Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Mark Lane #83
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anthony Marsh  
View profile  
 More options Sep 20 2012, 8:50 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Date: 20 Sep 2012 20:50:37 -0400
Local: Thurs, Sep 20 2012 8:50 pm
Subject: Re: Mark Lane #83
On 9/20/2012 6:05 PM, Bud wrote:

> On Sep 20, 12:43 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <7342d09e-d81b-49c1-91d3-85a8fa132...@n9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
>> Bud says...

>>> On Sep 19, 1:41=A0pm, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <2qci58dpb7fn6vtcl687rp2uvtrdjtc...@4ax.com>, John McAdams say=
>>> s...

>>>>> On 6 Sep 2012 06:37:26 -0700, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that the Warren Commission=
>>> took
>>>>>> testimony from a Veterinarian for ballistics issues, yet still was forc=
>>> ed to
>>>>>> ignore the testimony since in contradicted the SBT.

>>>>>> "Although the Commission asserted that its experts had proved that one =
>>> bullet
>>>>>> could pass through the President's neck and then through the Governor's=
>>> chest
>>>>>> and wrist and enter his thigh, the experts had never attempted that
>>>>>> comprehensive test. Instead, they had fired different bullets, each thr=
>>> ough a
>>>>>> different substance, each bullet suffering distortion in the process.
>>>>>> Nevertheless the Commission concluded that one bullet - Commission Exhi=
>>> bit 399 -
>>>>>> did all the damage, while remaining unshattered, unflattened, undeforme=
>>> d.

>>>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ce399.gif

>>>>> Lane just can't stop lying.

>>>> You just can't stop making claims that you cannot defend.

>>>   Can you defend Lane`s claim that ce399 is undeformed?

>> The ballistics studies undertaken for the Warren Commission did an
>> excellent job at this. Much better than I could do.

>    Since you are running from the question I will assume you can`t
> defend Lane`s claim that CE 399 is undeformed.

>> Surely you can point to one of the photos showing a bullet which did half
>> the damage that CE 399 did, and even partially came close to looking like
>> CE 399, right?

>    <snicker> What does this strawman have to do with anything?

>    Since words have meaning, let me supply the definition for deformed,
> and you can tell us how it doesn`t apply to ce399.

>    deformed past participle, past tense of de·form (Verb)
> Verb:
> Distort the shape or form of; make misshapen.
> Become distorted or misshapen; undergo deformation: "the suspension
> deforms slightly on corners".

>    Obviously CE399 is not in it`s original shape, therefore it is
> deformed. Lane lied about this, it is simple as that.

It is not in its [sic] original shape the moment it is fired.
So by your definition a test bullet fired into a water tank is
"deformed." And it can look just like CE 399.
>>>> [Further comments in the open forum]

>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ben Holmes
>> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.