 |
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Saintly Oswald <fatoldcr...@gmail.com>
Date: 3 Nov 2012 10:01:42 -0400
Local: Sat, Nov 3 2012 10:01 am
Subject: Re: Jackie's Dingy Testimony
On Friday, November 2, 2012 9:17:12 PM UTC-4, elpdr...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously, you are correct. I think. I mean, why would she lie about the > On Thursday, November 1, 2012 10:56:08 PM UTC-4, Saintly Oswald wrote: > > Mrs. Kennedy.
> > No; there weren't any words. There was just Governor Connally's. And then > > I suppose Mrs. Connally was sort of crying and covering her husband. But I > > don't remember any words. And there was a big windshield between--you > > know--I think. Isn't there?
> > Mr. Rankin.
> > Between the seats.
> > Mrs. Kennedy.
> > So you know, those poor men in the front, you couldn't hear them.
> > As we know, that window had been removed long before. There was no privacy > > window between the front and rear of the car on Nov. 22, 1963. Was Jackie > > really a scatter-brained dope?
> How disrespectful you truly are.
> I find it doubtful that Mrs. Kennedy ever paid much attention to small
> details like the window having been removed from the limousine, since it
> wasn't her personal limousine it was her husbands. She was provided with
> one of her own. I also find it doubtful that she occupied that limousine
> often enough to know that the window was removed.
window? Maybe she had a drug problem. Whatever the cause, her testimony was erratic and inaccurate. And I'm I'm not just picking out the gems here. They didn't ask her very many questions. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||