Received: by 10.68.241.98 with SMTP id wh2mr4995491pbc.7.1336964818315;
        Sun, 13 May 2012 20:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: Harold Weisberg
Date: 13 May 2012 23:06:57 -0400
Lines: 40
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <4fb07408@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <7cd08590-e66f-4582-9f88-a644a111c3f0@ns1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <4fabf503@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <9e38ec81-9c9c-4944-9394-b6f51d2da160@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <cc553cbe-951b-455c-9985-2175db8d15f7@pw2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <4fafac47@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4fafac47@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 13 May 2012 21:55:04 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.1
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.1
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1336964817 166.84.1.1 (13 May 2012 22:06:57 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 13 May 2012 22:06:57 -0500, 166.84.1.1
Path: pr3ni23385pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newspump.sol.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/13/2012 6:05 PM, Research wrote:
>> Jim DiEugenio said:
>>
>> "I actually am beginning to think those [Dillard] photos were
>> reenactments."
>> DVP said:
>>
>> Great! Another fake picture!
>>
>> DiEugenio wants Jarman, Norman,&  Williams to be somewhere other than
>> the fifth floor at 12:30 PM, so what does Jimbo do (even with the
>> Dillard picture staring back at him) -- Jimbo will pretend that the
>> Dillard picture is a "re-enactment" photo. Lovely.
>
> First of all the three ear witnesses you seem to believe, didn't just sit
> there and wait for a photo opt. Their faint images can be seen (or
> someone's) in the Hughes film. So someone was there. But no rifle was
> hanging out above their heads. If they heard what they claimed, why did
> they run to the west end and return to the east end as they themselves
> said? Why didn't they go upstairs, if they really heard the rifle firing
> above their heads? Phony testimony and sound bits don't make concrete
> evidence in a court or public opinion.
>
>>
>> Take Fetzer's latest "fake" revelation -- he thinks Lovelady was
>> inserted into the news film showing Oswald being taken into the DPD.
>
> Get your facts straight. Lovelady did see Oswald escorted into the DPD. He
> was in the interrogation room when Oswald was brought in. Because Lovelady
> was in custody for questioning. Because he fit the Oswald profile and the
> police was looking for Oswald. And when he was arrested, Lovelady was

Lovelady was arrested? Can you show me the paperwork on that?

> released. Even though he matched the description given by another eye
> witness Bledshoe. Who claimed Oswald was on a bus. But was it really
> Oswald or Lovelady? Where was Lovelady when he was arrested? Still
> standing in the doorway?