O'Reilly's Book - alt.assassination.jfk

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
alt.assassination.jfk
Message from discussion O'Reilly's Book
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: O'Reilly's Book
Date: 11 Oct 2012 16:05:36 -0400
Lines: 133
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <50764247$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <f176f61e-e51a-4004-af45-262d07e472dc@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <5071dba9$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <3291f3da-ef57-44c0-91cc-e3a7f600e5e6@n2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <50734ba4$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <f3796167-f08b-415b-a84f-0dfa41515095@m5g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <caeruleo-AC8C3E.20124610102012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <caeruleo-AC8C3E.20124610102012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
Path: q10ni65116258wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
Bytes: 7422
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/10/2012 9:46 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> In article
> <f3796167-f08b-415b-a84f-0dfa41515...@m5g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>   David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> TONY MARSH SAID:
>>
>>>>> "Who said the floor-laying crew was on the sixth floor at the time of the
>>>>> shooting? A professional team would have spotters and lookouts to make
>>>>> sure they wouldn't be disturbed." <<<
>>
>> DVP:
>>
>> You're the one who said there were "hundreds" of workers on the sixth
>> floor, not me. (Hyperbolic though your comment might have been.)
>>
>> It would have been hard to hide from "hundreds" of guys, wouldn't
>> it? :-)
>
> Oh but David, don't you see?  All of them except for the known TSBD
> employees were shooters.  We've had it wrong all this time.  There weren't

Now wait a minute. Didn't some kook have a theory that the real shooter 
was a TSBD employee?
I also heard a theory that several other TSBD employees were also 
shooters. Like a company hit.

> three shots fired at the motorcade.  There were three-HUNDRED shots fired
> at the motorcade.  The first 100 shots were all fired simultaneously after
> the limo turned the corner.  No wonder it was so loud and no wonder all

Reductio ad Absurdum.

> those echoes fooled so many people into believing those shots came from
> the knoll and the underpass and the railroad yards and the Dal-Tex and so
> forth.  It's a wonder only Tague was hit, but that's because although
> their coordination was superb, their aim was atrocious.  But with more

Lifton's theory was that only blanks were fired from the TSBD to make 
people think that all the shot came from there, while the real shots came 
from the front. How about throwing in some silencers to confuse people?

> superb superhuman coordination the second group of 100 shooters (yes, they
> did it as sort of a tag team) fired all their rifles with pinpoint

And who said it had to be superhuman? Why not automated? Didn't you see 
the Bruce Willis remake of The Jackal?

> accuracy at exactly Z222.  But while all these guys were fabulous in their

And what exactly is the significance of Z-222? Is that your latest SBT 
du jour?

> timing, they weren't so snazzy with their aim, as the vast majority of
> them couldn't hit a donkey at ten feet, and only two of them hit anyone in
> the limo; one shooter hit JFK and the other hit JBC.  So this clears it up
> at long last after more than 48 years: there was no freakin' single

That's what the FBI said in its report and the WC said in its internal 
memos.

> bullet.  Then of course the last 100 shooters took their places at the
> windows, and once again, almost as if it had been preordained by Ye Powers
> That Be, they all fired at exactly Z312.  But sadly, 98 of them were even

So, where are all those clouds of smoke from your hundreds of guns?

> worse shots than the first and second groups.  But two of them found their
> mark.  Well, one on purpose and one accidentally.  One of these two, whom

I can't name him here, but there is actually one kook who believes that 
JFK was shot in the head accidentally by the SS. Reminds me of that story 
by the SS agent at LBJ's ranch who pulled his Tommy Gun on LBJ and almost 
pulled the trigger before he recognized him.

> we shall call John, got JFK directly in the back of the head.  The other,
> whom we shall call Anthony, aimed a tad high and missed JFK...but the
> bullet ricocheted off the inside of the windshield (hence the dent in the
> photos) and hit the front of JFK's head.
>

There is NO dent in the windshield. What are you on? How expensive is it?

> Now as to why so few witnesses noticed 300 shooters, that's simply because
> quite a few of the idjits fired out of the rear windows of the TSBD toward
> the parking lot.  They were a bit confused as to which side of the
> building their target would be on.  And the regular TSBD employees didn't
> mention all these shooters on the 6th floor because who's gonna tattle on
> 300 folks with rifles pointing atcha?
>

OH, so that explains why so many innocent bystanders were killed that day. 
;]> Maybe their job was to kill all the witnesses, like the Sadat 
assassination.

> Oh sorry, C&C warning.
>
>> And Tony knows full well that no strangers were seen by any TSBD
>> workers on the upper floors of the building on Nov. 22. The only
>> stranger noticed by anybody was the old geezer who used the restroom
>> on the first floor and was seen leaving in a car shortly thereafter.
>>
>> I can only wonder how a team of professional gunmen and "spotters"
>> worked their way, unnoticed, up to the 6th floor in order to start
>> playing their "Let's Frame Oswald As The Patsy" game?
>
> Especially 300 of them.  But you know, that's also why Victoria Adams et
> al didn't report them as thundering down the back stairs after the
> shooting because, again, who's gonna cause any trouble with 300 men and
> women (yes, there were some female shooters too; this is a new revelation
> from a document that was just declassified earlier today by the CIA, and a
> scan of it was sent to me today as an email attachment by one of my fellow
> spooks) who all have rifles waving around?
>
> The final revelation in this document is how they all got out of the
> building unnoticed by the crowd outside.  It's really quite simple: they
> had already dug a hole in the first floor, and they waited for all the
> bystanders to run over to the grassy knoll and then they just snuck out
> through the sewer.
>

Maybe they all pretended to be part of a movie crew as in the new movie 
ARGO (based on a true story).

> All 300 of them.
>
> They later emerged in Oak Cliff, but by that time their patsy had already
> accidentally shot an officer.
>
> Well, you can't expect everything to have gone right, can you?
>
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
