6):
OSWALD: The difference is primarily the difference between a country
like GUINEA, GHANA, Yugoslavia, China or Russia.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: Many countries such as Great Britain display very socialistic
aspects AND characteristics.
Transcript (p. 6):
OSWALD: Many countries such as Great Britain display very socialistic
aspects OR characteristics.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: I worked in Russia. I was under the protection of the AH, OF
THE AH, I WAS -- that is to say, I was not under the protection of the
American government, but, THAT IS, I was at all times considered an
American citizen. I did not lose my American citizenship.
Transcript (p. 7):
OSWALD: I worked in Russia. I was NOT under the protection of the --
that is to say I was not under protection of the american government,
but AS I was at all times considered an American citizen I did not
lose my American citizenship.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: Well, it's a long, drawn out situation in which permission to
live in the Soviet Union granted to a foreign resident is very rarely
given. This REQUIRES a certain amount of TECHNICALITIES, technical
papers and so forth.
Transcript (p. 7):
OSWALD: Well it's a long drawn out situation in which permission to
live in the Soviet Union BEING granted to a foreign resident is rarely
given. This CALLS FOR a certain amount of TECHNICALITY, technical
papers and so forth.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: Well, the VERY obvious answer to that IS that I am back in the
United States. A person who renounces his citizenship becomes legally
disqualified for RETURNING to the UNITED STATES.
Transcript (p. 7):
OSWALD: Well, the obvious answer to that I am back in the United
States. A person who renounces his citizenship becomes legally
disqualified for RETURN to the U.S.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: As I HAVE stated, it is very difficult for a resident, ah, for
a foreigner to get permission to reside in the Soviet Union.
Transcript (p. 7-8):
OSWALD: As I stated it is very difficult for a resident ALIEN, for a
foreigner to get permission to reside in the Soviet Union.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: The principles of the Fair Play for Cuba consist of
RESTORATION of diplomatic trade and tourist relations with Cuba. ... We
are in A minority, surely. We are, HOWEVER, not particularly
interested in what Cuban exiles or rightist members of rightist
organizations have to say.
Transcript (p. 8):
OSWALD: The principals OF THOUGHT of the Fair Play for Cuba consist of
diplomatic trade and tourist relations with Cuba. ... We are in THE
minority surely. We are not particularly interested in what Cuban
exiles or rightist members of rightist organizations have to say.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: However, I and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee DOES think
that... Mistakes which are pushing Cuba into the sphere of activity of
let's say a very dogmatic communist country as China is.
Transcript (p. 9)
OSWALD: However, I and the Fair Play for Cuba Committee DO think that...
Mistakes which are pushing Cuba into the sphere of activity of let's
say a very dogmatic communist country SUCH as China is.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: I would say that the activities of the United States
government in REGARD to Batista... As for public sentiment at that time,
I think EVEN AT THAT TIME, even before the revolution, there were
rumblings of official comment and so forth from government officials
against Fidel Castro.
Transcript (p. 9):
OSWALD: I would say that the activities of the United States
government in REGARDS to Batista... As for public sentiment at that
time, I think even before the the revolution, there were rumblings of
official comment and so forth from government officials er, against
Fidel Castro.
Sound recording:
OSWALD: Well, IN any country emerging from a semi-colonial state...
Nowadays, while Cuba is reducing its PRODUCT as far as sugar cane
goes, it is striving to grow unlimited, and unheard of for Cuba,
quantities of certain vegetables -- sweet potatoes, lima beans, cotton
and so forth -- so that they can become agriculturally independent...
Transcript (p. 9):
OSWALD: Well any country emerging from a semi-colonial state...
Nowadays, while Cuba is reducing its PRODUCTION as far as sugar cane
goes it is striving to grow unlimited, and unheard of for Cuba,
quantities of certain vegetables SUCH AS sweet potatoes, lima beans,
cotton and so forth, so that they can become agriculturally
independent...
tims...@gmail.com
Hi yeuhd,
Excellent post, my friend!
Very interesting material and very well put together.
Regards,
Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup Commentator*
On Feb 6, 1:55 pm, yeuhd <wall...@mailbag.com> wrote:
> > NOW, You Deliver or RUN from the authorities Tampering with
> > Evidence>>>http://whokilledjfk.net/PROVEN%20LIES.htm
> >http://whokilledjfk.net/CASE%20DISMISSED.htm
>
> "Oswald Never would have been convicted at Trial for 2 reasons.
>
> "#1. He was innocent.
>
> "#2. The authorities "Tampered" with the evidence repeatedly."
>
> (Why the quotation marks around the word tampered?)
>
> Let's examine another of the claims on that page: "Changing transcript
> of Oswald's radio debate. CASE DISMISSED"
>
> The transcript of the radio debate was prepared by Mrs. Jeanne Rodgers,
> the secretary at radio station WDSU in New Orleans, not by the Warren
> Commission:
>
> http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh26/html/WH_Vol26_00...
>
> The transcript can be compared with the actual sound recording:
>
> Sound recording:http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/3/3c/RG065.JFK.003.2of2_-_LHO_...
>
> Transcript:http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=113...
tomnln
I posted the actual page of the WC Volumes.
I posted the actual audio of that radio show.
http://whokilledjfk.net/spy.htm
"yeuhd" <wal...@mailbag.com> wrote in message
news:78993829-7d0c-486c...@b2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
yeuhd
> I posted the actual page of the WC Volumes.
> I posted the actual audio of that radio show.
So did I.
Do you allege that there are any discrepancies between Oswald's words
in the sound recording and the transcript the station (not the WC)
made, other than what I reported above?
If so, please state them.
Peter Fokes
The interview Oswald conducted with Stuckey is very interesting too.
Do you have a transcript of that interview?
Check out Oswald's use of the word "defunct" to describe the CIA.
Very odd.
We've discussed this issue in the past.
PF
tomnln
On Feb 6, 6:19 pm, "tomnln" <tom...@cox.net> wrote:
> I posted the actual page of the WC Volumes.
> I posted the actual audio of that radio show.
So did I.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you allege that there are any discrepancies between Oswald's words
in the sound recording and the transcript the station (not the WC)
made, other than what I reported above?
If so, please state them.
Someone inserted the word "NOT" into the first sentance of the transcript.
It is NOT in the audio I provided.
If the word "NOT" was in the first sentence, Oswld would NOT have to
correct himself.
Giving the Opposite meaning.
The Warren Commission Published it that way.
http://whokilledjfk.net/altering_evidence.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeuhd
> Someone inserted the word "NOT" into the first sentance of the transcript.
> It is NOT in the audio I provided.
>
> If the word "NOT" was in the first sentence, Oswld would NOT have to
> correct himself.
>
> Giving the Opposite meaning.
>
The first sentence of the transcript of the debate is the Announcer,
saying: "It's time now for Conversation Carte Blanche. Here is Bill
Slatter."
The second sentence of the transcript of the debate is Bill Slatter,
saying, "Good evening, for the next few minutes Bill Stuckey and I,
Bill whose program you've probably heard on Saturday night, 'Latin
Listening Post' Bill and I are going to be talking to three gentlemen
the subject mainly revolving around Cuba."
Oswald's first sentence in the transcript of the debate is: "That is
correct. Correct, yea."
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=1138&relPageId=657
So, where is this "Not" in the first sentence of the transcript of the
debate?
tomnln
http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=1138&relPageId=657
It's AMAZING how much Detail one has to supply to people who have no
knowledge of the subject.
Volume XXI page 638 has Bill Stuckey's question to Oswald as to how he
survived in Russia.
"Did you have a Gov/t subsidy?"
Oswald'sw answer is in page 638 of Volume XXI.
My website has BOTH pages scanned from Volume XXI. (showing ther insertion
of the rord "NOT")
My website ALSO has the actual Audio answer from Oswald. (just click on
the radio icon)
yeuhd
> It's AMAZING how much Detail one has to supply to people who have no
> knowledge of the subject.
>
> Volume XXI page 638 has Bill Stuckey's question to Oswald as to how he
> survived in Russia.
>
> "Did you have a Gov/t subsidy?"
>
> Oswald'sw answer is in page 638 of Volume XXI.
>
> My website has BOTH pages scanned from Volume XXI. (showing ther insertion
> of the rord "NOT")
>
> My website ALSO has the actual Audio answer from Oswald. (just click on
> the radio icon)
It's AMAZING, but I already reported all of that in the very first
message of this thread! Go ahead, re-read my first post above.
And the transcript of the radio debate was prepared by Mrs. Jeanne
Rodgers, the secretary at radio station WDSU in New Orleans, not by
the Warren Commission.
tomnln
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE WARREN COMMISSION PUBLISHED IT! ! ! ! !
You keep "Snipping" this>>> http://whokilledjfk.net/altering_evidence.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------