 |
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Date: 3 Nov 2012 15:39:56 -0400
Local: Sat, Nov 3 2012 3:39 pm
Subject: Re: Jack Ruby Rats Out LBJ
On 11/2/2012 9:14 PM, Saintly Oswald wrote:
> If, as some assert, the assassination was a CIA rogue element affair, then
No. Jack Ruby was a front for the Chicago Mafia and the Chicago Mafia > how does Jack Ruby fit into it? Did Jack work for the CIA, too? I suppose were partners in the CIA assassination plots. > he could have been part of that element, since he seems to have been
He does not implicate LBJ directly. He is indirectly referencing the ad > involved in the anti-Castro activities. But why does he implicate LBJ? Was > his statement leverage on the part of the plotters to get LBJ to by the John Birch Society which suggested that Kennedy should be assassinated so that a truly patriotic American could become President. > cooperate? I don't think so. I don't know the date of his "The answer is
LBJ thought that it was a conspiracy immediately and by that afternoon > the man in office now," comment, but my impression is that this came well > after LBJ had already shown his dedication to the cover up. It seems odd > to me that Googling doesn't get me more info on Ruby's statement, but it had started the cover-up even before Oswald was booked. > looks to me that it occurred in his trial period, when the Warren
Ruby was given an offer he couldn't refuse. Just as in Dr. Phibes they > Commission was in glorious full flight, so there would have been no need > for the CIA to prod him at this point. It seems more likely that this was > Jack acting in his own interest, or out of a belief that he had been left > to twist in the wind by LBJ. And I don't see how that makes any sense > unless Ruby saw LBJ as the boss of the assassination plot. would have fed him his own dogs. > On Friday, October 12, 2012 5:06:08 PM UTC-4, Saintly Oswald wrote:
>> wanting people to actually see the outtake of LBJ's interview with
>> Cronkite, after I had referred to it, an ignorant and silly accusation
>> when you consider that my most watched YouTube video, posted on April 22,
>> shows the entire clip. I even play part of it twice. My video puts it in
>> the context of Jack Ruby implying and then even more than implying, that
>> Lyndon Johnson was instrumental in the murder of JFK. I have read that one
>> of Ruby's associates thought it silly that he would be involved, because
>> *he wouldn't be able to keep his mouth shut.* He loved to talk. Ahem. I
>> have heard others said, that if it was a conspiracy, then somebody would
>> have talked. Ahem. Well, this is it. This is my video I supposedly don't
>> want anybody to see. I think everybody should watch it 100 times.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||