What you're doing is totally ignoring the "Best Evidence" for the back
wound -- i.e., the autopsy photo(s) and the autopsy report (plus the
testimony of the doctors who performed said autopsy).

They're all liars, right? Gotta be -- because if they're not (and if
the photos/X-rays are really genuine), then the SBT stands erect.

So, via the silly argument of "the clothing holes don't line up right",
you've trashed all the other verifiable evidence saying the SBT is the
ONLY possible correct answer. Silly.

Plus -- The "clothing" argument is lousy from the standpoint of the
other victim...Connally. The hole in the front of Connally's jacket
doesn't even come close to "lining up" with where everyone KNOWS the
bullet exited (the nipple area). Even CTers don't dispute this.

One bullet in chest...one hole in jacket = Bullet exited that 1 hole in
jacket...no matter WHERE on jacket said hole resides.

Rocket science here? No.

Why cannot the same reasoning be applied to JFK's shirt and coat
jacket?

Obviously, it can be applied here.

One hole in his back...one hole in his coat and shirt = The one bullet
passed through that shirt hole and his back....no matter WHERE exactly
on the clothing the hole resides.

Plus: Since this band of ever-efficient "plotters/assassins" were so
good at faking and manipulating evidence of all sorts to rid the world
of all notions of the evil conspiracy -- why, then, didn't they "see to
it" that the holes in the clothes lined up correctly to JFK's back
wound? Pretty careless of them.