Received: by 10.204.15.209 with SMTP id l17mr606621bka.6.1348234835416;
        Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: Mark Lane #83
Date: 19 Sep 2012 23:10:53 -0400
Lines: 68
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <505a7c09$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <k2a8um01ujo@drn.newsguy.com> <2qci58dpb7fn6vtcl687rp2uvtrdjtc9l6@4ax.com> <k3bfge0it8@drn.newsguy.com> <ae64cc76-aed4-441c-bd13-6a5418497827@u19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ae64cc76-aed4-441c-bd13-6a5418497827@u19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 19 Sep 2012 21:14:33 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.2
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.2
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1348110653 166.84.1.2 (19 Sep 2012 22:10:53 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 19 Sep 2012 22:10:53 -0500, 166.84.1.2
Path: q11ni9241982wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.11.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!newspump.sol.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 9/19/2012 8:28 PM, timstter wrote:
> On Sep 20, 3:41 am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In article <2qci58dpb7fn6vtcl687rp2uvtrdjtc...@4ax.com>, John McAdams says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 6 Sep 2012 06:37:26 -0700, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that the Warren Commission took
>>>> testimony from a Veterinarian for ballistics issues, yet still was forced to
>>>> ignore the testimony since in contradicted the SBT.
>>
>>>> "Although the Commission asserted that its experts had proved that one bullet
>>>> could pass through the President's neck and then through the Governor's chest
>>>> and wrist and enter his thigh, the experts had never attempted that
>>>> comprehensive test. Instead, they had fired different bullets, each through a
>>>> different substance, each bullet suffering distortion in the process.
>>>> Nevertheless the Commission concluded that one bullet - Commission Exhibit 399 -
>>>> did all the damage, while remaining unshattered, unflattened, undeformed.
>>
>>> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/ce399.gif
>>
>>> Lane just can't stop lying.
>>
>> You just can't stop making claims that you cannot defend.
>>
>> [Further comments in the open forum]
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ben Holmes
>> Learn to Make Money with a Website -http://www.burningknife.com
>
> Why is Lane claiming the bullet is unflattened and undeformed when it
> IS?
>

Why do you not citing the unshattered?
Because you know CE399 was not shattered.

> I say it's because Lane is a liar.
>
> Corrective Regards,
>
> Tim Brennan
> Sydney, Australia
> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>
> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>
> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0144a.htm
>
> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>