Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Battling Another CTer (Re: "Reclaiming History")
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ace Kefford  
View profile  
 More options Oct 14 2012, 6:32 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: Ace Kefford <bglobe...@yahoo.com>
Date: 14 Oct 2012 18:32:42 -0400
Local: Sun, Oct 14 2012 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: Battling Another CTer (Re: "Reclaiming History")
You cheeky commoners.  How dare you question the words of a "Lord"?  Pay
attention to your betters!
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 11:29:17 AM UTC-4, Ray wrote:
> DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

> I'm very surprised that Vince hasn't added a chapter in his

> book devoted to J.D. Tippit's murder. That's quite strange, IMO.

> ...but a lack of a chapter heading on

> that key Tippit crime is a bit of a mystery to me." -- DVP; May 5,

> 2007.

> Maybe Bugliosi was afraid to face up to ALL the facts in the Tippit case,

> especially Oswald's alibi defense and the clear indication that the

> shells, etc. were deliberately left at the scene to incriminate Oz. Hence

> the absence of a chapter on Tippit.

> ADDENDUM REGARDING THE ARTICLE WRITTEN BY LORD DEVLIN:

>  Lord Devlin, in his review of the Warren Commission's case against Lee

> Oswald in the March 1965 edition of "Atlantic Monthly",

>        "If the case against Oswald is stripped of everything that does

>  not amount to practical certainty, what is left is this. He was in the

>  building at the time of the assassination of the President and could

>  have been on the sixth floor...

> He COULD have been on the sixth floor, except he wasn't

> and had no motive.

> Devlin: "The President was killed by a gun which

> belonged to Oswald"

> Elsewhere in the same article Devlin says:

> "The ownership of a rifle used in a murder does not prove that the owner was the murderer,"

> LORD DEVLIN:  "It is no doubt distressing to the logical mind when after

> an immense investigation, two extraordinary murders occurring in the

> course of the same story are explained only as disconnected and senseless

> actions."

> Correction, M'Lord, they are trying to convince us that THREE

> sensless murders occurred by pure coincidence.

> David Von Pein writes:

> "Via the above excerpts, it sure sounds to me as if Lord Devlin thinks

> Lee Harvey Oswald, by himself, killed John F. Kennedy."

> Devlin is a true believer, but he admits that his beliefs are not proven

> by evidence, i.e they are irrational.

> Further, Devlin does not know how irrational he really is. Like most LN's,

> Devlin is a victim of the CONJUNCTION Fallacy

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_fallacy

> Devlin thinks it is more likely that Oz killed both JFK and Tippit

> than that he killed Tippit alone, which is a logical fallacy.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.