The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: John Reagor King <caeru...@yahoo.com>
Date: 7 Oct 2012 11:13:53 -0400
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 11:13 am
Subject: Re: photo of JFK's killer available
In article <5070581...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote: > So if your theory is that they both react in Z-226 doesn't that mean I haven't ducked anything. Quite obviously I don't think they were hit > that you think they were both hit at the same frame? How many frames do > you think it takes them to react? You have never been brave enough to > state that. Surely you don't think they were both hit in Z-226 and then > both reacted in Z-226. No human can react that quickly. You keep ducking > this question. I think we know why. in the same frame in which they begin to react, and I've said so here many times. You're just afraid to look in the archives for it. But YOU said, falsely, that I had once said that Connally was hit in that frame, which I never said. You ALSO said, in that same sentence, that I said that JFK already had his fists by the PREVIOUS frame, which is obviously something I've never once said. Here are you exact words to me again: "You have JFK"s fists up by Z-225 and then the bullet hitting Connally I NEVER said the bullet hit Connally at Z226. I NEVER said JFK's fists You keep ducking your plain admission that you were wrong about me on I think we know why.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||