Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Getting David VP's opinion on other pressing issues ....

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Peter Fokes

unread,
May 1, 2007, 1:53:55 PM5/1/07
to

Lets provide David VP with some new issues to discuss. Recently he's
resorted to writing about horoscopes so maybe you'll agree with me: he
needs some new material.

Here are some issues he might find irresistible:

1. Was the popularity of The Beatles part of the conspirators plot?

2. Did a bird deflect a bullet and did any witness see the bird?
Was the bird injured? Did Posner interview the bird by telephone and
tell everyone he has the conversation on tape?

3. Did Clint Hill really run backwards to the limo, and was the
Zapruder film altered to show him running forward?

4. Did the assassination really take place in Houston?


Please feel free to add your own issues ....

Avoid caps please.

Lets not let the well run dry.

Keep David VP going strong!


PF

aeffects

unread,
May 1, 2007, 8:25:01 PM5/1/07
to

Way ahead of you, on .acj David refused to answer the above questions.

One curious question for Dvaid VP, who is Nicolas Katzenbach, what
memo did he write on Nov 25, 1963?


David Von Pein

unread,
May 1, 2007, 9:59:06 PM5/1/07
to
Any ideas as to WHY Katzenbach would, in essence, put the conspiracy/
cover-up IN WRITING?

Was he nuts? Or just stupid?

Or....maybe that memo has simply been misinterpreted by CTers.


Gerry Simone (O)

unread,
May 4, 2007, 12:51:54 AM5/4/07
to
In those days, governments believed the people would readily take their
pabulum.

That memo implies a cover-up or biased investigation.

When was it first made public?


"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1178066851....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

Bud

unread,
May 4, 2007, 1:09:36 AM5/4/07
to

Peter Fokes wrote:
> Lets provide David VP with some new issues to discuss.

I thought you considered it bad form to call people out in the
header, Peter.

Bud

unread,
May 4, 2007, 1:10:10 AM5/4/07
to

<snicker> Healy has ventured forth from the nuthouse to the forum
he has heaped so much contempt on in the past. I guess if you can`t
beat them, you join them.

Bud

unread,
May 4, 2007, 1:11:50 AM5/4/07
to

Gerry Simone (O) wrote:
> In those days, governments believed the people would readily take their
> pabulum.
>
> That memo implies a cover-up or biased investigation.

By calling for an immediate investigation to get the facts to the
public.

0 new messages