Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion The Faking of Zapruder Frame 224
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Research  
View profile  
 More options Oct 3 2012, 3:51 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: "Research" <questio...@hotmail.com>
Date: 3 Oct 2012 15:51:35 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 3 2012 3:51 pm
Subject: Re: The Faking of Zapruder Frame 224

"Saintly Oswald" <fatoldcr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:ca1696e5-fb6a-4cea-a790-3593327c8f28@googlegroups.com...

One trouble with my idea that the film was altered after the Life
publication is that in frame 225 Connally's necktie in both the Life and
my high resolution versions has the same distorted line, presumably caused
by the shot hitting him. If that was faked, then it had to be done early
on, before, probably, the need for a SBT would have been known. Perhaps
the purple rectangle in the color versions is caused by differences of
contrast in the the different versions. When I play with the contrast of
the Life version, I can't get the rectangle, but I can get the same line
against his shirt of which the rectangle is a part. Perhaps it is just a
coincidence that frame 222 is missing from the nice clear version? On the
other hand, if it had been known that Greer had shot Connally, and the
editor would have known because he had to re-frame the limousine to hide
that shot, then the faking might have been intended to account for his
wounds rather than for the SBT, and would have been done with the original
editing. Actually, that would be the creation of the SBT right there by
the editor. Yes. I like that. I hope you all do, too. But I wouldn't bet
on a post-Life publication faking as I proposed when I opened this topic.

Well, well, well. Here is somebody who's prescription has been corrected.
He can actually see the "rectangle or triangle" shape. In another thread I
tried to discuess this issue with another poster who claimed I invented it
and that it didn't exist. But what can we expect from LNers. I called the
"rectangle or triangle" shape an ink smear. Because it is. It's not a
lapel flip. It is a faulty alteration where the forger's hand slipped.
Maybe you think I'm crazy. Well o.k. Then ask yourself how did Z314 and
Z315 get switched. PLEASE don't rely on the Zavada report. That was one of
those government projects to make lame excuses seem probable. And it in
reality says nothing. It is part of the conspiracy to cover-up the murder
conspiracy. One of those fake excuses. Watch out cause the LNers have no
case without it.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.