Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Anthony Marsh yet again claims I said something I never said
36 views
Skip to first unread message
John Reagor King
Oct 5, 2012, 10:33:33 AM10/5/12
to
Lol, two days ago Mr. Marsh made this astonishing claim about me:
"You have JFK"s fists up by Z-225 and then the bullet hitting Connally
at Z-226."
I challenged him yesterday to quote me verbatim saying either of those
things from any article I have ever posted. In his reply he absolutely
refused to even try to quote such a thing, and instead, as he has so
often done, absolutely refused to admit that he had made an obvious
mistake about me personally.
I have never once said that JFK already had his fists up by Z225. What
I have been saying here for about a decade is that JFK's right hand
begins to rise in the following frame, Z226; rather obviously his fists
aren't all the way up until quite a few frames later.
Unless it was more than nine years ago in one of my earliest articles to
this newsgroup, I have also never once said that Connally was hit at
Z226. Instead, for the past nine years at least, I have been saying
that that is where his visible reaction begins, as that is the frame
where the flip of the hat begins.
I have also frequently said that both men begin to violently jerk at
Z226.
In the past decade Mr. Marsh has on hundreds of occasions claimed I said
things I've never said, and I have seen him do this to other posters
many times as well too. Almost never does he ever apologize to us and
admit his mistakes, even when we quote verbatim from our previous
articles proving beyond all possible doubt that we didn't say what he
claims we said. In fact, I can only recall Mr. Marsh admitting a
mistake once, last month, when he admitted that he wasn't following a
thread carefully, and thought John Canal was saying that JFK's head was
tilted by c.27 degrees at the time of the single bullet, when actually
John was saying it was tilted at the time of the head shot.
In stark contrast, I am well-known here for admitting my mistakes, at
least when they really are mistakes, and I'm not "wrong" in another
poster's opinion only.
I hope I am proven wrong, but I predict that Mr. Marsh will never, ever,
ever admit that I never said JFK had his fists up by Z225. I already
take very little that he says seriously, but if he does not admit this
obvious mistake about me personally I will know to take nothing he says
seriously ever again. If he refuses to admit such an obvious mistake
about me personally, how do I know that he also hasn't made mistakes
about the JFK assassination that he refuses to admit?
"You have JFK"s fists up by Z-225 and then the bullet hitting Connally
at Z-226."
I challenged him yesterday to quote me verbatim saying either of those
things from any article I have ever posted. In his reply he absolutely
refused to even try to quote such a thing, and instead, as he has so
often done, absolutely refused to admit that he had made an obvious
mistake about me personally.
I have never once said that JFK already had his fists up by Z225. What
I have been saying here for about a decade is that JFK's right hand
begins to rise in the following frame, Z226; rather obviously his fists
aren't all the way up until quite a few frames later.
Unless it was more than nine years ago in one of my earliest articles to
this newsgroup, I have also never once said that Connally was hit at
Z226. Instead, for the past nine years at least, I have been saying
that that is where his visible reaction begins, as that is the frame
where the flip of the hat begins.
I have also frequently said that both men begin to violently jerk at
Z226.
In the past decade Mr. Marsh has on hundreds of occasions claimed I said
things I've never said, and I have seen him do this to other posters
many times as well too. Almost never does he ever apologize to us and
admit his mistakes, even when we quote verbatim from our previous
articles proving beyond all possible doubt that we didn't say what he
claims we said. In fact, I can only recall Mr. Marsh admitting a
mistake once, last month, when he admitted that he wasn't following a
thread carefully, and thought John Canal was saying that JFK's head was
tilted by c.27 degrees at the time of the single bullet, when actually
John was saying it was tilted at the time of the head shot.
In stark contrast, I am well-known here for admitting my mistakes, at
least when they really are mistakes, and I'm not "wrong" in another
poster's opinion only.
I hope I am proven wrong, but I predict that Mr. Marsh will never, ever,
ever admit that I never said JFK had his fists up by Z225. I already
take very little that he says seriously, but if he does not admit this
obvious mistake about me personally I will know to take nothing he says
seriously ever again. If he refuses to admit such an obvious mistake
about me personally, how do I know that he also hasn't made mistakes
about the JFK assassination that he refuses to admit?
Anthony Marsh
Oct 5, 2012, 9:03:45 PM10/5/12
to
On 10/5/2012 10:33 AM, John Reagor King wrote:
> Lol, two days ago Mr. Marsh made this astonishing claim about me:
>
> "You have JFK"s fists up by Z-225 and then the bullet hitting Connally
> at Z-226."
>
> I challenged him yesterday to quote me verbatim saying either of those
> things from any article I have ever posted. In his reply he absolutely
> refused to even try to quote such a thing, and instead, as he has so
> often done, absolutely refused to admit that he had made an obvious
> mistake about me personally.
>
> I have never once said that JFK already had his fists up by Z225. What
> I have been saying here for about a decade is that JFK's right hand
> begins to rise in the following frame, Z226; rather obviously his fists
> aren't all the way up until quite a few frames later.
>
Still afraid to name your frames, eh?
> Lol, two days ago Mr. Marsh made this astonishing claim about me:
>
> "You have JFK"s fists up by Z-225 and then the bullet hitting Connally
> at Z-226."
>
> I challenged him yesterday to quote me verbatim saying either of those
> things from any article I have ever posted. In his reply he absolutely
> refused to even try to quote such a thing, and instead, as he has so
> often done, absolutely refused to admit that he had made an obvious
> mistake about me personally.
>
> I have never once said that JFK already had his fists up by Z225. What
> I have been saying here for about a decade is that JFK's right hand
> begins to rise in the following frame, Z226; rather obviously his fists
> aren't all the way up until quite a few frames later.
>
> Unless it was more than nine years ago in one of my earliest articles to
> this newsgroup, I have also never once said that Connally was hit at
> Z226. Instead, for the past nine years at least, I have been saying
> that that is where his visible reaction begins, as that is the frame
> where the flip of the hat begins.
>
> I have also frequently said that both men begin to violently jerk at
> Z226.
>
bullet hit AFTER Z-226? Are you claiming they were both psychic and
reacting out of fear because they knew they were about to be hit?
Lucy, you got a lotta splaining to do.
> In the past decade Mr. Marsh has on hundreds of occasions claimed I said
> things I've never said, and I have seen him do this to other posters
> many times as well too. Almost never does he ever apologize to us and
> admit his mistakes, even when we quote verbatim from our previous
> articles proving beyond all possible doubt that we didn't say what he
> claims we said. In fact, I can only recall Mr. Marsh admitting a
> mistake once, last month, when he admitted that he wasn't following a
> thread carefully, and thought John Canal was saying that JFK's head was
> tilted by c.27 degrees at the time of the single bullet, when actually
> John was saying it was tilted at the time of the head shot.
>
body leaning forward by 27 degrees to make the SBT possible.
> In stark contrast, I am well-known here for admitting my mistakes, at
> least when they really are mistakes, and I'm not "wrong" in another
> poster's opinion only.
>
were just making up crap and don't have any facts.
> I hope I am proven wrong, but I predict that Mr. Marsh will never, ever,
> ever admit that I never said JFK had his fists up by Z225. I already
> take very little that he says seriously, but if he does not admit this
> obvious mistake about me personally I will know to take nothing he says
> seriously ever again. If he refuses to admit such an obvious mistake
> about me personally, how do I know that he also hasn't made mistakes
> about the JFK assassination that he refuses to admit?
>
John Reagor King
Oct 6, 2012, 4:43:28 PM10/6/12
to
In article <506f23e1$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
**********
Interesting that you make no mention that Connally begins to jerk
violently at almost exactly the same frame you give above for the
beginning of JFK's visible reaction. Really it's Z226 rather than Z225
for both men, but that's trivial. But I'm not going to believe you or
anyone else who says they "don't see" the flip of Connally's hat that
clearly begins no later than Z226.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/1f66ddfa97e3bde8
?dmode=source
**********
Still afraid to admit you were wrong, eh?
**********
Interesting that you make no mention that Connally begins to jerk
violently at almost exactly the same frame you give above for the
beginning of JFK's visible reaction. Really it's Z226 rather than Z225
for both men, but that's trivial. But I'm not going to believe you or
anyone else who says they "don't see" the flip of Connally's hat that
clearly begins no later than Z226.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/1f66ddfa97e3bde8
?dmode=source
**********
Still afraid to admit you were wrong, eh?
John Fiorentino
Oct 6, 2012, 4:48:58 PM10/6/12
to
Why don't you give it a rest King??
I mean you're about as welcome as a horde of flies at a picnic.
John F.
"John Reagor King" <caer...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:caeruleo-6CB6BB...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
I mean you're about as welcome as a horde of flies at a picnic.
John F.
"John Reagor King" <caer...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:caeruleo-6CB6BB...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
John Reagor King
Oct 7, 2012, 5:54:55 PM10/7/12
to
In article <50702b77$1...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
only.
Mainly only the ones who refuse to support their claims after I
challenge them.
Like you.
"John Fiorentino" <jefior...@optimum.net> wrote:
> Why don't you give it a rest King??
>
> I mean you're about as welcome as a horde of flies at a picnic.
According to you and a tiny, tiny, tiny minority of other posters here
> Why don't you give it a rest King??
>
> I mean you're about as welcome as a horde of flies at a picnic.
only.
Mainly only the ones who refuse to support their claims after I
challenge them.
Like you.
John Fiorentino
Oct 9, 2012, 9:55:22 AM10/9/12
to
Yes,..........tiny,.tiny,....tiny.......very small
news:caeruleo-6CDF5D...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
news:caeruleo-6CDF5D...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu...
0 new messages