Message from discussion Mark Lane #93
Received: by 10.180.98.234 with SMTP id el10mr543036wib.3.1348366904510;
Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
Subject: Re: Mark Lane #93
Date: 22 Sep 2012 22:21:44 -0400
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1348366904 188.8.131.52 (22 Sep 2012 21:21:44 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 22 Sep 2012 21:21:44 -0500, 184.108.40.206
In article <d7ks58pkltabjtnmm130ch9mitqvg1o...@4ax.com>, John McAdams says...
>On 21 Sep 2012 18:18:23 -0400, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
>>In article <505baa3...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>, Anthony Marsh says...
>>>On 9/20/2012 7:29 PM, John McAdams wrote:
>>>> On 20 Sep 2012 07:11:08 -0700, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
>>>>>In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that the Warren Commission guessed
>>>>> that Brennan might have provided the reason for the DPD wanting Oswald.
>>>>>"Brennan said that from between 12:22 and 12:24, when he reached his position,
>>>>>to the moment when the motorcade arrived, he saw a man leave and return to the
>>>>>window 'a couple of times'. The Commission reported that 'Brennan saw the man
>>>>>fire the last shot and disappear from the window' and that 'within minutes of
>>>>>the assassination, Brennan described the man to the police. This description
>>>>>most probably led to the radio alert sent to police cars at approximately 12:45
>>>>>p.m., which described the suspect as white, slender, weighing about 165 pounds,
>>>>> about 5'10" tall, and in his early thirties."
>>>>>Mark Lane is showing the Warren Commission's guess as to why the DPD wanted
>>>> But at 12:45 the DPD did not want any "Oswald."
>>>Exactly when did Truly tell the DPD that Oswald was missing?
>>>Please list the exact minute and cite your source.
>>At 12:43... actually about 32 seconds after 12:43. My source is John
>>Kleagle, a reporter, who was standing nearby. I've already cited for this
>>many times. I can't be blamed if Tony never took the time to read the
>But the broadcast at 12:45 says an *unknown* white man.
>That's the best source. Lane lied when he implied otherwise.
The real question here is why you refuse to state that Wade, Gannaway, and Curry
When Mark Lane says what they said, you label *HIM* a liar, despite the fact
that he showed how they couldn't be correct.
You see, you *agree* with Mark Lane... that these three people did *NOT*
accurately depict what happened.
And I know that you can read well enough to understand that I've said this
several times now.
Along with "Bud", it looks like *you* don't know what the topic was either. If
you did, you wouldn't be trying to *change* it.
The topic was *NOT* "what did the 12:45 radio broadcast say". If that were the
question, the broadcast itself would *indeed* be the best source.
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com