Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Does Somebody Want To Tell Me That This Is Not Rip Robertson?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Saintly Oswald  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2012, 7:06 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Saintly Oswald <fatoldcr...@gmail.com>
Date: 5 Nov 2012 19:06:02 -0500
Local: Mon, Nov 5 2012 7:06 pm
Subject: Re: Does Somebody Want To Tell Me That This Is Not Rip Robertson?
I am reminded of a Pat Paulsen routine, if I may.

We of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour have had our share of censorship
problems. But we are not against censorship, because we realize there is
always the danger of something being said. Many people feel that
censorship is a violation of freedom of speech. Bullfeathers. Censorship
is not unconstitutional. Censors have a right to censor what you hear. The
Bill of Rights says nothing about the freedom of hearing. This, of course,
takes a lot of fun out of the freedom of speech. Without censorship of
television, how else can you, the American public, have the protection you
want from vulgar scenes, overexposed bodies, and all the other sights you
like to see? There's nothing in the Bill of Rights about freedom of
seeing. You can look for it, but if you see it, you'd better not show it
to anybody. And let's face it; there have to be some realistic taboos
about political comment. After all, the leaders of our country were not
elected to be tittered at. Censors have to draw the line somewhere. For
instance, we are allowed to say that Ronald Reagan is a lousy actor. But
we're not allowed to say he's a lousy governor. Which is ridiculous. We
know he's a good actor. And you can't say anything bad about President
Johnston, because you shouldn't insult the president. But, if you
compliment him, who will believe it? So, you can see that there is a place
for censors, and we only wish we could tell you where it is.

And that's the last thing I have to say to "President Johnston."

On Sunday, November 4, 2012 11:21:17 PM UTC-5, Anthony Marsh wrote:
> On 11/4/2012 4:25 PM, Saintly Oswald wrote:

> > If that is not Rip Robertson in the picture, then somebody else is wearing

> > his nose.

> So what? He bought it fair and square the plastic surgery only took two

> months.

> > https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-x1jUFfO_OAw/UJVCVrV-LBI/AAAAAAAAAa...

> > It is a very distinctive nose, exactly the same in each picture. The chin,

> > also, has that low point to his right of center, in both pictures. And it

> Nonsense.

> > passes the flash recognition test: it just looks like him. It seems to me,

> Like him? To whom? To you? That means absolutely nothing in the real

> world.

> > that anybody who is serious, and who thinks the CIA killed Kennedy, would

> > have to think that this photo is significant. And the camera original must

> > have a much wider plane, yet this is the widest version I can find. I

> > would like to see Connally and JFK in this photo, too, to see if they

> > notice old Rip holding his hat in a funny way. Are you listening, Santa?

> Why would they even know him?

> > On Saturday, November 3, 2012 3:49:06 PM UTC-4, Saintly Oswald wrote:

> >> https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-x1jUFfO_OAw/UJVCVrV-LBI/AAAAAAAAAa...

> >> This photograph showing a man who looks like Rip Robertson signalling

> >> Kellerman and Greer is the only evidence I know of concerning Rip's

> >> whereabouts on November 22, 1963. The insert is a known picture of dear

> >> old Rip. Does anybody have any evidence indicating that he was not in

> >> Dallas on that day?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.