Message from discussion Harold Weisberg
Received: by 10.68.241.98 with SMTP id wh2mr4995491pbc.7.1336964818315;
Sun, 13 May 2012 20:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Harold Weisberg
Date: 13 May 2012 23:06:57 -0400
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
X-Original-Trace: 13 May 2012 21:55:04 -0500, 184.108.40.206
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1336964817 220.127.116.11 (13 May 2012 22:06:57 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 13 May 2012 22:06:57 -0500, 18.104.22.168
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 5/13/2012 6:05 PM, Research wrote:
>> Jim DiEugenio said:
>> "I actually am beginning to think those [Dillard] photos were
>> DVP said:
>> Great! Another fake picture!
>> DiEugenio wants Jarman, Norman,& Williams to be somewhere other than
>> the fifth floor at 12:30 PM, so what does Jimbo do (even with the
>> Dillard picture staring back at him) -- Jimbo will pretend that the
>> Dillard picture is a "re-enactment" photo. Lovely.
> First of all the three ear witnesses you seem to believe, didn't just sit
> there and wait for a photo opt. Their faint images can be seen (or
> someone's) in the Hughes film. So someone was there. But no rifle was
> hanging out above their heads. If they heard what they claimed, why did
> they run to the west end and return to the east end as they themselves
> said? Why didn't they go upstairs, if they really heard the rifle firing
> above their heads? Phony testimony and sound bits don't make concrete
> evidence in a court or public opinion.
>> Take Fetzer's latest "fake" revelation -- he thinks Lovelady was
>> inserted into the news film showing Oswald being taken into the DPD.
> Get your facts straight. Lovelady did see Oswald escorted into the DPD. He
> was in the interrogation room when Oswald was brought in. Because Lovelady
> was in custody for questioning. Because he fit the Oswald profile and the
> police was looking for Oswald. And when he was arrested, Lovelady was
Lovelady was arrested? Can you show me the paperwork on that?
> released. Even though he matched the description given by another eye
> witness Bledshoe. Who claimed Oswald was on a bus. But was it really
> Oswald or Lovelady? Where was Lovelady when he was arrested? Still
> standing in the doorway?