Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion John Connally's November 22, 1963
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anthony Marsh  
View profile  
 More options Oct 12 2012, 9:48 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Date: 12 Oct 2012 21:48:02 -0400
Local: Fri, Oct 12 2012 9:48 pm
Subject: Re: John Connally's November 22, 1963
On 10/11/2012 10:43 PM, John Reagor King wrote:

> In article <0e3506d6-2aed-4984-9f3a-c971f497aedc@googlegroups.com>,
>   Saintly Oswald <fatoldcr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Whatever, but it seems that LBJ and Hoover both, knew on November 29 that
>> Connally was between the assassin and JFK, meaning that shots, or, at least
>> the ones that hit Connally, came from the front.

> Then how does the trajectory through his body work?  The bullet entered
> his back almost right at his right armpit.  It exited his chest about two
> inches to the left of his right nipple.  This is a right to left path
> through his body.  At no time in the entire film is he ever in any
> position to be shot from the front with the bullet entering his back
> without it being a left to right path through his body.

Well, give this newbie a chance. Maybe he can change his theory so that
it happens when we can't see Connally through the sign.
Then all your blather is meaningless.

>> Some are so attached to
>> their Lone Nut that they cannot see the truth.

> And some are so attached to their patently ridiculous conspiracy
> scenarios that they cannot see the truth either.

Oh, you mean like the Single Bullet Theory?
>> Who are we to take away their
>> sole comfort? I say, let them keep their Lone Nut, if it makes them happy,

> And let the believers in the most implausible conspiracy scenarios keep
> their multiple nuts too.

>> but let not this cancer of the mind spread to others.

> Oh yes, and prithee let us not perforce allow any patently ridiculous
> conspiracy scenarios be forthwith proclaimed before the many readers of
> this group without those readers also seeing much more rational challenges
> proclaimed as well.

>> Perhaps we could build
>> Lone Nut colonies for them to live in.

> Indeed, and let us also have some other colonies for the multiple nuts, so
> that they may indulge themselves around their holy campfires and regale
> each other with amazing stories that bring down manna from the heavens and
> stupefy the imagination.

>> Yes. This should be studied.

> I think so too.

>> Perhaps
>> Montana? Yes. We could move everybody out of Montana and put them their.
>> Welcome to Montana, the Lone Nut State.

> And where should the multiple nut colony be?  As far away from the lone
> nut colony as possible, I should think.  Northern Territory, Australia?
> Yes, I think that's far enough.  Then y'all can all have your glorious
> campfires around the Uluru.  That ought to bring in some wonderful
> revelations hitherto unimagined.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.