On 10/6/2012 8:36 PM, Research wrote:
> "Anthony Marsh" <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote in messageNo, you are not paying attention. It is the wound trajectory which
>> On 10/4/2012 11:37 PM, Research wrote:
>>> "doctorw" <PSA...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> On Oct 2, 4:22 pm, john.mcad...@marquette.edu (John McAdams) wrote:
>>>> On 2 Oct 2012 16:20:49 -0400, Squinty Magoo <magooslen...@msn.com>
>>>>> Anyone have anything to report on Bill O'Reilly's new book on the
>>>> There is some information here:
>>> O'Reilly has already, specifically, stated on camera that he knows that
>>> When asked, he, specifically, cited George DeMohrenschildt, and that as a
>> And his hands were never tested for gunpowder residue.
>>> It will also be very interesting (among many key details) to read if
>>> Well had the shots really cmae from the 6th floor, wouldn't the police be
>> No, and the acoustical evidence pinpoints exactly where on the sixth floor
> You can't prove that. The cone you refer to includes most of the 6th floor
produces a cone. The acoustical evidence produces a circle. Which in this
case is centered in the sniper's nest. More refined testing limits that
circle to within a few inches at a spot about 1-1/2 feet back from the
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.