Anthony Marsh says I can't do this ;-) - alt.assassination.jfk

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
alt.assassination.jfk
Message from discussion Anthony Marsh says I can't do this ;-)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: Anthony Marsh says I can't do this ;-)
Date: 28 Sep 2012 13:44:46 -0400
Lines: 71
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <506543f1$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <caeruleo-916A90.13060326092012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <caeruleo-7AAACB.14360927092012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <caeruleo-7AAACB.14360927092012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.1
Path: q11ni88165007wiw.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 9/27/2012 11:28 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> Well, I've only seen one reply in this thread so far, from Mr. Marsh
> himself, and so far all he's done is to once again falsely claim that I'm
> wrong while directly contradicting himself by posting the findings of
> another researcher who did indeed give a figure of under 10% for the
> witnesses who said the shots came from multiple directions, which of
> course is entirely consistent with my own claims at the beginning of this
> thread.  And so far I do not yet see any article by anyone in this thread
> who has quoted even one witness who said the shots came from multiple
> directions, or said that any individual shot sounded louder and/or closer
> than the other shots.  So I will now do exactly what I said I would do.
> I very specifically said that I would quote nine or more witnesses who
> didn't say the shots came from multiple directions and didn't say there
> was any difference in volume and/or distance for each witness that WAS
> quoted by another poster saying otherwise.  As not one such witness has
> been quoted yet, by anyone in this thread, in precise consistency with no
> difference whatsoever from the criteria I set for myself at the beginning,
> I do not yet have to quote nine.
>
> Because I'm still waiting for someone, anyone to quote one on the other
> side.
>
> Obviously.  ;-)
>
> So I shall start today with just one witness who didn't say the shots
> came from multiple directions and didn't say that there was any
> difference in volume and/or distance.
>
> Victoria Adams, FBI report, 11-24-63:
>
> "They observed the motorcade as it approached and began passing in front
> of her window and at about 12:30 PM, as the car containing President
> KENNEDY, Governor CONNALLY and his wife, was passing, she heard three loud
> reports which she first thought to be fire crackers of a crank and she
> believed the sound came from toward the right of the building, rather than
> from the left and above as it must have been according to subsequent
> information disseminated by the news services."
>
> Victoria Adams, WC testimony, April 7, 1964:
>
> **********
>
> Miss ADAMS - And from our vantage point we were able to see what the
> President's wife was wearing, the roses in the car, and things that
> would attract men's attention. Then we heard---then we were obstructed
> from the view.
> Mr. BELIN - By what?
> Miss ADAMS - A tree, and we heard a shot, and it was a pause, and then a
> second shot, and then a third shot. It sounded like a firecracker or a
> cannon at a football game, it seemed as if it came from the right below
> rather than from the left above.
>
> **********
>
> In both statements it is said that the gunfire came from the right (or
> "the right below") and no other direction is named.  There is also no
> mention of any difference in volume and/or distance for any of the shots.
>
> If by tomorrow I see that someone, anyone, has quoted a witness or
> witnesses who did say that the shots came from multiple directions and/or
> did say that at least one of the shots was of a different volume and/or
> distance, I will bring my total up to nine or more for each of those
> witnesses quoted.
>


Victoria Adams? I guess that makes it a Straw Woman Argument. No one 
suggested Victoria Adams. And I asked you to quote EVERYTHING the 
witness ever said. You are cherry picking.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
