Received: by 10.180.91.231 with SMTP id ch7mr1641318wib.1.1350184363610;
        Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: Lying The Mark Lane Way # 1 (Rush To Judgment Film)
Date: 10 Oct 2012 16:12:12 -0400
Lines: 93
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <50750896$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
References: <dd9bccaf-17d4-460f-a152-d13ac30a537d@ql4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <5068ec54$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <1232e938-2715-400b-a967-3e10124299a7@k13g2000pbq.googlegroups.com> <506d1eab$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <c54bdb74-4134-42f2-89e6-d97e5602d0a3@wz4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <5071f529$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <caeruleo-D4BABC.13470109102012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
Return-Path: <anthony.ma...@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <caeruleo-D4BABC.13470109102012@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.61.15.155
X-Original-Trace: 10 Oct 2012 00:33:10 -0500, 24.61.15.155
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.2
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.2
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1349899932 166.84.1.2 (10 Oct 2012 15:12:12 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 10 Oct 2012 15:12:12 -0500, 166.84.1.2
Path: q11ni134302993wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!216.196.110.144.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/9/2012 9:00 PM, John Reagor King wrote:
> In article <5071f52...@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>,
>   Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> On 10/6/2012 6:52 PM, timstter wrote:
>>> On Oct 5, 1:41 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> On 10/3/2012 9:00 PM, timstter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 1, 1:04 pm, Anthony Marsh <anthony.ma...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/30/2012 4:45 PM, timstter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>>>> Say, according to this video, Richard C. Dodd was NEVER mentioned in
>>>>>>> the Warren Commission Report:
>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YODZyI2qRMw
>>>>
>>>>>>> What Mark Lane FAILS to tell the viewer is that Dodd's FBI interview
>>>>>>> DID appear in the Warren Commission volumes:
>>>>
>>>>>> Do you understand the difference between an affidavit and testimony?
>>>>
>>>>> Do you understand the concept of lying by omission?
>>>>
>>>> I understand the concept of lying by misrepresenting what someone claimed.
>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/html/WH_Vol...
>>>>
>>>>>>> He is simply LYING by omission, in my view.
>>>>
>>>>>>> No wonder the KGB saw fit to partially fund his research.
>>>>
>>>>>> That is a lie by the CIA.
>>>>
>>>>> Then why did the information come from British intelligence?
>>>>
>>>> Because they are lackies licking the boots of the CIA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You should stop making stuff up, Marsh.
>>>>
>>>>> Concerned Regards,
>>>>
>>>>> Tim Brennan
>>>>> Sydney, Australia
>>>>> *Newsgroup(s) Commentator*
>>>>
>>>>> *...NOT ONE of the three experts was able to strike the head or the
>>>>> neck of the target EVEN ONCE.* (Emphasis added).
>>>>> Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, page 129, footnoted as: XVII 261-262.
>>>>
>>>>> And yet here IS WC XVII 261-262, showing hits to the head...
>>>>> http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol...
>>>>
>>>>> X marks the spot where Mark Lane lied!
>>>
>>> That still has nothing to do with your claim that the information came
>>> from the CIA, Marsh.
>>>
>>
>> Ned Dolan, CIA agent is the one who has been spreading this on the
>> InterNet.
>
> You've never proven that Dolan ever worked for the CIA in any capacity
> whatsoever.

I just did or are you blind? I uploaded his biography from the AFIO 
booklet. I think people are starting to catch onto your tactic of ignoring 
evidence.

>
> So why is it taking you a week to finally admit that I never said that
> JFK already had his hands up by Z225, Anthony?  Afraid to admit that you
> made an obvious mistake?  Could that also be the reason you're afraid to
> admit that you never proved that Dolan was in any way connected with the
> CIA?
>