The Faking of Zapruder Frame 224 - alt.assassination.jfk

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
alt.assassination.jfk
Message from discussion The Faking of Zapruder Frame 224
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: The Faking of Zapruder Frame 224
Date: 16 Oct 2012 22:56:53 -0400
Lines: 114
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <507df04e$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <2dd2f668-d768-493d-8c92-1e98da63decc@googlegroups.com> <652a29d7-d722-4efd-a546-e9022cdf206c@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <5070b118$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <71f46fc6-1d03-4142-ac5e-305e65669cc1@n16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <507b253f$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <55e85b19-49ca-40f8-80cd-5594c9068f8d@b8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <69211cb1-f119-480b-985c-770cbb4d80c4@n16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <69211cb1-f119-480b-985c-770cbb4d80c4@n16g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.1
Path: q11ni134341640wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/16/2012 4:27 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
> On Oct 14, 10:47 pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 14, 7:09 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/13/2012 10:52 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>
>>>> On Oct 6, 9:05 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/6/2012 4:50 PM, curtjester1 wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On Oct 5, 9:06 pm, fatoldcr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> I watched several of those symposium videos, and I kept waiting for the
>>>>>>> clincher, but it never came. I wanted to believe them, and they failed.
>>>>>>> They didn't prove a damn thing. Sorry.
>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, October 5, 2012 4:27:54 PM UTC-4, curtjester1 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 5, 10:37 am, Saintly Oswald <fatoldcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's face it. Jack White knew Mack, but he didn't know Jack.
>>
>>>>>>>> Let's also face that you don't know very much either.  Jack White might
>>
>>>>>>>> not have the science background as some at the Symposium but he has done
>>
>>>>>>>> quite a bit of great work.
>>
>>>>>>>> First of all you should get acquainted with the Z film, and why there is a
>>
>>>>>>>> fuss about alteration and fabrication.  There are many parts to the
>>
>>>>>>>> Symposium of 2003 besides Jack White, that the previously posted link
>>
>>>>>>>> should provide anyone.  One will see why the sign was needed to be
>>
>>>>>>>> enlarged, so it would hide the earlier shot to JFK, and keep the SBT
>>
>>>>>>>> alive.  One other very noticeable thing to observe is the listlessness of
>>
>>>>>>>> the people.  They are not watching a passing motorcade, so they got that
>>
>>>>>>>> picture from somewhere previous to the motorcade's arrival for a backdrop.
>>
>>>>>>>> If they were real people when the motorcade passed, they would have been
>>
>>>>>>>> animated, waving wildly, and they would not be so 'in position.'
>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/hoax/costella1.html
>>
>>>>>>>> CJ
>>
>>>>>> One would first have to realize the audience mostly are already into the
>>>>>> topic, some being very technical people, and a lot was just on camerawork
>>>>>> talk.  You can go to many sites online if you want to get some of the more
>>>>>> glaring anomolies that are always brought out. Sometimes one has to look
>>>>>> at not what's there so much, as what is potentially taken out.  I do think
>>>>>> you could have got out of Costella, the people not being animated as the
>>>>>> motorcade came through.  That's the one I watched most all the way
>>>>>> through.  I think the biggest topic discussed as related to alteration is
>>>>>> the limo slowdown that's not shown like witnesses related in their
>>
>>>>> The limo slowdown IS shown. Alvarez measured it.
>>
>>>>>> testimonies.  If they eliminated that then one can go to what people and
>>>>>> vehicles might have been doing or not doing in relation to that.  And
>>>>>> remember like Costella said, when you fabricate something, one can leave a
>>>>>> lot of authentic photography in, up to a high level, so one really would
>>>>>> have to look. Here's a site that will give you enough to go on as far as
>>>>>> looking:
>>
>>>>>> http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/zfilmaltered.htm
>>
>>>>>> CJ
>>
>>>> If it was shown, then why didn't the brake lights come on for
>>>> Alvarez's slowdown?
>>
>>>> CJ
>>
>>> Because it wasn't caused by the brakes.
>>
>> Why would you say that?  Are you trying to say that the brake lights
>> were faulty for not working that day?   Anyone would know that if they
>> were that they should have come on numerous times throughout the day
>> and especially during the shooting.
>>
>> Now as far as the Muchmore film ones can see at a discussion at the EF
>> on the motorcyclists and the films in general, one has pinpointed the
>> frame (in a super closeup0 where the brake light did come on.  It was
>> NOT a reflection, because the light came on and then immediately went
>> off.  They also showed the brake lights from the front, where they
>> were working, TOO.
>>
>> The only way it can be denied is if one is bent on the film to being
>> authentic.
>>
>> CJ
>
> is this the way the Zapruder Film would have looked if the witness
> testimony was correct?
>
> http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?topic=5604.0
>
> CJ
>


John, you need to take a course on the Internet so that you can learn 
how to point to a specific picture on the Web site rather than the 
entire page.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
