Received: by 10.180.73.134 with SMTP id l6mr2247270wiv.1.1349940993470;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: Lying The Mark Lane Way # 1 (Rush To Judgment Film)
Date: 8 Oct 2012 17:19:46 -0400
Lines: 103
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <5071f529$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <dd9bccaf-17d4-460f-a152-d13ac30a537d@ql4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <5068ec54$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <1232e938-2715-400b-a967-3e10124299a7@k13g2000pbq.googlegroups.com> <506d1eab$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <c54bdb74-4134-42f2-89e6-d97e5602d0a3@wz4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c54bdb74-4134-42f2-89e6-d97e5602d0a3@wz4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 7 Oct 2012 16:33:29 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1349731187 166.84.1.3 (8 Oct 2012 16:19:47 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 8 Oct 2012 16:19:47 -0500, 166.84.1.3
Path: q11ni134269051wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
Bytes: 4261
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/6/2012 6:52 PM, timstter wrote:
> On Oct 5, 1:41 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 10/3/2012 9:00 PM, timstter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 1, 1:04 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 9/30/2012 4:45 PM, timstter wrote:
>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>
>>>>> Say, according to this video, Richard C. Dodd was NEVER mentioned in
>>>>> the Warren Commission Report:
>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YODZyI2qRMw
>>
>>>>> What Mark Lane FAILS to tell the viewer is that Dodd's FBI interview
>>>>> DID appear in the Warren Commission volumes:
>>
>>>> Do you understand the difference between an affidavit and testimony?
>>
>>> Do you understand the concept of lying by omission?
>>
>> I understand the concept of lying by misrepresenting what someone claimed.
>>
>>>>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol...
>>
>>>>> He is simply LYING by omission, in my view.
>>
>>>>> No wonder the KGB saw fit to partially fund his research.
>>
>>>> That is a lie by the CIA.
>>
>>> Then why did the information come from British intelligence?
>>
>> Because they are lackies licking the boots of the CIA.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> You should stop making stuff up, Marsh.
>>
>>> Concerned Regards,
>>
>>> Tim Brennan
>>> Sydney, Australia
>>> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>>
>>> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
>>> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
>>> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>>
>>> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
>>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
>>
>>> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>
> That still has nothing to do with your claim that the information came
> from the CIA, Marsh.
>

Ned Dolan, CIA agent is the one who has been spreading this on the 
InterNet.

> Your blind hatred of the CIA led you to make a wild accusation, Marsh.
>

Not blind. Seen up close.

> Christopher Andrew published the information about Lane, which he got
> from British intelligence, who got it from a KGB mole.
>

Wrong. From the CIA.

> NOTHING to do with the CIA, Marsh.
>
> Corrective Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>