Message from discussion Officer Haygood's call in at 12:34-12:35
Received: by 10.66.84.168 with SMTP id a8mr11747paz.25.1349942238509;
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Officer Haygood's call in at 12:34-12:35
Date: 5 Oct 2012 21:13:06 -0400
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <caeruleo-89E2EB.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <caeruleo-27B281.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <caeruleo-06132E.email@example.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
X-Original-Trace: 5 Oct 2012 15:38:59 -0500, 18.104.22.168
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1349485987 22.214.171.124 (5 Oct 2012 20:13:07 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 5 Oct 2012 20:13:07 -0500, 126.96.36.199
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 10/4/2012 11:46 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
> Saintly Oswald <fatoldcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That Bothun photo is key. It shows Hargis on his way before Haygood gets
>> there. That was the one I needed to find. And Hargis wears dhort gloves.
>> Haygood wears long gloves.
> Are you talking about the photo labeled here as "Bothun Annotated
> Motorcycle Identification"?
Do you mean this photo?
You have to click on it to get the fullsize picture. Even that is not as
large as other versions found elsewhere.
I am not sure that the resolution is not high enough for you to be able
to see that Hargis is wearing black gloves.
Does fatoldcreep think that all cops wore black gloves that day?
> If so, for the one labeled "Haygood," the front of his motorcycle is
> barely in frame, and I can't see either of his hands. If that's not the
> right one, which of the Bothun photos are you talking about? Could you
> give a link to it, please?
> And I just noticed something else. I looked at the Cabluck photo again
> just now. You've been saying in quite a few articles that he's wearing
> black gloves. I just zoomed in on that, and neither of his hands are
> visible. His left hand is obviously placed on the wall, but because of
> the camera being at a lower elevation, his left hand is not visible. And
> his entire right arm and hand are behind his body.
> Again, I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong about that being Haygood,
> but I do not now understand where you've gotten your claim from that you
> can tell what sort of gloves he's wearing in the Cabluck photo, since
> neither of his hands are visible in it.