In article <50684...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
 "John Fiorentino" <jefiorent...@optimum.net> wrote:

Let's go through this again.  I asked you over and over and over to say
what material you were stretching in your experiment, and you absolutely
***REFUSED*** to answer such a perfectly reasonable question, over and
over and over, day after day after day.  I also asked you a couple of
other perfectly reasonable questions repeatedly and you absolutely
***REFUSED*** to answer those as well.  You THEN told me that ALL of my
questions would be answered in your PREVIOUS articles in the archives.  
But when I did EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAID, I found NO articles EVER posted by
you in which these EXACT questions were answered.  Then you quoted a
previous article of yours which DID NOT answer a SINGLE one of these
perfectly reasonable questions I asked.

I am not calling you a liar, I am saying you were MISTAKEN when you said
that ALL of my questions had ALREADY been answered in your previous
articles.  And you haven't even TRIED to prove me wrong.

My gawd, John, what is the big deal?  I've been asking you for weeks to
just NAME the material you were stretching in your experiment which
"proved" that JFK's scalp would have torn.  Couldn't you have typed the
answer to that in less than ten seconds?  You're acting like it's some
big major deal to type a few words.  You're the one making yourself look
like a liar, not me.

The same goes for me.  Take it for what it's worth.  But we are both
posting in a "public" newsgroup that can be read by anyone with standard
Internet access.  And by yourself you are ruining and ruining and
ruining your own credibility by refusing to answer a perfectly
reasonable question that would take you only a few seconds to answer.  
And refusing to answer it for several weeks continuously on top of that.