>On Sep 21, 9:09=A0am, Ben Holmes <ad...@burningknife.com> wrote:
>> In the previous paragraphs, Mark Lane showed that the Warren Commission guessed
>> that Brennan might have provided the reason for the DPD wanting Oswald.

>> "Brennan swore to the Commission that the man he saw fire from the window 'was
>> standing up and resting against the left window sill'. However, there could not
>> have been a man standing and firing from there because, as photographs of the
>> building taken within seconds of the assassination prove, the window was open
>> only partially at the bottom, and one shooting from a standing position would
>> have been obliged to fire through the glass. As the window pane was intact, the
>> Commission was compelled to concede that 'although Brennan testified that the
>> man in the window was standing when he fired the shots, most probably he was
>> either sitting or kneeling.'"

>> Mark Lane is showing the Warren Commission was forced to contradict its own star
>> witness.

>  On one detail, big deal. Brennan thought the guys on the 5th floor
>were standing and they were kneeling also.