Received: by 10.216.235.32 with SMTP id t32mr466236weq.7.1347850330357;
        Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: bigdog <jecorbett1...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
Subject: Re: Who fired the shots?
Date: 11 Sep 2012 21:01:10 -0400
Lines: 366
Approved: jmcad...@shell.core.com
Message-ID: <52e4eae3-e133-419b-adac-d95ac601b104@googlegroups.com>
References: <504cadc4$1@mcadams.posc.mu.edu> <3eb29ed9-fe53-432e-9dbe-8a5d85d19e73@googlegroups.com>
 <15019ffd-3c91-4d0c-ade3-4c9afcee0178@googlegroups.com> <b9a65011-b1b7-49bf-9c17-f6f116709a16@googlegroups.com>
 <1592579e-d77c-4b76-b330-f10305e0dcd7@googlegroups.com>
Return-Path: <n...@google.com>
X-Original-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: aa...@panix.com
Delivered-To: alt-assassination-...@moderators.isc.org
In-Reply-To: <1592579e-d77c-4b76-b330-f10305e0dcd7@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.5.121.136; posting-account=OcaisAoAAAB2P7VVni00k_cqDpSyB4R2
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:22:14 +0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.84.1.3
X-Trace: mcadams.posc.mu.edu 1347411671 166.84.1.3 (11 Sep 2012 20:01:11 -0500)
X-Original-Trace: 11 Sep 2012 20:01:11 -0500, 166.84.1.3
Path: ed8ni104388834wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!mcadams.posc.mu.edu!panix3.panix.com!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:29:50 PM UTC-4, ss679x wrote:
> On Monday, September 10, 2012 10:31:11 PM UTC-5, bigdog wrote:
>=20
> > On Monday, September 10, 2012 7:33:29 PM UTC-4, markusp wrote:
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > On Monday, September 10, 2012 3:36:56 PM UTC-5, bigdog wrote:
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > They claimed they came from the direction of the knoll. And they we=
re
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > wrong. Others said the shots came from the direction of the TSBD. T=
hey
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > were right.
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > Certainly these people were truthful in their observations and what t=
hey
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > heard. A second person firing from the rear would likely have been
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > perceived as emanating from the direction of the TSBD. This building =
had
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > been sealed by police, and naturally the witnesses to the murder in D=
P
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > were aware of that. So, when asked about the direction they believed =
the
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > shots came from, we could expect them to say the direction of the TSB=
D,
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > and not (for example) the direction of the Dal-Tex building.
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > If only there was a shred of evidence that a second person fired.=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > We know this because there was an eyewitness who SAW a gunman
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > on the sixth floor of the TSBD,
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > Is a "gunman" the same as a "person holding a gun"?
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > HUH???
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > spent shells at the very location he saw=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > the shooter,=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > Did he see the shooter, or a person holding a gun?
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > You really are stretching. He did see the last shot fired.=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > and a rifle found on that floor that matched not only the
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > shells but the two recovered bullets.
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > Two? CE399 is one. What other bullet was recovered?
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > The fragmented bullet found in the limo by the SS that evening.=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > There are no eyewitnesses who saw a
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > > shooter on the knoll or any physical evidence there was such a shoo=
ter.
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > > Does the frontal throat wound as described by Dr. Perry as a "penetra=
ting" wound count?
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > No because he said it could have been an entrance or an exit. You conti=
nue=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > to cling to this silly idea that the throat wound was an entrance despi=
te=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > the fact you can't offer even a remotely plausible explaination for wha=
t=20
>=20
> >=20
>=20
> > happened to the bullet.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> And yet do you not cling to the silly idea that the fatal headshot at Z31=
3 that fragmented and the 'magic bullet' that went through two people and s=
upposedly ended up in nearly-pristine condition both came from the same amm=
o and the same gun?
>=20
Apparently you have trouble grasping that a bullet fired directly into a sk=
ull and a bullet that passes through soft tissue of two bodies and tumbling=
 before striking any dense bone are going to come out looking vastly differ=
ent. CE399 was not magic and not pristine. You continue to repeat this fact=
oid because you have no real evidence to support your position. The ballist=
ics testing showed that the fragmented bullet and CE399 were positively fir=
ed from the same gun and that was the same gun that fired the shells found =
in the sniper's nest and that was the same gun found on that same floor as =
the sniper's nest. Amazing that you can add 1 + 1 + 1 and arrive at an irra=
tional number.=20
>=20
>=20
> Ironically, the ITTC tests may have demonstrated that the bullets LHO was=
 supposed to have used were probably not used in the fatal headshot because=
 none of the test bullets fragmented.

None of the test bullets hit a real skull.