Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Lying The Mark Lane Way # 1 (Rush To Judgment Film)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
timstter  
View profile  
 More options Oct 3 2012, 9:00 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: timstter <timst...@gmail.com>
Date: 3 Oct 2012 21:00:18 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 3 2012 9:00 pm
Subject: Re: Lying The Mark Lane Way # 1 (Rush To Judgment Film)
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Oct 1, 1:04 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 9/30/2012 4:45 PM, timstter wrote:

> > Hi All,

> > Say, according to this video, Richard C. Dodd was NEVER mentioned in
> > the Warren Commission Report:

> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YODZyI2qRMw

> > What Mark Lane FAILS to tell the viewer is that Dodd's FBI interview
> > DID appear in the Warren Commission volumes:

> Do you understand the difference between an affidavit and testimony?

Do you understand the concept of lying by omission?

> >http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol...

> > He is simply LYING by omission, in my view.

> > No wonder the KGB saw fit to partially fund his research.

> That is a lie by the CIA.

Then why did the information come from British intelligence?

You should stop making stuff up, Marsh.

Concerned Regards,

Tim Brennan
Sydney, Australia
*Newsgroup(s) Commentator*

*...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.

And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...

X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google