Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.assassination.jfk
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Battling Another CTer (Re: "Reclaiming History")
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Reagor King  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 9:50 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: John Reagor King <caeru...@yahoo.com>
Date: 10 Oct 2012 21:50:44 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 9:50 pm
Subject: Re: Battling Another CTer (Re: "Reclaiming History")
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
In article <507389a...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
 Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 10/8/2012 9:03 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> > In article
> > <07ee0ec2-e7e6-41b2-88de-28bb779f9...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
> >   David Von Pein <davevonp...@aol.com> wrote:

> >> it contains untruths, and it
> >> avoids any ideas that conflict with its conclusions. I'll give your
> >> review a D- because there are very few grammatical or spelling errors.

> >> DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

> >> How sweet of you. But at least a D- is better than the F- that you're
> >> getting for your review of my review.

> >> The day you come up with one solid piece of credible evidence that
> >> undermines the "Oswald Did It" conclusions of both the Warren
> >> Commission and the HSCA, please drop me a line. Thus far no conspiracy
> >> theorist has been able to do that. But, who knows, maybe Garry Puffer
> >> of Riverside, California, will be the first. Good luck.

> >> http://ReclaimingHistory.blogspot.com

> > This is similar to me.  I'm still waiting, and waiting, and waiting for
> > just someone, just anyone, to prove, for the first time ever, that more
> > than 10% of the Dealey Plaza witnesses said that the shots came from
> > multiple directions.  I have been saying for years that it is less than

> Straw man argument. No one made that claim.

Yes you did, on many different occasions, every single time you said my
"less than 10%" and "more than 90%" statistics were bogus.  It's such a
shame (for you only) that you are helplessly unable to prove it.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google