Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Was there a shallow wound in JFK's back
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
burgundy  
View profile  
 More options Dec 3 2011, 10:35 pm
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
From: burgundy <WBurgha...@aol.com>
Date: 3 Dec 2011 22:35:23 -0500
Local: Sat, Dec 3 2011 10:35 pm
Subject: Re: Was there a shallow wound in JFK's back
On Dec 3, 1:44 pm, claviger <historiae.fi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Dec 2, 11:17 pm, burgundy <WBurgha...@aol.com> wrote:

> > This is an offshoot from the other long string regarding wounds and other
> > things. I stated I had recently come in possession of the Saturday Evening
> > Post of 12/2/67 which is basically a sectional reprint of part of Josiah's
> > Thompson "Six Seconds in Dallas."

> > What struck me is that this "early evidence" in a sense; not evidence the
> > day of the shooting but early evidence from a scholarly writer who
> > dissected the problems of the Warren Report.

> > There's many things to focus on and here's one thing I think needs major
> > discussion and clarification.

> > Thompson quotes the following, from the Sibert and O'Neill report: "During
> > the later stages of this autopsy, Dr. Humes located an opening which
> > appeared to be a bullet hole which was below the shoulders and two inches
> > to the right of the middle line of the spinal column.

> > "This opening was probed by Dr. Humes with his finger, at which time it
> > was determined that the trajectory of the missile entering at this point
> > had entered at downward position of 45 to 60 degrees. Further probing
> > determined that the distance traveled by this missile was a short distance
> > inasmuch as the end of the opening could be felt with a finger."

> > Thompson writes, "I asked Commander's Humes assistant, Cmdr. J. Thronton
> > Boswell about Humes inserting his finger in the back wound and feeling its
> > end. Boswell told me that this was correct and that, in fact, three
> > doctors had probed this wound with their fingers up to the first or second
> > knuckle -- a penetration of one to two inches. Secret Service agent
> > Kellerman gave this description of the doctors' additional exploration of
> > the wound with a metal probe: "'A Colonel Finck (was) probing inside the
> > shoulder with his instrument, and I said, 'Colonel, where did it go?' He
> > said, 'There are no lanes for an outlet of this entry in this man's
> > shoulder.'"

> > On this forum, it has been said this wound never existed. How can anyone
> > claim that?

> Burgundy,

> Large muscles have an elasticity factor.  A wound tunnel through soft
> tissue will expand and contract.  If there was a shallow wound there
> would be a bullet still inside the wound track.  No missile showed up
> in the X-rays.  By the same token if the throat wound was an entrance
> wound that bullet would also be obvious in X-rays.  Again no bullets
> showed up on any X-ray of the thorax region of the anatomy.  The body
> of President Kennedy revealed wounds to the back, throat, skull, and
> small puncture wounds in the face.

> The ammunition used by the Carcano rifle was developed for deep
> penetration through-and-through wounds.  It was a highly stable bullet
> by design.  If any missile could penetrate two human beings in tandem
> it was the 6.5 FMJ used in the military Carcano rifle.  It had ample
> velocity and a thick jacket to prevent the mushroom effect causing
> expansion of the wound cavity.  It's length-to-width ratio prevented
> tumbling.  The bullet was designed to drill small neat holes through
> enemy soldiers.  It rarely disintegrated into a "lead snowstorm".  For
> this reason ballistics expert Howard Donahue had forensic doubts if
> this stable bullet caused the head wound on the President.  Not
> impossible, just unlikely given the history of this bullet through two
> wars and similar bullets used in hunting big game.

The "wound" that went nowhere is too low to transit the throat and hit
Connally. If you believe that than there has to be another wound higher
up.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.