Received: by 10.180.82.226 with SMTP id l2mr116085wiy.1.1348085090292; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:04:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthony Marsh Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk Subject: Re: 9/11 Required Reading: "500 Days" Date: 19 Sep 2012 16:04:49 -0400 Lines: 37 Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com Message-ID: <50595628@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> References: <504ffdcf$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <53e8a227-ade6-46ed-972b-f58e89bf0d96@e14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <6cfaa52a-63e6-4a55-a6a5-3d5a112f3edb@u15g2000yql.googlegroups.com> Return-Path: X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155 X-Original-Trace: 19 Sep 2012 00:20:40 -0500, 24.61.15.155 NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3 X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1348085090 166.84.1.3 (19 Sep 2012 15:04:50 -0500) X-Original-Trace: 19 Sep 2012 15:04:50 -0500, 166.84.1.3 Path: ed8ni2928707wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!46.4.82.166.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/18/2012 8:22 PM, John Reagor King wrote: > In article > <6cfaa52a-63e6-4a55-a6a5-3d5a112f3...@u15g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, > mainframetech wrote: > >> On Sep 12, 8:03 pm, curtjester1 wrote: >>> On Sep 12, 9:06 am, Anthony Marsh wrote: >>> >>>> Bush lied. >>> >>> http://commonground.ca/2012/06/911-bamboozle/ >>> >>> CJ >> >> For another scrupulously honest site dealing with the fall of the >> THREE towers, go here: >> >> http://www.ae911truth.org/ >> >> Over 1,700 architects and engineers have signed off that the WTC >> 9/11 catastrophy was done with controlled demolition, and they can >> prove it. > > Really? More than 1700 architects and engineers have specifically said > that? Where may we see a list of the names of all 1700+ of these I believe they have a Web site. Learn how to use the Internet. > architects and engineers so that we may independently verify whether or > not there are really that many, and so that we may independently verify > that they really are accredited architects and engineers? > Why don't you interview each for yourself and report back to us?