Received: by 10.180.91.231 with SMTP id ch7mr955878wib.1.1350077892602;
        Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: THE TWO STAR WITNESSES Euins & Brennan
Date: 12 Oct 2012 17:38:12 -0400
Lines: 83
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <507856b7$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <506b0f29@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <4ae338f7-39e5-44a8-9880-263ff9516acd@w3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <50776974@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50776974@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 12 Oct 2012 12:43:19 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.2
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.2
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1350077892 166.84.1.2 (12 Oct 2012 16:38:12 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 12 Oct 2012 16:38:12 -0500, 166.84.1.2
Path: q10ni65102259wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!87.79.20.101.MISMATCH!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/11/2012 10:50 PM, Research wrote:
> I read you post and agree with what you said. Thanks for intrest in my
> thoughts. You answer, even though intriging, did not answer the question.
> The question was, was there any other witnesses who saw the rifle in the
> window? Cause I don't think there was only three shot. I do think the
> assassin's nest a ploy and the MC was a throw down. But proving it is the
> million dollar answer.

Your question is nonsense. People seeing a rifle in the window does not 
prove it was fired and does not rule out a second rifle from somewhere 
else. That's why we pushed for the HSCA and their tests PROVED that 
three shots were fired from the sniper's nest and one shot was fired 
from the grassy knoll.
Maybe more refined tests could even prove that it was Oswald's rifle 
that fired all three shots. But in the meantime the recovered bullet and 
fragments were fired from Oswald's rifle.

>
> I also find it curious that only two (so far) witnesses out of the over 3
> hundred looked up to the depository. Hundreds of people stood on the

Only two did WHAT? Looked up? Saw the rifle? Maybe many more did, but 
were never questioned.

> corner around the building and only two looked up. I can't believe in only
> 3 shots and that these shots came from the dep. Many of the people the WC
> claimed heard 3 shots from the dep was not even asked. Some of these
> witneses claimed the FBI had them sign blank affidavids and when they
> found out the affidavids were falsified, it was to late.
>

Something like that. I'd like to see you document whatever you think you 
are claiming.

> All the evidence around the MC can be discredited. Oswald had to die to
> keep him out of court. The circumstantial evidence of the case would not
> hold up. The bent shell is only one example. The "eye" witnesses who did

Not true. Remember where this case would be tried. Dallas, Texas. Wade 
had 25 convictions out of 26 cases. Wade could have convicted a ham 
sandwich.

> not see the large scope mounted on the rifle is another issue. They
> described they saw the shooter's finger on the trigger. But they did not
> see the scope? I personally think the shooter, if there really was one,
> used an automatic rifle without a scope. I say automatic because the shots

Never rely on witnesses.

> sound timing were to close together to be a bolt-action. The second and
> third shots were reported to almost on top of each other. The dictabelt

The acoustical evidence rules out an automatic.

> showed them 1/2 second apart. Could have been from the dep but I rather

You know nothing about the Dictabelt. Those two shots separated by less 
than a second are not from the same weapon. They are from two weapons in 
two different locations. Try reading the evidence before setting out to 
dream up wacky theories.

> think from two different directions. And I also think the dictabelt was a
> fake, to cover up the fact that there was a conspiracy and shots were
> fired from different directions. I'm not saying Oswald was a patsy. It
> might have been him in the window, but with help from the knoll.
>
>

So your brilliant conspirators cover up their conspiracy by planting a 
fake Dictabelt which proves conspiracy? Boy are these guys brilliant. So 
Nixon planted a fake WH tape of an innocent conversation which had 
dozens of erasures over 18-1/2 minutes only to MAKE it look like he was 
destroying evidence of conspiracy?
Ah ha, but what he didn't know is that the real conversation was 
accidentally duplicated on an early part of the tape via printthtough!
You know, that aside to Haldeman where he said, "God damn it, I covered 
up for Helms when he killed Kennedy and now God damn it, he's going to 
cover up for me."

>
>