>> On Monday, November 12, 2012 5:46:03 PM UTC-8, claviger wrote:
>>> On Oct 25, 3:12=A0pm, "pjspe...@AOL.COM" <pjspe...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> =20
>>>> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:26:59 PM UTC-7, claviger wrote:
>>> =20
>>>>> It doesn't take a genius to figure out the SBT. =A0Any hunter, cop, o=
>> r
>>> =20

>>> =20
>>>>> combat veteran could have told Specter what happened. Through-and-thr=
>> ough
>>> =20

>>> =20
>>>>> wounds are nothing new. =A0The SBT has been proved conclusively using=
>> the
>>> =20

>>> =20
>>>>> Scientific Method in high tech field testing. CTs lost this argument =
>> a
>>> =20

>>> =20
>>>>> long time ago.
>>> =20

>>> =20
>>>> Nonsense. Find us a case history in which a high-velocity bullet entere=
>> d the back and exited from the middle of the throat in which no bones were =
>> struck and no blood vessels torn. I've looked. I've studied the wound balli=
>> stics. This doesn't happen.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Pat,
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Do you think it nonsense an aerodynamic missile made of lead weighing 160
>>> =20
>>> grains moving over 2000 feet per second can penetrate a bag of water
>>> =20
>>> inside a soft outer lining only 0.07 inches (2 mm) thick?  The human body
>>> =20
>>> is basically a bag of fluid with a skeleton inside to act as a coat
>>> =20
>>> hanger. Lead is over 10 times more dense than water and the adult human
>>> =20
>>> body is 60% water.  If the missile mentioned above misses any hard
>>> =20
>>> structure there is little to impede its progress.  It may slow down the
>>> =20
>>> missile somewhat but not prevent it from puncturing all the way
>>> =20
>>> approximately 8" of this liquid filled balloon.  This is why I find it
>>> =20
>>> amazing so many CTs think it impossible for a military FMJ missile to
>>> =20
>>> penetrate two human being sitting closely together in tandem.
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Water properties: The water in you (Water Science for Schools)
>>> =20
>>> http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/propertyyou.html

>> That's not the problem. The problem is that the internal damage to the neck=
>> makes no sense. When a high velocity FMJ bullet tears through a neck it cr=
>> eates a lot more damage than was done to Kennedy's neck.

> IOW your so far past the point of no return on those wacky theories it's
> sad.

> Cripes, that type of round was designed to penetrate enemy soldiers, IOW
> to cripple vs. kill on the battlefield...where the hell do you think it
> went after entering JFK's back?

> 1. There was air in the tissue bewteen the back and throat wounds.

> 2. The apex of the right lung and pleura were bruised.

> 3. Slight fracture of the tip of the transverse process of T1.

> 4. There was debris seen near C7/T1.

> 5. The right side of his larynx was contused.

> 6. There was a nick to the right side of his trachea.

> 7. The strap muscles on the right side of his neck were bruised.

> 8. "Free air & blood" was observed in the area of the throat wound,
> indicative of a wound in the upper right hemithorax (mediastinum).

> ....not to mention the holes/nick in the clothes/tie bent outward as if a
> bullet exited there causing those holes/that nick.

> What do you want Pat to believe a bullet entered the back/upper neck,
> transited, and exited his throat where the tracheostomy was performed....a
> damn picture of a tunnel like hole through his body there big enough to
> put your fist through???????

> John Canal