Message from discussion
Jack Martin
From: "Redcurrant" <redcurr...@lineone.net>
Subject: Re: Jack Martin
Date: 2000/09/22
Message-ID: <39cbd1ea@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 673017920
Sender: jmcad...@clark.net
Approved: jmcad...@execpc.com
References: <20000921150545.24234.00000201@ng-bj1.aol.com> <20000922110354.18784.00000170@ng-cj1.aol.com>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.1.45.241
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net
X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 969658679 161.58.1.85 (Fri, 22 Sep 2000 21:37:59 GMT)
Organization: Verio
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 21:37:59 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
The HSCA came to the following conclusion on Jack
Martin's reasons:
'As for Jack Martin's reasons for calling attention to Ferrie
as a suspect in the assassination, they may not have been based
on personal knowledge. Martin never claimed such information
but his action seems to have been based on sincere concerns
and some legitimate suspicions'.
Redcurrant
********
Emmatyler <emmaty...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000922110354.18784.00000170@ng-cj1.aol.com...
> To paraphrase Tom Bethell, I'm afraid Jack Martin would linked Sirhan
Sirhan to
> the grassy knoll if he felt it suited his purposes.
>
> Steve
>