Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

First 17 pages of Road to Dallas by Kaiser online at Harvard University Press

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Peter Fokes

unread,
Mar 26, 2008, 8:01:10 PM3/26/08
to
http://www.hup.harvard.edu/

See link on the page above.

Requires Adobe Acrobat

Peter Fokes

Martin Shackelford

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 11:39:02 AM4/2/08
to
Very interesting book. A few errors, but some fine analysis.

Martin

"Peter Fokes" <jp...@toronto.hm> wrote in message
news:frolu3hlv76kief31...@4ax.com...

Anthony Marsh

unread,
Apr 2, 2008, 7:47:27 PM4/2/08
to
Martin Shackelford wrote:
> Very interesting book. A few errors, but some fine analysis.
>

I picked it up Saturday. As usual I go to a couple of specific topics
right away. He was confused about the acoustical evidence. For example
he writes that both DPD radio channels were recorded on Dictabelts.
He did have a couple of new tidbits, but not very well documented. So I
may be asking people here if anyone can document those.

Martin Shackelford

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 10:58:16 AM4/3/08
to
I noticed that he incorrectly identified the Odio visitors, but I thought
his analysis of the statements of Marina was good, among other things.
He also makes good use of much newly released information, and got
some good tips from a fine British researcher, Malcolm Blunt.

Martin

"Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:GOadnaeStOZ9dG7a...@comcast.com...

John McAdams

unread,
Apr 5, 2008, 11:54:48 PM4/5/08
to
On 3 Apr 2008 10:58:16 -0400, "Martin Shackelford"
<msh...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>I noticed that he incorrectly identified the Odio visitors, but I thought
>his analysis of the statements of Marina was good, among other things.
>He also makes good use of much newly released information, and got
>some good tips from a fine British researcher, Malcolm Blunt.
>

Do you think it was Seymour who was the "Oswald" figure?

He claims to have documents that prove otherwise, but I haven't looked
them up.


>Martin
>
>"Anthony Marsh" <anthon...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:GOadnaeStOZ9dG7a...@comcast.com...
>> Martin Shackelford wrote:
>>> Very interesting book. A few errors, but some fine analysis.
>>>
>>
>> I picked it up Saturday. As usual I go to a couple of specific topics
>> right away. He was confused about the acoustical evidence. For example he
>> writes that both DPD radio channels were recorded on Dictabelts.
>> He did have a couple of new tidbits, but not very well documented. So I
>> may be asking people here if anyone can document those.
>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> "Peter Fokes" <jp...@toronto.hm> wrote in message
>>> news:frolu3hlv76kief31...@4ax.com...
>>>> http://www.hup.harvard.edu/
>>>>
>>>> See link on the page above.
>>>>
>>>> Requires Adobe Acrobat
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter Fokes
>>>
>>>
>>
>

.John
--------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

tomnln

unread,
Apr 6, 2008, 10:38:44 AM4/6/08
to
HSCA Report page 139.

HSCA Believed Odio.


"John McAdams" <john.m...@marquette.edu> wrote in message
news:oaigv3d4psgm25kcl...@4ax.com...

0 new messages